On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 04:32:03PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:14:40AM -0700, hal wrote:
> > I have done:
> > cvsup RELENG_5
> >
> > make buildkernel
> > make installkernel
> >
> > All worked just f
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:14:40AM -0700, hal wrote:
> I have done:
> cvsup RELENG_5
>
> make buildkernel
> make installkernel
>
> All worked just fine ... but. When I reboot, the boot process
> picks up the old 4 kernel. How do I make the boot p
I have done:
cvsup RELENG_5
make buildkernel
make installkernel
All worked just fine ... but. When I reboot, the boot process
picks up the old 4 kernel. How do I make the boot process
pick up the new 5 kernel? What am I missing?
hal
Since it is impossible to use the report generator at the moment,
because of error: "There is an error in the configuration of the
problem report form generator. Please back up one page and report
the problem to the owner of that page.
Report 84.158.9.109 is an open proxy server."
Category: misc
S
Subject: Re: RELENG_6 upgrade from RELENG_5
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 12:40, artifex maximus wrote:
> I think much better to leave GENERIC as is and making new config file
> like this:
> include GENERIC
>
> ident NEWKERNEL
>
> nomakeoption DEBUG
> nooptions KDB
Slick!
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 12:40, artifex maximus wrote:
> I think much better to leave GENERIC as is and making new config file
> like this:
> include GENERIC
>
> ident NEWKERNEL
>
> nomakeoption DEBUG
> nooptions KDB
Slick! So, how does one "nocpu I486_CPU"?
--
Kirk Strauser
pgpSz75g5in3L.p
Thanks,
> I think much better to leave GENERIC as is and making new config file like th
> is:
>
> include GENERIC
>
> ident NEWKERNEL
>
> nomakeoption DEBUG
> nooptions KDB
> nooptions DDB
> nooptions GDB
> nooptions INVARIANTS
> nooptions INVARIANTS_SUPPORT
> nooptions WITNESS
> nooptions WITN
Hi,
On 8/23/05, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/22/05, Joel Hatton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Before I go crazy and change my RELENG_5 to 6 and resync my sources, can
> > someone point me at a README/UPDATING for upgraders? I'm sure I'll
On 8/22/05, Joel Hatton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before I go crazy and change my RELENG_5 to 6 and resync my sources, can
> someone point me at a README/UPDATING for upgraders? I'm sure I'll find
> one _after_ I cvsup, but I'd like to read it f
Joel Hatton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Before I go crazy and change my RELENG_5 to 6 and resync my sources, can
> someone point me at a README/UPDATING for upgraders? I'm sure I'll find
> one _after_ I cvsup, but I'd like to read it first.
Do "
Hi,
Before I go crazy and change my RELENG_5 to 6 and resync my sources, can
someone point me at a README/UPDATING for upgraders? I'm sure I'll find
one _after_ I cvsup, but I'd like to read it first.
thanks
-- Joel Hatton --
Security Analyst| Hotline: +61 7 33
On 7/1/05, Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was under the impression that the only patches being back ported
> in 5.4-RELEASE are from the security team to fix security related
> issues. Do patches that resolve problems that are known to cause panics
> get back ported as well?
>
wrote:
On 7/1/05, Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I understand the difference between STABLE and CURRENT but I am a
bit confused about the RELENG_5 branch. Is this just another name for
the 5.x STABLE branch or is it used for something completely different?
I have a prod
On 7/1/05, Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I understand the difference between STABLE and CURRENT but I am a
> bit confused about the RELENG_5 branch. Is this just another name for
> the 5.x STABLE branch or is it used for something completely
On 2005-07-01 10:37, Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I understand the difference between STABLE and CURRENT but I am a
> bit confused about the RELENG_5 branch. Is this just another name
> for the 5.x STABLE branch or is it used for something complet
All,
I understand the difference between STABLE and CURRENT but I am a
bit confused about the RELENG_5 branch. Is this just another name for
the 5.x STABLE branch or is it used for something completely different?
I have a production server that is running 5.4-RELEASE but requires a
few
On Thursday 03 March 2005 03:26 pm, Aaron Nichols wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:39:16 -0800, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > You missed a step. Your system clock is off and that makes the
> > installworld try to use touch. Set your system clock and you may
> > have to remake your worl
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:39:16 -0800, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You missed a step. Your system clock is off and that makes the
> installworld try to use touch. Set your system clock and you may have
> to remake your world but it should install.
>
> Kent
Infact it was off - can you g
your world but it should install.
Kent
>
> cvsup'ed w/ the following basic values in supfile (no, this is not
> the entirety of the file)
> *default host=cvsup17.FreeBSD.org
> *default base=/var/db
> *default prefix=/usr
> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
> *default
er bonehead move that I'm not aware of.
cvsup'ed w/ the following basic values in supfile (no, this is not the
entirety of the file)
*default host=cvsup17.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
*default delete use-rel-suffix
# cd /usr/src
#
-RELEASE freshly installed - installing
> cvsup and updating to RELENG_5 was the first thing I did.
> The procedure in UPDATING is followed strictly.
Some people don't follow it and strange things happen. FWIW, my upgrade
worked as expected.
> I have done many installations on
points to /etc/make.conf:
CPUTYPE=p3
CFLAGS= -O -pipe -msse -mmmx
COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe -msse -mmmx
NO_BIND=true
BOOTWAIT=0
It is a dual PIII Xeon, 5.3-RELEASE freshly installed - installing cvsup
and updating to RELENG_5 was the first thing I did.
The procedure in UPDATING is followed strictly.
I have
On Friday 25 February 2005 11:46 am, Velko Ivanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a freshly cvsup-ed to RELENG_5 i386 machine failed during 'make
> installworld' today with reason 'uuencode: can not find uuencode' in
> the share/syscons/scrnmaps directory.
> I changed
Hello,
a freshly cvsup-ed to RELENG_5 i386 machine failed during 'make
installworld' today with reason 'uuencode: can not find uuencode' in the
share/syscons/scrnmaps directory.
I changed the Makefile in /usr/src/share/syscons/scrnmaps, specifying
the absolute path to the
I've did that two days ago.;-)
Just cvsup everything and go to /usr/src
Give the 'make buildworld' command.
After that is finished:
make buildkernel
make installkernel
reboot
boot in single user mode then.
mergemaster -p ( for etc files )
make installworld
mergemaster
reboot (now you have upgraded
Hi.
I have a FreeBSD 4-STABLE machine.
I want to do my custom RENELG_5 FreeBSD release.
I'm get all RELENG_5 CVS source (with cvs checkout -rRELENG_5 src)
So can I compile RELENG_5 kernel and sources im a 4-STABLE enviroment?
Brovo.
___
freebsd-ques
e mid-summer
timeframe to RELENG_5 on an i386 platform (actually dual opteron
running i386).
I did a cvsup early this morning and then try and build my kernel
and get the following:
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=HOST-SMP
I am not sure what is not found. I don't see it looking for a
file +fo
On Thursday 21 October 2004 03:14 pm, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to upgrade my 5.2-CURRENT from the mid-summer
> timeframe to RELENG_5 on an i386 platform (actually dual opteron
> running i386).
>
> I did a cvsup early this morning and then tr
On Oct 21, 2004, at 2:36 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:14:57PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
wrote:
Hi
I am trying to upgrade my 5.2-CURRENT from the mid-summer timeframe to
RELENG_5 on an i386 platform (actually dual opteron running i386).
I did a cvsup early this
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:14:57PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to upgrade my 5.2-CURRENT from the mid-summer timeframe to
> RELENG_5 on an i386 platform (actually dual opteron running i386).
>
> I did a cvsup early this morning and the
Hi
I am trying to upgrade my 5.2-CURRENT from the mid-summer timeframe to
RELENG_5 on an i386 platform (actually dual opteron running i386).
I did a cvsup early this morning and then try and build my kernel and
get the following:
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=HOST-SMP
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Friday 17 September 2004 21:14, Mark Ovens wrote:
Hmmm, if I delete XFree86-libraries then X won't run, and without
libXinerama.so.1 KDE won't run :-/
Anyone have a solution to this conundrum please?
Yes: Update all of XFree86 to the latest version in ports (4.4).
XFre
>
> Hi all:
>
> I have been using FreeBSD in production enviroments so I used FreeBSD 4.7
> and 4.8.
> Now, I have installed FreeBSD 5.1 on my laptop.
> So I decided to keep track of the -RELEASE_5 (STABLE). But It seems that
> there is not such a branch on the repository.
> Reading diferent l
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:41:55AM +0200, David Rio wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:27:21PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:18:40AM +0200, David Rio wrote:
> > > Hi all:
> > >
> > > I have been using FreeBSD in production enviroments so I used FreeBSD 4.7 and
>
On Monday 21 July 2003 06:18 pm, David Rio wrote:
> If I am not wrong with this, what will be the reason to install 5.1
> instead 4.8? I mean, 5.1 has more features but a worst performace
> that 4.8. On the other hand, there is no -STABLE branch of 5.1 so
> the only way to keep you system up to da
Hi David,
You might want to look at the "FreeBSD-CURRENT vs. FreeBSD-STABLE" page which
discusses the differences between stable and current.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html
cheers,
Torben
David Rio wrote:
Hi all:
I have been using FreeBSD in pro
Hi all:
I have been using FreeBSD in production enviroments so I used FreeBSD 4.7 and 4.8.
Now, I have installed FreeBSD 5.1 on my laptop.
So I decided to keep track of the -RELEASE_5 (STABLE). But It seems that there is
not such a branch on the repository.
Reading diferent links at freebsd.org.
37 matches
Mail list logo
