On 2006-04-17 17:18, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://users.rcn.com/rneswold/fbsd-init.html#AEN258
>
> I stand corrected. I can still envision problems if tmp files use enough space
> to prevent a memory swap. Running out of swap space is not healthy.
That's why swap-backed /tm
> On Monday 17 April 2006 14:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > > > > > > Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just curious... What are the security reasons? After
> > >
> > > some thought,
> > >
> > > > > > here's what I'm planning on doing...
> > > > > >
> > >
On Monday 17 April 2006 14:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > > > > > Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
> > > > >
> > > > > Just curious... What are the security reasons? After
> >
> > some thought,
> >
> > > > > here's what I'm planning on doing...
> > > > >
> > > > > Disk is 73gb
> > > > > Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
> > > >
> > > > Just curious... What are the security reasons? After
> some thought,
> > > > here's what I'm planning on doing...
> > > >
> > > > Disk is 73gb scsi...
> > > >
> > > > / 500mb
> > > > swap4gb
> > > > /var
> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:21:55 +0930
> From: "Brendan Grossman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: /boot at beginning of drive
> To:
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> > > Whe
On Monday 17 April 2006 13:59, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > > > Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
> > >
> > > Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought,
> > > here's what I'm planning on doing...
> > >
> > > Disk is 73gb scsi...
> > >
> > > / 500mb
> > > sw
On Monday 17 April 2006 16:59, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > > > Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
> > >
> > > Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought,
> > > here's what I'm planning on doing...
> > >
> > > Disk is 73gb scsi...
> > >
> > > / 500mb
> > > sw
>
> > Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
>
> Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought, here's
> what I'm planning on doing...
>
> Disk is 73gb scsi...
>
> / 500mb
> swap 4gb
> /var 4gb
> /usr 4gb
> /home remainder (about 60gb)
>
> then /var/db
> > > Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
> >
> > Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought,
> > here's what I'm planning on doing...
> >
> > Disk is 73gb scsi...
> >
> > / 500mb
> > swap4gb
> > /var4gb
> > /usr4gb
> > /home
On Monday 17 April 2006 16:29, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
>
> Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought, here's
> what I'm planning on doing...
>
> Disk is 73gb scsi...
>
> / 500mb
> swap 4gb
> /var 4gb
> /usr 4gb
> Databases are stored in /var/db for security reasons
Just curious... What are the security reasons? After some thought, here's
what I'm planning on doing...
Disk is 73gb scsi...
/ 500mb
swap4gb
/var4gb
/usr4gb
/home remainder (about 60gb)
then /var/db/mysql -> /home/mysql
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:43:49PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> You should also take a look at the following rc.conf options then:
>
> tmpmfs="AUTO" # Set to YES to always create an mfs /tmp, NO
> to never
> tmpsize="20m" # Size of mfs /tmp if created
> t
On 2006-04-17 06:21, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
It's not a good idea to put everything on the / filesystem.
At a minimum I would have:
/
swap
/var
/usr
Your users will not fill up /var unless you
On Sunday 16 April 2006 13:30, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > Having a separate /tmp slice is not a bad idea, combining /,
> > /usr, and /var is unless you're doing a very minimal install.
>
> I can separate /usr, but my goal is to combine /home and /var, or at least
> where mail and databases are sto
On Sunday 16 April 2006 14:19, Colin Percival wrote:
> Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > Here is my reason for separating /tmp and mounting it
> > noexec,nosuid:
> >
> > http://www.sagonet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2852
>
> Quoth mount(8):
> noexec Do not allow execution of any binaries o
On Sunday 16 April 2006 22:30, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > Having a separate /tmp slice is not a bad idea, combining /,
> > /usr, and /var is unless you're doing a very minimal install.
>
> I can separate /usr, but my goal is to combine /home and /var, or at least
> where mail and databases are sto
> Having a separate /tmp slice is not a bad idea, combining /,
> /usr, and /var is unless you're doing a very minimal install.
I can separate /usr, but my goal is to combine /home and /var, or at least
where mail and databases are stored, for reasons already mentioned.
I suppose I could do this.
Brendan Grossman wrote:
> Here is my reason for separating /tmp and mounting it noexec,nosuid:
>
> http://www.sagonet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2852
Quoth mount(8):
noexec Do not allow execution of any binaries on the mounted
file system. This option is usefu
On Sunday 16 April 2006 21:51, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 6:19 AM
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Cc: Brendan Grossman
> > Subject: Re: /b
On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:51, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 6:19 AM
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Cc: Brendan Grossman
> > Subject: Re: /b
On Sunday 16 April 2006 21:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> I agree that it's not a great idea, but considering the software I'm using,
> user files are stored in /var and /home. I don't know what percentage of
> quotas users will use for emails, databases, or home dirs, and I don't want
> to take a
> -Original Message-
> From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 6:19 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Brendan Grossman
> Subject: Re: /boot at beginning of drive
>
> On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:38, Brendan Grossman
On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:38, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > It's not a good idea to put everything on the / filesystem.
> > At a minimum I would have:
> > /
> > swap
> > /var
> > /usr
> >
> > Your users will not fill up /var unless you allow them
> > unlimited mail, databases or access to root.
>
>
> It's not a good idea to put everything on the / filesystem.
> At a minimum I would have:
> /
> swap
> /var
> /usr
>
> Your users will not fill up /var unless you allow them
> unlimited mail, databases or access to root.
They will have unlimited access up until their quota has been reached. Wh
On Sunday 16 April 2006 11:59, Brendan Grossman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Glenn Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 5:16 AM
> > To: Brendan Grossman; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: /boot at beginning
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 17 April 2006 5:16 AM
> To: Brendan Grossman; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: /boot at beginning of drive
>
> /boot has to be in the / file system.
>
> There'
At 12:40 PM 4/16/2006, Brendan Grossman wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to install FreeBSD with the following partition scheme...
/boot 100mb (50mb too small? Install fails with filesystem full error)
swap 1gb
/tmp 100mb
/ remainder
However after I install and boot, it says it can't find /boot/kernel/
Hello
I'm trying to install FreeBSD with the following partition scheme...
/boot 100mb (50mb too small? Install fails with filesystem full error)
swap 1gb
/tmp 100mb
/ remainder
However after I install and boot, it says it can't find /boot/kernel/kernel
The version is 6.0. Am I missing sometihn
28 matches
Mail list logo