> Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable
> the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from
> abusing it.
> >>
> >>Why not have a "pr-moderator" for each category (i386, kern, doc, etc), who
> >>approves each incoming PR. Basically this person would act as a front
At 2003-03-03T15:48:17Z, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I understand the reason for this, keep in mind that if you make this
> too complicated, you'll never get any bug reports.
I might note that zero bug reports are currently being submitted via the web
interface. Allowing repor
Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-03-03T14:58:22Z, "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
How 'bout "cookie"ing them...
How 'bout requiring GPG signatures on the bug report? Or giving the user a
block of text to sign and paste into a textbox?
While I understand the reason for this, k
At 2003-03-03T14:58:22Z, "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How 'bout "cookie"ing them...
How 'bout requiring GPG signatures on the bug report? Or giving the user a
block of text to sign and paste into a textbox?
--
Kirk Strauser
In Googlis non est, ergo non est.
pgp00
From: "Kirk Strauser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.
>Could you rate-limit the system to 'n' submissions
>from a given email address in a given
This definitely worked! It's too slow, maybe cause I
left "enable dns", I'll get it working fine.
Thanks Alexey!
Pedro.
--- "Alexey V. Litvinov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
scritto: >
> What version of mustdie you use?
> if 95/98 try to run WINIPCFG.EXE while in connect
> to ISP... as i can
>
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Daxbert wrote:
Quoting Matthew Emmerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR
database.
OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find
>
> Sure it does. The manpage of ppp(8) includes:
>
> 8. Ask your ISP to authenticate your
> nameserver address(es) with
> the line
>
> enable dns
>
I did this, and I'm not running named.
Thanks to Alexey's hints I found the values I needed
though.
thanks,
> 8. Ask your ISP to authenticate your nameserver address(es) with
> the line
>
> enable dns
>
hi said in prevous posts that :
>Anyway, it's not even an option since I've been unable
>to set up ppp properly. It connects fine but it
>doesn't resolv any address, a
> Yeah I meant that Windows doesn't ask the user to
> write it down. FreeBSD's chap doesn't seem to get it,
> but I still have to find out why :(.
freeBSD also ;) I for example getting it automaticaly from ISP and written
in resolv.conf
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsub
On 2003-03-03 03:16, "Pedro F. Giffuni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- "Alexey V. Litvinov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> > hmm why you thinking that Windows doesn't need ip of
> > ISP's dns-server?
> > It is getting it through ppp.
>
> Yeah I meant that Windows doesn't ask the user to write
--- "Alexey V. Litvinov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
scritto: >
>
> hmm why you thinking that Windows doesn't need ip of
> ISP's dns-server?
> It is getting it through ppp.
>
Yeah I meant that Windows doesn't ask the user to
write it down. FreeBSD's chap doesn't seem to get it,
but I still have t
> Thanks! I'll do this when I find more time to hunt the
> problem. What's weird (for me) is that I don't have
> their DNS IP address: since Windows doesn't need it,
> the ISP doesn't provide it.
hmm why you thinking that Windows doesn't need ip of ISP's dns-server?
It is getting it through ppp.
I just sent my ports to Jens... thanks!!
Also thank you to everyone that made jokes in
private...I'm still laughing :-P.
Pedro.
__
Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino
http://it.yahoo.com/
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
...
Or you could consider helping find a way to
re-enable
the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies
from
abusing it.
Well, If heard for years several committers
criticising the whole PR system. Time for bugzilla??
..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-03-02 12:15, Daxbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never submitted a pr, but I've written scripts for bulk web
> submissions (GET and POST for load testing web apps). Did the
> previous web pr-interface have any sort of verification proce
At 2003-03-02T20:51:43Z, Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's a good idea, but wouldn't really have helped; the email addresses
> concerned were "disposable" and all from various free webmail providers.
Could you rate-limit the system to 'n' submissions from a given email
address in a
On 2003-03-02 17:22, "Pedro F. Giffuni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So? Set your EDITOR environment variable to whatever you prefer
> > and you won't have to deal with vi.
>
> I tried that with pico some years ago, but the result
> was not nice.
That's a problem of pico then. Pico does stupid
--- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
...
> Or you could consider helping find a way to
> re-enable
> the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies
> from
> abusing it.
>
Well, If heard for years several committers
criticising the whole PR system. Time for bugzilla??
...
>
> You
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:17:21PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> Ceri Davies wrote:
> Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable
> the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from
> abusing it.
> >>
> >>Why not have a "pr-moderator" for each category (i386, kern, doc, etc
Ceri Davies wrote:
Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable
the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from
abusing it.
Why not have a "pr-moderator" for each category (i386, kern, doc, etc), who
approves each incoming PR. Basically this person would act as a front-line
defens
Quoting Matthew Emmerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > > >>No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming
> > > >>the PR database.
> > > >
> > > >OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers
> >
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:58:58PM -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > > >>No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming
> > > >>the PR database.
> > > >
> > > >OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > >>No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming
> > >>the PR database.
> > >
> > >OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers
> > >interested in my ports (math/cad stuff) anyway. I
> > >gu
On 2003-03-02 05:47, "Pedro F. Giffuni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance that http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html
> will be fixed, or FreeBSD dislikes feedback??
Not really. Not without making large changes to the way gnats works.
I'm not against enabling it again, but it'll take a bit of
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> >>No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming
> >>the PR database.
> >
> >OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers
> >interested in my ports (math/cad stuff) anyway. I
> >guess I'll just ke
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming
the PR database.
OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers
interested in my ports (math/cad stuff) anyway. I
guess I'll just keep'em for myself for some more time.
Or you could consider helping find a way to re
--- Jim Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On
Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 08:47 PM, Pedro F.
> Giffuni wrote:
> > Hi guys;
> >
> > Any chance that
> http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html
> > will be fixed, or FreeBSD dislikes feedback??
>
> No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Mock
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:00 AM
To: Pedro F. Giffuni
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.
On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 08:47 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hi guys;
>
> A
On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 08:47 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi guys;
Any chance that http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html
will be fixed, or FreeBSD dislikes feedback??
No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR database.
I've been waiting for this to get fixed to submit two
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 05:47:03AM +0100, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hi guys;
>
> Any chance that http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html
> will be fixed, or FreeBSD dislikes feedback??
It was disabled because it was being abused by a juvenile who was
spamming the GNATS DB with bogus PRs.
Talk to the
Hi guys;
Any chance that http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html
will be fixed, or FreeBSD dislikes feedback??
I've been waiting for this to get fixed to submit two
ports and the ports guys did changes to the ports tree
in the meantime :(.
I know . send-pr(1), but
1) I've been unable to make ppp
32 matches
Mail list logo
