On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Michael Ross wrote:
> ipfw always has one default rule, standard is
>
> [snip]
>
> Specifing firewall_type="OPEN" gives you an additional rule
Michael,
Thank you that is exactly what I am seeing.
Chris
___
freebsd-que
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 04:38:45 +0200, Chris Stankevitz
wrote:
Hello,
Handbook section 31.9 describes the setup of NAT.
Section 31.9.3 suggests net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept="1" "during
the first attempts to setup a firewall and NAT gateway".
Section 31.9.5 suggests I "specify a predefined
On 8/27/2010 9:14 PM, Michael J. Kearney wrote:
Will natd forward rtmp:// ???
I am sure libalias and natd know nothing about rtmp.
freebsd# cat /etc/natd.conf
use_sockets
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.3:3389 10.1.10.172:3389
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:1935 10.1.10.172:1935
redirect_port tc
I haven't had a chance to work on this yet. I'll be out of town for a little
while, and will update the thread upon my arrival.
Thanks.
Casey
- "Коньков Евгений" wrote:
> Здравствуйте, Casey.
>
> What does natd with '-v' options shows? what is aliasing?
>
> You must bind natd to extern
Здравствуйте, Casey.
What does natd with '-v' options shows? what is aliasing?
You must bind natd to external interface
NEVER DO: any to any divert!!!
NOTICE: no traffice go through this rule
CS> 05000 00 divert 8668 ip from any to any out via fxp0
NEVER DO: open firewall because o
> I'm trying to build a server that will act as a gateway between my wireless
> network and the rest of the world. Here's an overview of the current setup:
>
> 1. FreeBSD 7.1
> 2. isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.5_2
> 3. natd configured to connect fxp0 (public network, dynamic IP) to fxp1
> (private network
Tim Gustafson wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a server that will act as a gateway between my wireless
network and the rest of the world. Here's an overview of the current setup:
1. FreeBSD 7.1
2. isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.5_2
3. natd configured to connect fxp0 (public network, dynamic IP) to fxp1
(p
Joe wrote:
> I have a question about natd/ and ipfw. I am running natd on my external
> interface and I have some services on my internal interface.
>
> The services seem to be getting their ip addresses nat'd and some of them
> work and some of them dont.
>
> Any idea how to prevent
Joe wrote:
I have a question about natd/ and ipfw. I am running natd on my external interface and I have some services on my internal interface.
The services seem to be getting their ip addresses nat'd and some of them work and some of them dont.
Any idea how to prevent things from going in
Hello Ross,
FreeBSD as a gateway is very easy and simple to setup, but a very small
mistake could
stop your box from acting as a gateway,
1)
Please send the follow :
the output of #ifconfg -a
2) output of #uname -a
3) copy of rc.conf file
4) Whats the lines you have changed in your kern
"Ross Penner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've configured my freebsd computer to be the gateway for my home network
> using the guidelines in the handbook. All the required kernel options are
> enabled and the entries in /etc/rc.conf have been added. I'm unsure what the
> problem could be and I'
I just cvsup'ed the source and rebuilt world, and now natd starts on
boot-up just fine. I don't have any idea what changed, although I did
notice that when I ran mergemaster there was new text in
/etc/defaults/rc.conf, which I installed without examining too closely. The
thing is, I looked it o
At 07:21 AM 6/9/2006 -0800, you wrote:
On 6/6/2006 21:13, Roger Merritt seems to have typed:
> Everything
> starts on boot-up as it should -- except natd. I can start it manually
from
> the command line after booting up and logging in and it works fine, but I
> can't tell what's going on that i
On 6/6/2006 21:13, Roger Merritt seems to have typed:
> Everything
> starts on boot-up as it should -- except natd. I can start it manually from
> the command line after booting up and logging in and it works fine, but I
> can't tell what's going on that it's failing to start.
Try adding:
natd_
At 02:13 PM 6/9/2006 +1000, you wrote:
I've been doing a little hunting around to figure out
how /etc/rc.d/natd's called in the first place and it seems
this is done by the /etc/rc.d/ipfw script, which in turn is run
when "firewall_enable" is set
in /etc/rc.conf. /etc/rc.d/natd's not run directl
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 18:01:43 +0700
Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 02:12 AM 6/7/2006 -0700, you wrote:
> >On 6/7/06, Nick Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:23:18 +0700
> >>Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > At 04:35 PM 6/7/2006 +1000, you
On 6/6/2006 21:13, Roger Merritt seems to have typed:
> Everything
> starts on boot-up as it should -- except natd. I can start it manually from
> the command line after booting up and logging in and it works fine, but I
> can't tell what's going on that it's failing to start.
Try adding:
natd_fla
At 01:34 PM 6/7/2006 +0300, you wrote:
Try to comment the line natd_enable="YES" and then add
a new line at the end of rc.conf:
/etc/rc.d/natd start
Well, that looks like it would work. I'll keep it in mind as a last resort.
if this doesn't work, try to put
natd_flags=""
I'll give it a tr
At 02:12 AM 6/7/2006 -0700, you wrote:
On 6/7/06, Nick Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:23:18 +0700
Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:35 PM 6/7/2006 +1000, you wrote:
> >On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 12:13:29 +0700
> >Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
Roger Merritt wrote:
I'm thoroughly puzzled. Over the weekend I transferred my FreeBSD
system to a new hard drive. Through laziness I didn't follow the
instructions and had to make a completely new install. Everything
now seems to be working the way it should, Apache, MySQL
Roger Merritt wrote:
I'm thoroughly puzzled. Over the weekend I transferred my FreeBSD
system to a new hard drive. Through laziness I didn't follow the
instructions and had to make a completely new install. Everything now
seems to be working the way it should, Apache, MySQL, PHP, syslog,
Samb
On 6/7/06, Nick Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:23:18 +0700
Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:35 PM 6/7/2006 +1000, you wrote:
> >On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 12:13:29 +0700
> >Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm thoroughly puzzled. Over the wee
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:23:18 +0700
Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:35 PM 6/7/2006 +1000, you wrote:
> >On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 12:13:29 +0700
> >Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm thoroughly puzzled. Over the weekend I transferred my FreeBSD
> > system to
> > > a
At 04:35 PM 6/7/2006 +1000, you wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 12:13:29 +0700
Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thoroughly puzzled. Over the weekend I transferred my FreeBSD
system to
> a new hard drive. Through laziness I didn't follow the instructions and
had
> to make a completely
At 08:46 AM 6/7/2006 +0200, you wrote:
Hello Roger,
what happens if you type
/etc/rc.d/natd start
after boot-up?
The script prints out the string " natd", leading space but no newline, and
a process is started for natd.
--
Roger
___
freebsd
Hello Roger,
what happens if you type
/etc/rc.d/natd start
after boot-up?
Björn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 12:13:29 +0700
Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thoroughly puzzled. Over the weekend I transferred my FreeBSD system to
> a new hard drive. Through laziness I didn't follow the instructions and had
> to make a completely new install. Everything now seems to be w
Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> On 3/12/06, Nagilum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ... ]
> I checked the man page but really didn`t understand - it will forward the
> traffic simultaneously threw two interfaces ? Based on IP?
No, you would use IPFW to forward different IP ranges through one interface or
On 3/12/06, Nagilum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> How about interface bonding/aggregation ? Check ng_fec(4) for details.
> Hope this helps,
> Nagilum.
I checked the man page but really didn`t understand - it will forward the
traffic simu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
How about interface bonding/aggregation ? Check ng_fec(4) for details.
Hope this helps,
Nagilum.
Ramiz Sardar wrote:
> Dears, I am using freebsd machine in office as a gateway and using
> ipfw+natd for internet sharing. I have two dsl connection
That`s how i do it with PF!!!
nat on ed0 proto {tcp udp icmp} from 10.10.xx.xx to any -> 172.16.xx.xx
# Rule 2 (NAT)
#
#
nat on ed0 proto {tcp udp icmp} from 10.10.xx.xx to any -> 172.16.xx.xx
#
# Rule 3 (NAT)
#
#
nat on ed0 proto {tcp udp icmp} from 10.10.xx.xx to any -> 172.16.xx.xx
#
# Ru
On 2/16/06, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > I wonder, what tricks do you use to use more than
> > one alias IP? I mean, if you have hundreds of
> > hosts behind your firewall, what can you do to alias
> > some of them to one ip, others to another and so on.
>
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> I wonder, what tricks do you use to use more than
> one alias IP? I mean, if you have hundreds of
> hosts behind your firewall, what can you do to alias
> some of them to one ip, others to another and so on.
See "man natd" about the following options for 1-to-1 NAT trans
On 2/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not a ipfw expert. The truth of it is I was a ipfw user before
> I added a LAN behind my gateway box. Ipfw does it's nating from
> within ipfw and that it what makes ipfw nating so hard to get right.
> It's even harder if you use keep
eeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: natd with several alias IPs
On 2/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure just what you are asking about.
>
> Are you saying that you have 4 static public ip address assigned
to
> you by your ISP and you want to round robin t
On 2/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure just what you are asking about.
>
> Are you saying that you have 4 static public ip address assigned to
> you by your ISP and you want to round robin those 4 in the NATing
> process to your hundreds of LAN users?
>
> If that's
I am not sure just what you are asking about.
Are you saying that you have 4 static public ip address assigned to
you by your ISP and you want to round robin those 4 in the NATing
process to your hundreds of LAN users?
If that's what you are after then any of FreeBSD's 3 built in
firewall can do
number or DNS reverse name or maybe from table like oidentd?
How about running oidentd, if you already know it does what you'd
like? It's in ports.
well that's what i needed.
___
"oidentd is an ident (rfc1413 compliant) daemon that runs on Linux,
connections handled by natd? like answering last byte of source IP
number or DNS reverse name or maybe from table like oidentd?
How about running oidentd, if you already know it does what you'd
like? It's in ports.
well that's what i needed.
___
free
handled by natd? like answering last byte of source IP number or DNS
reverse name or maybe from table like oidentd?
If you're using 1-to-1 NAT forwarding, run identd or the inetd-based version on
the internal hosts you're forwarding to. If you're using NAT to only forward
individual ports to sp
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> how can i make ident service to make informative answers for
> connections handled by natd? like answering last byte of source IP
> number or DNS reverse name or maybe from table like oidentd?
How about running oidentd, if you already know it does wha
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> how can i make ident service to make informative answers for connections
> handled by natd? like answering last byte of source IP number or DNS
> reverse name or maybe from table like oidentd?
If you're using 1-to-1 NAT forwarding, run identd or the inetd-based version on
> I have natd set up on a 4.10 box to get the rest of my network on the
> internet. I have an application that requires connections to be able to
> be established on a specific port. The problem is, sometimes I run this
> app on system A and sometimes on system B. The port stays the same. So
> in m
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris S. Wilson
>Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 3:08 PM
>To: Greg Barniskis
>Cc: freebsd-questions
>Subject: RE: NATD Internal Network problems
>
>
>Weird, every other rou
Chris S. Wilson wrote:
Weird, every other router I've used forwards all the packets properly,
even my backup linksys when I hook it up.
Probably works there because there's not a very complex packet
filtering operation in the middle when using an off-the-shelf router.
Keep in mind that I'm s
al Message-
From: Greg Barniskis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 3:05 PM
To: Chris S. Wilson
Cc: freebsd-questions
Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems
Chris S. Wilson wrote:
> Hello! :)
>
> I am having a problem with freebsd 5.3-release and natd.
Chris S. Wilson wrote:
Hello! :)
I am having a problem with freebsd 5.3-release and natd.
When I try to connect to a service on my internal network to an IP on my
external network that has a port redirected, it wont connect.
IE: 67.128.100.2 is my external IP, on my internal network I try to
on
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems
Chris S. Wilson wrote:
> Hmm, still does'nt work.
>
> That seemed to be a typo however I still cant connect :(
Does "telnet 10.0.10.2 80" from the firewall box work?
Does normal NAT work OK (ie,
Chris S. Wilson wrote:
Hmm, still does'nt work.
That seemed to be a typo however I still cant connect :(
Does "telnet 10.0.10.2 80" from the firewall box work?
Does normal NAT work OK (ie, can internal machines connect outside)?
Does not using the external IP help:
redirect_port tcp 1
Hmm, still does'nt work.
That seemed to be a typo however I still cant connect :(
CW
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:42 PM
To: Chris S. Wilson
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NATD Internal Ne
Chris S. Wilson wrote:
[ ... ]
IE: 67.128.100.2 is my external IP, on my internal network I try to
connect to 67.128.101.2:80 which is forwarded in my natd.conf and the
connection is refused.
Does anyone know why?
Change the "-" to a "0" in:
redirect_port tcp 10.0.10.2:8- 67.128.100.2:80
"Efren Bravo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've a freebsd5.4 with ipfw and natd. I need that external users can enter
> to my internal network services (http, ftp, etc).
>
> freebsd box:
> out interface: 200.x.x.x
> in interface: 10.x.x.x
>
> /etc/rc.conf file:
> --
>
El día Thursday, October 20, 2005 a las 02:19:55PM -0500, Efren Bravo escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I've a freebsd5.4 with ipfw and natd. I need that external users can enter
> to my internal network services (http, ftp, etc).
>
> freebsd box:
> out interface: 200.x.x.x
> in interface: 10.x.x.x
>
> /etc
And I would like to add these questions to
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 07:44 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Saying it's not working is way to vague.
> You need to post more details about what is not working.
> Like can the 5.3 server ping the public internet?
> Can it ping PCs on the LAN?
> Can a win
Saying it's not working is way to vague.
You need to post more details about what is not working.
Like can the 5.3 server ping the public internet?
Can it ping PCs on the LAN?
Can a win LAN PC ping the server?
What does the firewall log contain?
Have you tested with firewall out of the way by havin
faisal gillani wrote on Tuesday 19 April 2005 10:08 in the group
list.freebsd.questions:
> Well i recently installed my first natd server on
> freebsd 5.3, but its not working ?
>
> here is wat i did ..
>
> 1. compiles kernal with the following options
>
> options IPFIREWALL
> options IPV6FIR
It's been a while but I'll see if I can help out.
On Friday, March 4, 2005, at 06:52 PM, Florian Hengstberger wrote:
Hi!
Tell me if I should post this otherwhere.
Given two network cards sis0 (external) and vr0 (internal) I'm trying
to give my girlfriend access to the web. Her ip is 192.168.0.2,
I
> To: Gelsema, Patrick
> Cc: 'Cristian Salan'; 'Gelsema, Patrick';
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: natd or firewall problem?
>
>
> Gelsema, Patrick wrote:
> > Thats right, you can do the following:
> > Put the ip-address with its FQDn
Gelsema, Patrick wrote:
Thats right, you can do the following:
Put the ip-address with its FQDn (www.webserverwhatever.com) in every hosts
file (taken its windows) or in its hosts file on freebsd. Or you run an
internal DNS with an internal zone for your domain whilst running on the
internet the ex
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100, Gelsema, Patrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thats right, you can do the following:
> Put the ip-address with its FQDn (www.webserverwhatever.com) in every hosts
> file (taken its windows) or in its hosts file on freebsd. Or you run an
> internal DNS with an inte
,
Patrick
> -Original Message-
> From: Cristian Salan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 1:51 PM
> To: Gelsema, Patrick
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: natd or firewall problem?
>
>
> > > Hello dear list,
>
> > Hello dear list,
> >
> > I have one FreeBSD router in front of the internal network. Now I've
> > installed another FreeBSD box which must be the www sever.
> > I've managed to redirect the port 80 at the router and the web server
> > is visible to the outside world. But the problem is now at t
Hi,
IN order to enlighten you we need some more information. Sounds to me you
could be having issues with internal/external DNS and ip-addresses. In
other words, you are querying your www server from a dns and is getting
the Internet ip back instead of the lan ip. Can you connect to your www
serve
> I know similar questions have been asked in the past, and I'm sure the
> natd manpage has it described quite clearly, but I just can't seem to
> figure this out.
>
> I'm trying to automagically route all udp ports above 1023 coming from
> a network block to a machine on the internal network.
>
>
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, John Murphy wrote:
Section 14.9.6.3 /etc/rc.conf Options says:
If you don't have IPFW compiled into your kernel you will need to
load it with the following statement in your /etc/rc.conf:
firewall_enable="YES"
I eventually figured it out.. after HOURS of checking around.
I did
Francisco Reyes wrote:
>Migrating a 4.10 box.
>Copied data to a second drive.
>Installed 5.3
>Changed kernel to add
>
>options IPFIREWALL
>options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
>options "IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT"=50
>options IPDIVERT
>
>In /etc/rc.conf have
>firewall_enable="Y
On Monday 01 November 2004 09:28 pm, sonjaya wrote:
> Dear all
>
> i ussually use iptables for NAT in my linux box , but
> in freebsd i newbies , how to configure freebsd be NAT
> server , i search i get 3 option :
> 1.use ipfw
> 2.use NATD
> 3.use ipnat
>
> how to use that all with whis network :
- Original Message -
From: "Alex de Kruijff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Micheal Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: n
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:33:13AM -0500, Micheal Patterson wrote:
> From: "Alex de Kruijff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I changed the list from current@ to questions@, since you question is
> > not only for CURRENT.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:11:39PM +1000, Rebecca Dridan wrote:
> > > Hi all:
- Original Message -
From: "Alex de Kruijff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: natd not doing anything
> I changed the list f
I changed the list from current@ to questions@, since you question is
not only for CURRENT.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:11:39PM +1000, Rebecca Dridan wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I am having some issues with network set-up. I'm running CURRENT as of
> 26th September, with an ipfw firewall and natd. I have
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am probably missing something really stupid but here it goes.
>> I've
>> read the man pages, the handbook and even googled the problem to no
>> avail.
>>
>> I am trying to set up natd to redirect public ips to my private
>> addresses.
>>
>> This is what I have set up in rc.con
> Hello all,
>
> I am probably missing something really stupid but here it goes. I've
> read the man pages, the handbook and even googled the problem to no
> avail.
>
> I am trying to set up natd to redirect public ips to my private
> addresses.
>
> This is what I have set up in rc.conf
>
> defaul
OP forgot to Cc: list...
thank you so much. I found that for some reason natd was not loading
at boot so I typed this ipfw -f flush
ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via xl0
ipfw add pass all from any to any
natd -n xl0 -redirect_address 192.168.0.10 24.97.250.203
and it works like a dream
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 06:57:16PM +1000, Jon Kurjakovich wrote:
> My problem: I am trying to use NATD to forward packets to machines on
> the internal network using the redirect_port command.
I don't have a solution to your problem with natd, however net/rinetd
(from ports) might be a good enoug
lp is greatly appreciated.
Rgds,
Jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Micheal
Patterson
Sent: Sunday, 4 July 2004 8:12 PM
To: Jon Kurjakovich; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NATD Port Forwarding question
Is the system configured to accept r
Is the system configured to accept remote desktop requests? Windows XP has
it disabled by default.
--
Micheal Patterson
TSG Network Administration
405-917-0600
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contai
On 2004-06-18T14:46:31-0500, Jim Freeze wrote:
> mike oliver wrote:
> > The trick here with NAT is that AH will build a checksum of the IP
> > header, which includes the private IP address of your laptop. Since NAT
> > changes this IP address, the destination will dump the packet since the
> > AH
> Protocol 50 is ESP, or encapsulating security payload
> Protocol 51 is AH, or authentication header
>
Ok, thanks.
> The trick here with NAT is that AH will build a checksum of the IP
> header, which includes the private IP address of your laptop. Since NAT
> changes this IP address, the desti
On 2004-06-18T00:11:03-0500, Jim Freeze wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to configure my firewall to allow packets through
> for a VPN connection. I am running FBSD 5.2 as my router and am trying
> to connect my laptop from behind the router to our work computer.
>
> The laptop is running OSX 10.3.4 w
Jim Freeze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to configure my firewall to allow packets through
> for a VPN connection. I am running FBSD 5.2 as my router and am trying
> to connect my laptop from behind the router to our work computer.
>
> The laptop is running OSX 10.3.4 with a Nortel Netw
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 07:37:15AM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 11:26 +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
> > Anyway, the prsent (simple) natd rules don't seem to suffice.
>
> If I'm not wrong, ms netmeeting and msn messenger (audio,video) do not
> work over nat. There are s
On Thursday 03 June 2004 11:26, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> I have problems getting a MC netmeeting seession established
> across a FreeBSD gateway (5.2-current).
>
> Anyway, the prsent (simple) natd rules don't seem to suffice.
>
In most cases you want to use username to ip mapping and a proxy, i
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 11:26 +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> Anyway, the prsent (simple) natd rules don't seem to suffice.
If I'm not wrong, ms netmeeting and msn messenger (audio,video) do not
work over nat. There are some third party windows utilities available to
enable this to work. I have
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Micheal Patterson; Anthony Philipp
Subject: Re: natd -redirect_port
On Saturday 15 May 2004 18:56, JJB wrote:
> You are wrong also. The boot time message that displays about the
> ipfw module being loaded
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 11:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christian Hiris;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Anthony Philipp
> Subject: Re: natd -redirect_port
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "JJB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: &q
D]
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christian Hiris;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Anthony Philipp
Subject: Re: natd -redirect_port
- Original Message -
From: "JJB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christian Hiris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAI
- Original Message -
From: "JJB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christian Hiris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Anthony Philipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 8:05 AM
Subject: RE: natd -redirect_port
f"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christian
Hiris
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 3:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Anthony Philipp
Subject: Re: natd -redirect_port
On Saturday 15 May 2004 07:49, Anthony Philipp wrote:
> hello,
> im
On Saturday 15 May 2004 07:49, Anthony Philipp wrote:
> hello,
> im am trying to redirect various ports through my gateway, a freebsd
> machine, to other machines. when i type: natd -interface rl0 -redirect_port
> tcp 10.10.10.4:25 25
> to redirect port 25 to 10.10.10.4 on port 25 it tells me
> nat
Rob wrote:
fxp0, the one that connects to the outside network.
Yes. It is.
I don't think you have to do this yourself.
I believe by adding
natd_enable="YES"
Yes, i have this. And gateway_enable, firewall_enable, firewall_type
to your rc.conf, you get the following rule as a result:
divert
Arek Czereszewski wrote:
Hi
I have configuration like this:
Intrenet - fxp0 (public IP) [freebsd box] - fxp1 (public IP) class /28 and
some workstatins connected,
mail daemon, www and others
JP wrote:
--- "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
JP wrote:
Hey Gang--
I recompiled my kernel to include support for
firewall
and such.
OK, we kinda know what you mean. So I'll kinda
give you an answer. You kinda did something
wrong ;-)
Se
*grin* I added the following to my kernel:
options IPFIREWALL
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100
options IPDIVERT
--- "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> JP wrote:
>
> >Hey Gang--
> >
> >I recompiled my kernel to include support for
> firewa
JP wrote:
Hey Gang--
I recompiled my kernel to include support for firewall
and such.
OK, we kinda know what you mean. So I'll kinda
give you an answer. You kinda did something
wrong ;-)
Seriously, exactly what did you add to your kernel
config?
After creating my rules file, fwrules and
r
o any keep-state via ${iif}
Btw, i have a static internet ip address, not the dynamic. I have read the
man ipfw BUGS section, but still I can't understand, how can i solve my
problem.
- Original Message -
From: "jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Prodigy" <[EMAIL
tate via ${iif}
Btw, i have a static internet ip address, not the dynamic. I have read the
man ipfw BUGS section, but still I can't understand, how can i solve my
problem.
- Original Message -
From: "jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Prodigy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
> Ping to an ip address does not use DNS.
> What is response time when you use ping domain name?
It's ~250ms for google.com and other domains (good enough too).
> I see you have forced ip address for your nic card connected to the
> public internet by using rc.conf statement.
> This looks wrong to
Multihome your FBSD box. Assign your outside nic the external ip,
inside nic your local subnet dg. Configure natd.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-natd.html
Does FreeBSD still ship with ipnat? Or is natd the only nat'ing service?
Chris
Markus Kovero wrote:
ot;JJB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Rosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 2:03 PM
Subject: RE: natd
> Are you saying you have 2 separate Nic connections to the public
> internet, each one being assigned an different
> dynamic IP address by
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
