On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:20:10PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:52:37PM -0400, Gerard wrote:
> >>Since it appears to be apparent that newer software might very well
> >>be
> >>released under the GPLv3 license, it might be
On Aug 4, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:52:37PM -0400, Gerard wrote:
Since it appears to be apparent that newer software might very well
be
released under the GPLv3 license, it might behoove the FreeBSD team
to
rethink its ideas or beliefs regarding the inclu
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:52:37PM -0400, Gerard wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:46:35 +0200
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Isn't possible to add GPLv3 code in the base system?
> >> (By possible I mean the license part, not the technical part;)
> >>
> >
> >There is a strong p
Gerard wrote:
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:46:35 +0200
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't possible to add GPLv3 code in the base system?
(By possible I mean the license part, not the technical part;)
There is a strong preference not to do this.
Doing a totally unscientific investiga
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:46:35 +0200
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Isn't possible to add GPLv3 code in the base system?
>> (By possible I mean the license part, not the technical part;)
>>
>
>There is a strong preference not to do this.
Doing a totally unscientific investigation re
Christer Solskogen wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing
gcc43 as
base.
I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered
by the GPLv3.
Isn't possible to add GPLv3 code in the base system?
(B
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing
gcc43 as
base.
I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by
the GPLv3.
Isn't possible to add GPLv3 code in the base system?
(By possible I mean the licen
>> ___
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>>
>>
>
> Thank you very much fo
/clang will mature enough to
> provide an alternative. It is already quite far along and has
> significant resources behind it (apple, etc).
>
> Kris
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe,
Jakub Lach wrote:
Kris Kennaway-3 wrote:
Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing
gcc43 as
base.
I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by
the GPLv3.
Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff
at licensing stuff is going to
be omitted?
If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18737322.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing gcc43 as
base.
I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by
the GPLv3.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing gcc43 as
base.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18736784.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at
13 matches
Mail list logo
