re or hardware defects in individual
systems, so I am eager to hear how the new release is working for everyone.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, sen
, and operating
systems. We may want to look this gift horse very carefully in the
mouth, or at least monitor very closely "contributions" of code
that might introduce backdoors or weaknesses.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
ver from the USB key; still
can't boot. Tried moving the GENERIC kernel over from the USB key
into /boot/kernel, just in case there was a problem with my custom
one; still can't boot. Not sure what to try next. Any ideas would
be muc
be able to do fast,
multithreaded kernel builds, but will obviously have to avoid it if
the resulting kernels are corrupted.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To uns
Just made that into a batch file for my library. Should be a target in
the standard ports Makefile, IMHO. Maybe call it "rdistclean". Perhaps
this could be submitted as a PR.
--Brett Glass
At 12:37 PM 4/10/2013, Greg Larkin wrote:
Here's an easy way to delete all of the distf
the machine unless I do a painstaking manual search
and removal. Aaargh!
--Brett Glass
At 12:03 PM 4/10/2013, pete wright wrote:
can't answer for the freebsd project - but the folks at pc-bsd have
made a 9.1 pkgng repository available:
http://blog.pcbsd.org/2013/04/pc-bsd-announces-pac
ey be back?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Have begun getting warnings from freebsd-update that 9.0 is close to its
EOL, but the successor release (9.1) is not even out yet... which means
that there's no way to gauge its stability or quality by watching for
reported problems. How's 9.1-RELEASE coming? Any showstoppers?
--B
ustom kernel, for use in
emergencies and during version upgrades.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
eebsd-update on a FreeBSD 9.0 machine with a
module-less custom kernel at /boot/kernel/kernel, it fetched a
GENERIC kernel and overwrote the custom kernel with it.
Interestingly, it didn't bring in any modules; it just overwrote the one file.
--B
rashed the customer kernel
in /boot/kernel, and did so with no warning. If there had been a
power outage or other problem before I could rebuild, the system
would have been disabled.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
ating /boot/GENERIC, and putting the GENERIC
kernel in it, would cause freebsd-update to update that directory
rather than one's custom kernel. I now must rebuild the kernel to
keep the machine working.
What went wrong, and how do stop it from recurring?
--B
any more.
What sets the limit on the number of "tun" devices that can exist
in the system, and how can the limit be adjusted? Is there a
similar limit on, say, "ng" devices?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing l
27;t want to
reinvent the wheel if someone's already come up with a clever
system to do it on FreeBSD.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
of
drivers that are not going to be linked statically into the kernel.
Build on an older Pentium II server took about 10-12% of the time!
Worth knowing about.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
y where the new kernel is placed after installation? I am
not intimately familiar with the cascade of makefiles that does the
build I could probably figure out what to tweak, but if someone
who is expert in this can help it would be appreciated. It would
save me countle
4 08:31:21 joe kernel: MCA: Bank 3, Status 0x9001010a
Nov 4 08:31:21 joe kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0005,
Status 0x
Nov 4 08:31:21 joe kernel: MCA: Vendor "GenuineIntel", ID 0x652, APIC ID 0
Nov 4 08:31:21 joe kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR GCACHE L2
TA for RC2? Need to build servers, and since
freebsd-update can't do binary updates between release candidates
I'd like a version that has the latest fixes.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
Just wondering if a date has been set for posting of FreeBSD
9.0-RC1. I have some servers to build that will need fixes made after BETA3
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Just looked at the project Web site, and the timeline for
9.0-RELEASE is way, way out of date. If all goes well, when is 9.0
expected to be released? What remains to be done?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Everyone:
The Hifn, Inc. patent on the compression used in Microsoft's MPPC
protocol expired earlier this year. Shouldn't the code at
http://mavhome.dp.ua/MPPC/
at last be added to the source tree to support it?
--Brett Glass
_
ated to do an address assignment. What's more,
there's virtually zero propagation time and no flapping.
The problem seems to be that RFC 1821 ignores this use of ICMP
redirects. It recommends not allowing any router to accept ICMP
redirects, and this appears to ha
Here's a networking question: Does FreeBSD generate and accept ICMP
redirects? Is it controllable via tuneables? How long do routing
tables generated by ICMP redirects last?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
y other systems this is affecting.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
hosen if it rolls over in less than a second,
since this clearly leads to imprecision and missed rollovers.
--Brett Glass
At 11:04 PM 9/12/2011, Adam Vande More wrote:
>it's a runtime tunable so /etc/sysctl.conf
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
) with the EOL
that's the farthest out.
We'll retire the hardware before we will run non-release code on a
production box.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
the BIOs setup,
including clock speed modulation. So, the TSC ought to be pretty stable. At
least it's worth a shot.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
s?
I am wondering if perhaps some recent change to the kernel
assumed that one would always have a faster CPU than the old
Celeron this machine is running, and that there is a race
condition or an error in the kernel code.
--Brett Glass
# ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64
led
xl0: promiscuous mode disabled
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold
Any hints here as to what's wrong?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
, the BIOS reports
that you have 1GB of "4GB+ memory" (a possible indication that the
last gigabyte is mapped into some special space). Maybe there's
something like PAE going on. Anyone know what might be up? (Copying
this message back to the lis
; (or, for that matter, anything else that wasn't
the name of a local user), mail.local(8) would just reject it.
--Brett Glass
At 02:35 PM 9/4/2011, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Maybe ssmtp is something you can use.
It is in ports, it does get mail out of the system.
I use it on all of my serve
by programs
that do things such as mail output to a local user.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
At 08:26 PM 9/3/2011, Adam Vande More wrote:
Call a shell script which preforms the actions you want.
Needlessly complex, and doesn't handle the case of stderr.
Since the utility has the ability to force mail to be sent, it
should also have an option not to send it, IMHO.
--Brett
to tell the kernel to do that.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
At 02:35 PM 9/3/2011, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>Is 'atrun' actually sending the mails or is 'cron' doing it? 'atrun' is
>invoked by 'cron', from a specification in the system crontab file.
/usr/src/libexec/atrun/atrun.c shows an invocation of sendmail(8) directly
from atrun(8).
>Cron emails *whene
ported CPU load is an artifact of some weirdness in the kernel. I
need to know, though, before I deploy the system... so I'd
appreciate any advice or ideas from any kernel experts who might be
reading messages here.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-ques
At 10:55 AM 9/3/2011, Adam Vande More wrote:
If you redirect the output from the command to /dev/null or other
file, you shouldn't recieve an email unless you've also specified -m.
True. But that's awkward, and if you have a job that runs more than
once, it'd be convenient to be able to keep
at says "do not mail," or at least I can't find one.) Am I
missing something, or does at(8) always expect to be able to send
mail? If so, would it be worth implementing an atrun.conf
configuration file that makes it optional and possibly sets other
a 4% difference. (If the peak were 50% idle, HTT would be
doing nothing at all, because top(1) can't tell that there aren't
really 4 CPUs.)
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
do not know if the supposed higher utilization of the
resources on each chip (including executing one thread while the
CPU waits for data for another) is worth it. What has your experience been?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing li
eally should not be trying to
issue them in the first place.
In short, this shouldn't be something that's handled by
"quirks." Instead, the system simply should recognize that
a USB memory stick is not a SCSI drive.
--Brett Glass
___
f there's a bug, one would
think it would have gotten some attention). Do I have to abandon
the use of FreeBSD with USB thumb drives (or maybe with USB
altogether)? Hope not, but I may have to if I can't get this fixed.
--Brett Glass
___
free
s now absolutely no reason for them
to do so anymore. (Linux, in fact, has jumped the gun and has
compression code available.) Shall we start coding?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Thank you. Neither the 8.1 release notes nor the man page mentions
the chip. They both should.
--Brett Glass
At 11:46 AM 11/18/2010, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Brett Glass
<<mailto:br...@lariat.net>br...@lariat.net> wrote:
Does FreeBSD 8.1 have sup
Does FreeBSD 8.1 have support for the Realtek 8111C GigE adapter chip?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ques
I just received a handful of USB Ethernet NICs whose primary chip
says "SUPEREAL" on it. I've installed one on a Windows machine, and
the computer identifies it as having the Supereal SR9600 chip on
it. Is there support for this chip in FreeBSD?
often
used in embedded systems because it can interface with pretty much any CPU.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd
et me know; any help would be MUCH appreciated!
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Just installed mpd5 to experiment with it, and got the following error message
on the next boot:
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
What does this mean? Does it signal a serious problem?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd
At 04:33 PM 11/26/2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Though it seems hyperthreading is improved on the Atom and there is no
penalty for leaving it on.
Is there really no penalty? With HZ=1000 there are double the clock
interrupts to be serviced at least. And as I understand it the Atom
has less re
At 08:28 AM 11/26/2009, Warren Block wrote:
Hard to tell. Is it possible it's just disabled?
There's no switch to disable the wireless on the Eee Box. Also, the
wireless did work with Linux just before I installed FreeBSD. So, I
do not think the problem is that the wireless is disabled. I t
> Dead as in doesn't show in dmesg/pciconf
Yep, that's correct. The only hint of it is the following message:
pci3: at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
--Brett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
eas as to how I can get it working with FreeBSD 8.0?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
fore I tried
polling, and I'm not sure how many packets the interfaces (some
fxp, some em) can buffer up. I'm going to try it, but if it doesn't
work I will have to go back to interrupt-driven operation.
--Brett Glass
___
fr
ld be more effective? How can I tell? (Feel free
to ask for more information about the hardware or kernel config if it would
help you to provide a good answer.)
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
tarted within the past 24 hours, is "%l:ps.1p". But to me, it
looks as if the correct format is "%l:%M%p". Is the man page wrong,
or am I missing something here?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
head? What "HZ" settings are recommended?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
At 02:50 AM 10/30/2009, Randi Harper wrote:
This bikeshed is old and tired. I don't want to paint it. I want to drown it
in lighter fluid and set it on fire.
I've never seen a bike shed. Unless perhaps it had a furry seat cover.
--B
'd add the information.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
At 05:43 PM 2/1/2009, Dan Nelson wrote:
Do you have "options LIBALIAS" in your kernel config?
Nope. There was nothing that said that such an option was needed
(or even that it existed). I did find it, via a recursive grep, in
a file labeled "NOTES" a couple of levels up in the directory
hie
t the build failed -- and the error messages suggest
that the problem had to do with linking libalias into the kernel.
libalias seems to be there, so I'm not sure what's wrong. Ideas?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
o processes that were both privileged anyway, it might
make sense to re-enable it. But has this feature of the scheduler
been maintained well enough for this to be a good idea? If not,
would it worth looking into updating it so that FreeBSD runs well on the Atom?
--Brett Glass
_
ere I and others can set up a secondary DNS server?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
It's worth noting that the WINE project, not long ago, abandoned
the BSD license for the GPL despite urging from many sources to keep
the code open and free for use by developers. We've stopped using it
as a result.
--Brett Glass
At 10:59 AM 12/6/2007, Tom Wickline wrote:
>Oh yea,
Is there a FreeBSD driver for USB Wi-Fi adapters based on
the Realtek 8187 chip? Many vendors, including TrendNET,
are coming out with USB adapters based on it.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
, I need their IPs so that I can get into
them via a telnet or Web interrace. I could scan for the devices'
addresses, but this would take months. But if they respond to
inverse ARP queries, I can find out in an instant what their
IP addresses are.
--Brett
At 10:01 AM 4/14/2007, Colin Percival wrote:
>GPL/CDDL taint doesn't cross dynamic linking.
Richard Stallman claims it does. The proposed Version 3 of the GPL makes it
even more explicit.
--Brett Glass
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing l
e, not
ever to patent anything, to give up firstborn children, etc.). So, FreeBSD is
covered by the license. You can't use it freely. It is no longer free.
--Brett Glass
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
BSD part.
Yes, you are. Because it appears that the whole thing is now covered
by the CDDL.
--Brett Glass
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
At 10:12 AM 4/14/2007, Bill Moran wrote:
>How is this any worse than the GPLed stuff in /usr/src/contrib?
It's in the kernel. And the announcement went as far as to say that
it is "part of FreeBSD."
--Brett
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://l
This is part of the nastiness of viral licenses.
--Brett Glass
At 07:06 AM 4/14/2007, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
>Brett Glass wrote:
>> I just read with some concern the announcement that Sun's ZFS has been
>> integrated into the FreeBSD kernel. This would mean, unfortunately, th
ernel truly free?
--Brett Glass
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I'll need to be
careful about if I upgrade just the system disk?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
it'd be a great help.
It'd be nice if administrators could just download the relevant
files and drop them into /etc/localtime. Perhaps someone with the
power to do so could upload the zones in both formats to directories
on ftp.freebsd.org, so folks could bring in the zone(s) they needed
via
IX, but I don't know if
versions of FreeBSD that old are POSIX-compliant.)
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
h can set sysctl variables
at the time when the kernel is loaded. But the bug should be
addressed in 6.2. If you're not running NFS, you don't need NFS-
related processes laying around.
--Brett Glass
At 02:42 PM 10/31/2006, Dan Nelson wrote:
>In the last episode (Oct 31), Bret
ystem
not to start these processes, which take up resources and may be a
security risk? Why isn't this done at sysinstall time?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
n one up, but since
this seems like something that people would want to do frequently,
find it hard to believe that someone hasn't already written one.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
interrupt
overhead (important because interrupts in FreeBSD 6.x are
relatively expensive)? I have some Intel "em" interfaces available
to me, but have been told that while the driver is well supported
they are quirky and not the best choice.
--Brett Glass
_
arguments and options;
information on how to get it to listen on a specific address, port, or
interface; and how it responds to signals. Other things can be in
other documentation, but these are essential in the man page for a
daemon, IMHO.
--Brett Glass
___
load limits, etc.? Will there be
problems with file locking, queues, etc. if a third instance of
Sendmail is started on a standard FreeBSD install (which normally
runs two)? And where's the option that tells Sendmail to listen
only on a particular interface? (This should be on the ma
is problem? The only tunable I can
find that seems to address this issue is kern.ipc.maxsockbuf, which
seems to set an absolute ceiling on the size of a socket's buffers.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
27;ve seen hints that the problem may
have something to do with IPV6 but no instructions as to how to
resolve it. Can anyone explain what's wrong and how to fix it?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
internal modem are a bit like WinModems they
are software type.
Regards,
Chris
> On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 13:30 -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
>> At 05:54 AM 2/27/2006, robert wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 12:30 -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
>> >> What internal DMT
At 05:54 AM 2/27/2006, robert wrote:
>On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 12:30 -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
>> What internal DMT ADSL modems are supported by FreeBSD? I am
>> looking for internal modems rather than external ones, because the
>> link requires redundancy and I'd like F
What internal DMT ADSL modems are supported by FreeBSD? I am
looking for internal modems rather than external ones, because the
link requires redundancy and I'd like FreeBSD to do multilink PPP
over two of them.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-ques
7;s not available as a package or port for FreeBSD?
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
entry cause for
concern? Is there a way in which it could have happened
innocently (e.g. due to a power failure that left the disk
inconsistent)?
--Brett Glass
At 02:31 AM 7/10/2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>When I am in that same position as a rule I tell the customer
>that I would assume
At 05:32 PM 7/7/2005, J65nko BSD wrote:
>If you would have installed something like tripwire or aide, you would have
>been in a better position to find out whether the box has been owned.
I didn't build the machine.
--Brett Glass
unning and we can give
>you a better idea of how easy it might be to root.
>
>Ted
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brett Glass
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 9:42 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A client had a network problem, and I wanted to make sure that his FreeBSD 4.11
router wasn't the cause of it, so I rebooted it. I then did a "last" command
and saw the following:
root ttyv0 Tue Jul 5 12:01 - 12:05 (00:04)
adminttyp0localhost
At 06:48 PM 6/27/2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>The 1820a has hardware XOR while the 1820 is purely software
This server will be mirroring, so we wouldn't need XOR. It'd
be a big plus for RAID 5, though.
--Brett
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
At 06:34 PM 6/26/2005, Nikolas Britton wrote:
>Highpoint RocketRAID:
>1640: 4xSATA,PCI 32bit, 33MHz
>1810A: 4xSATA,PCI-X 64bit, 66/100/133Mhz
>1820A: 8xSATA,PCI-X 64bit, 66/100/133Mhz
>2220: 8xSATA-II, PCI-X 64bit, 66/100/133Mhz
>
>With the exception of the 2220 all of the other
At 02:53 PM 6/26/2005, Björn König wrote:
>You don't need an additional controller necessarily, because you can set up a
>RAID 1 with two single ATA hard disks. You'll find a small how-to at [1]. Even
>most cheap ATA chipsets have hot-swap capabilities.
>
>[1] http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirr
At 12:39 PM 6/26/2005, Mike Maltese wrote:
>Brett Glass wrote:
>>I need to set up a FreeBSD server with two or more sets of
>>mirrored drives. What is the best controller to use for this
>>purpose? Note that I don't need striping or other RAID
>>functions -- ju
with minimal
impact on performance would be ideal.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
At 05:58 PM 4/20/2005, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
>Not in my experience. More oft than not, it's FreeBSD I "fix" and
>that other OS I "flatten".
>
>But then, maybe we work in different environments, although
>I'm betting my experience is more common than yours
I consult with, and provide service to, qui
mple. And make sure that the port collection
as a whole does not break itself when updated according to the
recommended procedure. (This is the least one could expect of software
of even mediocre quality.)
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.or
rately aggravating, or does it just come naturally to you?
My e-mail client has been honoring your "Reply-to" field correctly.
You'll note that the "To:" fields on my replies all point to the
list.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-ques
one they get with Linux or even Windows.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
