Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following link:
Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Webmaster
___
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to.
> For more information on our business please click on the following link:
> Click here for our website
> We look forward to your continued busines
>When you do decide on your MTA, I'd recommend buying a book which
>documents it.
Oh, definitely. Particularly if you decide on qmail.
R's,
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On 02-02-2011 16:37, Frank Shute wrote:
What I'd also say is that Postfix is probably easier to install and
configure.
Agreed. Postfix is *really* easy and well documented; so much that I've
seen people claim that it "can't be that good" since it's so easy to
configure, with great defaults an
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
>
> thanks in advance
I've used both and both have their advocates/supporters.
I used qmail for about 10 yrs and picked it when basically the choice
was qmail, sendmail and smail.
It
On 2/1/2011 at 8:44 PM Paul Macdonald wrote:
|On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
|>
|> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix,
and
|> pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
|>
|> But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want
it
version i tried. that turns off certain maintainers, and it would
put me
off
aswell
postfix on the other hand is more in tune with the rest of the
system
>
> thanks in advance
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
>> pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
>>
>> But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something
> "Jarrod" == Jarrod Slick writes:
Jarrod> If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would
Jarrod> substantiate your claim I encourage you to inform the project's
Jarrod> maintainers.
In fact, given the legacy of other security tools created by the author
of Postfix (Wietse Vene
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> Calling qmail more secure is pretty much just echoing conjecture at this
> point. Sure, it was designed to be secure (years and years ago) and the
> original author even held a contest with a monetary reward for anyone who
> could find a vuln
Calling qmail more secure is pretty much just echoing conjecture at this
point. Sure, it was designed to be secure (years and years ago) and the
original author even held a contest with a monetary reward for anyone who
could find a vulnerability -- that said, AFAIK that person no longer
maintains
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
qmail is more secure... but the design is just as alien to unix as sendmail is
for example, the fact that qmail uses custom libc, or at least did so on the
version i tried. that turns off certain
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:44:24PM +, Paul Macdonald wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> >
> >No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
> >pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
> >
> >But I've never found postfix without a knob to do
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:44:24 +
Paul Macdonald articulated:
> so for us folks still using sendmail (which works fine for me)
> what benefits do we get with postfix that'd outweigh the hassles of
> changing?
Without knowing your exact configuration and requirements, answering
that question is
On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to
do, and most of the knobs are set properly right out of
> "Outback" == Outback Dingo writes:
>> |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by
>> |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding
>> |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS
>> |world.
>> =
>>
>>
>> I
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
>
> |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
> |Alessandro Baggi articulated:
> |
> |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
> |
> |"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
> |numerous patch
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
>
> |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
> |Alessandro Baggi articulated:
> |
> |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
> |
> |"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
> |numerous patch
On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
|On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
|Alessandro Baggi articulated:
|
|> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
|
|"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
|numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable
standards.
|
|"P
I like qmail, but I would, having written a book about it.
If you want something that works reasonably well out of the
box, I'd use Postfix. If you want something you can tweak to
do whatever you want, qmail is more of a toolkit.
Don't use the version of qmail in ports, it includes way too many
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
Alessandro Baggi articulated:
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable standards.
"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantl
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 09:32, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
>
> thanks in advance
That's a loaded question. Both have advocates, just like "vi or
emacs", "Linux or Nothing", "FreeBSD or OpenBSD", "OS X or Windows"
and "X Window System or CLI".
That said, if
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:40:33 -0600
> "Peter" wrote:
>
>> > I have the following config:
>> >
>> > FreeBSD ppert-zone.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 14
>> > 01:44:13 UTC 2010
>> > r...@canopus.ispsystem.net:/root/src/sys/i386/compile/ISPSYSTEM
>> > i386
>> >
>> > it is a vps runnin
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:40:33 -0600
"Peter" wrote:
> > I have the following config:
> >
> > FreeBSD ppert-zone.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 14
> > 01:44:13 UTC 2010
> > r...@canopus.ispsystem.net:/root/src/sys/i386/compile/ISPSYSTEM
> > i386
> >
> > it is a vps running via a jail.
> I have the following config:
>
> FreeBSD ppert-zone.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 14
> 01:44:13 UTC 2010
> r...@canopus.ispsystem.net:/root/src/sys/i386/compile/ISPSYSTEM i386
>
> it is a vps running via a jail. I have installed mail/qmail and added
> it to rc.conf. It starts
Sollunga S([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2008.11.11 04:32:08 -0800:
> Hi all
>
> Greetings to all, this is my first time installation of freebsd, i am going
> to use this installation for my mail server obviously qmail+ldap. I have a
> bit of fear to go ahead on it, can anyone clarify please?
>
> Previou
Jeff Dickens wrote:
> I used the patches and documents from qmail.jms1.net and built my own
> qmail, and it works well. I think a port that tracks qmail + jms1's
> current combined patch set would be well received.
>
For what is worth the mail/qmail-tls port says it supports smtp-auth. I
dont us
I used the patches and documents from qmail.jms1.net and built my own
qmail, and it works well. I think a port that tracks qmail + jms1's
current combined patch set would be well received.
BTW, I copied the maintainer of the qmail port on my earlier message,
and it eventually bounced:
[EMA
> Paul A. Procacci wrote:
> > Victor Farah wrote:
> >> Hello
> >> I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my
> >> /var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM
> >> qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I
> >> made. I start qmail
Paul A. Procacci wrote:
Victor Farah wrote:
Hello
I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my
/var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM
qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I
made. I start qmail using supervise scripts.
Victor Farah wrote:
Hello
I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my
/var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM
qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I
made. I start qmail using supervise scripts.
Also in my smtproutes file
://www.ourwebtemplates.com
-Original Message-
From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 10:14 AM
To: Bill Banks
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail help
On 2007-09-13 22:48, Bill Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just make qmail from
On 2007-09-13 22:48, Bill Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just make qmail from port and killed sendmail. I can send mail out but
> can't recvice it. I think that the mailboxes is not made,,
You'll have to provide us with *many* more details about the precise
steps you followed, what you wante
forget it. I am switching to another MTA that is easier to use.
cheers,
Noah
John L wrote:
I thought my explanation was fairly clear. Also domain.com is a
sample domain name and really has nothing to do with the issue at
hand. Sample domain names are used all the time In examples and
sho
I thought my explanation was fairly clear. Also domain.com is a sample
domain name and really has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Sample
domain names are used all the time In examples and should not hinder arriving
or providing solutions to configuring qmail aliases and virtualdomains.
On Sat, 05 May 2007 08:35:43 -0700, Noah wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> hahaha - now that is a funny response.
>
> I thought my explanation was fairly clear. Also domain.com is a sample
> domain name and really has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Sample
> domain names are used all the time
>Since I am not getting a response from the qmail list - well there are a
>bunch of knowledgeable members here. So...
We saw your question on the qmail list, but we couldn't answer it because
you're not telling us what you're really doing. (Unless you are the
registrant for domain.com, which yo
Hi John,
hahaha - now that is a funny response.
I thought my explanation was fairly clear. Also domain.com is a sample
domain name and really has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Sample
domain names are used all the time In examples and should not hinder
arriving or providing solutions
7676Thanks everyone for your help. It's been a long weekend with lots of
mistakes, but I'm up now.
Rachel
Sponsored Link
Mortgage rates near 39yr lows.
$420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment!
www.Lowe
On Saturday 18 November 2006 20:54, Rachel Florentine wrote:
> 7883- Original Message
> From: Tom Ierna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the
> > instructions from qmailrocks and most recently using the instructions
> > found here:
> >
>
On Nov 18, 2006, at 9:54 PM, Rachel Florentine wrote:
make test resulted in this:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
--
-
t/Toaster.t1 256411 2.44% 22
t/toaster-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Florentine
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 1:19 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports
Hi;
I've installed both qmail and vpopmail from ports. Qmail is up and runn
- Original Message
From: John L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In general I agree. The qmail port, unlike most of the other ports, is
> junk.
I didn't realize you're the author of O'Reilly's book on Qmail :)
I'll take your opinion a little more seriously.
I noticed that although I have all my
7883- Original Message
From: Tom Ierna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the instructions
> from qmailrocks and most recently using the instructions found here:
>
> http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/install.shtml108
>
> The "toaste
John, there's a rationalle for using ports, you know. A very, very
strong argument in favor of them.
In general I agree. The qmail port, unlike most of the other ports, is
junk.
Would you mind telling me how to get vpopmail working?
If you really want to know, please read chapter 13 of my
On Nov 18, 2006, at 4:50 PM, Rachel Florentine wrote:
Well, going to that page led me to this as the authority for vpopmail:
http://dev.qmailrocks.org/qmail/freebsd/vpopmail_std.htm
I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the
instructions from qmailrocks and most recentl
- Original Message
From: John L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Why would I want to rip out a perfectly good installation?
>
> Because it's not perfectly good. Many of the patches only sort of work.
>
>> I just want to get vpopmail working with qmail.
> If you don't care whether it crashes myste
Don't install qmail from the port, which includes a whole bunch of
ill-advised patches. Instead, download and install netqmail 1.05 from
www.qmail.org, which has a small set of patches that really work.
I've been meaning to make a port of netqmail, but haven't had time yet.
You'll also want daem
797984- Original Message
From: Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://dev.qmailrocks.org/qmail/freebsd/109 is your friend.
Well, going to that page led me to this as the authority for vpopmail:
http://dev.qmailrocks.org/qmail/freebsd/vpopmail_std.htm
(I already have qmail working
Rodrigo G. Tavares de Souza wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody know a free webmail solution for Qmail?
Best regards,
Rodrigo Souza
Anything that uses imap or can read a Maildir will work just fine.
Depends on if you want to connect to your mailstore from another
machine, or read your mail off the f
SquirrelMail
http://www.squirrelmail.org/
- Original Message -
From: "Rodrigo G. Tavares de Souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 3:01 PM
Subject: Qmail - Webmail solution
Hi,
Does anybody know a free webmail solution for Qmail?
Best regards,
Rodrigo Sou
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 12/28/05, Angelin Lalev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But now my friend's clients want all mail that is tagged as spam
(in my case, prefixed with "[SPAM]" in the subject) moved to
separate courier imap folder (for example .SPAM).
I figured out (maybe I make error h
On 12/28/05, Angelin Lalev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But now my friend's clients want all mail that is tagged as spam
> (in my case, prefixed with "[SPAM]" in the subject) moved to
> separate courier imap folder (for example .SPAM).
> I figured out (maybe I make error here) that I need procmail
Angelin Lalev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's been a long time since my last day as a system administrator,
> but recently I needed to install a qmail server for a friend.
> Although I had forgoten many things, I've managed to make
> a working netqmail 1.05 + SMTP-AUTH + TLS patch +
> qmail-sca
Hi
Thanks once again for your message.
I followed directions at the following website :
http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/mailserver/qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin.php
There was one strange comment on this page :
"Note: the binc-imap configuration is not complete enough to work. It will
On Thursday 10 March 2005 05:57, Peter Risdon wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 00:12 -0500, Madhusudan Singh wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am new to both FreeBSD and qmail. However, I am definitely not new to
> > unix/linux (2 years of HP-UX and 7 years of Linux experience). I am using
> > a pf firewall
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 00:12 -0500, Madhusudan Singh wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am new to both FreeBSD and qmail. However, I am definitely not new to
> unix/linux (2 years of HP-UX and 7 years of Linux experience). I am using a
> pf firewall on a machine that will host a webserver as well as my mailserver
Okay.
Thanks!
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:33:20 -0700, Chris Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've added "localhost" to the "locals" and "rcpthosts" files. Seemed
> to take care of that.
>
> gabriel wrote:
>
> | very cool, I edited the appropi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've added "localhost" to the "locals" and "rcpthosts" files. Seemed
to take care of that.
gabriel wrote:
| very cool, I edited the appropiate files and restarted everything.
| The problem is then I send the periodic It gets bounced cause it
| cant fin
very cool, I edited the appropiate files and restarted everything. The
problem is then I send the periodic It gets bounced cause it cant find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *sigh*
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:47:36 -0700, Chris Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My defaulthost just has "myhost", and defaultdomain has "mydomain".
My daily run output is sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gabriel wrote:
| I did actually, it USED to have somedomain.com in a lot of the
| files but I changed them to the actual domain. Shoul
I did actually, it USED to have somedomain.com in a lot of the files
but I changed them to the actual domain. Should they be the mail
server's host or the domain?
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:24:15 -0700, Chris Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I believe this is done in your /var/qmail/control/defaultdomain and
/var/qmail/control/defaulthost files.
In fact, check through all the files in the control dir to make sure
they are right.
Chris
gabriel wrote:
| Ok, well I installed qmail and all that
james doucette wrote:
# qmailctl stat
/service/qmail-send: up (pid 131) 187 seconds
/service/qmail-send/log: up (pid 137) 187 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd: up (pid 33965) 0 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd/log: up (pid 138) 187 seconds
/service/qmail-pop3d: up (pid 136) 187 seconds
/
: "Mike Grissom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: Qmail Problems
Mike Grissom wrote:
I have been having a problem with qmail-send dying for a while now.
In the log file
> it says that "alert: oh no! lo
Tabor Kelly wrote:
In addition to everything Mike Grissom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
Sorry, I meant Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
-Tabor Kelly
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsub
Mike Grissom wrote:
I have been having a problem with qmail-send dying for a while now. In the log file
> it says that "alert: oh no! lost spawn connection" which leads me to
> believe the problem is with the qmail-lspawn or qmail-rspawn. I have
> FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Thu Nov 11 17:21:04 EST 20
On 2004-12-13 14:53, Mike Grissom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Grissom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have been having a problem with qmail-send dying for a while now.
> > In the log file it says that "alert: oh no! lost spawn connection"
> > which leads me to believe the problem is with the
Anyone have an insights to this problem?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Grissom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 2:59 PM
Subject: Qmail Problems
I have been having a problem with qmail-send dying for a while now. In the
log file it says that
dextermetall wrote:
> How can i configure dns for useing qmail?
There is nothing particularly different for qmail than for any other
MTA. You need to set the MX records for your mail server with a priority
number. The priority number is only important if you have multiple servers.
If you have se
Eric Heintzberger wrote:
Thanks for the tip. My impression was that qmailadmin is intended for a
certain kind of virtual domain setup, and designed so that the
administrator of each domain would have a GUI admin console, not
necessarily the end-users. But maybe it could work in my case as well.
Thanks for the tip. My impression was that qmailadmin is
intended for a certain kind of virtual domain setup, and
designed so that the administrator of each domain would have a
GUI admin console, not necessarily the end-users. But maybe it
could work in my case as well.
Peter Risdon wrote:
Eri
Eric Heintzberger wrote:
Hello everyone!
I run qmail, courier-imap, and FreeBSD as a mail server for a small
business network. Most of the end-users have no familiarity with UNIX,
and so training them to SSH into the mail server and uncomment the
autoresponder line in their .qmail configuration
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 20:54
Subject: qmail-scanner.pl and perl 5.8?
> if I look in /usr/bin I see:
>
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel23 Nov 6 11:49 suidperl ->
> /usr/local/bin/suidperl
>
> if I do a ls
> Mar 3 09:30:34 patriot qmail: 1078327834.990817 delivery 600: deferral:
> Unable_
> to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/
It can't access the maildir. Off the top of my head, check at least:
* Is the entry in the .mail file correct? Don't forget the extra dot if you
have opted for a name beginning w
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 09:41 am, Brian H wrote:
> sorry for bringing up qmail again.
It's OT on freebsd-questions, so I'm replying privately...
> I am able to get my mail sent to my user account henninb, but i can't
> get mail for root or postmaaster.
Have you read www.lifewithqmail.org?
>
Hi,
First note that this is a Qmail specific question, in no way related to
freebsd.
Secondly:
checkout the startup scripts from Qmail, probably /var/qmail/rc or something
like that
if there is splogger qmail, it clearly states you then that it logs to
syslog.
else if you use daemontools, checko
: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:48 PM
To: Brian Henning; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail error
The protections are wrong on the mail directory. Qmail is very picky
about
those. I believe they have to be 600 or 644. See the install docs for
details.
Alternatively the Maildir might not exist, what is in
The protections are wrong on the mail directory. Qmail is very picky about
those. I believe they have to be 600 or 644. See the install docs for
details.
Alternatively the Maildir might not exist, what is in the .qmail file of that
user?
--Chuck
On Monday 01 March 2004 11:58, Brian Henning wr
>
> Hi,
> I have followed the install from freebsd.qmailrocks.org,
> and everything appears to be going OK, I'm almost done with
> the guy's walk-thru...but I found something of interest on
> the qmail.org website - patches to do smtp-auth so I can have
> my clients be able to 'roam' while b
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:57:16 -0500, Brian McCann wrote:
> I don't know what you mean by "speaking SMTP". If you are referring to
> sending the correct SMTP "commands" to tell it HELO/OLEH or whatever, I
> don't even get that far. It literally connects, then right away
> disconnects...I don't even
Hi Brian,
--On Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:57:16 PM -0500 Brian McCann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know what you mean by "speaking SMTP". If you are referring to
sending the correct SMTP "commands" to tell it HELO/OLEH or whatever, I
don't even get that far. It literally connects, then
Hi Brian,
--On Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:57:16 PM -0500 Brian McCann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
don't know what you mean by "speaking SMTP". If you are referring to
sending the correct SMTP "commands" to tell it HELO/OLEH or whatever, I
don't even get that far. It literally connects, then
Hi Brian,
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 12:05:04 AM -0500 Brian McCann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
/service/*/log"...which I expected since there are no files in /service
since it does not exist. From the output I sent you I would assume it's
running correctly, but when I do a "ps -ax | grep sm
site you sent me.
Thanks,
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:49 PM
To: 'FreeBSD'
Subject: RE: QMail?
Hi Brian,
--On Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:42:07 PM -0500 Brian McCann
<[EMAIL P
. I'm going to
check out that link though, thanks!
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QMail? - additional thoughts
Hi Brian,
--On Sunday, February
Hi Brian,
--On Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:42:07 PM -0500 Brian McCann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok...sendmail isn't running...and below is the result of "svstat
/var/service/*/log"...it's under /var since that's where the tutorial
said to put it...before I really knew what I was doing.
That's
og: up (pid 47867) 533524 seconds
/var/service/smtpd/log: up (pid 47865) 533524 seconds
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QMail?
Hi Brian,
--On Sunday, Febr
Hi Brian,
--On Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:11:58 PM -0500 Brian McCann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all. I'm trying to setup Qmail on one of my systems. Being a former
user of Sendmail, I decided to try to find a HOWTO or something to get
me started.
It just occurred to me, are you speaking
Hi Brian,
--On Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:11:58 PM -0500 Brian McCann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all. I'm trying to setup Qmail on one of my systems. Being a former
user of Sendmail, I decided to try to find a HOWTO or something to get
me started. So, I found this one...
http://stevenfe
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 12:06:51PM +0100, Michael Sig Birkmose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just recently installed qmail + qmail scaner + clamav + fprot and it all
> works fine.
>
> However when I attempt to send myself a test email from the machine
> running the services, using pine, this mail does not p
Hi Roland,
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:04:46 +0200 UTC (11/26/2003, 11:04 AM -0600 UTC my
time), Roland Giesler wrote:
R> I'm installing qmail using the qmailrocks instructions and get the
R> following:
R> I have seen the warning that the "run" scripts are the place where most
R> error occur, but nee
Hello Micheas,
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, 12:54:13 AM, you hammered out:
M> I have about 100 mboxes that I need to convert in to maildirs.
M> I REALLY want the timestamp of the files in the maildir to match the
M> timestamps inside the emails.
M> Does anyone have a suggestion?
There are seve
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 17:13, Gary wrote:
> Hello Micheas,
>
> On Saturday, October 4, 2003, 12:54:13 AM, you hammered out:
>
> M> I have about 100 mboxes that I need to convert in to maildirs.
> M> I REALLY want the timestamp of the files in the maildir to match the
> M> timestamps inside the ema
"jaap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there i make clean install freebsd may be some can give me some links or wher can
> i get manuals in default freebsd have sandmail!
The port itself gave you some instructions when you installed it.
See the pkg-message in the port's directory if you forgo
Alin-Adrian Anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otherwise, mail works fine. With qfilter, only forwarding is not
> working, everything else works. Without qfilter, everything including
> forwarding works.
Try to unset the QMAILQUEUE environment variable when forwarding and
see if this helps. This
> Does anyone know any good tutorials sites for qmail and vpopmail? im
trying
> to set up a mail server for multiple domains.
http://www.tigertimes.net/vpopmail/Qmail-FreeBSD.txt
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
(B- Original Message -
(BFrom: "Cliff Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:59 PM
(BSubject: Qmail Help
(B
(B
(B> Does anyone know any good tutorials sites for qmail and vpopmail? im
(Btrying
(B> to set up a mail server for mu
Hi there, you can try:
http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:59:47 -0400
Cliff Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know any good tutorials sites for qmail and vpopmail? im trying
> to set up a mail server for multiple domains.
>
> Any help would be gre
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 10:06, Darryl Hoar wrote:
> Greetings,
> I want to setup a personal email server for my domain
> on my frebsd 4.7S box. I've heard great things about
> qmail. This lead me to wonder about smtp authentication
> with qmail as I think that would eliminate the open relay
> probl
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
