Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data
Access/Read/Write, etc?
I haven't done any testing, but would assume that it would impact it
to a certain degree, because there is the additional encryption
overhead.
--Nick Pavlica
.
--Nick Pavlica
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
I have just set up a FBSD6.0 server configured with gmirror/raid1
using two SATA drives ad4 ad6 according to these instructions:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html
Everything is functioning properly with the exception of a boot
warning that
I am going to be attacking this tonight and my efforts will be primarily
focused on creating one large 5.8TB slice.wish me luck!!
How did this go? Were you able to create the very large slice?
--Nick
--
*From:* Nick Pavlica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent
On 4/15/05, Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK...so now we are going into some new territory...I am curious if you
would
care to elaborate a bit more...I am intrigued...if anyone wants me to do
some experiments or test something, let me know...I for one welcome any
attempts at
Is there any limitations that would prevent a single volume that large?
(if
I remember there is a 2TB limit or something)
2TB is the largest for UFS2. 1TB is the largest for UFS1.
Is the 2TB limit that you mention only for x86? This file system comparison
lists the maximum size to be much
One of these days I want to release a small tutorial on how to do this.
That would be great!
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
If anyone has an operational 5.4 + vinum installation which
was generated fresh on 5.3 or 5.4, any experiences, sample
configurations, and notes about the how the installation was
really done would be more than welcome.
I haven't tried to use vinum or gvinum, but have used gstripe with
On Apr 4, 2005 9:40 AM, Uro Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have one server 5.3RC2 and it's on Gvinum RAID1. Is it safe to upgrade
to 5.4
(is there any big work since then). And one thing. Is it possible to
move from gvinum to
gmirror on live working server (production). I can do
Chris,
I alway install the ports that I want during my initial installation
so I'm not sure what the best post installation method is. I would
venture to say that cvsup would be you best bet.
--Nick
On Apr 7, 2005 8:22 AM, Christopher Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've installed
On Apr 7, 2005 2:58 AM, Graham Bentley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Bentley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also wondered if there is a project based on FreeBSD that
achieves similar goals to SME Server (ie all in one LAN server
with Web config) or similar to Trustix (ie minimal config
On Apr 7, 2005 9:12 AM, Christopher Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Pavlica wrote:
Chris,
I alway install the ports that I want during my initial installation
so I'm not sure what the best post installation method is. I would
venture to say that cvsup would be you best bet
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:43:40 +0300, Perttu Laine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have trouble burning dvd-r images to dvd+r discs on freebsd 5.4.
I haven't been using k3b on FreeBSD, but you may want to report this
as a bug with the port maintainer.
--Nick
Can you guys please take this discussion off line.
Thanks!
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Chip,
You can reconfigure your network interface using the sysinstall
utility (/stand/sysinstall). If you are not using DHCP make sure
that you have a DNS server and GATEWAY configured.
--Nick
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:46:07 -0700, Chip Wiegand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed 5.3
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:51:15 -0500, Joel Heikkila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to make buildworld the 5-STABLE tree (fetched as of about
an hour ago), and I got these error messages a bit of the way into it.
Any idea what was causing this? I'll get back to you right away if you
Hello,
However even then this is not a good test of HT - the point of HT is to
improve throughput in multi thread workloads and the benchmark suite is
basically single thread.What would be more interesting would be to
run a test with a constant background load also running.In theory
Paul,
Nagios might meet your monitoring requirements?
http://www.nagios.org/
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Hello,
tag=RELENG_5 ?
This is the correct tag for Beta 1.
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
You may want to try portupgrade to bring everything up to date.
Here is a link to a tutorial:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi Stacey,
What results do you get when you generate/test a new configuration
file for XORG? I'm sure that you have been to the on line docs, but I
thought I would provide a link just in case:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11.html
I hope this helps!
--Nick
Hi Boris,
I haven't had an opportunity to work with any AMD64 hardware yet,
but have had good results with 5.4.? on i686. I can relate to your
frustration, but can say that I was able to greatly improve 5.x
performance with some effort. For example I went from a maximum
sustained disk write of
VNC works very well for me, good suggestion!
--Nick
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:02:48 -0500, daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On March 22, 2005 10:54 am, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I have this big curse that I have to access the office computer from
home. The office PC runs WinXP Home, not
Well said! I completely agree.
--Nick
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:55:01 -0600 (CST), Duo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Stijn Hoop wrote:
Can we please STOP fueling Anthony's drivel?
--Stijn
--
Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.
I have two words for you: Mail
I wounder if there was an ACPI fix that addressed the issue?
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:51:48 +0100, Danny Pansters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 23:19, Alex D'Elia wrote:
Hello dear people @ freebsd
something wonderfull ( at least in my case ) happened
since the last
Hello,
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:16:05 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nick Pavlica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:45:44 -0700
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4
a
candle to the available *nix bases solutions. Exchange has it's place
with out a doubt, but please don't try to wave the Exchange flag to
someone that knows better.
--Nick
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:09:42 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Pavlica writes:
I have had
PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nick Pavlica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:45:44 -0700
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question
:em1897,
: I'm curious how you are testing
I have had odd behavior like you are describing with cheap
motherboards. I ran all of the memory tests etc, and everything
passed with flying colors. Despite passing all of the tests I could
throw at the hardware, windows 2000 was very unstable. We ultimately
ended up replacing the board.
On
I have had excellent results with Novell GroupWise.
--Nick
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:44:36 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emanuel Strobl writes:
??? Windows is a really good, well maintained standardized and secure piece
of
software compared to Exchange. I can't
em1897,
I'm curious how you are testing. In my testing, the 5.4 pre IP
stack performed very well. I was able to get 100% more throughput
than Linux (2.6.10 FC3) under heavy load on the exact same hardware.
I was actually surprised at the difference because I have been a Linux
Zellot for
I have had good luck with sql-ledger.
--Nick
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:30:06 -0500, Harry Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a client server accounting package for industrial equipment
dealers and distributors that will handle serialized whole good inventory,
parts inventory and a
I would have to agree that it is a HW issue. The RAM itself may be
ok, but may have issues with other HW components in your system.
--Nick
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:10:27 -0800, Jean Lagarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been troubleshooting reboots over the last weekend, I think I
might have
I believe that this would do it, but I don't think they have created
the 5_4 branch yet. Of course I haven't looked today :) Please keep
in mind that the 5_4 final is still a few weeks out.
--Nick
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:29:35 +0200, Perttu Laine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
If I want
a UFS2 file system on the volume. Is
this treated like any other UFS2 volume that can utilize fsck, etc?
- How resiliant is this volume if the system were to crash?
--Thanks!
Nick
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:48:39 +0100, Andrea Venturoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Pavlica wrote:
All,
I
in the online documentation (Hand Book). I wouldn't
have even known about gstripe, if it were not for the people on this
list. I wounder how many undocumented gems are out there.
Thanks Again!
--Nick
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:45:40 -0800, John Pettitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Pavlica
Boris,
I would agree that my initial impression of 5.3 was that it was slow
compared to 4.x. After some tuning, I now have 5.3 running at an
acceptable performance level. You may want to start testing the newer
versions of 5 current. I have noticed improved performance on my test
servers and
All,
I would like to set up a raid 0 volume on my 5.3 server using two
identical SATA drives.After reading through a number of documents
I noticed that there are two related utilities to do this, Vinum and
Gvinum. Which utility should be used? It's my understanding that
Gvinum is the most
Hi Doug,
I will take a look at this. Have you used it on any production
servers? How does it compare to vinum/gvinum in terms of performance
reliability?
--Thanks!
Nick
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:04:31 -0600, Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:01:06PM -0700, Nick
Is this safe ?
Obviously security isn't really a priority in your situation. It
sound like you are really looking for convenience. That said there
are a large number of options out there for you, samba is one of them
and can easily be configured with a utility called webmin
Make sure that your system is time synchronized then cvsup, rm files
in /usr/obj, etc... This has helped me in the past.
--Nick
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:46:04 +, Pietro Cerutti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:53:17 -0600, J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
drwxr-xr-x
I use cups and IPP with allot of success.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:47:03 -0500, Timothy Radigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to have a highly available print server using FreeBSD? I've
looked into SAMBA, but it doesn't look like it supports a form of clustering
SAMBA servers at this
All,
I'm looking at adding some hardware to my FreeBSD 5.3+ Backup
servers and would like your recommendations for the following items:
- Gigabit Ethernet cards: I'm going to use them as dedicated cards in
the primary and backup servers so that I can quickly rsync between
them. I would like
Does Gnome Conference provide this?
--Nick
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:40:47 -0500, Sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Trying to find some Video Conference software for personal use to chat
with a friend of mine.
Obviously I am using Freebsd (amd64) he is on Windows.
Any
Eric,
I believe that UFS2 (5.3+) will handle filesystems of that size
without a problem. I would make sure however that your hardware plays
well with freebsd before you purchase it.
--Nick
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:49:18 -0500, Eric McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm planning to build a fairly
All,
Is it possible to use vinum and gbde? I read in the handbook that
they were not compatible, but saw a number of posts on the Internet
that mention an integration of the two in 5.x.
Thanks!
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
All,
Is it possible to replicate NFS servers is V4? If so can you point
me in the right direction in setting this up.
Thanks!
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
How would you restrict regular users from accessing any part of the
file system accept there home dirs? Is this even possible?
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:26:10 +0100, David Landgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
hey
i didn't realize all my users had full access to my
I was thinking along the lines of a scp server that would only allow
the user to browse only there directories.
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:39:43 +0100 (CET), Stevan Tiefert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Nick Pavlica wrote:
How would you restrict regular users from accessing
I will have to give this a try, it sounds like it will do the trick.
Thanks for the info!
--Nick
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:16:43 +, Chris Hodgins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Nick Pavlica wrote:
I was thinking along the lines of a scp server that would only allow
All,
I'm trying to set up a group of redundant scp servers to back up my
data. I was thinking that a cluster of servers with replicated file
systems would provide the redundancy that I would like. I have a fair
amount of data and would like to be able to grow the storage as my
backups
I believe if you do a portuprade -arR you will also upgrade any dependant ports.
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:28:31 +, Chris Hodgins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George Katsanos wrote:
Hello,
Your team is ALWAYS very helpful . It's the best support i've ever dealt
with.
Question : How
All,
I'm trying to get the Call of Duty Dedicated server running on
FreeBSD 5.3. To do get an error when I run the daemon which is caused
by issue below. Are there compatibility libs in the ports collection?
If not should I use the libs from this link? If so where to I put
them?
Thanks!
linux, so
it doesn't look like it will work without patching.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:43:11 -0700, Nick Pavlica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I just noticed that Hulu Server
(http://hula-project.org/index.php/Hula_Server) was released. They
only mention Linux support at this time
problem today, so it should be buildable on freebsd by tomorrow.
You will need to install
/usr/ports/gnu-tools/automake
/usr/ports/gnu-tools/autoconf
/usr/ports/gnu-tools/libtool
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:54:03 -0700, Nick Pavlica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't done this yet, but do
All,
I just noticed that Hulu Server
(http://hula-project.org/index.php/Hula_Server) was released. They
only mention Linux support at this time, but provide source install
instructions. What is the best approach to installing this on
freeBSD?
Thanks!
--Nick
Peterhin,
I have been an avid Linux/Open Source user and advocate for
approximately 7 years . I was into Linux before it was the Cool
thing to do. I have recently began my journey with FreeBSD, and I'm
really enjoying it thus far. In fact, I have decided to use it on all
of my production
I have used both of these databases on critical production servers
with great results. I would suggest that you play around with both
of them.
--Nick
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:59:10 -0500, Ean Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On February 11, 2005 05:17 pm, Sean wrote:
Jan Branbergen wrote:
Personally I'm very happy that they are changing the logo. Thanks to
those that decided to take the plunge to do this!
--Nick
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:42:32 +0100, Stephan Lichtenauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 10.02.2005 um 10:20 schrieb Anthony Atkielski:
Joshua Tinnin writes:
I
Here are a couple of other solutions to look at:
http://www.inlab.de/balance.html
http://pythondirector.sourceforge.net/
--Nick
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:07:20 -0500, Gerard Samuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im looking for suggestions for a port and/or tips that would assist me in
I have a PE 2400 running 4.11R with a PERC2-SI. I also had 5.3
running on it with no problem. I didn't have to reconfigure the
kernel for either install.
--Nick
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:14:42 -0800, Mark A. Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Bear wrote:
I was looking at the support
Executive
MySQL, Inc. www.mysql.com
Tel: 206-824-4356
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure all your code is GPL and is available in source for download :)
--Nick
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:31:53 +, Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:46:22PM -0700, Nick Pavlica wrote
In this scenario the box has already been compromised and needs
serious attention now. Even if you have to go to the land of Far Far
away :)
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:32:18 +0100, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By default the root ssh is disabled. If a dedicated server x somewhere
far far
I think this would depend on your application, but I have hear allot
of good things about AMD 64.
--Nick
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:04:21 -0500, Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Just looking for general opinions and/or advice regarding use of one over
the other.
Cost wise,
All,
MySql 4.1 has been the production release since 4.1.7 and are
currently at the 4.1.9 release. You could look into the seperate
MySql Cluster product, but it is around $5k per cpu last time I
checked.
--Nick
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:28:22 -0700 (MST), Technical Director
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
me where I want to go?
- Do I need to rebuild the Kernel after doing the cvsup / make
buildworld / make installworld?
- Is there anything else I should do to make sure I have a good test version?
Thanks!
--Nick Pavlica
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
All,
I'm looking at deploying FreeBSD on my servers and would like your
book recommendations. We will probably be using 4.11 or 5.3 or on
our servers.
Thanks!
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Thanks! I just wanted to verify that I was on the right track.
--Nick
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:16:43 +, Jason Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/02/05 18:04:36, Nick Pavlica wrote:
All,
I would like to update my 5.3 server to the 5.4+ development branch
so that I can do some
Try these links:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/privileges.html
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/can-not-connect-to-server.html
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/request-access.html
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/privilege-system.html
--Nick
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:41:40 -0800, Positive
--Nick
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:26:35 -0500, Michael Conlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Nick Pavlica wrote:
All,
I have been searching for a load balancing tool/method for managing
the traffic going to my web servers(http(s)). I have found a number
of tools
.
Thanks!
--Nick Pavlica
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:52:38 + (GMT), Robert Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I/O (reads, writes at fairly large multiples of the sector size -- 512k is
a good number) and small I/O size (512 bytes is good
Could the linux compat libs be used until the port is finished?
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:37:55 -0500, Tom McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 12:21 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
SigmaX [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm fairly new to FreeBSD (Former Linux user), and I have
:)). I'm currently testing on FreeBSD 4.11 and 5.3 on
x86.
- What method/tool do you use or recommend based on your production experience?
Thanks for the feedback.
--Nick Pavlica
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
. I will probably test 6 for the fun of it.
Thanks!
--Nick Pavlica
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Is there
any specific components of the 5.3 that have been identified to cause
this performance difference?
Your feedback/thoughts on this are appreciated!
--Nick
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:59:55 -0700, Nick Pavlica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I would like to start addressing some
I have been testing 5.3 (Standard Install/Default settings) and
haven't had any file system corruption. However, the I/O performance
results from my testing currently show that there is a major
difference between 4.11 and 5.3 (4.11 is much faster!). I have a
suspicion that these issues may be
That same thought ran thought my mind when I was testing. I started a
process that does heavy writing and literally pulled the plug during
the middle of the operation. I plugged it back in and the box came
back up without a hitch. I did all my testing on x86 boxes using SCSI
and IDE drives. I
the testing environment. I
look forward to seeing the testing results, and any good feedback that
helps identify specific tuning options, or bugs that need to be
addressed.
Thanks!
--Nick Pavlica
--Laramie, WY
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
aren't comparing filesystems with different mount
options? Async comes to mind first.
Pete
Nick Pavlica wrote:
All,
I would like to start addressing some of the feedback that I have
been given. I started this discussion because I felt that it was
important to share the information I
of your feedback, so that I can better understand the differences
in these great operating systems and communities.
Thanks Again!
--Nick Pavlica
OK, The testing notes already :)
---
Hardware
it was a fun play on words. I appreciate
all of your feedback, so that I can better understand the differences
in these great operating systems and communities.
Thanks Again!
--Nick Pavlica
OK, The testing notes already
All,
Sorry for this post, but I have submitted a couple of posts and they
haven't appeared on the list. I just want to make sure that things
are working.
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
hardware. My
best guess, is that FreeBSD 5.3 + updates is still in need of some
performance tuning.
Are there any good reasons for such a difference. Your thoughts are
appreciated.
Thanks!
--Nick Pavlica
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
83 matches
Mail list logo
