who hadn't move to FreeBSD?
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
For instance, I'm writing this on a Linux box, but have 3 FBSD servers I
administer, as well as a small handful of Windows servers I'm responsible
for. I also use windows 2000 and XP as well as FBSD and more than 2
distros of Linux at the desktop, from various work and home locations.
?
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
move to FreeBSD?
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
On Saturday 30 August 2003 08:13 am, Denis Troshin wrote:
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
I think a lot of people use this list to get advice on how to install FreeBSD
and how to resolve issues. I know when I
move toFreeBSD?
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied
with FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
I have two servers at home, and a third computer on my desk, with
FreeBSD, and my girlfriend is using FreeBSD at her shop. As most
companies still uses MS Windows I do
of people here who hadn't move to FreeBSD?
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
Let's all refrain from feeding this troll.
--
Adam McLaurin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
At 07:13 PM 30/08/2003 +0700, Denis Troshin wrote:
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
As a desktop I still like the interface better. There are also a lot of
applications I use on a regular basis
a lot of people here who hadn't move to FreeBSD?
I use FreeBSD for my servers (I have one Linux server as well).
|Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
|FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
I still use Windows 2000 here on my desktop. The main reason
Adam McLaurin wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 08:13, Denis Troshin wrote:
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
To use windows doesn't implicate that the user prefers Windows. Using
Windows more often implicates to hate
Denis Troshin wrote:
Looking at the field MAILER of e-mails' headers, I see that there a
lot of people here who are using mail programs like Outlook, Eudora,
Mozillafor win32. This means that they run windows systems. So
I'm asking why still a lot of people here who hadn't move to
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 19:13 +0700 Denis Troshin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Looking at the field MAILER of e-mails' headers, I see that there a
lot of people here who are using mail programs like Outlook, Eudora,
Mozillafor win32. This means that they run windows systems. So
Your conclusion that people mailing from Windows systems don't run
FreeBSD is not valid, for one thing. Check your logic.
In my case, my webserver is running FreeBSD for my domains. I use Mac
OS X's mail.app for email. Plus the obvious, an x86 machine running
windows can dual boot
13 matches
Mail list logo
