-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ivan Carey
Posted At: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:28 PM
Posted To: FreeBSD-Questions
Conversation: Kernel Options fo a File Server
Subject: Kernel Options fo a File Server
Hello,
What would be the best Kernel
of my
hardware.
Ivan Carey wrote:
Hello,
What would be the best Kernel options to run a file server?
I will be using an Intel server mother board with one Xeon quad core CPU
installed (this mother board has 2 CPU sockets) 2GB RAM and dual 500Gb
SATA HDD's
I am thinking of options
in squeezing a little out of my
hardware.
Ivan Carey wrote:
Hello,
What would be the best Kernel options to run a file server?
I will be using an Intel server mother board with one Xeon quad core CPU
installed (this mother board has 2 CPU sockets) 2GB RAM and dual 500Gb
SATA HDD's
I am thinking
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:42:17PM -0700, PeterPluta wrote:
Ivan Carey wrote:
Hello,
What would be the best Kernel options to run a file server?
I will be using an Intel server mother board with one Xeon quad core CPU
installed (this mother board has 2 CPU sockets) 2GB RAM and dual
Hello,
What would be the best Kernel options to run a file server?
I will be using an Intel server mother board with one Xeon quad core CPU
installed (this mother board has 2 CPU sockets) 2GB RAM and dual 500Gb
SATA HDD's
I am thinking of options that would make the kernel efficient as a pure
Ivan Carey wrote:
Hello,
What would be the best Kernel options to run a file server?
I will be using an Intel server mother board with one Xeon quad core CPU
installed (this mother board has 2 CPU sockets) 2GB RAM and dual 500Gb SATA
HDD's
I am thinking of options that would make
Hi
I asked about this a while back and a few of you were good enough to
give me some pointers. I've been forced to look again at Samba
because the single unmirrored disk not covered by the backup scripts
that a certain sysadmin installed crashed the other day. So I
thought we need a
A big File Server
I’m the administrator of a student network of 350 people in the student
campus of Xanthi Greece. We are NOT funded by the university or anybody
else so we pay for everything in our network. I use FreeBSD for over a
year now for our main server and I’m very happy
I want to set up a FreeBSD file server and want to choose the
appropriate method. The filesytems must be mounted on the client,
always available, and transparent to the user.
NFS for *nix to *nix only
NIS for better management of NFS
Can OSX mount and respond to NFS/NIS?
What other OSs can
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 09:19 -0800, Sean Murphy wrote:
I want to set up a FreeBSD file server and want to choose the
appropriate method. The filesytems must be mounted on the client,
always available, and transparent to the user.
NFS for *nix to *nix only
NIS for better management of NFS
On 11/18/05, Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to set up a FreeBSD file server and want to choose the
appropriate method. The filesytems must be mounted on the client,
always available, and transparent to the user.
[...]
Any thing for connecting to a Novell Server?
NDS and Bindrey
I want to set up a FreeBSD file server and want to choose the
appropriate method. The filesytems must be mounted on the client,
always available, and transparent to the user.
Thanks
===
NFS for *nix to *nix only
NIS for better management of NFS
Can OSX mount and respond to NFS/NIS?
What
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:58:10 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I try to make my ports as user friendly and automated as
possible, I would vote for 2) above. I hate when something just
changes on my system without me telling it to do so explicitly; plus I
could very well
Hello,
I'm working for a security port and I noticed that none of the existing
ones integrate their filters automatically after install, regardless of
the agent they are installed for. Instead, every port gives (usually
from pkg-message) the necessary information on how to integrate the
filter.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:21:02 +0200
Adi Pircalabu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm working for a security port and I noticed that none of the existing
ones integrate their filters automatically after install, regardless of
the agent they are installed for. Instead, every port gives
Good Morning!
Here at the shop, there is a mixture of W2K workstations and FreeBSD
4.10 servers. Is there a non-NetBIOS file server that runs on FreeBSD
that will allow access to files from the windows clients?
We're already using samba, but I don't allow any NetBIOS traffic through
our
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 15:54, you wrote:
Good Morning!
Here at the shop, there is a mixture of W2K workstations and
FreeBSD 4.10 servers. Is there a non-NetBIOS file server that runs
on FreeBSD that will allow access to files from the windows
clients?
We're already using samba, but I
Scott Rothgaber wrote:
Good Morning!
Here at the shop, there is a mixture of W2K workstations and FreeBSD
4.10 servers. Is there a non-NetBIOS file server that runs on FreeBSD
that will allow access to files from the windows clients?
We're already using samba, but I don't allow any NetBIOS
On Oct 12, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Scott Rothgaber wrote:
Good Morning!
Here at the shop, there is a mixture of W2K workstations and FreeBSD
4.10 servers. Is there a non-NetBIOS file server that runs on FreeBSD
that will allow access to files from the windows clients?
We're already using samba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 04:10, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Thanks Chris. Please take a look at my reply to Scott because the two of
you seem to be suggesting contradicting ideas, and I'm keen to learn why!
Have done. It's just my preference
Thanks Chris and Scott for your input on this subject - I've found it most
helpful.
The freedom to tweak the system to your own way of working is great, and I now
feel I am better informed on how to do this without doing anything radical
that I will regret in years to come.
Thanks again to
Tom Munro Glass wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:31, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:53:20PM +1300, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
On an intranet file server, the users' private files are obviously stored
in /usr/home/username but where is the correct place to store files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 02:52, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
I guessed there isn't a default, but I thought there might be a convention
for this and I want to follow conventions where ever possible.
I prefer to put things onto /usr/home (e.g.
Depends on what philosophy you subscribe to- if it's on a local system
only, then create a group for members that will need access to it, and
create a directory in the /home tree, like /home/'project_foo
If it's going to be NFS mounted by other systems, then create an /export
directory and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 19:38, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
filesystem for /home, should I mount this at /home and make /usr/home a
link to /home, or do I just mount it at /usr/home?
The latter is probably preferable.
- --
Cheers, Chris
Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Depends on what philosophy you subscribe to- if it's on a local system
only, then create a group for members that will need access to it, and
create a directory in the /home tree, like /home/'project_foo
If it's going to be NFS mounted by other systems, then create an
Hi Tom- /usr doesn't _have_ to be mounted read-only, but it's not
uncommon to do it on systems connected to the net/susceptible to
hacking/just for security. Default Sun for home is /export home,
primarily b/c Solaris thinks it's always the NFS server ;-) Most Linux
distros use /home, and
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:47, Chris Howells wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 19:38, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
filesystem for /home, should I mount this at /home and make /usr/home a
link to /home, or do I just mount it at /usr/home?
The latter is probably preferable.
Thanks Chris. Please
Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Hi Tom- /usr doesn't _have_ to be mounted read-only, but it's not
uncommon to do it on systems connected to the net/susceptible to
hacking/just for security. Default Sun for home is /export home,
primarily b/c Solaris thinks it's always the NFS server ;-) Most Linux
On an intranet file server, the users' private files are obviously stored in
/usr/home/username but where is the correct place to store files that are
common to many users? Would this be something like /usr/home/public or
/usr/local/public or even /var/public?
Thanks,
Tom Munro Glass
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:53:20PM +1300, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
On an intranet file server, the users' private files are obviously stored in
/usr/home/username but where is the correct place to store files that are
common to many users? Would this be something like /usr/home/public or
/usr
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:31, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:53:20PM +1300, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
On an intranet file server, the users' private files are obviously stored
in /usr/home/username but where is the correct place to store files that
are common to many users
correct me also help me.
My idea is to build an http file server.
OS: Naturally I am going to use FreeBSD
Hardware: May be I will buy two (2) 50 Gb IDE disks. Is 256 Mb ram is enough or need
more? What kind of backup system we should put? Which is reliable RAID controller? Or
What size
.
Present requirements: 50 Gb disk space, web access password protected
directories/folders and less expensive.
My idea is to build an http file server.
It would be pretty easy to build some kind of file browsing system with PHP
or Perl. You could also use either of these for whatever authentication
me.
My idea is to build an http file server.
OS: Naturally I am going to use FreeBSD
Hardware: May be I will buy two (2) 50 Gb IDE disks. Is 256 Mb ram is enough or need more? What kind of backup system we should put? Which is reliable RAID controller? Or What size of Dat's. etc.
Appls
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 02:54, Ajitesh wrote:
Hi Friends, I have been asked to come up with some kind of system
so that our company can share the
data drawings with different customers and vendors.
A very good and quick CMS setup for this kinda thing:
http://www.plone.org
freebsd port:
Hi. I'm seeking suggestions for sysctl variables to use on a highly-taxed
mission-critical file-server. This computer exports two 630GB arrays via
SAMBA over gigabit on 3ware escalades. Anyone have any tips?
The reason I'm asking is because smbd has been dropping processes lately. I
recently
[snip]
6 Nov 21 04:20:01 fnord /kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 208 to
200 packets per second
This is because you have 'options ICMP_BANDLIM' in your kernel config.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
On Thursday 21 November 2002 20:08, david wrote:
[snip]
6 Nov 21 04:20:01 fnord /kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 208
to 200 packets per second
This is because you have 'options ICMP_BANDLIM' in your kernel config.
Further more you can increase this by setting
Hi.
6 Nov 21 04:20:01 fnord /kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from
208
to 200 packets per second
This is because you have 'options ICMP_BANDLIM' in your kernel config.
Further more you can increase this by setting net.inet.icmp.icmplim: 200
using sysctl.
That's what I
In the last episode (Nov 21), David Smithson said:
Hi. I'm seeking suggestions for sysctl variables to use on a
highly-taxed mission-critical file-server. This computer exports two
630GB arrays via SAMBA over gigabit on 3ware escalades. Anyone have
any tips?
The reason I'm asking
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
