Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-08 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:58:41AM +, Frank Shute wrote: On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 09:24:15PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:05:17PM +, Frank Shute wrote: On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: Hi Upon reading chapters

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Frank Shute wrote: So if it's not branched but tagged, what's the difference between the ports tree I get if I use RELENG_4_8 compared to RELENG_7_0 as tags in my ports supfile? Probably not a very great deal -- you'll get equally

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-07 Thread Frank Shute
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:03:12AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: Frank Shute wrote: So if it's not branched but tagged, what's the difference between the ports tree I get if I use RELENG_4_8 compared to RELENG_7_0 as tags in my ports supfile? Probably not a very great deal --

port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Walter Jansen
Hi Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly using the wrong tag (tag=.), I erroneously but successfully installed the CURRENT version. I could have used SYSINSTALL for the RELEASE 6.2

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: Hi Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly using the wrong tag (tag=.), I erroneously but successfully installed the

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Predrag Punosevac
Erik Trulsson wrote: On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: Hi Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly using the wrong tag (tag=.), I erroneously but

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Frank Shute
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: Hi Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly using the wrong tag (tag=.), I erroneously but successfully installed the

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:05:17PM +, Frank Shute wrote: On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: Hi Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly using the

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Frank Shute
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 09:24:15PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:05:17PM +, Frank Shute wrote: On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: Hi Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, I wanted to

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread 'Frank Shute'
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:34:50AM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: Thanks for your effort Fank, but unfortunately the Handbook shows that your answer does not reflect the actual use of tags for fetching ports with cvsup. Your answer triggers me to look for other places where information can be