Re: problems with jail

2007-02-24 Thread Jim Stapleton

OK, I managed to get it so something else wasn't grabbing *.*, dunno
what made that happen. What you said made me think Hey, there was
something in the man pages about starting services, I figured I ought
test that out. So I did:




Pre-Jail process/netstat:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:52:14 (0) /usr/ports   ps -A | grep syslog
2952  ??  Ss 0:00.08 /usr/sbin/syslogd -b 192.168.1.84
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:52:17 (0) /usr/ports   ps -A | grep send
5489  p2  S+ 0:00.00 grep send
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:52:25 (0) /usr/ports   ps -A | grep name
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:52:29 (0) /usr/ports   ps -A | grep inet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:52:31 (0) /usr/ports   ps -A | grep ssh
2474  ??  Is 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/sshd
5498  p2  R+ 0:00.00 grep ssh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:51:08 (0) ~   netstat -f inet -a; netstat -f inet6 -a
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address  Foreign Address(state)
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.53971 nz-in-f83.google.http  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.57400 oam-d17a.blue.ao.aol   ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.56522 205.188.7.124.aol  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.50267 py-in-f83.google.http  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.ssh   *.*LISTEN
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.53732 ar-in-f83.google.http  ESTABLISHED
udp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.syslog*.*




starting jail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:52:50 (0) /usr/ports   jail /jail/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 192.168.1.85 /bin/sh /etc/rc
Loading configuration files.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting hostname: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating and/or trimming log files:.
ln: /dev/log: Operation not permitted
Starting syslogd.
ELF ldconfig path: /lib /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat
a.out ldconfig path: /usr/lib/aout /usr/lib/compat/aout
Clearing /tmp (X related).
Starting local daemons:.
Updating motd.
Starting sshd.
Starting cron.
Local package initialization:.

Sat Feb 24 07:54:40 UTC 2007



Jailed port/binding list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:54:05 (0) ~   netstat -f inet -a; netstat -f inet6 -a
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address  Foreign Address(state)
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.85.smtp  *.*LISTEN
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.85.ssh   *.*LISTEN
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.58735 nz-in-f83.google.http  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.57400 oam-d17a.blue.ao.aol   ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.56522 205.188.7.124.aol  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.50267 py-in-f83.google.http  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.ssh   *.*LISTEN
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.53732 ar-in-f83.google.http  ESTABLISHED
udp4   0  0  192.168.1.85.syslog*.*
udp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.syslog*.*



Issue not confused, but it did give me some try this tests.
Unfortunately I still cant connect to anything outside of the jail,
not even to the host.
SSHing into jail does not work, into host does.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:54:40 (0) /usr/ports   jail /jail/ legolas 92.168.1.85 
/bin/csh
%ssh -x 192.168.1.84
^C

And as a last test I should have thought of before:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:59:13 (0) /usr/ports   sysctl 
security.jail.allow_raw_sockets
security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:59:26 (0) /usr/ports   jail /jail/ legolas 92.168.1.85 
/bin/csh
%ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
^C
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
%ifconfig
nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
   ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
   media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
   status: active
plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384


oh, and for testing purposes, I unhid everything in /jail/dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08:04:20 (0) /usr/ports   devfs rule -s 666 show
100 path acd* hide
200 path ad10* hide
300 path audio* hide
400 path dsp* hide
500 path apm* hide
600 path dev* hide
700 path geom* hide
800 path kmem* hide
900 path mem* hide
1000 path nfs* hide
1100 path pci* hide
1200 path nvidia* hide
1300 path snd* hide
1400 path sysmouse* hide
1500 path ukbd0* hide
1600 path usb* hide
1700 path ums* hide
1800 path net* mode 755
1900 path ata* hide
2000 path atkbd* hide
2100 path kbd* hide
2200 path fd* hide
2300 path fid* hide
2400 path net* mode 777
2500 path show
2600 path * unhide



Still no luck. Thanks everyone for all the help, hopefully this is
enough information to indicate the problem.

-Jim Stapleton








sockstat (referenced at the end of the netstat man page) will show you
process names/ports.

To get any given service to work inside the jail, that IP:Port must
not be bound anywhere else, but it must be bound 

Re: problems with jail

2007-02-24 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Jim Stapleton wrote:
 
 Issue not confused, but it did give me some try this tests.
 Unfortunately I still cant connect to anything outside of the jail,
 not even to the host.
 SSHing into jail does not work, into host does.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:54:40 (0) /usr/ports   jail /jail/ legolas 92.168.1.85
 /bin/csh
 %ssh -x 192.168.1.84
 ^C
 
 And as a last test I should have thought of before:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:59:13 (0) /usr/ports   sysctl
 security.jail.allow_raw_sockets
 security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:59:26 (0) /usr/ports   jail /jail/ legolas 92.168.1.85
 /bin/csh
 %ping 127.0.0.1
 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
 ^C

There is missing a 1 in front of 92.168.1.85

If you do ifconfig inside the jail and you don't see the ipaddr. of the
jail configured on any of the network interfaces, you did something
wrong. Either forgot to configure the ipaddr. or used the wrong in the
jail command.

greetings,
philipp

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-24 Thread Jim Stapleton

Thank you, that fixed it.

After all the other stuff (some of which also had it broke), it was a 1...
ARGH!

Thanks again, I am now the proud owner of a shiny new jail to put all
my processes behind bars inside of.

:-)

On 2/24/07, Philipp Wuensche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jim Stapleton wrote:

 Issue not confused, but it did give me some try this tests.
 Unfortunately I still cant connect to anything outside of the jail,
 not even to the host.
 SSHing into jail does not work, into host does.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:54:40 (0) /usr/ports   jail /jail/ legolas 92.168.1.85
 /bin/csh
 %ssh -x 192.168.1.84
 ^C

 And as a last test I should have thought of before:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:59:13 (0) /usr/ports   sysctl
 security.jail.allow_raw_sockets
 security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:59:26 (0) /usr/ports   jail /jail/ legolas 92.168.1.85
 /bin/csh
 %ping 127.0.0.1
 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
 ^C

There is missing a 1 in front of 92.168.1.85

If you do ifconfig inside the jail and you don't see the ipaddr. of the
jail configured on any of the network interfaces, you did something
wrong. Either forgot to configure the ipaddr. or used the wrong in the
jail command.

greetings,
philipp



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

Thank you, it still did not connect using that. The mail server is a
SMTP server. Also I copied over my host's resolve.conf file.

With all these hassles/headaches, would it be better/more secure for
me to settup Bochs or QEmu running a virtual BSD server?

Thanks,
-Jim Stapleton

On 2/23/07, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:49:25AM +, Jim Stapleton wrote:
 oops, did a reply instead of reply all, sorry.

 My question was what's the best way to test net connectivity in jail,
 csup?, and i did try csup (using a copy of my standard ports
 supfile), it failed:

 %csup -g -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports
 Parsing supfile /etc/supfile-ports
 Connecting to cvsup12.FreeBSD.org
 Name lookup failure for cvsup12.FreeBSD.org: hostname nor servname
 provided, or not known
 Will retry at 20:52:12

You need to set up the jail's /etc/resolv.conf to query a suitable
DNS. If you want to check connectivity from within the jail to out,
you could always telnet mail-server-ip 25. To check connectivity in,
you could try enabling the jail's sendmail server...

Hope this helps.
--
Jonathan Chen  |  To do is to be  -- Nietzsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |  To be is to do  -- Sartre
   |  Scooby do be do -- Scooby


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jeff Palmer

At 08:22 PM 2/22/2007, you wrote:

I'd like to get Apache running in jail, but I can't seem to get
network working in jail.
..snip..
Anyway, when I go to jail, running csh (as root) in jail, I try/get:
   %ping 192.168.1.1
   ping: socket: Operation not permitted


You can't ping from a jail unless you set the 
security.jail.allow_raw_sockets sysctl on the host OS.


- Jeff


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 02:49 schrieb Jim Stapleton:
 oops, did a reply instead of reply all, sorry.

 My question was what's the best way to test net connectivity in jail,
 csup?, and i did try csup (using a copy of my standard ports

For ping (and other ICMP tools etc.) you have to change the following on the 
host:
'sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1'
See the man (8) jail for more info!

Greetings,

-Harry

 supfile), it failed:

 %csup -g -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports
 Parsing supfile /etc/supfile-ports
 Connecting to cvsup12.FreeBSD.org
 Name lookup failure for cvsup12.FreeBSD.org: hostname nor servname
 provided, or not known
 Will retry at 20:52:12


 I'm only using one jail (it'll run apache, mysql and possibly sftp)

 Thanks,
 -Jim Stapleton

 On 2/23/07, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:22:53AM +, Jim Stapleton wrote:
   I'd like to get Apache running in jail, but I can't seem to get
   network working in jail.
 
  [...]
 
   Anyway, when I go to jail, running csh (as root) in jail, I try/get:
  %ping 192.168.1.1
  ping: socket: Operation not permitted
 
  This is normal. You can't ping out from a jail. If you're going to
  manage several jails on a box, I would suggest you try the ezjail
  port.
 
  Cheers.
  --
  Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ---
  I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by
  - Douglas Adams

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
OmniSEC  -  UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher
Harald Schmalzbauer
Flintsbacher Str. 3
80686 München
+49 (0) 89 18947781
+49 (0) 160 93860101
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

Thank you, that's at least useful testing, but it did not work. Jail
is definetly not getting any network action.

Would a host netstat output be useful? I looks pretty cryptic.

Thanks,
-Jim Stapleton


On 2/23/07, Jeff Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

At 08:22 PM 2/22/2007, you wrote:
I'd like to get Apache running in jail, but I can't seem to get
network working in jail.
..snip..
Anyway, when I go to jail, running csh (as root) in jail, I try/get:
%ping 192.168.1.1
ping: socket: Operation not permitted

You can't ping from a jail unless you set the
security.jail.allow_raw_sockets sysctl on the host OS.

- Jeff




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Jim Stapleton wrote:
 Thank you, that's at least useful testing, but it did not work. Jail
 is definetly not getting any network action.
 
 Would a host netstat output be useful? I looks pretty cryptic.

Can you please post the output of ifconfig and jls. From your rc.conf it
seems the ipaddr. for the jail is not or wrong configured on your interface.

greetings,
philipp

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:25:00PM +, Jim Stapleton wrote:
 Thank you, it still did not connect using that. The mail server is a
 SMTP server. Also I copied over my host's resolve.conf file.

Hmm. Did you remember to set up the alias entry on your host machine?
What about firewall changes?

 With all these hassles/headaches, would it be better/more secure for
 me to settup Bochs or QEmu running a virtual BSD server?

Dunno. I don't use those tools. My jail setup sent surprisingly smooth
when I did it.
-- 
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We laugh in the face of danger, we drop icecubes down the vest of fear
 - Edmond Blackadder III
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

Jail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:11 (0) ~   sudo jail /jail/ legolas 192.168.1.85 
/bin/csh
%telnet 192.168.1.4 25
Trying 192.168.1.4...
^Z
Suspended
%kill %1
[1]Terminatedtelnet 192.168.1.4 25
%ifconfig -a
nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
   ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
   media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
   status: active
plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384


OK, from host:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:02:11 (0) ~   ifconfig -a
nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
   inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
   ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
   media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
   status: active
plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
   inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
   inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
   inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:08 (0) ~   jls
  JID  IP Address  Hostname  Path
1  192.168.1.85legolas   /jail



Is that what you needed

Thanks,
-Jim Stapleton


Jim Stapleton wrote:
 Thank you, that's at least useful testing, but it did not work. Jail
 is definetly not getting any network action.

 Would a host netstat output be useful? I looks pretty cryptic.

Can you please post the output of ifconfig and jls. From your rc.conf it
seems the ipaddr. for the jail is not or wrong configured on your interface.

greetings,
philipp

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 20:07 schrieb Jim Stapleton:
 Jail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:11 (0) ~   sudo jail /jail/ legolas 192.168.1.85
 /bin/csh %telnet 192.168.1.4 25
 Trying 192.168.1.4...
 ^Z
 Suspended
 %kill %1
 [1]Terminatedtelnet 192.168.1.4 25
 %ifconfig -a
 nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active
 plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384


 OK, from host:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:02:11 (0) ~   ifconfig -a
 nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
 ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active

You are missing ifconfig_nve0_alias0=192.168.1.85/32 in rc.conf.
The host hast to have the ip of a jail, network stak is not virtualized (yet?)

-Harry

 plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:08 (0) ~   jls
JID  IP Address  Hostname  Path
  1  192.168.1.85legolas   /jail



 Is that what you needed

 Thanks,
 -Jim Stapleton

  Jim Stapleton wrote:
   Thank you, that's at least useful testing, but it did not work. Jail
   is definetly not getting any network action.
  
   Would a host netstat output be useful? I looks pretty cryptic.
 
  Can you please post the output of ifconfig and jls. From your rc.conf it
  seems the ipaddr. for the jail is not or wrong configured on your
  interface.
 
  greetings,
  philipp

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
OmniSEC  -  UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher
Harald Schmalzbauer
Flintsbacher Str. 3
80686 München
+49 (0) 89 18947781
+49 (0) 160 93860101
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jeff Palmer

At 02:07 PM 2/23/2007, Jim Stapleton wrote:

Jail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:11 (0) ~   sudo jail /jail/ legolas 192.168.1.85 
/bin/csh
%telnet 192.168.1.4 25


..snip..


[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:02:11 (0) ~   ifconfig -a
nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
   inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
   ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
   media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
   status: active
plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
   inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
   inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
   inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:08 (0) ~   jls
  JID  IP Address  Hostname  Path
1  192.168.1.85legolas   /jail



Is that what you needed

Thanks,
-Jim Stapleton


I don't see where you have 192.168.1.85 as an alias on the host OS.


ifconfig nve0 alias 192.168.1.85 netmask 255.255.255.255

then launch the jail

- Jeff 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

Nope, I didn't. I fixed that. It now doesn't give me an error, but at
the same time I still don't get incoming/outgoing network traffick:

(after turning on the variable to allow raw sockets - note: telnet to
my mailserver IP doesn't work either.):


jail /jail/ legolas 92.168.1.85 /bin/csh

%ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
%exit
exit





On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:25:00PM +, Jim Stapleton wrote:
 Thank you, it still did not connect using that. The mail server is a
 SMTP server. Also I copied over my host's resolve.conf file.

Hmm. Did you remember to set up the alias entry on your host machine?
What about firewall changes?

 With all these hassles/headaches, would it be better/more secure for
 me to settup Bochs or QEmu running a virtual BSD server?

Dunno. I don't use those tools. My jail setup sent surprisingly smooth
when I did it.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Jim Stapleton wrote:
 Jail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:11 (0) ~   sudo jail /jail/ legolas 192.168.1.85
 /bin/csh
 %telnet 192.168.1.4 25
 Trying 192.168.1.4...
 ^Z
 Suspended
 %kill %1
 [1]Terminatedtelnet 192.168.1.4 25
 %ifconfig -a
 nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
 plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
 
 
 OK, from host:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:02:11 (0) ~   ifconfig -a
 nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
 plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:08 (0) ~   jls
   JID  IP Address  Hostname  Path
 1  192.168.1.85legolas   /jail
 
 
 
 Is that what you needed

You only have configured the 192.168.1.84 ipaddr on your nve0 interface,
you need to configure the 192.168.1.85 ipaddr. on the interface too.

Delete the

ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0

line in rc.conf and replace it with

ipv4_addrs_nve0=192.168.1.84-85/24

and do a reboot. If you don't want to reboot, use ifconfig nve0 alias
192.168.1.85/32 to configure the alias while the system is running.

You could also use the jail_example_interface=nve0 option in rc.conf
and reboot, but I don't recommend that because it is somewhat broken and
poorly implemented.

greetings,
philipp


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

new host rc.conf:

hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
#ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
ipv4_addrs_nve0=192.168.1.84-85/24 netmask 255.255.255.0
defaultrouter=192.168.1.1
#ifconfig_nve0=DHCP
usbd_enable=YES
linux_enable=YES
sshd_enable=YES

sendmail_enable=NO
inetd_flags=-wW -a 192.168.1.84
rpcbind_enable=NO


attempts after rebooting still fail.


The jail rc.conf:
#hostname=legolas.ameritech.net
#ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.85 netmask 255.255.255.0
#defaultrouter=192.168.1.1
rpcbind_enable=NO
ifconfig_nve0=


I have tried this with both the above setup, and one setup commenting
out the ifconfig_nve0= line, and uncommenting the other
ifconfig_nve0/defaultrouter lines (just in case I misread something).
Neither worked.

Thanks
-Jim Stapleton



On 2/23/07, Philipp Wuensche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jim Stapleton wrote:
 Jail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:11 (0) ~   sudo jail /jail/ legolas 192.168.1.85
 /bin/csh
 %telnet 192.168.1.4 25
 Trying 192.168.1.4...
 ^Z
 Suspended
 %kill %1
 [1]Terminatedtelnet 192.168.1.4 25
 %ifconfig -a
 nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
 plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384


 OK, from host:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:02:11 (0) ~   ifconfig -a
 nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
 plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:08 (0) ~   jls
   JID  IP Address  Hostname  Path
 1  192.168.1.85legolas   /jail



 Is that what you needed

You only have configured the 192.168.1.84 ipaddr on your nve0 interface,
you need to configure the 192.168.1.85 ipaddr. on the interface too.

Delete the

ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0

line in rc.conf and replace it with

ipv4_addrs_nve0=192.168.1.84-85/24

and do a reboot. If you don't want to reboot, use ifconfig nve0 alias
192.168.1.85/32 to configure the alias while the system is running.

You could also use the jail_example_interface=nve0 option in rc.conf
and reboot, but I don't recommend that because it is somewhat broken and
poorly implemented.

greetings,
philipp




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jeff Palmer

At 02:38 PM 2/23/2007, Jim Stapleton wrote:

new host rc.conf:

hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
#ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
ipv4_addrs_nve0=192.168.1.84-85/24 netmask 255.255.255.0
defaultrouter=192.168.1.1
#ifconfig_nve0=DHCP
usbd_enable=YES
linux_enable=YES
sshd_enable=YES

sendmail_enable=NO
inetd_flags=-wW -a 192.168.1.84
rpcbind_enable=NO



Jim:  try the following:

hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig_nve0_alias0=192.168.1.85 netmask 255.255.255.255
defaultrouter=192.168.1.1
#ifconfig_nve0=DHCP
usbd_enable=YES
linux_enable=YES
sshd_enable=YES

- Jeff

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

It still does not function. I noticed the netmask and broadcast do not
look right, could this be it?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 16:26:28 (0) ~   ifconfig
nve0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
   inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
   inet 192.168.1.85 netmask 0x broadcast 192.168.1.85
   ether 00:13:d4:2e:2f:62
   media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
   status: active
plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
   inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
   inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
   inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00



On 2/23/07, Jeff Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

At 02:38 PM 2/23/2007, Jim Stapleton wrote:
new host rc.conf:

hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
#ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
ipv4_addrs_nve0=192.168.1.84-85/24 netmask 255.255.255.0
defaultrouter=192.168.1.1
#ifconfig_nve0=DHCP
usbd_enable=YES
linux_enable=YES
sshd_enable=YES

sendmail_enable=NO
inetd_flags=-wW -a 192.168.1.84
rpcbind_enable=NO


Jim:  try the following:

hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig_nve0_alias0=192.168.1.85 netmask 255.255.255.255
defaultrouter=192.168.1.1
#ifconfig_nve0=DHCP
usbd_enable=YES
linux_enable=YES
sshd_enable=YES

- Jeff



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Jim Stapleton wrote:
 new host rc.conf:
 
 hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
 #ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
 ipv4_addrs_nve0=192.168.1.84-85/24 netmask 255.255.255.0

/24 is already the netmask.

Can you ping the ipaddr. from another host in your network?

greetings,
philipp

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

yes, I can ping it from this machine, other machines and jail.

Going on that line, I tried to ssh to it, and I got into the host
system. My problem is in the sshd config I think then? I'm pretty sure
there are no other daemons running on this system...

Oh, I guess I have devd and usbd, they shouldn't be causing issues:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20:05:26 (0) ~   ps -A | grep -e 'd$'
 484  ??  Is 0:00.01 /sbin/devd
 648  ??  Ss 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/usbd
 699  ??  Is 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/sshd
1930  ??  Is 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/moused -p /dev/ums0 -t auto -I
/var/run/moused.ums0.pid
1957  ??  Ss 0:00.09 /usr/sbin/moused -p /dev/ums1 -t auto -I
/var/run/moused.ums1.pid


Thanks,
-Jim Stapleton

On 2/23/07, Philipp Wuensche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jim Stapleton wrote:
 new host rc.conf:

 hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
 #ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
 ipv4_addrs_nve0=192.168.1.84-85/24 netmask 255.255.255.0

/24 is already the netmask.

Can you ping the ipaddr. from another host in your network?

greetings,
philipp



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Am Samstag, 24. Februar 2007 02:06 schrieb Jim Stapleton:
 yes, I can ping it from this machine, other machines and jail.

 Going on that line, I tried to ssh to it, and I got into the host
 system. My problem is in the sshd config I think then? I'm pretty sure

Please, read man (8) jail.
All your pitfalls are very well explained!

 there are no other daemons running on this system...

 Oh, I guess I have devd and usbd, they shouldn't be causing issues:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20:05:26 (0) ~   ps -A | grep -e 'd$'
   484  ??  Is 0:00.01 /sbin/devd
   648  ??  Ss 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/usbd
   699  ??  Is 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/sshd
  1930  ??  Is 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/moused -p /dev/ums0 -t auto -I
 /var/run/moused.ums0.pid
  1957  ??  Ss 0:00.09 /usr/sbin/moused -p /dev/ums1 -t auto -I
 /var/run/moused.ums1.pid


 Thanks,
 -Jim Stapleton

 On 2/23/07, Philipp Wuensche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Jim Stapleton wrote:
   new host rc.conf:
  
   hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
   #ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
   ipv4_addrs_nve0=192.168.1.84-85/24 netmask 255.255.255.0
 
  /24 is already the netmask.
 
  Can you ping the ipaddr. from another host in your network?
 
  greetings,
  philipp

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
OmniSEC  -  UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher
Harald Schmalzbauer
Flintsbacher Str. 3
80686 München
+49 (0) 89 18947781
+49 (0) 160 93860101
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

I saw them in there, but that section seemed to be lacking in what I
needed to do... I admit I missed the alias until someone reminded me.

by lacking I mean:
   To configure sshd(8), it is necessary to modify /etc/ssh/sshd_config.

doesn't tell me what I need to change, and I couldn't find the answer
in the docs about sshd. I assume that having the listen port set to
192.168.1.84 should be sufficient, but that doesn't fix the problem

OK, I didn't bother editing sendmail and named's files, I thought the suggested:
sendmail_enable=NO
would keep it from starting. I did turn off sendmail, but that didn't
fix the problem. named is not running, and hasn't run on this machine.

and I did read the jail man page, I'm still stuck.

-Jim Stapleton

On 2/24/07, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Am Samstag, 24. Februar 2007 02:06 schrieb Jim Stapleton:
 yes, I can ping it from this machine, other machines and jail.

 Going on that line, I tried to ssh to it, and I got into the host
 system. My problem is in the sshd config I think then? I'm pretty sure

Please, read man (8) jail.
All your pitfalls are very well explained!

 there are no other daemons running on this system...

 Oh, I guess I have devd and usbd, they shouldn't be causing issues:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20:05:26 (0) ~   ps -A | grep -e 'd$'
   484  ??  Is 0:00.01 /sbin/devd
   648  ??  Ss 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/usbd
   699  ??  Is 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/sshd
  1930  ??  Is 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/moused -p /dev/ums0 -t auto -I
 /var/run/moused.ums0.pid
  1957  ??  Ss 0:00.09 /usr/sbin/moused -p /dev/ums1 -t auto -I
 /var/run/moused.ums1.pid


 Thanks,
 -Jim Stapleton

 On 2/23/07, Philipp Wuensche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Jim Stapleton wrote:
   new host rc.conf:
  
   hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
   #ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
   ipv4_addrs_nve0=192.168.1.84-85/24 netmask 255.255.255.0
 
  /24 is already the netmask.
 
  Can you ping the ipaddr. from another host in your network?
 
  greetings,
  philipp

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
OmniSEC  -  UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher
Harald Schmalzbauer
Flintsbacher Str. 3
80686 München
+49 (0) 89 18947781
+49 (0) 160 93860101


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

I did the ssh after you did the previous mail, but it didn't fix the problem.

I'm not having problems senmail or named, they were simply mentioned
in the man page. I never had named running, and I didn't realize
sendmail was running. The latter was my problem with sendmail. That
problem as I said is fixed. Beyond that I don't even know which
process on my system are daemons at this point, except usbd and devd,
neither of which (to my knowledge) should be listening to any sockets.
Actually there are a couple of kernel processes (pagedaemon, vmdaemon,
and bufdaemon), but I don't know where to find documentation on them,
X, and KDM. I can't find anything on limiting sockets of these to a
specific IP only.

-Jim STapleton

On 2/24/07, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Am Samstag, 24. Februar 2007 04:01 schrieben Sie:
 I saw them in there, but that section seemed to be lacking in what I
 needed to do... I admit I missed the alias until someone reminded me.

 by lacking I mean:
  To configure sshd(8), it is necessary to modify /etc/ssh/sshd_config.

 doesn't tell me what I need to change, and I couldn't find the answer
 in the docs about sshd. I assume that having the listen port set to
 192.168.1.84 should be sufficient, but that doesn't fix the problem

Well, have you sighuped sshd? If you have ListenAddress 192.168.1.84
in /etc/ssh/sshd_config (and sighuped/restarted sshd) it's impossible that it
answers connections to 192.168.1.85

 OK, I didn't bother editing sendmail and named's files, I thought the
 suggested: sendmail_enable=NO
 would keep it from starting. I did turn off sendmail, but that didn't
 fix the problem. named is not running, and hasn't run on this machine.

What problems do you have with named and sendmail?
If you don't need them don't care about, just keep them disabled.

You have to limit listening sockets of all daemons running on the host system.
That's all.

Best regards,

-Harry

--
OmniSEC  -  UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher
Harald Schmalzbauer
Flintsbacher Str. 3
80686 München
+49 (0) 89 18947781
+49 (0) 160 93860101


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Am Samstag, 24. Februar 2007 04:21 schrieb Jim Stapleton:
 I did the ssh after you did the previous mail, but it didn't fix the
 problem.

 I'm not having problems senmail or named, they were simply mentioned
 in the man page. I never had named running, and I didn't realize
 sendmail was running. The latter was my problem with sendmail. That
 problem as I said is fixed. Beyond that I don't even know which
 process on my system are daemons at this point, except usbd and devd,
 neither of which (to my knowledge) should be listening to any sockets.
 Actually there are a couple of kernel processes (pagedaemon, vmdaemon,
 and bufdaemon), but I don't know where to find documentation on them,
 X, and KDM. I can't find anything on limiting sockets of these to a
 specific IP only.

To see what daemons are listening you can use 'netstat -f inet -a'. Then you 
see if you have to limit some other daemons (use -f inet6 for IPv6 if 
configured).

Please post the output of the command above to see why you get ssh connections 
to your jail IP answered by the host's ssh daemon.

-Harry

-- 
OmniSEC  -  UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher
Harald Schmalzbauer
Flintsbacher Str. 3
80686 München
+49 (0) 89 18947781
+49 (0) 160 93860101
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

OK, I have a fairly sizeable list, but it looks like most stuff is
bound to 192.168.1.84 except two things, one is closed, and the other
is syslog (guess I have to look at it's man page). It also looks like
there is something else there. I guess I'll be looking at the netstat
man page to figure out how to get the name of the daemon touch it:

 netstat -f inet -a; netstat -f inet6 -a
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address  Foreign Address(state)
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.57256 ar-in-f18.google.http  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.62237 caim-m05b.blue.a.aol   TIME_WAIT
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.58627 oam-d17a.blue.ao.aol   TIME_WAIT
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.64265 205.188.7.124.aol  TIME_WAIT
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.ssh   *.*LISTEN
tcp4   0  0  *.**.*CLOSED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.61774 ar-in-f19.google.http  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.53732 ar-in-f83.google.http  ESTABLISHED
udp4   0  0  *.syslog   *.*
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address  Foreign Address(state)
udp6   0  0  *.syslog   *.*



On 2/24/07, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Am Samstag, 24. Februar 2007 04:21 schrieb Jim Stapleton:
 I did the ssh after you did the previous mail, but it didn't fix the
 problem.

 I'm not having problems senmail or named, they were simply mentioned
 in the man page. I never had named running, and I didn't realize
 sendmail was running. The latter was my problem with sendmail. That
 problem as I said is fixed. Beyond that I don't even know which
 process on my system are daemons at this point, except usbd and devd,
 neither of which (to my knowledge) should be listening to any sockets.
 Actually there are a couple of kernel processes (pagedaemon, vmdaemon,
 and bufdaemon), but I don't know where to find documentation on them,
 X, and KDM. I can't find anything on limiting sockets of these to a
 specific IP only.

To see what daemons are listening you can use 'netstat -f inet -a'. Then you
see if you have to limit some other daemons (use -f inet6 for IPv6 if
configured).

Please post the output of the command above to see why you get ssh connections
to your jail IP answered by the host's ssh daemon.

-Harry

--
OmniSEC  -  UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher
Harald Schmalzbauer
Flintsbacher Str. 3
80686 München
+49 (0) 89 18947781
+49 (0) 160 93860101


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Stapleton

addendum, I fixed syslogd by adding this to my rc.conf:
syslogd_flags=-b 192.168.1.84

However, looking through netstat's man page, I couldn't find the name
of the flag (if it exists) that will show the process name. Does that
require a different tool?

Thank you,
-Jim Stapleton



On 2/24/07, Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OK, I have a fairly sizeable list, but it looks like most stuff is
bound to 192.168.1.84 except two things, one is closed, and the other
is syslog (guess I have to look at it's man page). It also looks like
there is something else there. I guess I'll be looking at the netstat
man page to figure out how to get the name of the daemon touch it:

  netstat -f inet -a; netstat -f inet6 -a
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address  Foreign Address(state)
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.57256 ar-in-f18.google.http  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.62237 caim-m05b.blue.a.aol   TIME_WAIT
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.58627 oam-d17a.blue.ao.aol   TIME_WAIT
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.64265 205.188.7.124.aol  TIME_WAIT
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.ssh   *.*LISTEN
tcp4   0  0  *.**.*CLOSED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.61774 ar-in-f19.google.http  ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  192.168.1.84.53732 ar-in-f83.google.http  ESTABLISHED
udp4   0  0  *.syslog   *.*
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address  Foreign Address(state)
udp6   0  0  *.syslog   *.*



On 2/24/07, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Am Samstag, 24. Februar 2007 04:21 schrieb Jim Stapleton:
  I did the ssh after you did the previous mail, but it didn't fix the
  problem.
 
  I'm not having problems senmail or named, they were simply mentioned
  in the man page. I never had named running, and I didn't realize
  sendmail was running. The latter was my problem with sendmail. That
  problem as I said is fixed. Beyond that I don't even know which
  process on my system are daemons at this point, except usbd and devd,
  neither of which (to my knowledge) should be listening to any sockets.
  Actually there are a couple of kernel processes (pagedaemon, vmdaemon,
  and bufdaemon), but I don't know where to find documentation on them,
  X, and KDM. I can't find anything on limiting sockets of these to a
  specific IP only.

 To see what daemons are listening you can use 'netstat -f inet -a'. Then you
 see if you have to limit some other daemons (use -f inet6 for IPv6 if
 configured).

 Please post the output of the command above to see why you get ssh connections
 to your jail IP answered by the host's ssh daemon.

 -Harry

 --
 OmniSEC  -  UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher
 Harald Schmalzbauer
 Flintsbacher Str. 3
 80686 München
 +49 (0) 89 18947781
 +49 (0) 160 93860101



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


problems with jail

2007-02-22 Thread Jim Stapleton

I'd like to get Apache running in jail, but I can't seem to get
network working in jail.

I followed the instructions in the man page for jail so far, breating
the world install in my jail directory (/jail), which is the only BSD
partition on the drive (ad8s3d, ad8s3b is swap, and ad8s3c is that
weird partition chunk that always appears after a swap chunk).

In doing this I should be able to remove the main system disk from the
devfs in the jail, which seemed to be a good idea. But I hadn't gotten
that far yet...

Regardless, I didn't squash out any devices just yet with devfs,
instead, I ensure any 'net*' device had mode 755 (basic jail test,
ping the tail on the router), an modified the rc.conf files as the
manual page suggested.

Anyway, when I go to jail, running csh (as root) in jail, I try/get:
   %ping 192.168.1.1
   ping: socket: Operation not permitted

from my normal system prompt (out of jail):
 ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=150 time=0.489 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=150 time=0.468 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=150 time=0.465 ms
...



I figure I messed something up pretty oddy for this not to work.
System:
FreeBSD 6.2 i386
CSUP run 2007-02-10
Ports [and their required deps] installed
x11/xorg, x11/kde3, editors/xemacs, editors/openoffice.org-2,
editors/nano, editors/pico, x11-wm/WMaker, lang/python25, net-im/gaim,
www/firefox


System rc.conf
hostname=elrond.ameritech.net
ifconfig_nve0=inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0
defaultrouter=192.168.1.1
#ifconfig_nve0=DHCP
usbd_enable=YES
linux_enable=YES
sshd_enable=YES
sendmail_enable=NO
inetd_flags=-wW -a 192.168.1.84
rpcbind_enable=NO


jail rc.conf
rpcbind_enable=NO
#I had the nve0 interface setup with 192.168.1.85 and with  assigned
to it also


jail command (run from root for testing purposes only - I'll narrow it
down to a less privledged host/jailed system user later)
jail /jail/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 192.168.1.85 /bin/csh

The machine was rebooted since I set everything up.


Thank you,
-Jim Stapleton
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-22 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:22:53AM +, Jim Stapleton wrote:
 I'd like to get Apache running in jail, but I can't seem to get
 network working in jail.
 

[...]
 Anyway, when I go to jail, running csh (as root) in jail, I try/get:
%ping 192.168.1.1
ping: socket: Operation not permitted

This is normal. You can't ping out from a jail. If you're going to
manage several jails on a box, I would suggest you try the ezjail
port.

Cheers.
-- 
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by
- Douglas Adams
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-22 Thread Jim Stapleton

oops, did a reply instead of reply all, sorry.

My question was what's the best way to test net connectivity in jail,
csup?, and i did try csup (using a copy of my standard ports
supfile), it failed:

%csup -g -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports
Parsing supfile /etc/supfile-ports
Connecting to cvsup12.FreeBSD.org
Name lookup failure for cvsup12.FreeBSD.org: hostname nor servname
provided, or not known
Will retry at 20:52:12


I'm only using one jail (it'll run apache, mysql and possibly sftp)

Thanks,
-Jim Stapleton


On 2/23/07, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:22:53AM +, Jim Stapleton wrote:
 I'd like to get Apache running in jail, but I can't seem to get
 network working in jail.


[...]
 Anyway, when I go to jail, running csh (as root) in jail, I try/get:
%ping 192.168.1.1
ping: socket: Operation not permitted

This is normal. You can't ping out from a jail. If you're going to
manage several jails on a box, I would suggest you try the ezjail
port.

Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by
- Douglas Adams


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-22 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:49:25AM +, Jim Stapleton wrote:
 oops, did a reply instead of reply all, sorry.
 
 My question was what's the best way to test net connectivity in jail,
 csup?, and i did try csup (using a copy of my standard ports
 supfile), it failed:
 
 %csup -g -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports
 Parsing supfile /etc/supfile-ports
 Connecting to cvsup12.FreeBSD.org
 Name lookup failure for cvsup12.FreeBSD.org: hostname nor servname
 provided, or not known
 Will retry at 20:52:12

You need to set up the jail's /etc/resolv.conf to query a suitable
DNS. If you want to check connectivity from within the jail to out,
you could always telnet mail-server-ip 25. To check connectivity in,
you could try enabling the jail's sendmail server...

Hope this helps.
-- 
Jonathan Chen  |  To do is to be  -- Nietzsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |  To be is to do  -- Sartre 
   |  Scooby do be do -- Scooby
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problems with jail

2007-02-22 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:49:25AM +, Jim Stapleton wrote:

[...]
 I'm only using one jail (it'll run apache, mysql and possibly sftp)

The reason why I'm using ezjail to manage multiple jails is that each
jail only provides *one* external service, to minimise effects from
intrusion/breakage.

Cheers.
-- 
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
If you wish your merit to be known, acknowledge that of other people
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Still a few problems in jail

2002-12-05 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hey,
Using (FreeBSD 4.7-Release)
It takes considerably long to login from a workstation to a jailed ssh
server or sometimes I even can't login.
The login: appears, and then Sent username 'xyz' and then nothing
happens or after 20 or even far more seconds I can enter my password!

For information: login in from a workstation with ssh on the host itself
causes no problems!

The only option in the jail sshd_config file which is set, is the
ListenAddress which has the ip address of the jail!

As you can see below there are problems with timeout.

(Some comments on the other errors opensocket_f bind etc.. Are
welcomed!! I replaced the original ip address with jail_ip_address,
I'm also running bind in a sandbox see the previous posting in the list
with the titel Jail problems)

I have deleted the /var/log/messages and rebooted this is the output
after a fresh reboot!
%tail /var/log/messages
Dec  5 20:15:46 dns named[321]: not listening on any interfaces
Dec  5 20:15:46 dns named[321]: opensocket_f:
bind([jail_ip_address].53): Address already in use
Dec  5 20:15:46 dns named[321]: opensocket_f:
bind([jail_ip_address].53): Address already in use
Dec  5 20:15:46 dns sshd[331]: error: Bind to port 22 on jail_ip_address
failed: Address already in use.
Dec  5 20:15:46 dns sshd[331]: fatal: Cannot bind any address.
Dec  5 20:15:46 dns syslogd: exiting on signal 15
Dec  5 20:16:55 dns named[198]: starting (/etc/named.conf).  named
8.3.3-REL Wed Dec  4 09:59:37 CET 2002
xyz@xyz:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named
Dec  5 20:16:55 dns named[198]: limit files set to fdlimit (1024)
Dec  5 20:16:55 dns named[199]: Ready to answer queries.
Dec  5 20:17:44 dns sshd[237]: fatal: Timeout before authentication for
my_pc_somewhere

Here is rc.conf from the jail:
hostname=x.y.z
portmap_enable=NO
network_interface=
sshd_enable=YES
sendmail_enable=NONE
syslog_enable=YES
syslogd_flags=-ss -l /etc/namedb/dev/log
named_enable=YES
named_flags=-u bind -g bind -t /etc/namedb /etc/named.conf

Here is sshd_config from the jail:


Many many many thanks for any
Help or comments
didier



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Still a few problems in jail

2002-12-05 Thread Christian Kratzer
Hi,

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Didier Wiroth wrote:

 Hey,
 Using (FreeBSD 4.7-Release)
 It takes considerably long to login from a workstation to a jailed ssh
 server or sometimes I even can't login.
 The login: appears, and then Sent username 'xyz' and then nothing
 happens or after 20 or even far more seconds I can enter my password!
[rest snipped]

you most propably have dns resolution problems in the jail.  
Do you have a correctly setup resolv.conf in your jail ?

Greetings
Christian

-- 
CK Software GmbH
Christian Kratzer,  Schwarzwaldstr. 31, 71131 Jettingen
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone:  +49 7452 889-135Open Software Solutions, Network Security
Fax:+49 7452 889-136FreeBSD spoken here!



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message