8.1-STABLE Unexpected XML: what does it mean?
Hi I observe the very strange message while run a lot of commands: r...@beaver:eugene# glabel status Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432 Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0 Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432 Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0 Name Status Components iso9660/CDROM N/A acd0 r...@beaver:eugene# mdconfig -l Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432 Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0 r...@beaver:eugene# gmirror status Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432 Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0 gmirror: Command 'status' not available. What subsystem prints them? How can I fix it? Good luck -- EMIT-RIPN, EVM7-RIPE ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.1-STABLE Unexpected XML: what does it mean?
How can I locate this device? Also I dont understand why mdconfig complains? On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Ivan Voras wrote: On 14/12/2010 15:27, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote: Hi I observe the very strange message while run a lot of commands: r...@beaver:eugene# glabel status Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432 Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0 Maybe you have a label or some other custom device name with non-ascii characters or with characters which break xml parsing? ___ freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- EMIT-RIPN, EVM7-RIPE ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.1-STABLE Unexpected XML: what does it mean?
On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Ivan Voras wrote: On 14/12/2010 16:19, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote: How can I locate this device? Also I dont understand why mdconfig complains? Try examining the output of # sysctl -b kern.geom.confxml Here they are: mesh class id=0x807a5a20 nameFD/name geom id=0xff00029f6200 class ref=0x807a5a20/ namefd0/name rank1/rank provider id=0xff00029f6100 geom ref=0xff00029f6200/ moder0w0e0/mode namefd0/name mediasize1474560/mediasize sectorsize512/sectorsize stripesize18432/stripesize stripeoffset0/stripeoffset /provider /geom /class class id=0x807152e0 nameACD/name geom id=0xff0002ae7200 class ref=0x807152e0/ nameacd0/name rank1/rank provider id=0xff0002b27500 geom ref=0xff0002ae7200/ moder0w0e0/mode nameacd0t01/name mediasize550307840/mediasize sectorsize2048/sectorsize /provider provider id=0xff0002da1600 geom ref=0xff0002ae7200/ moder0w0e0/mode nameacd0/name mediasize550307840/mediasize sectorsize2048/sectorsize /provider /geom /class class id=0x80759f00 nameLABEL/name geom id=0xff0002d22400 class ref=0x80759f00/ nameacd0/name rank2/rank config /config consumer id=0xff0002a19780 geom ref=0xff0002d22400/ provider ref=0xff0002da1600/ moder0w0e0/mode config /config /consumer provider id=0xff0002d22500 geom ref=0xff0002d22400/ moder0w0e0/mode nameiso9660/CDROM/name mediasize550307840/mediasize sectorsize2048/sectorsize config index0/index length550307840/length seclength1074820/seclength offset0/offset secoffset0/secoffset /config /provider /geom /class class id=0x80759da0 nameVFS/name geom id=0xff008a7bbd00 class ref=0x80759da0/ nameffs.ipsd0s1g/name rank4/rank consumer id=0xff0182c39780 geom ref=0xff008a7bbd00/ provider ref=0xff0002c66900/ moder1w1e1/mode /consumer /geom geom id=0xff006f8e7000 class ref=0x80759da0/ nameffs.ipsd0s1f/name rank4/rank consumer id=0xff01825cda80 geom ref=0xff006f8e7000/ provider ref=0xff0002c66500/ moder1w1e1/mode /consumer /geom geom id=0xff0002be6800 class ref=0x80759da0/ nameffs.da0s1d/name rank4/rank consumer id=0xff014ada3900 geom ref=0xff0002be6800/ provider ref=0xff0002aa8a00/ moder1w1e1/mode /consumer /geom geom id=0xff0008205200 class ref=0x80759da0/ nameffs.da1s1d/name rank4/rank consumer id=0xff0182e9cc80 geom ref=0xff0008205200/ provider ref=0xff0002a6a100/ moder1w1e1/mode /consumer /geom geom id=0xff0002ae7a00 class ref=0x80759da0/ nameffs.da1s1e/name rank4/rank consumer id=0xff0005400c00 geom ref=0xff0002ae7a00/ provider ref=0xff0002a6a900/ moder1w1e1/mode /consumer /geom geom id=0xff0002ae7300 class ref=0x80759da0/ nameffs.ipsd0s1e/name rank4/rank consumer id=0xff0005400b00 geom ref=0xff0002ae7300/ provider ref=0xff0002ce5300/ moder1w1e1/mode /consumer /geom geom id=0xff0002c64900 class ref=0x80759da0/ nameffs.ipsd0s1d/name rank4/rank consumer id=0xff0002dc3980 geom ref=0xff0002c64900/ provider ref=0xff0002ce4e00/ moder1w1e1/mode /consumer /geom geom id=0xff0002ae7600 class ref=0x80759da0/ nameffs.ipsd0s1a/name rank4/rank consumer id=0xff0002d43880 geom ref=0xff0002ae7600/ provider ref=0xff0002ce4400/ moder1w1e1/mode /consumer /geom /class class id=0x8075acc0 namePART/name geom id=0xff0002a6a000 class ref=0x8075acc0/ nameda1s1/name rank3/rank config schemeBSD/scheme entries8/entries first0/first last1560072086/last fwsectors63/fwsectors fwheads255/fwheads stateOK/state /config consumer id=0xff0002ac8500 geom ref=0xff0002a6a000/ provider ref=0xff0002aa7b00/
Re: 8.1-STABLE Unexpected XML: what does it mean?
on 14/12/2010 16:27 Eugene Mitrofanov said the following: Hi I observe the very strange message while run a lot of commands: r...@beaver:eugene# glabel status Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432 Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0 Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432 Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0 Name Status Components iso9660/CDROM N/A acd0 r...@beaver:eugene# mdconfig -l Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432 Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0 r...@beaver:eugene# gmirror status Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data=18432 Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data=0 gmirror: Command 'status' not available. What subsystem prints them? How can I fix it? I'd hazard a guess that either your userland and kernel are out of sync or something like that is taking place. The messages come from libgeom and they mean it doesn't understand those stripe* properties. P.S. geom@ is often the best mailing list for geom issues. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
port sysutils/hal - fixed_mountpoints - what does this mean?
in port sysutils/hal there is an option fixed_mountpoints= which is off by default. Is the meaning of this option documented somewhere? I've had lots of trouble with hal/dbus/X in the past I wonder if my options are to blame. many thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: port sysutils/hal - fixed_mountpoints - what does this mean?
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:37 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: in port sysutils/hal there is an option fixed_mountpoints= which is off by default. Is the meaning of this option documented somewhere? This option tells hal to use fixed names for /media mount points instead of volume labels. It should have no effect on being able to detect or mount media. Joe I've had lots of trouble with hal/dbus/X in the past I wonder if my options are to blame. many thanks -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: g_ufs_done() WHAT does it mean?
Bob Falanga wrote: I have installed freeBSD on a SATA 320 gig hard drive. After running for a few minutes I get several of the following error messages: g_ufs_done():ad4s1d[WRITE(offset=385482752, length=16384)]error=6. After two pages like that the computer stops and requires a hard boot to restart. I assume that the messages concern the hard drive, but what are they telling me? First, it's g_vfs_done, not g_ufs_done -- precision and accuracy are usually important when reporting error messages. In this case the important part is the error=6. You can look this up in /usr/include/errno.h which says: #define ENXIO 6 /* Device not configured */ which probably means that the device disappeared at runtime. What other messages were logged prior to this? Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g_ufs_done() WHAT does it mean?
I have installed freeBSD on a SATA 320 gig hard drive. After running for a few minutes I get several of the following error messages: g_ufs_done():ad4s1d[WRITE(offset=385482752, length=16384)]error=6. After two pages like that the computer stops and requires a hard boot to restart. I assume that the messages concern the hard drive, but what are they telling me? Help, and thanks, Bob Falanga ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw --- What does it mean?
James wrote: E. J. Cerejo wrote: Trying to upgrade libopensync022 and I get this error even though libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2 tarball is in /usr/ports/distfiles. = libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://www.opensync.org/attachment/wiki/download/. fetch: libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw: stat() = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw: stat() = Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this = port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. Why is it trying to fetch libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw ? Instead of libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2? I can't even rename it to that name! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I downloaded it just fine from the Makefile. It seems to extract itself entirely reasonably, though the name definitely looks peculiar. Visiting their website, it seems to randomly come and go whether I can access the download page. Try cding into the port directory and typing make a few times a few minutes apart. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I tried that, it still does the same thing. I was able to compile it though. Had to edit the Makefile a little and downloaded it manually. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw --- What does it mean?
E. J. Cerejo wrote: Trying to upgrade libopensync022 and I get this error even though libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2 tarball is in /usr/ports/distfiles. = libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://www.opensync.org/attachment/wiki/download/. fetch: libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw: stat() = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw: stat() = Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this = port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. Why is it trying to fetch libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw ? Instead of libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2? I can't even rename it to that name! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I downloaded it just fine from the Makefile. It seems to extract itself entirely reasonably, though the name definitely looks peculiar. Visiting their website, it seems to randomly come and go whether I can access the download page. Try cding into the port directory and typing make a few times a few minutes apart. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw --- What does it mean?
Trying to upgrade libopensync022 and I get this error even though libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2 tarball is in /usr/ports/distfiles. = libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://www.opensync.org/attachment/wiki/download/. fetch: libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw: stat() = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw: stat() = Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this = port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. Why is it trying to fetch libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2?rev=format=raw ? Instead of libopensync-0.22.tar.bz2? I can't even rename it to that name! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tar Ignoring out-of-order file What Does that Mean?
Jonathan McKeown writes: [that was me - I'm glad I was of some help] Most definitely. You've been a tremendous help but I am still stuck and I believe all issues are known except this one. I should know when the unpacking/packing part is working by unpacking the FreeBSD iso image and then repacking it without doing anything at all. This should give me an iso image that is the same size as the good one and probably a byte-for-byte copy of the original. I did as you suggested and here is what happened. First, I created a directory called image and cd'd there. $ ls It's empty as it should be. $ ln -s usr/src/sys sys $ ls -l total 0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 martin martin 11 Nov 5 07:44 sys - usr/src/sys Now, it is time to unpack the iso image. $ tar xf ~/6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso tar: Ignoring out-of-order file Darn! Well, Let's see how big an ISO image file it makes anyway. $ mkisofs -l -R -q . ~/tmp/testfile.iso $ ls -l ~/6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso ../tmp/testfile.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 martin martin 598476800 Nov 5 07:48 ../tmp/testfile.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 martin martin 601229312 Sep 21 08:57 /home/martin/6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso The original iso image is 2,752512 bytes larger. I bet it's the files that tar doesn't seem to be happy about. Once this hurdle is finally jumped, the rest should be quite normal. If you mount the image on a Linux system and use tar or mkisofs, you get a file that is almost twice the proper size so I think there may be some links that end up as multiple versions of the same files when they should have been symlinks or something else. The image made with FreeBSD's mkisofs and tar utilities is the archive that is 2.5 megs short. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tar Ignoring out-of-order file What Does that Mean?
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 16:02, Martin McCormick wrote: I need to modify the first installation image for a headless installation of Freebsd6.2. The file in question is: 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso Thanks to a helpful member of the list [that was me - I'm glad I was of some help] I found out that tar works on unpacking these images and it mostly does on this one, but there is a complaint I get from tar that I haven't found on other images. If I do a tar tvf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso Here is what happens while looking at the contents list: 0 44232 Jan 12 2007 RELNOTES.HTM lr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Jan 12 2007 stand - /rescue lr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Jan 12 2007 sys - usr/src/systar: Ignoring out-of-order file -r--r--r-- 1 0 0 22916 Jan 12 2007 RELNOTES.TXT I haven't taken any steps at all to verify this, but just looking at the error message it would appear that it's ignoring sys, which is a symlink to usr/src/sys. I wonder if it's encountering sys, trying to create the soft link and finding that usr/src/sys doesn't exist to be linked to because it hasn't been unpacked yet? That may be the meaning of the message about an out-of-order file. It appears that the entire image unpacks except for the ignored file. If one tries the extraction with tar xf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso The complaint about the out-of-order file is the only indication that anything is wrong. If it is indeed sys that's not being created, it's a symlink to a directory rather than a file or link to a file. If the root of the CD doesn't contain a directory called sys which softlinks to usr/src/sys, it should be possible to correct the error by doing ln -s usr/src/sys sys in the root of the unpacked CD filesystem. In looking at the man page for tar, nothing jumps out at me as to how to end up with the proper file structure that mkisofs can put back in to an image to put on a CDROM. My thanks for any suggestions as I may be needing to do one of these installs in a day or so and it would be nice to know that all the image is there. I may have missed your deadline in that case - sorry, I've been on holiday. Jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tar Ignoring out-of-order file What Does that Mean?
Martin McCormick wrote: I need to modify the first installation image for a headless installation of Freebsd6.2. The file in question is: 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso Thanks to a helpful member of the list, I found out that tar works on unpacking these images and it mostly does on this one, but there is a complaint I get from tar that I haven't found on other images. If I do a tar tvf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso Here is what happens while looking at the contents list: 0 44232 Jan 12 2007 RELNOTES.HTM lr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Jan 12 2007 stand - /rescue lr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Jan 12 2007 sys - usr/src/systar: Ignoring out-of-order file -r--r--r-- 1 0 0 22916 Jan 12 2007 RELNOTES.TXT It appears that the entire image unpacks except for the ignored file. If one tries the extraction with tar xf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso The complaint about the out-of-order file is the only indication that anything is wrong. In looking at the man page for tar, nothing jumps out at me as to how to end up with the proper file structure that mkisofs can put back in to an image to put on a CDROM. My thanks for any suggestions as I may be needing to do one of these installs in a day or so and it would be nice to know that all the image is there. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is probably not a direct answer to your question, but might be helpful: ISO images can be mounted as filesystems. In linux you would do something like mount -o loop /path/to/your.iso /path/to/mnt In FreeBSD, you would need to create a memory disk and mount it, i.e. mdconfig -a -f /path/to/your.iso (response) md0 mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /path/to/mnt you can then copy the files, and modify what you need. In order to make boot CDs again, you would need to use cdrecord with suitable options, which I don't remember by heart. BUT, you may look at the instructions on the following page: http://www.pa.msu.edu/~tigner/bsddvd.html there are instructions to create a bootable DVD from FreeBSD cdroms, and I can confirm the procedure works perfectly. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tar Ignoring out-of-order file What Does that Mean?
I need to modify the first installation image for a headless installation of Freebsd6.2. The file in question is: 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso Thanks to a helpful member of the list, I found out that tar works on unpacking these images and it mostly does on this one, but there is a complaint I get from tar that I haven't found on other images. If I do a tar tvf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso Here is what happens while looking at the contents list: 0 44232 Jan 12 2007 RELNOTES.HTM lr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Jan 12 2007 stand - /rescue lr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Jan 12 2007 sys - usr/src/systar: Ignoring out-of-order file -r--r--r-- 1 0 0 22916 Jan 12 2007 RELNOTES.TXT It appears that the entire image unpacks except for the ignored file. If one tries the extraction with tar xf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso The complaint about the out-of-order file is the only indication that anything is wrong. In looking at the man page for tar, nothing jumps out at me as to how to end up with the proper file structure that mkisofs can put back in to an image to put on a CDROM. My thanks for any suggestions as I may be needing to do one of these installs in a day or so and it would be nice to know that all the image is there. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tar Ignoring out-of-order file What Does that Mean?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-February/078081.html This may help Am Dienstag 30 Oktober 2007 14:02 schrieb Martin McCormick: I need to modify the first installation image for a headless installation of Freebsd6.2. The file in question is: 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso Thanks to a helpful member of the list, I found out that tar works on unpacking these images and it mostly does on this one, but there is a complaint I get from tar that I haven't found on other images. If I do a tar tvf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso Here is what happens while looking at the contents list: 0 44232 Jan 12 2007 RELNOTES.HTM lr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Jan 12 2007 stand - /rescue lr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Jan 12 2007 sys - usr/src/systar: Ignoring out-of-order file -r--r--r-- 1 0 0 22916 Jan 12 2007 RELNOTES.TXT It appears that the entire image unpacks except for the ignored file. If one tries the extraction with tar xf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso The complaint about the out-of-order file is the only indication that anything is wrong. In looking at the man page for tar, nothing jumps out at me as to how to end up with the proper file structure that mkisofs can put back in to an image to put on a CDROM. My thanks for any suggestions as I may be needing to do one of these installs in a day or so and it would be nice to know that all the image is there. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpkd4fq7OZpX.pgp Description: PGP signature
What does this mean?: +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5
Noticed the message in the subject in last night's security run. Is this a sign of impending drive failure? Some google searches turned up information about Areca drivers and lots of unanswered questions. This system doesn't have an Areca driver, and it's been rock-solid for about 2 months now. This is the first time I've seen these errors. The error (in case the subject gets mangled): internet.potentialtech.com kernel log messages: +++ /tmp/security.SIpHyxqO Fri Jun 22 03:01:14 2007 +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #1: Tue Feb 27 07:24:58 UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP ACPI APIC Table: DELL PE_SC3 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2800.12-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Cores per package: 2 real memory = 1073479680 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1023991808 (976 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.17.2 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) acpi0: DELL PE_SC3 on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.0 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.4 on pci0 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 bge0: Broadcom BCM5750 B1, ASIC rev. 0x4101 mem 0xfe9f-0xfe9f irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3 miibus0: MII bus on bge0 brgphy0: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:15:c5:fb:aa:a4 pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.5 on pci0 pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 bge1: Broadcom BCM5750 B1, ASIC rev. 0x4101 mem 0xfe7f-0xfe7f irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci4 miibus1: MII bus on bge1 brgphy1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:15:c5:fb:aa:a5 uhci0: UHCI (generic) USB controller port 0xbce0-0xbcff irq 20 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: UHCI (generic) USB controller on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: UHCI (generic) USB controller port 0xbcc0-0xbcdf irq 21 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: UHCI (generic) USB controller on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: UHCI (generic) USB controller port 0xbca0-0xbcbf irq 22 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: UHCI (generic) USB controller on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: Intel 82801GB/R (ICH7) USB 2.0 controller mem 0xfeb00400-0xfeb007ff irq 20 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: EHCI version 1.0 usb3: wrong number of companions (7 != 3) usb3: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3: Intel 82801GB/R (ICH7) USB 2.0 controller on ehci0 usb3: USB revision 2.0 uhub3: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered uhub4: vendor 0x04b4 product 0x6560, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.0b, addr 2 uhub4: multiple transaction translators uhub4: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci5: ACPI PCI bus on pcib5 pci5: display, VGA at device 5.0 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: Intel ICH7 UDMA100 controller port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0 ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0 atapci1: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
Re: What does this mean?: +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5
On Friday 22 June 2007 15:45, Bill Moran wrote: Noticed the message in the subject in last night's security run. Is this a sign of impending drive failure? Some google searches turned up information about Areca drivers and lots of unanswered questions. This system doesn't have an Areca driver, and it's been rock-solid for about 2 months now. This is the first time I've seen these errors. The error (in case the subject gets mangled): internet.potentialtech.com kernel log messages: +++ /tmp/security.SIpHyxqOFri Jun 22 03:01:14 2007 +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 Maybe it is just the medium. You could try reproducing the problem using dd. And then try another medium to see what's going on. Nikos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What does this mean?: +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5
In response to Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 22 June 2007 15:45, Bill Moran wrote: Noticed the message in the subject in last night's security run. Is this a sign of impending drive failure? Some google searches turned up information about Areca drivers and lots of unanswered questions. This system doesn't have an Areca driver, and it's been rock-solid for about 2 months now. This is the first time I've seen these errors. The error (in case the subject gets mangled): internet.potentialtech.com kernel log messages: +++ /tmp/security.SIpHyxqO Fri Jun 22 03:01:14 2007 +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 Maybe it is just the medium. You could try reproducing the problem using dd. And then try another medium to see what's going on. Whups ... never mind, just realized the cause. Must be working too hard ... I'd completely forgotten that I'd tried to mount a CD when there was nothing in the tray yesterday. Thanks for the quick response. Sorry for the noise. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does it mean: BBB reset failed?
Hello list, I have connected my MP3-Player Mustek E-102 on my SiS 5571 USB controller named as ohci0. The Kernel reports immediately after connection: umass1: vendor 0x10d6 USB 2.0(HS) Flash Disk, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 da0 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 da0: USB 2.0 (HS) Flash Disk 1.00 Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 1.000MB/s transfers da0: 242MB (497377 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 242C) But in /dev the device da0 never appears! During the next minutes these errors appears: umass1: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass1: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass1: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, TIMEOUT (da0:umass-sim1:1:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x4, scsi status == 0x0 and it seems that the system freezes randomly afterwards for a few milliseconds... Any ideas? With regards Stevan Tiefert ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
just what does kserel mean?
I have searched all over the net for a good definition of what the top state, kserel means. When I run mysql this is the state in which it runs. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 2117 mysql 17 200 323M 59080K kserel 0 0:02 0.00% mysqld I'm a newbie with freebsd and am concerned that this might be some sort of problem since my installation of Mysql turned out to be rather challenging. Thanks, Nestor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: just what does kserel mean?
In the last episode (Sep 11), Nestor Wheelock said: I have searched all over the net for a good definition of what the top state, kserel means. When I run mysql this is the state in which it runs. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 2117 mysql 17 200 323M 59080K kserel 0 0:02 0.00% mysqld That's just a wait state used inside libkse threads meaning a thread is waiting for something to do. Note that for a threaded program, the STATE seen by top is that of only one thread owned by the process. Press 'H' to see each thread on its own line. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: just what does kserel mean?
On Sep 11, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Nestor Wheelock wrote: I have searched all over the net for a good definition of what the top state, kserel means. When I run mysql this is the state in which it runs. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 2117 mysql 17 200 323M 59080K kserel 0 0:02 0.00% mysqld I'm a newbie with freebsd and am concerned that this might be some sort of problem since my installation of Mysql turned out to be rather challenging. This state is set in the kse_release() call in sys/kern/kern_kse.c, and appears to mean that the process is waiting to be woken up by a signal or is otherwise blocked waiting for more work; this is handled by returning control to userspace via an upcall. See man kse_release: In other words, as soon as there is a scheduling decision to be made, the KSE becomes unassigned, because the kernel does not presume to know how the process' other runnable threads should be scheduled. Unassigned KSEs always return to user space as soon as possible via the upcall mechanism (described below), allowing the user process to decide how that KSE should be utilized next. KSEs always complete as much work as possible in the kernel before becoming unassigned. [ ... ] The kse_release() system call is used to ``park'' the KSE assigned to the currently running thread when it is not needed, e.g., when there are more available KSEs than runnable user threads. The thread converts to an upcall but does not get scheduled until there is a new reason to do so, e.g., a previously blocked thread becomes runnable, or the timeout expires. If successful, kse_release() does not return to the caller. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: just what does kserel mean?
On 09/11/06 17:14, Nestor Wheelock wrote: I have searched all over the net for a good definition of what the top state, kserel means. When I run mysql this is the state in which it I don't mean to be stating the obvious... but as a newbie you might not know that KSE == Kernel Schedulable Entity You can do all sorts of googling on freebsd KSE and as Chuck mentioned browse sys/kern/kern_kse.c HTH. runs. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 2117 mysql 17 200 323M 59080K kserel 0 0:02 0.00% mysqld I'm a newbie with freebsd and am concerned that this might be some sort of problem since my installation of Mysql turned out to be rather challenging. Thanks, Nestor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Regards, Eric ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
poor mm, vmstat -- flt/ fr peaks -- what does they mean?
I use recent STABLE I lately noticed some memory management related performance problems on my system -- I haven't changed the software I use (apart from upgrading some packages) but I get clicks/lags which playing music, which didn't happen before :( In fact, I've never had such 'lags' when clicking windows/firefox tabs or problems with music since FreeBSD 4.5. I tried to trace this, but i don't have an idea how. It seems there are peaks of faulting, and then freeing a lot of memory. The music clicks are happening about 2-3 lines (seconds) below the peaks. Also, there is a lot of 'fr' --freed pages, but the ammount of 'fre' - free pages does not change. what does this mean? It's not freeing because of forced swapping, because pi/po is 0 almost all the time vmstat says: procs memory pagedisks faults cpu r b w avmfre flt re pi po fr sr ad0 cd0 in sy cs us sy id 4 2 1 887924 76716 5678 10 3 3 6733 617 0 0 1154 11552 5400 18 10 72 0 2 1 887924 76708 71 1 0 0 52 0 0 0 1231 9366 5873 12 6 82 2 2 1 887924 76516 224 0 0 0 202 0 2 0 1245 29414 7338 37 8 54 2 2 1 887920 76512 13083 1 0 0 16187 0 0 0 1242 37314 7983 38 22 40 0 2 1 887920 76384 295 0 0 0 278 0 1 0 1275 56337 8235 16 10 74 0 3 0 887920 76384 72 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 1575 10924 6780 7 2 91 1 2 1 887920 76384 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 1782 12263 7128 8 4 88 1 2 1 887920 76384 69 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 1720 10189 7021 17 4 78 0 3 0 887920 76256 12732 0 0 0 15655 0 4 0 1225 9442 5858 29 28 44 0 2 1 887920 76256 155 0 0 0 157 0 18 0 1257 21274 6910 11 6 83 2 2 1 887920 76176 126 0 0 0 141 0 1 0 1248 22010 6824 6 4 90 2 2 1 887924 76172 73 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 1755 10257 7042 28 7 65 1 2 1 887920 76048 42 0 0 0 51 0 1 0 1816 11311 7325 28 4 67 0 2 1 887936 76032 12804 0 0 0 15792 0 0 0 1797 10466 7008 35 29 36 1 3 0 887936 76028 46 0 0 0 67 0 14 0 1816 11688 7352 7 6 87 0 3 0 887676 76416 70 0 0 0 162 0 0 0 1763 10971 7105 13 7 80 0 2 1 887680 76284 52 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 1727 52113 6806 29 20 50 1 3 0 887680 76284 69 0 0 0 50 0 1 0 1770 10418 7171 19 7 73 0 2 1 887688 76164 12804 0 0 0 15672 0 32 0 1763 12186 6998 41 28 31 1 2 1 887688 76164 69 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 1284 10588 6178 5 2 94 1 2 1 887688 76036 44 0 0 0 52 0 1 0 1238 10377 5988 5 6 89 0 2 1 887688 76036 71 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 1261 10256 5929 14 4 82 1 2 1 895776 70236 1845 0 0 0 136 0 1 0 1193 18138 5565 34 8 57 2 2 1 887688 76036 11269 0 0 0 15649 0 0 0 1288 10355 5988 24 19 57 1 2 1 887688 75796 75 0 0 0 79 0 2 0 1451 12141 6548 9 5 86 2 2 1 887688 75796 69 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 1767 11031 7108 6 7 87 1 2 1 887688 75812 40 0 0 0 69 0 1 0 1265 10258 5993 18 5 77 (sorry for wrapped output) Thank You for Your thoughts, m. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what does this mean
On Sunday 21 May 2006 05:19, Imran Imtiaz wrote: i've seen the following log in my messages can any body tell me what does it mean? May 21 02:50:29 darkstar sm-mta[55021]: k4KLoTeq055021: localhost [127.0.0.1] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSA It means that someone (probably you or a program you were running since it's from localhost) connected to sendmail (probably on TCP port 25) on your machine, but then disconnected before issuing any commands. You can generate the message again by doing telnet localhost 25 and then typing ^] and quit without typing anything over the connection. Probably the result of a port scan or connectivity check. I wouldn't worry about it unduly. JN ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what does this mean
i've seen the following log in my messages can any body tell me what does it mean? May 21 02:50:29 darkstar sm-mta[55021]: k4KLoTeq055021: localhost [127.0.0.1] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSA regards, Imran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freebsd-questions] what does this mean
Imran Imtiaz wrote: i've seen the following log in my messages can any body tell me what does it mean? May 21 02:50:29 darkstar sm-mta[55021]: k4KLoTeq055021: localhost [127.0.0.1] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSA Do you run something like Nagios or BigBrother on your system? I see this in my logs when our network monitor connects to check port 25 is still responding. You would see it at regular intervals in that case. Of course, you or one of your users telnetting to port 25 manually would do the same thing. Best Regards, Howie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ports libtool change, what does it mean?
Earlier today, after a portsnap, I noticed a lot of ports with new revisions. I checked the UPDATING file, but it had nothing new in it (something about acroread7 was the latest entry). I decided to just do a simple portupgrade -a and let it rebuild everything (this is on a laptop with Xorg, Gnome2, etc.). Sometime later I portsnapped a server machine and noticed that there was now an updated UPDATING file explaining that the ports revisions were bumped because of the libtool change. It seems I portsnapped my laptop at a bad time, as it had apparently already gotten the ports after the libtool change but not the updated UPDATING file. (Note that I installed FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE on this laptop only 2 days ago with a fresh portstree so I don't think the bumped ports could have from some previous change). I have read the UPDATING entry 3 times now but I'm still not really sure what it means. Fortunately it seems that my laptop's portupgrade -a went OK except a dependency of subversion (apr-db4) failing to configure, but since I don't need svn at the moment I just removed it altogether and let it be for now. My question basically is, can I expect more problems later on, if so, should I rebuild my system from scratch? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports libtool change, what does it mean?
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:38:27AM +0100, Hans Nieser wrote: I have read the UPDATING entry 3 times now but I'm still not really sure what it means. Essentially nothing, to the end user. Fortunately it seems that my laptop's portupgrade -a went OK except a dependency of subversion (apr-db4) failing to configure, but since I don't need svn at the moment I just removed it altogether and let it be for now. My question basically is, can I expect more problems later on, if so, should I rebuild my system from scratch? If you do encounter build problems, please report them to ports@ including error transcripts. Kris pgpQm1vTGjpXw.pgp Description: PGP signature
GBDE error message - what does it mean?
Hello again everybody! A few days back I got my first GBDE-device up and running. After that I had a slight problem described in [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I already discribed this problem in a newsgroup (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc) and didn't get much help there[1] (apart from the adive to use geli instead of gbde). So I could go on working I simply changed to the trial-and-error approach. Well, I never really got to solve the problem itself, but could create and mount filesystems on ad6s1c and I could also initialize and attach that device to the kernel, create a filesystem on ad6s1c.bde and use it normally. At least, as far as I can tell. But then I took a look in /var/log/messages and saw this: Jan 24 00:00:21 jon kernel:g_vfs_done():ad6s1c.bde[WRITE(offset=157273636864, length=131072)]error = 1 Jan 24 00:00:52 jon last message repeated 2 times Jan 24 00:02:56 jon last message repeated 8 times Jan 24 00:12:48 jon last message repeated 39 times Jan 24 00:23:08 jon last message repeated 40 times Jan 24 00:32:57 jon last message repeated 38 times Jan 24 00:42:46 jon last message repeated 38 times Jan 24 00:53:06 jon last message repeated 40 times Jan 24 01:02:55 jon last message repeated 38 times Jan 24 01:13:12 jon last message repeated 39 times [...] dmesg is also full of this (only the first line of this quote, of course). Asking aunt google wasn't too helpful this time. I found one more or less useful thread about this subject: http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2005-11/0523.html A lot of talk and a fair bit of speculation, but what it boiled down to was, noone really knew what the problem was. There was a comment that maybe the device was full which in my case can't be since there are still som 38gigs free (of 149). Does anyone have an idea what I should do, or who I should bug? I'm not sure I want to write PHK an Email yet. Regards Chris [1] This is not a complaint, I guess noone had encountered and solved this problem before. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URGENT -- AP #1 (PHY #1) failed -- what does this mean?
Hi Sorry for the URGENT line. I have a critical server running 5.4- RELEASE-p1. It is a dual AMD MP 2800+ (Gigabyte board) with 4GB RAM and an Adaptec 2100S raid controller. Running (obviously) an SMP kernel. I recompiled the kernel this afternoon and changed one line -- the options HZ line from HZ=1100 to HZ=400 as a test of PHP performance. That was the only thing changed (the machine had been up since I installed 5.4 on it June 1). I built and installed the kernel and tonight I rebooted the machine. Now when it boots it comes up and real memory = 3758030848 (3583 MB) avail memory = 3678240768 (3507 MB) ACPI APIC Table: GBT AWRDACPI AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed! panic y/n? [y] What does this mean (and what do I do about it)? I am off to Google but as I am in a real tight spot I thought I would ask for some help asap before I go and try and figure this out. Thanks Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URGENT -- AP #1 (PHY #1) failed -- what does this mean?
At 12:51 AM 7/29/2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: Hi Sorry for the URGENT line. I have a critical server running 5.4- RELEASE-p1. It is a dual AMD MP 2800+ (Gigabyte board) with 4GB RAM and an Adaptec 2100S raid controller. Running (obviously) an SMP kernel. I recompiled the kernel this afternoon and changed one line -- the options HZ line from HZ=1100 to HZ=400 as a test of PHP performance. That was the only thing changed (the machine had been up since I installed 5.4 on it June 1). I built and installed the kernel and tonight I rebooted the machine. Now when it boots it comes up and real memory = 3758030848 (3583 MB) avail memory = 3678240768 (3507 MB) ACPI APIC Table: GBT AWRDACPI AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed! panic y/n? [y] What does this mean (and what do I do about it)? That basically means that the kernel failed to start the second CPU. -Glenn I am off to Google but as I am in a real tight spot I thought I would ask for some help asap before I go and try and figure this out. Thanks Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URGENT -- AP #1 (PHY #1) failed -- what does this mean?
On Jul 29, 2005, at 2:23 AM, Glenn Dawson wrote: At 12:51 AM 7/29/2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: Hi Now when it boots it comes up and real memory = 3758030848 (3583 MB) avail memory = 3678240768 (3507 MB) ACPI APIC Table: GBT AWRDACPI AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed! panic y/n? [y] What does this mean (and what do I do about it)? That basically means that the kernel failed to start the second CPU. Ok, thanks. Googling showed that absent other signs of a true HW problem, others have powercycled and the problem has gone away. That seems to have worked for me as well. Will monitor the situation. Thanks Chad -Glenn --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postfix, what does this mean?
Henry wrote: Err, I've got a bunch of mail questions... What the heck is going on here? Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 8B46133C3E: from=, size=2716, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: D956C33C39: from=, size=2712, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 5C36533C23: from=, size=2994, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: B9A8E33C21: from=, size=2950, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: 8B46133C3E: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=182913, status=deferred (connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: D956C33C39: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=190298, status=deferred (connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: 5C36533C23: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=60736, status=deferred (connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted) There from is not an omitted address... What is paypal trying to do? The last log is someone on nswebhost trying to use my smtp to send their mail correct? Is that what paypal is trying to do? But why? Subscribe to the Postfix users list. -- Best regards, Chris The first bug to hit a clean windshield lands directly in front of your eyes. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
postfix, what does this mean?
Err, I've got a bunch of mail questions... What the heck is going on here? Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 8B46133C3E: from=, size=2716, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: D956C33C39: from=, size=2712, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 5C36533C23: from=, size=2994, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: B9A8E33C21: from=, size=2950, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: 8B46133C3E: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=182913, status=deferred (connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: D956C33C39: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=190298, status=deferred (connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: 5C36533C23: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=60736, status=deferred (connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted) There from is not an omitted address... What is paypal trying to do? The last log is someone on nswebhost trying to use my smtp to send their mail correct? Is that what paypal is trying to do? But why? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postfix, what does this mean?
Henry wrote: Err, I've got a bunch of mail questions... What the heck is going on here? Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 8B46133C3E: from=, size=2716, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: D956C33C39: from=, size=2712, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 5C36533C23: from=, size=2994, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: B9A8E33C21: from=, size=2950, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: 8B46133C3E: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=182913, status=deferred (connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: D956C33C39: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=190298, status=deferred (connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: 5C36533C23: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=60736, status=deferred (connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted) There from is not an omitted address... What is paypal trying to do? Paypal is not trying to do anything. Some lamer is trying to use your SMTP host to send out fraud emails for malicious purposses. Regards S. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postfix, what does this mean?
But how come I can't see what IP the person is connecting from? So I can block him through my firewall since he is getting annoying :( ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does sbwait mean in top ?
Hi: What does sbwait mean in top? Is it related to a sysctl setting? I have looked in the man page for top, at William LeFebvres site ( http://www.groupsys.com/top ), in Evi Nemeth's UNIX System Administration Handbook and Googled in general. Does anyone know of a URL that gives an explanation of sbwait and for that matter semwait too. Kind regards, Jon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What does sbwait mean in top ?
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Jon Drews wrote: What does sbwait mean in top? Is it related to a sysctl setting? I have looked in the man page for top, at William LeFebvres site ( http://www.groupsys.com/top ), in Evi Nemeth's UNIX System Administration Handbook and Googled in general. Does anyone know of a URL that gives an explanation of sbwait and for that matter semwait too. The sbwait wchan is present when a thread has invoked the in-kernel sbwait() function to wait for a socket event. It's used in a number of situations, but the main ones are: - The thread is trying to send on a blocking socket, but there's insufficient socket buffer space, so it must wait for space. This might occur if it has managead to max out the bandwidth available to a TCP connection, or flow control is in use and the receiver does not wish to receive more data yet. - The thread is trying to receive on a blocking socket, but there's not enough data to satisfy the read request, so it must wait for data to be received. It might be waiting for a remote TCP sender to have data available, or for in-flight data to arrive. Robert N M Watson ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what does it mean?
Hi, I get message like this Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/sbin/update_dat mv: *.tar: No such file or directory ftp: Error retrieving file - `404 Object Not Found' what it mean? what I need to do and where can I find out information about it? Thanks as ever ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what does it mean?
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/sbin/update_dat mv: *.tar: No such file or directory ftp: Error retrieving file - `404 Object Not Found' what it mean? what I need to do and where can I find out information about it? Well, your program: '/usr/local/sbin/update_dat' Appears to be uploading files but can't find the file to upload. Open up the program file and take a look around. Your answer is sure to be in there (assuming that it is not a compiled program). Steve Thanks as ever ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what does it mean?
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:05:02 +0400 ??? (??) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get message like this Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/sbin/update_dat mv: *.tar: No such file or directory ftp: Error retrieving file - `404 Object Not Found' what it mean? what I need to do and where can I find out information about it? Looks to me like the script that updates the virus definition files for Macafee, but your mileage may vary. What does it mean? It means it was unable to download the latest package I think. But why don't you know what it's supposed to be doing? ;-) Regards, gerry ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harddisk UDMA ICRC error... from kernel at bootup. What does it mean?
Hi, A friend of mine switched from Windows XP to FreeBSD, because I garanteed that FreeBSD would be faster. I also want to optimize performance as much as possible. I'm therefore worried about the following messages from the kernel at bootup: [...snip...] ad0: 16448MB WDC WD172AA [33420/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ad1: 76319MB WDC WD800JB-00CRA1 [155061/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA66 acd0: CD-RW HL-DT-ST RW/DVD GCC-4320B at ata1-master PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) retrying ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) retrying ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) retrying ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) falling back to PIO mode --- Both harddisks are on the same IDE 40-pin cable as master and slave. ad0 is the FreeBSD formatted harddisk; one slice and several FreeBSD partitions. ad1 is from a former Windows XP installation, with two partitions: ad1s5 (ntfs) and ad1s6 (msdos). I don't understand much of the lines above. The last line says it falls back to PIO mode due to errors with ad1s5c. What does that mean? Will it use the slow 16.6 MB/s data exchange from disk to host? Does this then also imply that both disks use PIO/slow data exchange speed? (remember: both disks are on the same cable to the motherboard). What can I do to get things better and faster? And also: is this UDMA ICRC error because it's a Windows/DOS partition? Would formatting to FreeBSD filesystem solve the problem? Thanks, Rob. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Harddisk UDMA ICRC error... from kernel at bootup. What does it mean?
Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, A friend of mine switched from Windows XP to FreeBSD, because I garanteed that FreeBSD would be faster. I also want to optimize performance as much as possible. I'm therefore worried about the following messages from the kernel at bootup: [...snip...] ad0: 16448MB WDC WD172AA [33420/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ad1: 76319MB WDC WD800JB-00CRA1 [155061/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA66 acd0: CD-RW HL-DT-ST RW/DVD GCC-4320B at ata1-master PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) retrying ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) retrying ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) retrying ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) falling back to PIO mode --- Both harddisks are on the same IDE 40-pin cable as master and slave. ad0 is the FreeBSD formatted harddisk; one slice and several FreeBSD partitions. ad1 is from a former Windows XP installation, with two partitions: ad1s5 (ntfs) and ad1s6 (msdos). I don't understand much of the lines above. Super-simplified: it's telling you it gets checksum erros when it tries to talk to the drives at ATA66 speed, so it slows down and is then successful. The last line says it falls back to PIO mode due to errors with ad1s5c. What does that mean? Will it use the slow 16.6 MB/s data exchange from disk to host? Yes. Windows is probably already running at this speed, but it just doesn't bother to inform you. Does this then also imply that both disks use PIO/slow data exchange speed? (remember: both disks are on the same cable to the motherboard). Yes. What can I do to get things better and faster? Get an 80 conductor cable (probably). And also: is this UDMA ICRC error because it's a Windows/DOS partition? Would formatting to FreeBSD filesystem solve the problem? No, it's more likely because of the 40 pin cable. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Harddisk UDMA ICRC error... from kernel at bootup. What does it mean?
- Original Message - From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:26 PM Subject: Re: Harddisk UDMA ICRC error... from kernel at bootup. What does it mean? | Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Hi, | | A friend of mine switched from Windows XP to FreeBSD, because I garanteed that FreeBSD | would be faster. I also want to optimize performance as much as possible. I'm therefore | worried about the following messages from the kernel at bootup: | | [...snip...] | ad0: 16448MB WDC WD172AA [33420/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 | ad1: 76319MB WDC WD800JB-00CRA1 [155061/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA66 | acd0: CD-RW HL-DT-ST RW/DVD GCC-4320B at ata1-master PIO4 | Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a | ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) retrying | ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) retrying | ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) retrying | ad1s5c: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 93787664 of 46885768-46885895 (ad1s5 bn 93787664; cn 5838 tn 3 sn 5) falling back to PIO mode | | --- | | Both harddisks are on the same IDE 40-pin cable as master and slave. | ad0 is the FreeBSD formatted harddisk; one slice and several FreeBSD partitions. | ad1 is from a former Windows XP installation, with two partitions: ad1s5 (ntfs) and ad1s6 (msdos). | | I don't understand much of the lines above. | | Super-simplified: it's telling you it gets checksum erros when it tries to | talk to the drives at ATA66 speed, so it slows down and is then successful. | | The last line says it falls back to PIO mode due to errors with ad1s5c. | What does that mean? Will it use the slow 16.6 MB/s data exchange from disk to host? | | Yes. Windows is probably already running at this speed, but it just doesn't | bother to inform you. | | Does this then also imply that both disks use PIO/slow data exchange speed? | (remember: both disks are on the same cable to the motherboard). | | Yes. | | What can I do to get things better and faster? | | Get an 80 conductor cable (probably). Shouldn't they be able to use ATA33 on a 40 pin cable atleast? Try atacontrol? | | And also: is this UDMA ICRC error because it's a Windows/DOS partition? | Would formatting to FreeBSD filesystem solve the problem? | | No, it's more likely because of the 40 pin cable. | | -- | Bill Moran | Potential Technologies | http://www.potentialtech.com | ___ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions | To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What does this mean
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 06:19, Frank wrote: I have formatted my hard disk using the floppy that came with it. It is now a 32bit FAT. I ran FIPS and everything seemed to go OK except that I received a message at the end of FIPS that said it could not partition FAT12, but I have no idea where it is getting the FAT12 from. If you have a hard disk without any pre-existing operating systems and want to install FreeBSD why are messing with FIPS or FAT system. Just insert the installation CD and follow directions. If your trying to install some other system then you're in the wrong place. Please note that FIPS reported OK after checking FAT while running. The message I get from the FIPS at the end of everything is that the partition has been created and that I should run scandisk on the smaller partition. Then beneath this it says: Memory allocation error could not load command system halted. The exact msg from trying to install from the image CD I created is: What sort of image? Some operating system? Or something else? If it is not an operating system on what and how are you trying to install it? 'Building the boot loader arguments read error: 0x01 could not find primary volume descriptor' Unlikely anyone can help without more informatiom. Best of luck, Malcolm Kay ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does this mean
I have formatted my hard disk using the floppy that came with it. It is now a 32bit FAT. I ran FIPS and everything seemed to go OK except that I received a message at the end of FIPS that said it could not partition FAT12, but I have no idea where it is getting the FAT12 from. Please note that FIPS reported OK after checking FAT while running. The message I get from the FIPS at the end of everything is that the partition has been created and that I should run scandisk on the smaller partition. Then beneath this it says: Memory allocation error could not load command system halted. The exact msg from trying to install from the image CD I created is: 'Building the boot loader arguments read error: 0x01 could not find primary volume descriptor' Thanks Frank ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
top - what does sbwait mean ?
Hi to all , I've written a small perl script , when i run it it soemtimes shows in perl with sbwait state? where can i find out what sbwait ( or ither states for that matter ) mean ? --- PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 9146 root 2 -20 303M 303M sbwait 1 46:34 0.00% 0.00% perl thanks Moti To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: top - what does sbwait mean ?
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 10:16:53AM -0500, Moti Levy wrote:
Hi to all ,
I've written a small perl script ,
when i run it it soemtimes shows in perl with sbwait state? where can i find
out what sbwait ( or ither states for that matter ) mean ?
---
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
9146 root 2 -20 303M 303M sbwait 1 46:34 0.00% 0.00% perl
sbwait is the name of a kernel function meaning 'socket buffer wait'
--- ie. the process is waiting on data to be delivered to or drain
from a socket. Or, at least that's what I gather from reading the
sources: there doesn't seem to be any documentation in the whole
RELENG_4 src tree mentioning that particular term:
% find /usr/src -type f -print | xargs grep -i sbwait
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:error =
sbwait(so-so_snd);
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:error = sbwait(so-so_rcv);
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:error =
sbwait(so-so_rcv);
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c:sbwait(sb)
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c: (sb-sb_flags SB_NOINTR) ? PSOCK :
PSOCK | PCATCH, sbwait,
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c: * a race condition with sbwait().
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c: error =
sbwait(so-so_snd);
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c: * An error from sbwait
usually indicates that we've
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c: * if sbwait
returns an error due to receipt
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c: * of a signal.
If sbwait does return
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c:(void)
sbwait(so-so_rcv);
/usr/src/sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c: * sbwait() after someone else has
received my reply for me.
/usr/src/sys/sys/socketvar.h:intsbwait __P((struct sockbuf *sb));
The function definition is in /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c:
/*
* Wait for data to arrive at/drain from a socket buffer.
*/
int
sbwait(sb)
struct sockbuf *sb;
{
sb-sb_flags |= SB_WAIT;
return (tsleep((caddr_t)sb-sb_cc,
(sb-sb_flags SB_NOINTR) ? PSOCK : PSOCK | PCATCH, sbwait,
sb-sb_timeo));
}
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
What does portsclean *mean*?
I tried running portsclean after upgrading a lot of my ports recently, and got this output: [root@kepler:/usr/ports]# portsclean -DL Detecting unreferenced distfiles... no unreferenced distfiles found. ** /usr/lib/compat/libc_r.so.4 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 ** /usr/lib/compat/libedit.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libedit.so.3 So, does this mean I should delete the libraries in /usr/lib/compat? Then continuing: ** You have multiple versions of libgobject-1.3 but 2 of them are not from packages: gobject-1.3.13 (/usr/local/lib/libgobject-1.3.so.13)- ? gobject-1.3.1 (/usr/local/lib/libgobject-1.3.so.1) - ? and the symlink (/usr/local/lib/libgobject-1.3.so) points to: gobject-1.3.13 (/usr/local/lib/libgobject-1.3.so.13)- ? -- Skipping gobject-1.3.13 because it is newer than what the packages provide -- Skipping gobject-1.3.1 because it is newer than what the packages provide I don't understand what I should do here. Should I delete the older libraries? What does it matter that they are not from packages? I never use packages, I always download and build the port, which is how I just got these conflicts! Or are they conflicts? Do they matter? If not, why does portsclean tell me about them? ** You have multiple versions of libglib-1.3 but 2 of them are not from packages: glib-1.3.13 (/usr/local/lib/libglib-1.3.so.13) - ? glib-1.3.1 (/usr/local/lib/libglib-1.3.so.1)- ? and the symlink (/usr/local/lib/libglib-1.3.so) points to: glib-1.3.13 (/usr/local/lib/libglib-1.3.so.13) - ? -- Skipping glib-1.3.13 because it is newer than what the packages provide -- Skipping glib-1.3.1 because it is newer than what the packages provide ** You have multiple versions of libgthread-1.3 but 2 of them are not from packages: gthread-1.3.13 (/usr/local/lib/libgthread-1.3.so.13)- ? gthread-1.3.1 (/usr/local/lib/libgthread-1.3.so.1) - ? and the symlink (/usr/local/lib/libgthread-1.3.so) points to: gthread-1.3.13 (/usr/local/lib/libgthread-1.3.so.13)- ? -- Skipping gthread-1.3.13 because it is newer than what the packages provide -- Skipping gthread-1.3.1 because it is newer than what the packages provide ** You have multiple versions of libgmodule-1.3 but 2 of them are not from packages: gmodule-1.3.13 (/usr/local/lib/libgmodule-1.3.so.13)- ? gmodule-1.3.1 (/usr/local/lib/libgmodule-1.3.so.1) - ? and the symlink (/usr/local/lib/libgmodule-1.3.so) points to: gmodule-1.3.13 (/usr/local/lib/libgmodule-1.3.so.13)- ? -- Skipping gmodule-1.3.13 because it is newer than what the packages provide -- Skipping gmodule-1.3.1 because it is newer than what the packages provide ** Clean out /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg manually on occasions. Does this mean I should delete the three libraries in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg? ** Try using libchk(1) (sysutils/libchk) to find out unreferenced libraries. One of my gripes about the portupgrade group of tools is that their documentation doesn't explain their error messages. Any help would be appreciated. -- Roger To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
what does RELENG mean?
I've just been told that RELENG means RELEASE ENGINNER. Is this actually defined somewhere? -- Dan Langille To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: what does RELENG mean?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:44:51PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: I've just been told that RELENG means RELEASE ENGINNER. Is this actually defined somewhere? Release Engineering. Details at http://www.freebsd.org/releng/. -- Robin Damm [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
What does this mean?
Running FBSD 4.5-RELEASE Just looked at dmesg and noticed this at the end of the output: Limiting open port RST response from 261 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 312 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 282 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 281 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 264 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 226 to 200 packets per second What is this Open port Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator SageOne Net http://www.sage-one.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: What does this mean?
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 05:11 pm, Jack L. Stone wrote: Running FBSD 4.5-RELEASE Just looked at dmesg and noticed this at the end of the output: Limiting open port RST response from 261 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 312 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 282 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 281 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 264 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 226 to 200 packets per second What is this Open port Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator SageOne Net http://www.sage-one.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message Your were being port scanned, probably by yourself too. :) Been there, done that. There is a safety feature built in to limit the number of packets per second handled by the system. Tim -- FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE 5:13PM up 10:33, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: What does this mean?
At 05:15 PM 7.23.2002 -0500, Tim wrote: On Tuesday 23 July 2002 05:11 pm, Jack L. Stone wrote: Running FBSD 4.5-RELEASE Just looked at dmesg and noticed this at the end of the output: Limiting open port RST response from 261 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 312 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 282 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 281 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 264 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 226 to 200 packets per second What is this Open port Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator SageOne Net http://www.sage-one.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message Your were being port scanned, probably by yourself too. :) Been there, done that. There is a safety feature built in to limit the number of packets per second handled by the system. Tim Thanks, for the quick reply, Tim... whew! First time to see that Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator SageOne Net http://www.sage-one.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
