. What am I missing here?
How can I turn the bell off completely? This is on a fresh install of 4.9.
-Bob
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have had exactly the same experience with linux, using mandrake 10.
Everything works from my linux box on the lan to other hosts on the lan.
When I try to telnet on ports 22(ssh),25(smtp),80(http) and 110(pop3)
NOTHING WORKS. I can browse the web and send/recieve email with
blaming the dlink if
it works with the windows box.
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 23:49, bob wrote:
I have had exactly the same experience with linux, using mandrake 10.
Everything works from my linux box on the lan to other hosts on the lan.
When I try to telnet on ports 22(ssh),25(smtp),80(http) and 110
here we go ... the router is rubbish for ssh and telnet
even dlink have said it is a problem!!!
http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/remark,10278563~mode=flat
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Which d-link router is this that you were using? the 504T being talked
about has only been out since march this year an install that worked
on a previous router (for pop/smtp, never tried ssh) didn't work on this
d-link.
We are going to be testing this at work talking to d-link (as a
Check out the install guide at
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php
it has the best step by step instructions for using userppp.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter C.
Lai
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 8:37 PM
To:
This is covered in detail at
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aperez
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:19 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Router/Firewall?
Hi:
I am
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php
This install guide covers both of the 2 firewalls that come built in
to FreeBSD for all 4.x release. Software firewalls are heads and
shoulders above hardware firewalls which can not do stateful type of
protection.
I recommend ipfilter
here is real good install guide.
http://freebsd.packards-home.net/index.php
It has section on ports and packages.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of N.J. Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: greetings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 1:58 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What's an easy way to replace a drive?
Gary Smithe writes:
May not be the best answer, but if the
You used outdated example for your for ppp.conf.
Try this from http://freebsd.packards-home.net/Free_guide_index.html
PPPoE, ppp.conf statements for DSL connection
Edit the ppp.conf file and add the following so this is all that is
in the file.
Read the comments and do what they say.
cd
Is there a place I can go to over the internet to browse the contrib
stuff?
I don't want to have to download all the /usr/src/contrib/
content because I don't have room on my HD.
So looking for FTP site to browse and select just what I find
interesting.
Does anybody know the release date of 5.4?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This install guide will walk you through step by step to set ip
private
LAN behind FreeBSD gateway Box and fix your problems.
http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Banning
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 5:51
Is inetd a daemon that start other daemons ?
YES
Is sql and apache a standalone daemon ?
YES
Can i delete inetd ?
Just don't start it at boot time
I vote we get rid of inetd :)
It's your box, do what ever you want
___
Use your 3.4 FreeBSD system or a win system to download the mini.iso
file for 4.11 and then burn it to cd. Boot your box from the 4.11
mini newly created cd and accept the default slice sizes, select not
to install the ports collection. The ports collection is over 3000
strong now and some are
4.11 is the current production stable release which contains massive
changes from 4.8 one of which is the kernel configuration in
full-screen visual mode is not required any longer. The book you
are referencing is outdated. Release 4.6 and 4.8 are no longer
supported versions. The 5.3 version is
Read this http://freebsd.packards-home.net/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sonjaya
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:28 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: usb modem
dear all
i have usb modem and detect in my freebsd
Just add the 9 to front of phone number you code in ppp.conf for
ISP.
Read this http://freebsd.packards-home.net/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of RdBSD
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 2:59 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
set device /dev/cuaa0
This is not your real device name.
# Ensure that set device statement references the correct serial
port
# for your modem. (External modem on com1 = cuaa0, com2 = cuaa1)
# PCI modem com5 = cuaa4
# Only needed for dial out device.
# This can be found in dmesg boot log
For
There is a new write up of IPF in the official manual that explains
in detail how to get ipmon to log to separate file.
You have to give more technical details about what you have done.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I just installed 5.3 production release version and did not select
nfs server or nfs client during the install but nfs still gets
installed.
When I issue the ps -x command I see that nsfiod 0, 1, 2 ,4 is
running.
Is this still part of a dirty release process?
This is consuming unnecessary system
My rc.conf only contains the default serial mouse statements and the
usbd_enable statement.
I also get this msg in the boot log Mounting NFS file systems
The only way to stop the 4 nfsoid tasks is issue a kill command on
their task number every time you boot the system or recompile the
kernel
After testing with 5.3 on my workbench box it seems that ipfilter
has changed between 4.11 and 5.3. The syslog.conf logging statement
oflocal0.* /var/log/security is only valid for the
ipfilter in the 4.x versions of Freebsd.
security.* /var/log/security is only valid for the
This is a standard vanilla install from mini.iso cd with all the
sysinstall questions answered as no.
I have not made any changes to any /etc files.
What was delivered in the install is what the current content is.
The /etc/fstab as delivered does not have any nfs mounts.
This is not a
I think your missing the whole point. It's not suppose to be doing
this. This is a release build error. In the 4.x releases the kernel
had NFS support complied into the default kernel, but when you have
no NFS statements in rc.conf those tasks in question are not auto
spawned. Why would this
YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. The
majority of the content is written like the reader already has good
understanding of how FreeBSD works. It is not detailed enough for
someone who has no previous experience with Unix like operating
systems.
The referenced Install
YES there is something major wrong with the official handbook. The
majority of the content is written like the reader already has good
understanding of how FreeBSD works. It is not detailed enough for
someone who has no previous experience with Unix like operating
systems.
The referenced Install
What you didn't read the complete content of the message.
You just wanted to see this, your meaningless out of context mesg
on the list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
Nehren
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 3:09 PM
To:
You should search this lists archives for answers first.
In the list archives I found this.
http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd/JailAdmin
http://jailnotes.cg.nu/
Does anyone have any bright ideas for good file system layouts
when
running multiple jails?
I won't say they
The answer is very simple. The integration of the open source
ipfilter firewall into FreeBSD has changed between the 4.x releases
and the 5.3 release just made available. If you change the
syslog.conf:
Local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log which is how 4.10
4.11 work
To
As stated in the content displayed by those URL's the Install guide
is free to anyone to download and very plainly states the content is
contributed to public domain.
So why are so many people asking the same question when the answer
is so self evident?
And this writer takes offence to anybody
This could be heat related. Open your box and use small fine paint
brush to blow the dust away from the motherboard and in the power
supply. Try leaving the cover off the box and see if problem happens
again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Ian,
This is what works for most people.
Doing nat in pppoe is not normally done.
Doing nat as part of your firewall process is the accepted place.
And I see no reason to have compiled NETGRAPH in your kernel.
PPPoE, ppp.conf statements for DSL connection
start of
I am not sure just what you are asking about.
Are you saying that you have 4 static public ip address assigned to
you by your ISP and you want to round robin those 4 in the NATing
process to your hundreds of LAN users?
If that's what you are after then any of FreeBSD's 3 built in
firewall can do
Need more background info.
Explain where you are getting the public non-routable 10.0.0.0 ip
address from.
You say the ADSL router is using them.
Did you edit your real ip address to hide then from this public
post?
Also you have to post your ppp.conf file.
Are you trying to configure PPPoe?
I am not a ipfw expert. The truth of it is I was a ipfw user before
I added a LAN behind my gateway box. Ipfw does it's nating from
within ipfw and that it what makes ipfw nating so hard to get right.
It's even harder if you use keep state processing. Ipfilter and PF
do the nating separate from
Jim Csoka wrote:
No...I ran make maps, as well as make install for the blacklist
feature,
and make restart.
However, here is something interesting. When I access my
corporate
email via openwebmail, it functions as I would expectyou
cannot send
or receive to the given address.
Jim Csoka wrote:
No...I ran make maps, as well as make install for the
blacklist
feature,
and make restart.
However, here is something interesting. When I access my
corporate
email via openwebmail, it functions as I would expectyou
cannot send
or receive to the given
The mc installed 2 weeks ago on Freebsd 6.0 is mc 4.6.0 and
there is no shell link in the mc internal menu.
What version of mc are you using that it has that in the menu?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kyryll A
Mirnenko aka Mirya
Sent:
Is there some way to be able to use midnight
commander through a SSH
tunnel?
1) Use scp/sftp: it's called Shell link... is mc menu
(the problem is
Password: prompt is displayed somewhere on the mc
command line as it seems to
be unable to parse it for some reason. So when see it,
simply enter
I am running 4.10 stable.
I upgraded to php5.0.3_1 by:
cvsup
portsdb -Uu
pkgdb -vuf
portupgrade -v php5-session
portupgrade -v php5-mysql
...
portupgrade -v php5
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
/usr/local/lib/php/20041030/session.so
I get the same messages for the 12
is using /etc/my.cnf? Also does this seem
like the correct procedure
for running mysql with a web server?
Bob
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.6.3 - Release Date: 12/21/2004
I've been trying to set up a system (7.0 Release) with full-disk
encryption, using GELI, and booting from a thumb drive. When booting, it
gets as far as asking me for the passphrases of the various encrypted
disks; when I give them, GELI indicates that it successfully attached to
each, but after
Whoops - two mistakes in my original email:
First, the following fstab line is a typo (in my original email, not in
my actual fstab):
/dev/ad11.elif /disk2 ufs rw 2 0
It actually ends in a 2, not a 0.
Second, when I typed the following:
Here is my fstab, which is the same in
I believe your xfax modem is what is called a winmodem.
These type of cheap modems are built just for the ms/windows market
and do not work on FreeBSD.
They are missing the onboard hardware controller which is why you
have to install the win driver that comes with it.
Is there going to be a 4.12 release??
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ipfilter.log
Hi again Bob,
I read the ipfilter section of the Official manual for 5.3.
Where it
talks about adding that line to syslog.conf,
(local0.* /var/log/ipfilter.log), well it says to put local0.*. It
doesn't
mention putting security.*, although it did work for me. I looked
The boot menu has changed between 4.x and 5.x releases. I have
searched the handbook and can not find any written documentation
about the new beastie boot options, what they are and when each one
is intended to be used. I see a lot of posts about the beastie
figure but nothing about what the
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gareth
Bailey
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 9:26 AM
To: freebsd-questions
Subject: Fwd: IPF Firewall Rules... help!
Hi Bob,
Thanks, I have read the handbook and a couple of other articles. I
have attached my ipf and ipnat
Dick
Since you say you have lime ware working on your LAN behind firewall
why don't you post your rules so we can see how you did it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dick
Hoogendijk
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:26 PM
To: freebsd-questions
Code a ipfilter rule to log all blocked packets then look at log for
logged packets at time when you test smssend.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael
Sherman
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 3:17 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Dick
What you have working is only half of the product. Outbound works
for me also but I have ports 6346, 6347, 6348 and 6349.
What about the part of other internet users accessing your files.
Watch the log and you will see limewire remote server trying to
start session to your public ip address
You have to send modem Hayes AT command to configure it to answer
incoming calls.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gert
Cuykens
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 10:00 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: mgetty
When i see this in my
Gert
I see you are using pwd command to display where in directory tree
you currently pointing
There is a way to configure FBSD to display the directory path as a
prefix in front of the command line so you know where you are at in
the directory tree at all times, thus eliminating the need to use
I am running 4.10 with apache and have ICMP_BANDLIM enabled in
sysctl.conf and I have no problems. Look some where else for cause
of your problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brent
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 1:58 PM
To: [EMAIL
Your ipfw rule 2500 is denying those outbound packets
192.168.0.200:65117 is your ip address: port number
65.87.165.45:5800 is the remote target ip address and port number
and this is leaving your pc on NIC named tx0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
This is described in detail in the FreeBSD Install book at
http://freebsd.easyasthat.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexandre
Vasconcelos
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:04 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Using
Tip uses /etc/remote and the statements don't define
as many modems as you are using.
ee /etc/remote
# Finger friendly shortcuts
com1:dv=/dev/cuaa0:br#115200:pa=none:
com2:dv=/dev/cuaa1:br#115200:pa=none:
com3:dv=/dev/cuaa2:br#115200:pa=none:
com4:dv=/dev/cuaa3:br#115200:pa=none:
Saying it's not working is way to vague.
You need to post more details about what is not working.
Like can the 5.3 server ping the public internet?
Can it ping PCs on the LAN?
Can a win LAN PC ping the server?
What does the firewall log contain?
Have you tested with firewall out of the way by
This question has been covered in great detail on this questions
list in the past many times. You should review the archives for
answer to your question
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of steve
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 10:53 AM
To:
that is normal for dial up modems. In the FAQ there is directions
to make source changes to stop these unwanted messages.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Zhang
Chris-czhang01
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 9:10 AM
To:
Turn off power management in PC bios and try again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex
Zbyslaw
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 7:16 AM
To: Chris Zumbrunn
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stuck in bootstrapping hell - how do I troubleshoot?
That's the counter of how many times you have recompiled the kernel.
In this example you are running the default kernel that is installed
from cd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of markzero
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:27 PM
To:
check out (sysutils/freesbie) from port collection.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 11:30 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Bootable CD with Custom Kernel
Is it possible to create
Simple question, do problems 1, 2, 3 still happen when you comment
out the pf statements in rc.conf and run with out a firewall?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fafa Diliha
Romanova
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL
it is not uncommon for ISP to change the name of their DNS server or
its IP address. check your bind conf for hard coded items.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fafa Diliha
Romanova
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL
When asking for help with firewall rules you have to post complete
content of firewall rule set file because some previous rule may be
dropping all packets. If this is your complete rule set them you are
missing the mandatory L0 interface rule to pass quick all. rl0 must
be Nic connected to
First of all what I see in your log is just normal hacker traffic
probing for access to your box. Your firewall is doing it's job
denying this bogus traffic. I get over 1500 of these daily. I run
the abuse reporting system to report this junk to the owners of
the ip address range. You can
I use Norton Ghost on my FreeBSD systems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aguiar
Magalhaes
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:14 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Full backup
Hi list,
I´m using FreeBSD 5.3 - Release and I´d like to
hay nut case. take this bull shut some place else. this is not the
place to be saying lies like that. You are so full of your own shit
I can smell your rotten stink over the internet
You have no idea what you are talking about. grow up and become a
real member of the world
-Original
You did not follow handbook instruction close enough.
Your rc.conf statements are not correct.
Use the ones from the handbook just like they are printed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nicholas
Henry
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 3:18 PM
Log has this
ppp[505]: tun0: IPCP: PRIDNS[6] 10.155.201.22
which means your ISP has handed you ip 10.155.201.22 is dsn
server.
you say first line in /etc/resolv.conf is 10.255.201.22
Are you sure you posted the correct stuff here. that number is to
close not to be typo.
Try deleting contents
Doing a remote buildworld is just too dangerous for an production
box and expensive in backups because you have all the source files
to deal with. The more popular method of updating a remote system is
to have an local development box that has same components and do a
fresh install to a empty ata
ipfw has limit src ip option.
It's documented in the handbook's firewall section.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Teslik
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:33 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: dynamically limit ip
Sure any public person can post junk to wiki and that is just what
is wrong with it for official handbook. There would be no peer
review of info for correctness. There is no single person who knows
everything about FreeBSD and has time to review all the personal
opinions posted to some wiki.
hay enough of this BS about top posting. You have to wake up to the
fact there are many people who belong to this list who are not UNIX
bigots. Us win/outlook people have just as much right to post as the
rest of you. And more to the point who the hell pointed this new
comer of just 10 days
scale operations. CanIT is a combination of
spamassassin and mimedefang whith a web interface. You can run
mimedefang and spamassassin standalone without the web interface and I
believe they are using the GPL license.
Later,
Bob
___
freebsd-questions
. A
cracker could exploit the vulnerabilities which could potentially lead
to remote code execution and system control.
Appreciate any insight anyone has on this.
Thanks,
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Maybe this helps...
http://www.netperf.org/netperf/NetperfPage.html
Bob
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 01:01 -0700, jay alvarez wrote:
I hope you don't mind my asking this here.
I'm working in an ISP right now. We are using mrtg for
each client connected to us. They can view their mrtg
flash 7, don't think there's a working flash 8 yet. My kids
can goto most of their sites, as they're inevitably done in flash/java.
http://www.unixlike.com.br/?p=%2081
hth,
Bob
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 16:46 +0200, Jordi Carrillo wrote:
This I suppose is the eternal question, but I'm quite sick
Trying adding this enable dnsto your ppp.conf file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Falanga
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 1:52 PM
To: freebsd-questions
Subject: Having trouble getting ppp configured on my 6.1 box
Hello
I have same problem with my 10+ year old server boxes.
First the boot bios scan has changed between 4.11 and 6.0. You can upgrade
your old PC's bios. In most cases the mfg does not support the motherboard
any more so chance of getting upgrade to burn the bios chip is most
un-likely. You can get
Its in /etc
But if I remember correctly you have to run adduser one time to select
default values and create the default conf file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of azhar freebsd
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:04 PM
To:
Since 5.2 version FreeBSD has problems installing on older PC's, pre-2000 or
maybe pre-2002.
Move HD to newer PC do install and return to older pc and all is well.
You could all ways try installing version 4.11 and if that works then you
know for sure your pc is legacy version.
If you used
How about posting a diagram of the cable wiring of your network,
then maybe we have a starting point to work on your problem.
Chances this has nothing to do with NAT as source of problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Subhro
Sent:
Post your /etc/ppp/ppp.conf /var/log/ppp.log/etc/hosts and
firewall rules files.
Are you running DNS server?
You may also find the Install Guide at www.a1poweruser.com helpful.
It covers user ppp in detail.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of these, they all report to df that they are indeed 33BB
file systems!
How is this magic achieved?
Is there a doc somewhere with an explaination?
TIA
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
a
particular snapshot was created? The rotation of snapshots obscures their
creation date, and snapshot list doesn't give a clue.
TIA
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
-compiled my kernel.
I also fetched ALL upgrades via portupgrade -Fa.
# uname -a
FreeBSD tania.servebbs.org 6.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 #3: Thu Sep
14 11:55:02 EDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/TANIA i386
TIA
Bob
pgpbfxj0CLS1h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to buildworld before a version change?
I hate fixing something which is working perfectly, and this system has
been stellar!
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
to rebuild the entire
system for a sendmail upgrade, or a kernel stability patch, when the
individual broken/insecure pieces can be fixed with much less hassel, time,
and risk.
Is my logic flawed?
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
.
Just from past NIX experience though, I would never rebuild an entire OS
remotely without having someone onsite to push the On/Off switch when the
inevitable happens :-(
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
is a serial port you can control remotely, like an adjacent server, or a
router set it all up beforehand, and you should be good to go.
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How is it that this list gets SPAM? It seems to happen quite often. I
subscribe to a ton of and run a couple of Mailman lists and never see spam
except on this list. Just curious
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Sunday 17 September 2006 23:51, backyard wrote:
modems are relatively cheap.
And, if you put it into call-back mode, it becomes one of the most secure
methods of doing a remote serial console; plus you have the added advantage
of the remote site footing the bill for the call :-)
Bob
password, the
modem would only call you, not the hacker.
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 18:57, Derrick Ryalls wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
Have you checked the MX records on the secondary DNS server?
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
???
The differences between bsdtar, and gnutar are quite IMMENSE!
Being a stickler, and constant user of, proper documentation, I am just a
bit lost here! Help!
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Is it safe to portupgrade several packages in parallel? Open several root
consoles and do a portupgrade in each one at the same time?
Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
1 - 100 of 1225 matches
Mail list logo
