On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:37:26PM -0800, Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009 18:35:17 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > --On Monday, July 27, 2009 14:07:44 -0800 Mel Flynn
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Monday 27 July 2009 13:17:51 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > >> On ia64 8.0-beta1 SMP, running bsdstats
On Monday 27 July 2009 18:35:17 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> --On Monday, July 27, 2009 14:07:44 -0800 Mel Flynn
>
> wrote:
> > On Monday 27 July 2009 13:17:51 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >> On ia64 8.0-beta1 SMP, running bsdstats-5.4_2,
> >> I get this error:
> >>
> >> # /usr/local/etc/periodic/mont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, July 27, 2009 14:07:44 -0800 Mel Flynn
wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009 13:17:51 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> On ia64 8.0-beta1 SMP, running bsdstats-5.4_2,
>> I get this error:
>>
>> # /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics
On Monday 27 July 2009 13:17:51 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On ia64 8.0-beta1 SMP, running bsdstats-5.4_2,
> I get this error:
>
> # /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics
> /usr/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/task.c:1023: fatal
> error: RUNTIME_CHECK(((pthread_mutex_destro
Hi,
I'm looking for some information on what the best way to run a bind 9
caching name server on FreeBSD 6.3 +. Basically, configurations and
kernel tweaks on the FreeBSD side of things for memory and performance
is what I am looking for. The actual Bind compile and configurat
Frank Bonnet wrote:
> I'm searching for some "good" software that runs with FreeBSD to manage
> a primary DNS server with several domains.
We use Men & Mice at work for the last 2 years to manage our Linux
(BIND9) and MS DNS servers. The product also works with FreeBSD.
See http://www.menandmice.co
webmin is a good bind manager.
roberto
--
Ing. Roberto Pereyra
ContenidosOnline
http://www.contenidosonline.com.ar
Get secure managed email for your own domain with Hushmail Business -
http://www.hushmail.com/business?l=503&a=3211
___
freebsd-questio
Hi
I'm searching for some "good" software that runs with FreeBSD to manage
a primary DNS server with several domains.
I've looked around, google for it, but was not able to have a precise idea
so if some DNS admins that use one could tell me which are the most populars
and usefuls it would be gr
> I am having problems with my zone file...
> There used to be a command to run and check zone files/Named files..
>
> I can't seem to locate it...??
See named-checkzone(8) and named-checkconf(8)
David
--
David Robillard
UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA
CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Securi
HI
I am having problems with my zone file...
There used to be a command to run and check zone files/Named files..
I can't seem to locate it...??
Anyone have a clue??
TIA
User Iam
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
2) Better still is there some sort of "include" mechanism where I could
keep a flat file of public host information for use by db.external,
but include it into db.internal.
I don't think there is, but let someone who uses b
Josh Paetzel wrote:
Sure, you can $INCLUDE a file in to a zonefile. :)
Yup - that sure does it. However, it is still possible to do
Very Stupid Things (tm). Anyone running bind should not that
this combination of things causes great silliness:
$ORIGIN mydomain.com.
@ IN SOA ..
; Nam
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
2) Better still is there some sort of "include" mechanism where I could
keep a flat file of public host information for use by db.external,
but include it into db.internal.
I don't think there is, but let someone who uses bind more than I do
give
On Friday 13 July 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > On Monday 02 July 2007 16:48, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> >> I am (ever so) slowly moving my domain from FBSD 4.x to 6.2. I
> >> am now at the point where I need to convert my Bind 8
> >> configur
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
2) Better still is there some sort of "include" mechanism where I could
keep a flat file of public host information for use by db.external,
but include it into db.internal.
I don't think there is, but let someone who uses bind more than I do
give a definitive on that
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Monday 02 July 2007 16:48, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I am (ever so) slowly moving my domain from FBSD 4.x to 6.2. I am now
at the point where I need to convert my Bind 8 configuration to Bind 9.
In so doing, I like to finally separate my internal (non-routable) hosts
so that
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Monday 02 July 2007 16:48, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I am (ever so) slowly moving my domain from FBSD 4.x to 6.2. I am now
at the point where I need to convert my Bind 8 configuration to Bind 9.
In so doing, I like to finally separate my internal (non-routable) hosts
so that
On Monday 02 July 2007 16:48, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I am (ever so) slowly moving my domain from FBSD 4.x to 6.2. I am now
> at the point where I need to convert my Bind 8 configuration to Bind 9.
> In so doing, I like to finally separate my internal (non-routable) hosts
> so that
I am (ever so) slowly moving my domain from FBSD 4.x to 6.2. I am now
at the point where I need to convert my Bind 8 configuration to Bind 9.
In so doing, I like to finally separate my internal (non-routable) hosts
so that their names never resolve outside the private network, and
expose only
Hello,
I'm running bind, under FreeBSD. Its bind 9. I just
started noticing a udp port being used, port 63548.
udp4 0 0 *.63548*.*
I then ran tcpdump on that port, and it seems that it is
being used for dns queries.
I'm not a na
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:22:07 -0500
From: "Ryan J. Cavicchioni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: BIND 9 on a dynamic ip address
To: Ash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, FreeBSD Questions
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
A
Sorry for the typo ... "afters" should be "effects". Oops. :-P.
Ryan J. Cavicchioni wrote:
>All I am really looking to do is learn DNS and BIND as well as host my
>own local DNS server for faster DNS lookups within my home network.
>Would using the invalid LAN domain have any negative afters on m
All I am really looking to do is learn DNS and BIND as well as host my
own local DNS server for faster DNS lookups within my home network.
Would using the invalid LAN domain have any negative afters on my web or
ftp server? I am really new at BIND, sorry if I seem clueless. Thank you
for taking the
ould like
>>> to leard bind.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have a stable LAN ip address, it's not a problem.
>> Configure BIND to listen on it and the dynamic address you get to
>> use internet won't bother anyone (even BIND itself).
>>
>> On
leard bind.
If you have a stable LAN ip address, it's not a
problem. Configure BIND to listen on it and the
dynamic address you get to use internet won't
bother anyone (even BIND itself).
On the other hand, configuring a DNS server
listening on a dynamic IP address is a really
bad id
you have a stable LAN ip address, it's not a
problem. Configure BIND to listen on it and the
dynamic address you get to use internet won't
bother anyone (even BIND itself).
On the other hand, configuring a DNS server
listening on a dynamic IP address is a really
bad idea.
BIND 9 Adm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello, I am hoping to set up a DNS server for my home network just for
the sake of learning BIND. Unfortunately, I have a PPPoE connects
(wireless broadband) with a dynamic ip address. At the moment, I use
dyndns just so I have a hostname and I would
Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 23:29 schrieb kilim:
> Hello,
>
> regarding Bind 9, here:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bind9.htm
>l
>
> its stated that the configuration file resides in
> /var/named/etc/namedb/ and that bind wil
i guess you would have to set the bind directory to be jailed in the rc.conf,
but thats just a guess, i have no dns running on a bsd here.
Greetings
Oliver Leitner
Technical Staff
http://www.shells.at
On Friday 11 February 2005 23:29, kilim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> regarding Bind 9, here:
Hello,
regarding Bind 9, here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bind9.html
its stated that the configuration file resides in
/var/named/etc/namedb/ and that bind will be chrooted automatically.
Yet here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books
robg wrote:
I'm trying to setup BIND and the Release Notes say:
"When the named_chroot_autoupdate variable is set to YES (the
default), the chroot directory is automatically configured at the boot
time. A symbolic link which points to /var/named/etc/namedb is created
as /etc/namedb, and a symbolic
I'm trying to setup BIND and the Release Notes say:
"When the named_chroot_autoupdate variable is set to YES (the
default), the chroot directory is automatically configured at the boot
time. A symbolic link which points to /var/named/etc/namedb is created
as /etc/namedb, and a symbolic link which
Enrique Ayesta Perojo writes:
> Hello, i have recently installed a new FreeBSD 5.3 RC1 to replace
> our internal cache dns master server, so it has installed BIND 9,
> on another machine we have currently installed BIND 8. Does
> anybody of you know if the transfer of zones bet
El Viernes, 29 de Octubre de 2004 12:35, Matthew Seaman escribió:
> In principle, essentially yes. However, be aware that Bind9 is a lot
> pickier than Bind8, and various things that you used to be able to get
> away with now result in errors. Keep an eye on the /var/log/messages
> or /var/log/al
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:45:51AM +0200, Enrique Ayesta Perojo wrote:
> Hello, i have recently installed a new FreeBSD 5.3 RC1 to replace our internal
> cache dns master server, so it has installed BIND 9, on another machine we
> have currently installed BIND 8. Does anybody of you kn
Hello, i have recently installed a new FreeBSD 5.3 RC1 to replace our internal
cache dns master server, so it has installed BIND 9, on another machine we
have currently installed BIND 8. Does anybody of you know if the transfer of
zones between the two versions are compatible?
Thanks in
, gets me this:
named 8.3.6-REL Mon Oct 27 14:55:35 GMT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named
which totally doesn't look right since it should be bind 9 something or
other. The package was /usr/ports/dns/bind9
which stated in the package description that it would in
/sbin/named -v, gets me this:
named 8.3.6-REL Mon Oct 27 14:55:35 GMT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named
which totally doesn't look right since it should be bind 9 something or
other. The package was /usr/ports/dns/bind9
which stated in the pa
> Flaming aside, I did look for this answer in the bind docs before posting.
> Either I missed it, or its not there. I did see other things that reference
> round-robins, but not this.
Right. rrset-order defines the order in which multiple records of the same
type are returned, which wasn't quite
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 07:59 pm, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
wrote:
> Donald,
>
> I missed the 9 in the body of the post. And rrset_order isn't something
> I've ever used, so please provide an answer.
>
> Eric
> ___
Eric,
You have caught me
> I have an idea. Why don't you tell him how it's done with
> djbdns? Or at the
> very least, give him a rousing RTFM.
Flaming aside, I did look for this answer in the bind docs before posting.
Either I missed it, or its not there. I did see other things that reference
round-robins, but not thi
Donald,
I missed the 9 in the body of the post. And rrset_order isn't something
I've ever used, so please provide an answer.
Eric
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mai
d, I'm looking right at the subject line of Brent's e-mail and
yours, and reading, "Bind 9 answer limit question" so, it can't be that. I'm
wondering if your e-mail client, for some reason, doesn't show the subject
line, in which case, you wouldn't know th
> I'm running Bind on FreeBSD, so it qualifies. ;)
version information might be useful. 4, 8 or 9?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
This isn't really FreeBSD specific, but I'm running Bind on FreeBSD, so it
qualifies. ;)
Can you limit the number of responses bind will give for a round-robin A
record?
Microsoft DNS allows you to do this with a "AddressAnswerLimit" registry
change. The idea being you may have 16 ips in a round-
Hello, FreeBSD Gurus!
I have a very strange question for you.
I have two FreeBSD-5.2.1-p4 boxes, i386 & sparc64.
I installed bind-9.3.2 in both computers, configured
my /etc/rc.conf as follows:
named_enable="YES"
named_flags="-u bind"
named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named"
it worked perfectl
I'm trying to get the bind 9 port to run chrooted.
I've installed the bind9 port with the "overwrite base install" flag, and
added the define to /etc/make.conf to prevent building from the base tree.
My problem is that when I try to start it I keep running into issues. T
I have a large mail server with a couple of zones defined where the sum
of the zone definition files is 153 MB. When I use Bind 8 the VSIZE
for bind jumps to 250 MB. Thats with nothing going on using bind.
When I switch to Bind 9 and load the same files the VSIZE jumps to 353
MB. I was
On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 11:22 AM, liquid wrote:
Also, the existing named.conf I've written... will it work if I make it
really simplified(for now - I know that bind 9 adds new functionality
so
eventually I'd find myself tweaking that a little)?
Thanks in advance for a
e to start bind up
using rc.conf (by changing "named_program=..") or does some .sh script
get placed into /usr/local/etc/rc.d ?
Also, the existing named.conf I've written... will it work if I make it
really simplified(for now - I know that bind 9 adds new functionality so
eve
Hello
I'm using following:
OS: FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE
Bind: bind-9.2.2
both, release/stable version not a development and I'm expereincing two
major problem with bind (also I didn't had that problem while using same
bind on FreeBSD 4.x-STABLE/RELEASE )
anyway here is what's going on
I run bind it
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 13:45, John Morgan Salomon wrote:
> Unless you have a different instances listening on different interfaces/IPs
> as master/slave for the same domain if you only have one machine--some
> registrars will not permit master & slave on the same IP.
Isn't the requirement of provi
John Morgan Salomon wrote:
Unless you have a different instances listening on different interfaces/IPs
as master/slave for the same domain if you only have one machine--some
registrars will not permit master & slave on the same IP.
Or can BIND9 handle this in a single instance?
The requirement to h
In the last episode (Jul 23), John Morgan Salomon said:
> Unless you have a different instances listening on different
> interfaces/IPs as master/slave for the same domain if you only have
> one machine--some registrars will not permit master & slave on the
> same IP.
>
> Or can BIND9 handle this
At 2003-07-23T17:17:41Z, Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, it's generally considered {easier,better,more manageable,...} to only
> have one instance of BIND. BIND can be master for some domains and slave
> for others, so there really is no need.
I agree completely. That question w
At 2003-07-23T18:45:25Z, John Morgan Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unless you have a different instances listening on different
> interfaces/IPs as master/slave for the same domain if you only have one
> machine--some registrars will not permit master & slave on the same IP. Or
> can BIND9
Unless you have a different instances listening on different interfaces/IPs
as master/slave for the same domain if you only have one machine--some
registrars will not permit master & slave on the same IP.
Or can BIND9 handle this in a single instance?
Cheers,
-John
Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
On T
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 23:33, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> At 2003-07-23T03:55:47Z, Tony Sterrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to configure both a master and slave DNS on the same
> > machine. My approach is to run the master by setting named_enable="YES"
> > and it will use the config fi
> Hello:
Hi,
> I'm trying to configure both a master and slave DNS on the same
> machine. My approach is to run the master by setting named_enable="YES"
> and it will use the config file in /etc/named. To start the slave I
> will In rc.local and it would use the config files in /etc/named/slave.
At 2003-07-23T03:55:47Z, Tony Sterrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to configure both a master and slave DNS on the same
> machine. My approach is to run the master by setting named_enable="YES"
> and it will use the config file in /etc/named. To start the slave I will
> In rc.local an
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Tony Sterrett wrote:
> I'm trying to configure both a master and slave DNS on the same
> machine. My approach is to run the master by setting named_enable="YES"
> and it will use the config file in /etc/named. To start the slave I
> will In rc.local and it would use the
Hello:
I'm trying to configure both a master and slave DNS on the same
machine. My approach is to run the master by setting named_enable="YES"
and it will use the config file in /etc/named. To start the slave I
will In rc.local and it would use the config files in /etc/named/slave.
Does this s
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 08:40:14PM -0700, cp wrote:
[...]
> Before I go any further with 5.0, is it most appropriate
> to use FreeBSD 4.8 STABLE April with the Bind 9.2.2
> binary from ISC? I just want know it works or if there
> is a better combination that is secure and functional?
If you're u
ed if recursion is turned
on (such as would be necessary when running caching).
At ISC, it stated that Bind 8 should be used only for
experimentation or some such warning. I started to
realize that my setup work thus far was moot.
Running 5.0 January, I went to my ports disk and pulled
Bind 9 which
Thank you very much!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"And so, it begins" - Kosh
On 30 Mar 2003, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This may be a silly question but I need some help so here it is.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This may be a silly question but I need some help so here it is. I
> installed bind 9 and I am unable to find it. I installed FreeBSD 4.4
> upgraded to 4.7 stable. I have bind 8 installed. I want to run bind 9
> for security reasons. I
Sunday, March 30, 2003 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Bind 9
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:55:15 -0500 (EST)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This may be a silly question but I need some help so here it is.
I
> > installed bind 9 and I am unable to find it. I installed FreeBSD 4
At 2003-03-30T15:20:17Z, Tim van den Elsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Programs installed via ports are always placed in /usr/local/ and configs
> to /usr/local/etc/ The same for binaries :) /usr/local/sbin/named
That's not true. From /usr/ports/net/bind9/Makefile:
.if defined(PORT_REPLAC
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:55:15 -0500 (EST)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be a silly question but I need some help so here it is. I
> installed bind 9 and I am unable to find it. I installed FreeBSD 4.4
> upgraded to 4.7 stable. I have bind 8 installed. I want to run
This may be a silly question but I need some help so here it is. I
installed bind 9 and I am unable to find it. I installed FreeBSD 4.4
upgraded to 4.7 stable. I have bind 8 installed. I want to run bind 9
for security reasons. I installed in from ports. I can't find it. I
thought
On 11/20/2002 08:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am working with a BIND 9 server which, for some reason, isn't
> setting the "authoritative" bit on zones for which it is the
> master (as clearly stated in named.conf).
I recently converted 3 FreeBSD 4.6 machines to Bind
I am working with a BIND 9 server which, for some reason, isn't
setting the "authoritative" bit on zones for which it is the
master (as clearly stated in named.conf). Has anyone seen this
behavior?
--Brett Glass
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
72 matches
Mail list logo
