On 2006-04-17 17:18, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://users.rcn.com/rneswold/fbsd-init.html#AEN258
I stand corrected. I can still envision problems if tmp files use enough space
to prevent a memory swap. Running out of swap space is not healthy.
That's why swap-backed /tmp
On 2006-04-17 06:21, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
It's not a good idea to put everything on the / filesystem.
At a minimum I would have:
/
swap
/var
/usr
Your users will not fill up /var unless
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:43:49PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
You should also take a look at the following rc.conf options then:
tmpmfs=AUTO # Set to YES to always create an mfs /tmp, NO
to never
tmpsize=20m # Size of mfs /tmp if created
Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought, here's
what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/ 500mb
swap4gb
/var4gb
/usr4gb
/home remainder (about 60gb)
then /var/db/mysql - /home/mysql
On Monday 17 April 2006 16:29, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought, here's
what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/ 500mb
swap 4gb
/var 4gb
/usr 4gb
/home
Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought,
here's what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/ 500mb
swap4gb
/var4gb
/usr4gb
/home remainder (about 60gb)
Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought, here's
what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/ 500mb
swap 4gb
/var 4gb
/usr 4gb
/home remainder (about 60gb)
then /var/db/mysql -
On Monday 17 April 2006 16:59, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought,
here's what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/ 500mb
swap 4gb
/var
On Monday 17 April 2006 13:59, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought,
here's what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/ 500mb
swap 4gb
/var
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:21:55 +0930
From: Brendan Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: /boot at beginning of drive
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Where they use that quota is anyone's guess
Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After
some thought,
here's what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/ 500mb
swap4gb
/var4gb
/usr4gb
/home remainder
On Monday 17 April 2006 14:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After
some thought,
here's what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/ 500mb
On Monday 17 April 2006 14:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After
some thought,
here's what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/
Hello
I'm trying to install FreeBSD with the following partition scheme...
/boot 100mb (50mb too small? Install fails with filesystem full error)
swap 1gb
/tmp 100mb
/ remainder
However after I install and boot, it says it can't find /boot/kernel/kernel
The version is 6.0. Am I missing
At 12:40 PM 4/16/2006, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to install FreeBSD with the following partition scheme...
/boot 100mb (50mb too small? Install fails with filesystem full error)
swap 1gb
/tmp 100mb
/ remainder
However after I install and boot, it says it can't find
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 5:16 AM
To: Brendan Grossman; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: /boot at beginning of drive
/boot has to be in the / file system.
There's a rather lengthy thread about
On Sunday 16 April 2006 11:59, Brendan Grossman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 5:16 AM
To: Brendan Grossman; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: /boot at beginning of drive
/boot has
It's not a good idea to put everything on the / filesystem.
At a minimum I would have:
/
swap
/var
/usr
Your users will not fill up /var unless you allow them
unlimited mail, databases or access to root.
They will have unlimited access up until their quota has been reached. Where
they
On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
It's not a good idea to put everything on the / filesystem.
At a minimum I would have:
/
swap
/var
/usr
Your users will not fill up /var unless you allow them
unlimited mail, databases or access to root.
They will have
-Original Message-
From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 6:19 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Brendan Grossman
Subject: Re: /boot at beginning of drive
On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
It's not a good idea
On Sunday 16 April 2006 21:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
I agree that it's not a great idea, but considering the software I'm using,
user files are stored in /var and /home. I don't know what percentage of
quotas users will use for emails, databases, or home dirs, and I don't want
to take a
On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:51, Brendan Grossman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 6:19 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Brendan Grossman
Subject: Re: /boot at beginning of drive
On Sunday 16 April
On Sunday 16 April 2006 21:51, Brendan Grossman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 6:19 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Brendan Grossman
Subject: Re: /boot at beginning of drive
On Sunday 16 April
Brendan Grossman wrote:
Here is my reason for separating /tmp and mounting it noexec,nosuid:
http://www.sagonet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2852
Quoth mount(8):
noexec Do not allow execution of any binaries on the mounted
file system. This option is useful
Having a separate /tmp slice is not a bad idea, combining /,
/usr, and /var is unless you're doing a very minimal install.
I can separate /usr, but my goal is to combine /home and /var, or at least
where mail and databases are stored, for reasons already mentioned.
I suppose I could do
On Sunday 16 April 2006 22:30, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Having a separate /tmp slice is not a bad idea, combining /,
/usr, and /var is unless you're doing a very minimal install.
I can separate /usr, but my goal is to combine /home and /var, or at least
where mail and databases are stored,
On Sunday 16 April 2006 14:19, Colin Percival wrote:
Brendan Grossman wrote:
Here is my reason for separating /tmp and mounting it
noexec,nosuid:
http://www.sagonet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2852
Quoth mount(8):
noexec Do not allow execution of any binaries on the
On Sunday 16 April 2006 13:30, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Having a separate /tmp slice is not a bad idea, combining /,
/usr, and /var is unless you're doing a very minimal install.
I can separate /usr, but my goal is to combine /home and /var, or at least
where mail and databases are stored,
28 matches
Mail list logo