In sysinstall appears:
- ad0 = HD 80GB (for FreeBSD OS at complete)
- ad12 = oine of the SATA HD I think
- ad8 = The other SATA HD I think
- ar0 = ??? (I suppose this is the RAID isnt'it?)
What must I do?
- Make only for ar0?
Is the right alternative - ad8 and ad12 do not
On 6/15/06, DSA - JCR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I am installing a new and all Freebsd system (no other OS in it). The goal
is to have a NFS for a network that has 2x200Gb in RAID 1 disks for data.
It has 3 disks:
- 80Gb Seagate IDE for FreeBSD OS alone
- 2xSATA Seagate 200Gb disks in
Maan Jee wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%/dev
Maan Jee wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:38:57 -0700
From: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie File system
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
James Long wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33
On my system at least, /home is a symlink to /usr/home. I belive this
is the default.
On 5/15/06, Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a507630
On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs
On 2006-05-15 17:20, Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%
On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1
On 5/15/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Not reliably. Folks could guess.
Post again and include the output of ls -l / this time.
It's
Look in /usr/home
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maan Jee
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:21 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Newbie File system
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Maan Jee wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%/dev
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
at /
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%/dev
/dev/ad0s1e
or even easier...
cd
pwd
On 5/15/06, Atom Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/15/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Not reliably.
Maan Jee wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
at /
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
From: Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Newbie File system
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home
James Long wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
From: Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Newbie File system
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Can someone explane that at which filesystem
Jim Angstadt wrote:
Hi All,
I'm new to FreeBSD and a first time poster to this
list. I have used Linux for several years but would
like to see what FreeBSD is like.
tiny# uname -a
FreeBSD tiny.brc.localnet
6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0:
Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005
[EMAIL
Jim Angstadt wrote:
Hi All,
I'm new to FreeBSD and a first time poster to this
list. I have used Linux for several years but would
like to see what FreeBSD is like.
Welcome!
tiny# uname -a
FreeBSD tiny.brc.localnet
6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0:
Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005
Barnaby Scott wrote:
I am new to FreeBSD (or any other Unix operating system) but am very
keen to make the switch. I have read as much as I can over the last
couple of years, and am very nearly ready to ditch the various Windows
versions on my network - however there is one Windows-only
On Thursday 04 May 2006 15:55, Barnaby Scott wrote:
I am new to FreeBSD (or any other Unix operating system) but am very
keen to make the switch. I have read as much as I can over the last
couple of years, and am very nearly ready to ditch the various Windows
versions on my network - however
Barnaby Scott wrote:
I am new to FreeBSD (or any other Unix operating system) but am very
keen to make the switch. I have read as much as I can over the last
couple of years, and am very nearly ready to ditch the various Windows
versions on my network - however there is one Windows-only
Thanks for your interest in this.
A large part of the problem was in fact a bad cable.
I went back and forth between the command line and sysinstall. They seem not
to do the same things. It did seem to me that the disklabel in sysinstall and
the disklabel command-line tool did not necessarily
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:40:09PM -0700, Oliver Iberien wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to add a second IDE hard drive. I can't seem to get it
mounted, or to get what I put into sysinstall and what comes out when I use
the command line to agree.
Are you using the command line interface or
The short answer is to backup the files you want to save. As a general
rule, I suggest backing up:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/usr/local/www
The last one assumes you have some website(s).
If you are also worried about email, if you are using the standard
sendmail, also backup:
/var/mail
I would
Oliver Iberien wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 6.0 on a home machine and backing up to a DVD Burner,
probably using kdar, the dar archiver that comes with KDE.
My question is : which system files to back up, along with my personal stuff?
I'm used to using linux distributions that do your system
Oliver Iberien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What actually happens when you use Upgrade an existing system in
sysinstall? Do you end up with the X-server, etc., all functioning
as before, or is there a lot of cleanup to do afterwards?
X doesn't get automatically updated by that path; just the
Hi Oliver,
At a minimum, you will probably want to back up the following directories:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/home
That will get all of the configuration files for FreeBSD and the software thar
you installed from ports. The last directory will det all of your user's data.
At 09:58 PM 2/22/2006, Andy Reitz wrote:
Hi Oliver,
At a minimum, you will probably want to back up the following directories:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/home
That will get all of the configuration files for FreeBSD and the
software thar you installed from ports.
On Sunday 16 April 2006 09:00, Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 09:58 PM 2/22/2006, Andy Reitz wrote:
Hi Oliver,
At a minimum, you will probably want to back up the following directories:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/home
That will get all of the configuration files for
At 09:08 AM 4/16/2006, Oliver Iberien wrote:
On Sunday 16 April 2006 09:00, Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 09:58 PM 2/22/2006, Andy Reitz wrote:
Hi Oliver,
At a minimum, you will probably want to back up the following directories:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/home
That
Jim Stapleton wrote:
[ ... ]
When it comes to changing the default compiler a good rule of thumb is
that if you need to ask how to do it, then you should not do it.
That seems to be a general *nix world rule of thumb for just about everything...
The UNIX world is willing to give you a loaded
infernus - Bluelight wrote:
Sorry for bothering this mailing list, but I realy need some help..
I find awsome screenshots from FreeBSD on various sites on the net, but
on my comp,
the only thing I see is a black screen with some white text on it, and:
$|
What you are
I appologize is this stuff is too basic for you, but it sounds as if
you need a crash course in Unix basics, not just FreeBSD. This will
tell you how to do the basics. My suggestion is to go to the library
and pick up some books on Unix use/administration and/or FreeBSD.
O'Reily makes some nice
rehash? Cool, thanks, that'll be useful if I have to reinstall in the
future. At some point does this automatically get run after ports are
built? I knotice things get rehashed automatically after my first few
port builds, it's only the first few that cause the problem. (I
usually do bash,
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:43:51AM -0400, Jim Stapleton wrote:
I did a make install clean in the lang/gcc40/ directory to get a
newer version of GCC, and it seems happy, so the next thing I did was
I replaced my /usr/bin/gcc, /usr/bin/g++, etc. binaries with hard
links to the
how do I setup make.conf to automatically use the new compiler?
Is there any way to set this new compiler as the default (such as
building the OS), without causing issues? Or would that be just a
royal pain in the posterior that is not worth the effort?
On 4/10/06, Erik Trulsson [EMAIL
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:01:21AM -0400, Jim Stapleton wrote:
how do I setup make.conf to automatically use the new compiler?
Don't. But if you insist on doing that you could try putting
CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc40
CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++40
into /etc/make.conf. Just be aware that it will
When it comes to changing the default compiler a good rule of thumb is
that if you need to ask how to do it, then you should not do it.
That seems to be a general *nix world rule of thumb for just about everything...
___
On Monday 10 April 2006 16:01, Jim Stapleton wrote:
how do I setup make.conf to automatically use the new compiler?
Is there any way to set this new compiler as the default (such as
building the OS), without causing issues? Or would that be just a
royal pain in the posterior that is not worth
On Sunday 09 April 2006 20:38, infernus - Bluelight wrote:
I was thinking about setting up a FTP and Apache server +mail maybe..
But now when I see this black screen and don't have a clue on what to
do, or how to do enything..
I feel the hope is dripping into the sink!
Several people have
infernus - Bluelight wrote:
Sorry for bothering this mailing list, but I realy need some help..
I find awsome screenshots from FreeBSD on various sites on the net,
but on my comp,
the only thing I see is a black screen with some white text on it, and:
$|
infernus - Bluelight wrote:
How do I enter some kind of interface, or desktop, like on the
screenshots? Is there a web-site or enything with tutorials
explaining how to do all this..
1) Install xorg. If you chose an x installation, such as x-user, then
you can skip this step. To see what's
Ivan,
Yes, you are a newbie as many of us are (including myself ;). You have
already gotten some pretty good responses pointing you in the right
direction to correctly set up a graphical desktop, such as the ones you saw
in the screenshots. However, what the responses have not mentioned, and I
infernus - Bluelight wrote:
Sorry for bothering this mailing list, but I realy need some help..
I find awsome screenshots from FreeBSD on various sites on the net,
but on my comp,
the only thing I see is a black screen with some white text on it, and:
$|
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 14:46, Lawrence Petrykanyn wrote:
Hi!
snip
I tried make --with-default-tmpdir=/mnt/ramfs and received a message
informing me that this is not correct Make syntax.
No, you've got it all wrong! To build an application, you generally do this:
./configure
make
make
On 3/8/06, Bruce M. Axtens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to get FreeBSD 5.4 going on a friend's Celeron and
have been doing okay ... until now.
Question 1: How do I get automounting of cdroms working? Is it possible
in KDE or GNOME, when you put in a cd that the icon just appears
At 12:46 PM 3/8/2006, Lawrence Petrykanyn wrote:
Hi!
I am a newbie trying to compile the program JACK that is required
for the midi sequencer Rosegarden. This program (JACK) is not
available through the ports collection and is intended for a Linux
system. I am running FreeBSD 5.4 with
On 3/8/06, Lawrence Petrykanyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
directed. What I don't understand is the last instruction of the second
option listed below, the line that says,
add --with-default-tmpdir=/mnt/ramfs to the JACK configure line when
you build it.
I tried make
Lawrence Petrykanyn wrote:
Hi!
I am a newbie trying to compile the program JACK that is
required for the midi sequencer Rosegarden. This program
(JACK) is not available through the ports collection and is
intended for a Linux system. I am running FreeBSD 5.4 with
linux compatibility
Lawrence Petrykanyn wrote:
Hi!
I am a newbie trying to compile the program JACK that is required for
the midi sequencer Rosegarden. This program (JACK) is not available
through the ports collection and is intended for a Linux system. I am
I have jackd(1) installed (from ports) but maybe
At 05:30 PM 3/8/2006, you wrote:
I am a newbie trying to compile the program JACK that is required
for the midi sequencer Rosegarden. This program (JACK) is not
available through the ports collection and is intended for a Linux
system. I am
Perhaps I'm not understanding the whole scenario,
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 08:15 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:36 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
what about the dependency then? Ignore it? What if there
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:36 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
what about the dependency then? Ignore it? What if there are
files needed by xorg-clients? eg: libXX.so.Y and which
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 19:58, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Hi,
I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD and
still I can't understand FreeBSD Ports/Packages esp when it comes to
upgrading via packages. I'm from a Linux (gentoo linux) background so
I'm not a rough diamond.
do pkg_info
look in the output for xterm. it will contain its complete name
if its name in the list output is xterm-203 then
pkg_delete xterm-203 this will remove it
then pkg_add -rv xterm should fetch the package from the ports
collection and install it.
There is a better explanation of the
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 20:32 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 19:58, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Hi,
I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD and
still
$pkg_add -vr x11/xterm-206_1
pkg_add: package 'xterm-206_1' or its older version already
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Hi,
I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD and still
I can't understand FreeBSD Ports/Packages esp when it comes to upgrading
via packages. I'm from a Linux (gentoo linux) background so I'm not a
rough diamond.
rough diamond ... I like that idea.
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:37 -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
do pkg_info
look in the output for xterm. it will contain its complete name
if its name in the list output is xterm-203 then
I did that.
pkg_delete xterm-203 this will remove it
It says dependencies on xorg-clients.
Another poster said
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 20:32 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 19:58, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Hi,
I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD
and still
$pkg_add -vr x11/xterm-206_1
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
I'm from a Linux (gentoo linux) background so I'm not a
rough diamond.
rough diamond ... I like that idea. :D
haha..
As mentioned by one other poster, -f will force the deinstall.
Not an option for me.
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Hi,
I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD and still
I can't understand FreeBSD Ports/Packages esp when it comes to upgrading
via packages. I'm from a Linux (gentoo linux) background so I'm not a
rough diamond.
Problem statement.
FreeBSD-Release-6
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:36 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
what about the dependency then? Ignore it? What if there are files
needed by xorg-clients? eg: libXX.so.Y and which is not present in
the new xterm?
Since you want to
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:58 -0600, Eric Schuele wrote:
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
In gentoo, it's a simple emerge xterm and all will be done
automatically. (Granted, this is compile from source and not from binary
packages, which I know can do cd /usr/ports/x11/xterm make install
clean, but
by running a single
script.
I hope this helps you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ow Mun Heng
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:09 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Newbie Alert : pkg_add and packages Q (do not want
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
I'm from a Linux (gentoo linux) background so I'm not a
rough diamond.
rough diamond ... I like that idea. :D
haha..
As mentioned by one other poster, -f will force the deinstall.
Not an option for me.
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:58 -0600, Eric Schuele wrote:
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
In gentoo, it's a simple emerge xterm and all will be done
automatically. (Granted, this is compile from source and not from binary
packages, which I know can do cd /usr/ports/x11/xterm make install
Eric Schuele writes:
The only thing (again) unnerving is this statement.
[snip]
pkg_delete: package 'gettext-0.14.5' is required by these other packages
and may not be deinstalled (but I'll delete it anyway): --- *anyway*??
bash-3.1.10
[/snip]
Don't worry. Its
* On 16/12/05 07:23 -0800, manish jain wrote:
Hi,
I am trying my hand at FreeBSD administration and would greatly appreciate
assistance with some problems I am facing with setting up mail
services and the network properly.
My system has 2 network cards (rl0 and dc0). rl0 has been
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 14:43, Charles Haynes wrote:
Hi, all. I'm new to FreeBSD.
I'm setting up a machine to act as a webserver using:
FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p12-jc2 (jail18) #0
Tonight I added the package:
cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2
and ran:
# cvsup -g -L 2 /root/cvs-supfile
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:30:25 +0100
Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:54:46PM -0600, Douglass, Erik wrote:
After being an Windows/Cisco IT professional for the past 7 years, I
have decided to make the plunge over to FreeBSD on my own time. I have
it installed,
As someone from similar circumstances a few years ago, I found FreeBSD
Unleashed by Michael Urban and published by SAMS quite valuable.
Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE
Director of Information Services
Mason General Hospital
http://www.masongeneral.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Douglass, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After being an Windows/Cisco IT professional for the past 7 years, I
have decided to make the plunge over to FreeBSD on my own time. I have
it installed, and it is quite overwhelming. If anyone has any
recommendations/tips or books for acquainting
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:54:46PM -0600, Douglass, Erik wrote:
After being an Windows/Cisco IT professional for the past 7 years, I
have decided to make the plunge over to FreeBSD on my own time. I have
it installed, and it is quite overwhelming. If anyone has any
recommendations/tips or
On 12/2/05, Douglass, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After being an Windows/Cisco IT professional for the past 7 years, I
have decided to make the plunge over to FreeBSD on my own time. I have
it installed, and it is quite overwhelming. If anyone has any
recommendations/tips or books for
On 12/1/05, Douglass, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After being an Windows/Cisco IT professional for the past 7 years, I
have decided to make the plunge over to FreeBSD on my own time. I have
it installed, and it is quite overwhelming. If anyone has any
recommendations/tips or books for
Check this out its free.
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Douglass,
Erik
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:55 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: newbie
After being an
On Thursday 01 December 2005 06:55 pm, fbsd_user wrote:
Check this out its free.
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Douglass,
Erik
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:55 PM
To:
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 00:21 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-11-27 16:25, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for all that think about security please don't use popular
books, learn by yourself, and don't configure and use things
like everyone else do!
I have started with OpenBSD. I was coming from Red Hat 6.2 and to my
shame, I didn't knew at that time that the BSD did exist. The very same
day I discovered that BSD were free, and that I was indeed running one.
same with me i wasn't aware of BSD first, then i was teached by linux
community
Newbie for freeBSD. One question freeBSD vs openBSD...what's the
difference...security...supportdevelopment stage...other pros cons
for each.
People say that OpenBSD is the most secure.
I say i would be as secure as it's system administrator.
If we talk about performance, i agree with
On 2005-11-27 11:55, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newbie for freeBSD. One question freeBSD vs openBSD...what's the
difference...security...supportdevelopment stage...other pros
cons for each.
People say that OpenBSD is the most secure.
I say i would be as secure as it's
At 08:14 AM 11/27/2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-11-27 11:55, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newbie for freeBSD. One question freeBSD vs openBSD...what's the
difference...security...supportdevelopment stage...other pros
cons for each.
People say that OpenBSD is the
it seems the OpenBSD group doesn't actually like questions. You can get
flamed for the best worded question. Under FreeBSD, the community is more
open to ideas and people trying things.
In addition...some parts of the core of OpenBSD cannot easily be upgraded w/o
issues. (Like openSSL for
it seems the OpenBSD group doesn't actually like questions. You can
get flamed for the best worded question. Under FreeBSD, the
community is more open to ideas and people trying things.
But we have to admit they do know how to properly flame someone.
I mean, we never heard the rosted ash
On 2005-11-27 16:25, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for all that think about security please don't use popular
books, learn by yourself, and don't configure and use things
like everyone else do!
somewhat-far-fetched-comment/
Then you can never build upon the experience of others.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-11-27 16:25, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for all that think about security please don't use popular
books, learn by yourself, and don't configure and use things
like everyone else do!
somewhat-far-fetched-comment/
Then you
On Sunday, November 27, 2005 10:25:55 AM, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie Q: freeBSD vs openBSD
Wrote these words of wisdom:
for all that think about security please don't use popular books, learn by
yourself, and don't configure and use things like everyone else do
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 07:51 +0200, Eyad Salah wrote:
I'm kinda new to Linux, How can I start FreeBSD GUI (Like windows)?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
--
GnuPG key : 0xD25FCC81 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc
Fingerprint: D182 6F22 7EEC DD4C 0F6E 564C
On Monday 24 October 2005 06:51, Eyad Salah wrote:
I'm kinda new to Linux, How can I start FreeBSD GUI (Like windows)?
FreeBSD is not Linux.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On 10/13/05, makisupa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to be getting myself in trouble repeatedly...I'm sure someone can
help...
Fresh install of 6.0 RC1, gnome 2.12 from marcus's tb, freshly cvsupped
ports. I need to install some little apps like gaim and pan. when
running 'make install
Andrew P. writes:
=== Installing for glib-2.6.6
=== glib-2.6.6 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.7 - found
=== glib-2.6.6 depends on executable: pkg-config - found
=== glib-2.6.6 depends on shared library: intl - found
=== Generating temporary packing list
===
I'd start with installing portupgrade, and trying to
portupgrade -arR. I'm sure there's another solution,
though.
What is the use of specifying the 'r' switch when using the 'a'
switch?
# portupgrade -ar
Since all installed ports are targeted wouldn't installed ports that
depend on another
Andrew P. wrote:
On 10/13/05, makisupa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to be getting myself in trouble repeatedly...I'm sure someone can
help...
Fresh install of 6.0 RC1, gnome 2.12 from marcus's tb, freshly cvsupped
ports. I need to install some little apps like gaim and pan. when
running
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 14:21 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Andrew P. writes:
=== Installing for glib-2.6.6
=== glib-2.6.6 depends on
file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.7 - found
=== glib-2.6.6 depends on executable: pkg-config -
On 10/14/05, makisupa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What good will portupgrade it do here? Obviously I must not
properly understand what its doing...but in the error message I
have a newer version of the dependency than the port calls for
and the port misidentifies this. If there was a newer port
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 20:00 -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
makisupa wrote:
Been using Linux awhile...recently migrated a laptop to FreeBSD. Its a
bit old and BSD runs nicely on the deprecated hardware. I am using
6.0-BETA 5 despite warning to the contrary because my atheros based wifi
card
makisupa wrote:
Been using Linux awhile...recently migrated a laptop to FreeBSD. Its a
bit old and BSD runs nicely on the deprecated hardware. I am using
6.0-BETA 5 despite warning to the contrary because my atheros based wifi
card works well -- i had all kinds of trouble in 5.4. Running
201 - 300 of 667 matches
Mail list logo
