Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p12 bind9 log files not found

On Saturday 30 May 2009 17:01:17 Prokofyev Vladislav wrote: > > The named running chrooted has no clue about /var/named. You can either > > use ducttape: > > cd /var/named/var && sudo ln -s .. named > > > > or just strip /var/named from your config file, hence use > > /var/log/xfer.log. > > > > --

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p12 bind9 log files not found

> > named_enable="YES" > named_program="/usr/sbin/named" > named_chrootdir="/var/named" > > -Mike > > After adding these options on my system, named didn't start at boot. Manully attempt to start it via '/etc/rc.d/named start' brought to the following error: /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_comma

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p12 bind9 log files not found

Prokofyev Vladislav wrote: > Hello, > > I have setup FreeBSD recently, can somebody help me with one interesting > thing - Bind9 slave DNS server, everything is works great, but I got a > problem with extended logging of xfer, etc. > Bind9 started in chroot: > > root 7880.0 0.1 3156

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p12 bind9 log files not found

On Saturday 30 May 2009 14:50:31 Prokofyev Vladislav wrote: > Bind9 started in chroot: > > root 7880.0 0.1 3156 1004 ?? Ss Fri01AM 0:02.10 > /usr/sbin/syslogd -l /var/run/log -l /var/named/var/run/log -s > bind30792 0.0 1.2 16212 12864 ?? Is4:10PM 0:00.23 > /usr/sbi

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

"David Christensen" writes: > freebsd-questions: > > I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386: > > > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=misc&portname=amand > a-server > > > Most of my software background is GNU/Linux. I would prefer using the > Bash s

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:46:54PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 2:09 PM -0800 1/4/09, David Christensen wrote: > > > >I have changed the root shell to Bash on another machine I use as a CVS > >server and haven't noticed any issues yet, but I've been wondering if > >I'm setting myself up fo

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

At 2:09 PM -0800 1/4/09, David Christensen wrote: I have changed the root shell to Bash on another machine I use as a CVS server and haven't noticed any issues yet, but I've been wondering if I'm setting myself up for problems by doing so. Does anybody know if it's okay to change the root shel

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:09:03PM -0800, David Christensen wrote: > > freebsd-questions: > > I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386: > > > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=misc&portname=amand > a-server > > > Most of my software background is GN

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:09 PM, David Christensen wrote: > freebsd-questions: > > I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386: > > > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=misc&portname=amand > a-server

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

> Does anybody know if it's okay to change the root shell? A topic of debate, but yes it is okay to change the root shell, but there are some things to know... Some people fret about the idea that shells like bash are not on the root partition and are usually dynamically linked to libraries which

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

David Christensen wrote: [snip] > > > devel/glib20 and gio-fam-backend seemed to go okay. I think I got > further into firefox3, but it failed: checking for cairo >= 1.6.0 freetype2 fontconfig... Requested 'cairo >= 1.6.0' but version of cairo is 1.4.10 This is telling you the cairo you have

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:01 PM, David Christensen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sahil Tandon wrote: > > Do these ellipses include a 'make install'? Otherwise, that is likely > > your problem; devel/glib20 is not actually installed. > > Michael Powell wrote: > >> If you previously had glib20-2.1

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

Sahil Tandon wrote: > Do these ellipses include a 'make install'? Otherwise, that is likely > your problem; devel/glib20 is not actually installed. Michael Powell wrote: If you previously had glib20-2.14.6 installed, you will need to do a 'make deinstall' prior to 'make reinstall'. ... then

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

David Christensen wrote: > mdh wrote: >> The answer is to upgrade your devel/glib20 port to the latest version, >> then try to install or upgrade libgiofam, then install the other >> software. > > Thank you for your response. :-) > > > Here's my attempt to carry out your suggestions: > > 2008

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mdh wrote: >> The answer is to upgrade your devel/glib20 port to the latest version, >> then try to install or upgrade libgiofam, then install the other software. >> > > Thank you for your response. :-) > > Here's my attempt to carry out your sug

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

mdh wrote: The answer is to upgrade your devel/glib20 port to the latest version, then try to install or upgrade libgiofam, then install the other software. Thank you for your response. :-) Here's my attempt to carry out your suggestions: 20081026-122203 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # portsnap fetc

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

--- On Sun, 10/26/08, David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find > -lgio-2.0 > To: "Freebsd-Questions" > Date: Sunday, October 26, 2008, 2:10 PM > freebsd-questions: > > If

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:10:48AM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > freebsd-questions: Try freebsd-ports for this question, as your issue is with a port. :-) -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodiu

RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

> > Try disabling usb and firewire in BIOS. You may need to have > > a tech there do it for you. Your box has the sk NIC and usb > > sharing an irq. The NIC driver is MPSAFE but the usb stack is > > still under the GIANT lock. Disable usb and the NIC driver > > should perform better. > > Alternati

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

> Try disabling usb and firewire in BIOS. You may need to have > a tech there do it for you. Your box has the sk NIC and usb > sharing an irq. The NIC driver is MPSAFE but the usb stack is > still under the GIANT lock. Disable usb and the NIC driver > should perform better. Alternatively, to avoid

RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

David Polak wrote: [snip] >> >> try setting up speed and duplex options manually > > I have set the duplex to full-duplex and it has increased the speed to > about 200kb/s on the same file. > > As far as phy support, I guess I really don't know, but the drivers for > the chipset have been aroun

RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 11:21 AM > To: David Polak > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

still seeing really slow download speeds. I then decided to see if something was wrong with the system by downloading the same image from the same source that I downloaded on linux in order to bootstrap freebsd and the speed difference was appaling. It had downloaded at 10.29 MB/s. Once freebsd wa

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

Ryan Coleman wrote: chip wrote: Ryan Coleman wrote: chip wrote: Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround?

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

chip wrote: Ryan Coleman wrote: chip wrote: Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround? Thanks. chip wrote:

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

Ryan Coleman wrote: chip wrote: Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround? Thanks. chip wrote: A little mor

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

chip wrote: Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround? Thanks. chip wrote: A little more info - I now have g

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround? Thanks. chip wrote: A little more info - I now have gphoto2 recogn

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera?

A little more info - I now have gphoto2 recognizing and downloading my images, but only in a terminal window. I am using XFCE and want to create a shortcut on the toolbar or the desktop that will open a terminal window and run the command. I have a shortcut set up but it just opens a terminal w

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera?

* chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-27 13:40:59+]: > Anyone know how to get FBSD 7-R to recognize my Canon S3 IS and > download pics from it? Nowadays mostly everyone gets a cheap (less than $10US) USB card reader and reads it that way. Thomas ___ f

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera?

I'm not sure about getting FreeBSD to recognize the camera; but if it has a removable memory card, you should be able to access it through a memory card reader. Best regards, Andrew On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:40 PM, chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone know how to get FBSD 7-R to recognize m

Re: [gutenprint - Help] RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE+CUPS+gutenprint+Epson

On Tuesday 15 April 2008 07:33:03 pm SourceForge.net wrote: > Read and respond to this message at: > https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=4907395 > By: lexort > > Your results are consistent with the problem reading from ulpt(4). I > expect that if you turn off your spooling systems an

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Release

On 2007-07-02 16:21, Joe Vender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has a release date been set for FreeBSD 7.0-Release? If not, how about > an (educated guess) approximate date, month? The release schedules are posted online at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releng/ If a date is not posted there, it's pr

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Release

On 7/3/07, Joe Vender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 02 July 2007 18:16, matt donovan wrote: > it's on the freebsd site but the code freeze has begun so some are guessing > around October or so > > On 7/2/07, Joe Vender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has a release date been set for FreeBSD

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Release

On Monday 02 July 2007 18:16, matt donovan wrote: > it's on the freebsd site but the code freeze has begun so some are guessing > around October or so > > On 7/2/07, Joe Vender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has a release date been set for FreeBSD 7.0-Release? If not, how about an > > (educated gue

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Release

Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: > On Tue, July 3, 2007 01:33, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> matt donovan wrote: >>> it's on the freebsd site but the code freeze has begun so some are >>> guessing >> /\/\ >> >> Did you mean "it isn't", right? Because I just can't find any infos >> about the relen

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Release

On Tue, July 3, 2007 01:33, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > matt donovan wrote: >> it's on the freebsd site but the code freeze has begun so some are >> guessing > /\/\ > > Did you mean "it isn't", right? Because I just can't find any infos > about the releng schedule for 7-RELEASE.. http://www.freebs

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Release

From http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2007/6/emw531216.htm, quoted in the News sections of freebsd.org: "Developers on the FreeBSD project worked with researchers from NTT to integrate their code, under a BSD license, into the CURRENT branch of FreeBSD, which will become the 7.0 release in

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Release

matt donovan wrote: > it's on the freebsd site but the code freeze has begun so some are guessing /\/\ Did you mean "it isn't", right? Because I just can't find any infos about the releng schedule for 7-RELEASE.. > around October or so > > On 7/2/07, Joe Vender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Release

it's on the freebsd site but the code freeze has begun so some are guessing around October or so On 7/2/07, Joe Vender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has a release date been set for FreeBSD 7.0-Release? If not, how about an (educated guess) approximate date, month? Joe ___