Re: freebsd-update and speed

> Am 17.04.2021 um 23:09 schrieb Cejka Rudolf : > > Did you try aws.update.freebsd.org <http://aws.update.freebsd.org/> also? The problem with that is that it probably doesn’t have a fixed IP and not all our firewalls can whitelist a domain (and freebsd-update doesn’t wo

Re: freebsd-update and speed

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021, Cejka Rudolf wrote: The other day, freebsd-update even suffered a timeout. What are other European users experiences and is there anything to do about it? Did you try aws.update.freebsd.org also? I just did now with an update of 11.4 to 12.2. It was really fast, so

Re: freebsd-update and speed

On 2021-04-18 13:57:45 (+0800), Jason Tubnor wrote: On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 10:51, Philip Paeps wrote: It looks like there were at least experiments with pointing freebsd-update at AWS, similar to how portsnap currently works. I will check if these experiments went anywhere and possibly

Re: freebsd-update and speed

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 10:51, Philip Paeps wrote: > > > It looks like there were at least experiments with pointing > freebsd-update at AWS, similar to how portsnap currently works. I will > check if these experiments went anywhere and possibly point > freebsd-update there i

Re: freebsd-update and speed

On 2021-04-18 08:51:05 (+0800), Philip Paeps wrote: On 2021-04-18 03:12:35 (+0800), Rainer Duffner wrote: I’m cc-ing clusteradm and dnsadmin, in hope that there’s somebody there who can either fix it or take update4 out of the srv record… I can take update4 out of the DNS if it's misbehaving c

Re: freebsd-update and speed

experiments with pointing freebsd-update at AWS, similar to how portsnap currently works. I will check if these experiments went anywhere and possibly point freebsd-update there instead. I believe the problem with update4 is load-related. :-( I would rather just mirror the update serve

Re: freebsd-update and speed

w that I have time > to type this mail while waiting for '8778 patches'. Hello, you are right, it was ;o) > The other day, freebsd-update even suffered a timeout. > > What are other European users experiences and is there anything to do about > it? Did you try aws.

Re: freebsd-update and speed

> Am 16.04.2021 um 10:17 schrieb Ferdinand Goldmann : > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Rainer Duffner wrote: > >> >> >> It’s OK-ish most of the time here (CH). >> >> It does *NOT* work through a proxy, due to the use of pipelined >> http-requests. >> >> What’s your internet-connection? > > The 10

Re: freebsd-update and speed

is in Netherlands. My servers are in Germany and I get good speed. portsnap uses "AWS Global Accelerator" and while I use it I was getting good speeds too. I am not familiar with freebsd-update as I build from source, but update.freebsd.org points to update1.freebsd.org , update2.freebsd

Re: freebsd-update and speed

bly faster. Might have been a coincidence... I'll see when I do the next updates in a few days. Anyway this should be something I'd like the freebsd-update utility to by itsself: Choose a fast mirror. Or at least have a documented way on how to adjust this instead of trial and error. Regards

Re: freebsd-update and speed

Am 16.04.21 um 10:17 schrieb Ferdinand Goldmann: On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Rainer Duffner wrote: It’s OK-ish most of the time here (CH). It does *NOT* work through a proxy, due to the use of pipelined http-requests. What’s your internet-connection? The 10Gbit uplink of my university, directly

Re: freebsd-update and speed

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Rainer Duffner wrote: It’s OK-ish most of the time here (CH). It does *NOT* work through a proxy, due to the use of pipelined http-requests. What’s your internet-connection? The 10Gbit uplink of my university, directly connected to the internet, not behind a proxy. I d

Re: freebsd-update and speed

On 2021-04-15 14:20, Ferdinand Goldmann wrote: > I've noticed that ever since update3.freebsd.org is gone (which was in Czech > republic I think), FreeBSD updates are often quite slow for me (= > Austria/Europe) > Especially so for major release upgrades. In fact so slow that I have time > to typ

Re: freebsd-update and speed

On 4/15/2021 08:28, Ferdinand Goldmann wrote: Following up on my own mail: to type this mail while waiting for '8778 patches'. Which has ended in: 71107120 done. Applying patches... done. Fetching 1965 files... failed. and after restarting it: Fetching 1750 patches [...] Applying

Re: freebsd-update and speed

ase upgrades. In fact so slow that I have time > to type this mail while waiting for '8778 patches'. > > The other day, freebsd-update even suffered a timeout. > > What are other European users experiences and is there anything to do about > it? > > Regards

Re: freebsd-update and speed

Yeah it took some time. One machine (Netherlands) took 4 hours to download the patches, failed multiple times but it finished after all. today another box was faster but failed one time. Far from perfect ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https:

Re: freebsd-update and speed

s... This does not seem very reassuring to me. :( The other day, freebsd-update even suffered a timeout. What are other European users experiences and is there anything to do about it? Regards Ferdinand -- Ferdinand Goldmann System Administrator Information Management JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVE

freebsd-update and speed

78 patches'. The other day, freebsd-update even suffered a timeout. What are other European users experiences and is there anything to do about it? Regards Ferdinand smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

Hi, On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:52:59PM -0500, Doug McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:54:03PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: it just threw me that the thing-that-was-updated didn't update its version information when queried. Absent sources, how can I tell it was updated (apart from freebsd-v

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

uname -aU: FreeBSD t450s.local.lan 12.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p4 GENERIC amd64 1202000 freebsd-version: 12.2-RELEASE-p5 cat /etc/os-release NAME=FreeBSD VERSION=12.2-RELEASE-p5 VERSION_ID=12.2 ID=freebsd ANSI_COLOR="0;31" PRETTY_NAME="FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p5" CPE_NAME=cpe:/o:freebsd:fre

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 31/03/2021 12:35 am, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > Recently there was > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html > about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. > > What I'm unsure about is the openssl ver

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:54:03PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > it just threw me that the thing-that-was-updated didn't update its > version information when queried. Absent sources, how can I tell it > was updated (apart from freebsd-version -u) ? Comparing what the SA patch says it is doing at ht

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:07:41PM -0400, Karl Denninger wrote: Ok, that's fair; it DOES show -p5 for the user side. $ freebsd-version -ru 12.2-RELEASE-p4 12.2-RELEASE-p5 So that says my userland is -p5 while the kernel, which did not change (even though if you built from source it would carry

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:55:24AM -0400, Karl Denninger wrote: How do I *know*, without source to go look at, whether or not the fix is present on a binary system? Yep, you understand my point exactly. -- J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

.html about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report OpenSSL 1.1.1h-freebsd? 22 Sep 2020 Up-to-date stable/13-n245043-7590d7800c4 reports OpenSSL 1.1.1k-freebsd 25 Mar 2021 shouldn'

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

ipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html > > > > > > about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. > > > > > > What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. > > > Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report OpenSSL 1.1.1h-freebsd

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 3/30/2021 11:22, Guido Falsi via freebsd-stable wrote: On 30/03/21 15:35, tech-lists wrote: Hi, Recently there was https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. What I'm unsure abo

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 30/03/21 17:38, tech-lists wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-stable wrote: No, as you can see in the commit in the official git [1] while for current and stable the new upstream version of openssl was imported for the release the fix was applied without

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-stable wrote: No, as you can see in the commit in the official git [1] while for current and stable the new upstream version of openssl was imported for the release the fix was applied without importing the new release and without

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

cannot go to "-STABLE" via freebsd-update; to run -STABLE you must be doing buildworld/buildkernel from source.  I can confirm that 12.2-STABLE *does* have the patch as I checked it recently. I know. The reason I mentioned -STABLE at all was for the purpose of comparative versioni

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 30/03/21 15:35, tech-lists wrote: Hi, Recently there was https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report Op

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

x27;m not sure what you mean by this. In https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html it says 1) To update your vulnerable system via a binary patch: Systems running a RELEASE version of FreeBSD on the i386 or amd64 platforms can be updated via the freebsd-upd

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

s. In https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html it says 1) To update your vulnerable system via a binary patch: Systems running a RELEASE version of FreeBSD on the i386 or amd64 platforms can be updated via the freebsd-update(8) utility: # freebsd-update

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Ruben via freebsd-stable wrote: Hi, Did you mean 12.1-p5 or 12.2-p5 ? I'm asking because you refer to both 12.1-p5 and 12.2-p5 (typo?). yes, I meant 12.2-p5, sorry -- J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

freebsd-update fetch and freebsd-update install?? Brian On 3/30/2021 7:18 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: On 3/30/2021 10:14, Doug McIntyre wrote: Like the patch referenced in the SA. https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-21:07/openssl-12.patch Again, it seems like confusion over what happens

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

1 3:35 PM, tech-lists wrote: Hi, Recently there was https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report OpenSSL 1.1.1h-

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

> > On 3/30/21 3:35 PM, tech-lists wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Recently there was > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html > > about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. > > > > What I&#x

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

PM, tech-lists wrote: Hi, Recently there was https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report OpenSSL 1.1.1h-free

possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

Hi, Recently there was https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report OpenSSL 1.1.1h-freebsd 22 Sep 2020

Re: freebsd-update not removing old libraries

On Tue., Mar. 16, 2021, 10:48 p.m. Lucas Nali de Magalhães, < rollingb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 2021, at 3:57 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > > There seems to be a bug in freebsd-update on 11.x and 12.x systems where > it's not removing old library files in the final

Re: freebsd-update not removing old libraries

> On Mar 16, 2021, at 3:57 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > > There seems to be a bug in freebsd-update on 11.x and 12.x systems where > it's not removing old library files in the final "freebsd-update install" > run. > > System 1: > 10.2 upgrade to 11.2. /lib

freebsd-update not removing old libraries

There seems to be a bug in freebsd-update on 11.x and 12.x systems where it's not removing old library files in the final "freebsd-update install" run. System 1: 10.2 upgrade to 11.2. /lib/libreadline.so.8 is left behind, which breaks bash pkg. 11.2 upgrade to 11.4. /lib/libreadli

Re: FreeBSD update & custom kernel

> On 25 Jan 2019, at 21:19, Esa Karkkainen wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 05:03:32PM +1030, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >> Hi everyone, > > Hi Daniel, > >> Is it feasible for freebsd-update to update the source before the >> first reboot so a cus

Re: FreeBSD update & custom kernel

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 05:03:32PM +1030, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > Hi everyone, Hi Daniel, > Is it feasible for freebsd-update to update the source before the > first reboot so a custom kernel can be built? It's a hack, but sorta kinda yes. Use freebsd-update to update o

FreeBSD update & custom kernel

Hi everyone, I recently tried out freebsd-update on a system with a custom kernel (it uses ALTQ) and it seems that this means you have to reboot into the new generic kernel, build the custom kernel & install it and then reboot again. Obviously for me this is not a huge deal since I only nee

freebsd-update IDS: fixing errors

I'd like to use "freebsd-update IDS" as a simple intrusion check. I have a separate mechanism to test that freebsd-update itself hasn't been modified. However I get lots of lines like this: /usr/share/man/man4/if_ixgbe.

Re: freebsd-update: cannot open patchlist

> Am 27.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Randy Bush : > > indeed, that fixes it. thank you. ;-) BTDTGTT This is (or was) especially a problem with ezjail’s use of freebsd-update. Most of the time, freebsd-update works - but when it gets confused, the quickest solution is often to s

Re: freebsd-update: cannot open patchlist

>> # freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.1-RELEASE > > Does it still happen when you run > rm -rf /var/db/freebsd-update/* > freebsd-update -r 11.1-RELEASE upgrade indeed, that fixes it. thank you. randy ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: freebsd-update: cannot open patchlist

> Am 27.05.2018 um 04:05 schrieb Randy Bush : > > # freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.1-RELEASE Does it still happen when you run rm -rf /var/db/freebsd-update/* freebsd-update -r 11.1-RELEASE upgrade ? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai

Re: freebsd-update: cannot open patchlist

>> # freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.1-RELEASEa > > you probably noticed the moment you hit the send button, but in case > you didn't: Try to update to 11.1-RELEASE instead of 11.1-RELEASEa typo after paste # history | grep upgrade 53 freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.1-RE

freebsd-update: cannot open patchlist

# uname -a FreeBSD rip.psg.com 10.3-RELEASE-p24 FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p24 #0: Wed Nov 15 04:57:40 UTC 2017 r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.1-RELEASEa ... .30900309103092030930309403095030960

Re: Ancient FreeBSD update path

Back everything up. Forget about upgrading you are making your life harder. Do a ZFS install with BE's then port your apps. It will be quicker less prone to errors and you will end up with a better system in the end. If the system is a bit of a rats nest, then this would be the ideal time to docume

Re: Ancient FreeBSD update path

On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 13:28:41 +0100 Andrea Brancatelli wrote: Andrea Brancatelli writes: > Hello guys. > > I have a couple of ancient FreeBSD install that I have to bring into > this century (read either 10.4 or 11.1) :-) > > I'm talking about a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 and a couple of FreeBSD >

Re: Ancient FreeBSD update path

On 19 Jan, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 01:28:41PM +0100, Andrea Brancatelli wrote: >> Hello guys. >> >> I have a couple of ancient FreeBSD install that I have to bring into >> this century (read either 10.4 or 11.1) :-) >> >> I'm talking about a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 and a

Re: Ancient FreeBSD update path

On 1/19/18 4:59 AM, Mike Pumford wrote: I've just done a 9.3 to 10.3 upgrade with freebsd-update and pkg. Networking wasn't avalable when the system was running 10.3 kernel with 9.3 userland so I did that part of the update on the console. I have run into this problem with 9

Re: Ancient FreeBSD update path

best way is to update stepwise using freebsd-update, so: 8.0 -> 8.3 -> 9.1 -> 9.3 -> 10.1 -> 10.3 I would recommend source upgrade instead of binary freebsd-update. It is more predictable then freebsd-update if you are updating sooo old system Direct jump into the future (8

Re: Ancient FreeBSD update path

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 01:28:41PM +0100, Andrea Brancatelli wrote: > Hello guys. > > I have a couple of ancient FreeBSD install that I have to bring into > this century (read either 10.4 or 11.1) :-) > > I'm talking about a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 and a couple of FreeBSD > 9.3-RELEASE-p53. >

Re: Ancient FreeBSD update path

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Andrea Brancatelli < abrancate...@schema31.it> wrote: > Hello guys. > > I have a couple of ancient FreeBSD install that I have to bring into > this century (read either 10.4 or 11.1) :-) > > I'm talking about a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 and a couple of FreeBSD > 9.3-R

Re: Ancient FreeBSD update path

way is to update stepwise using freebsd-update, so: 8.0 -> 8.3 -> 9.1 -> 9.3 -> 10.1 -> 10.3 > Direct jump into the future (8 -> 11)? Progressive steps (8 -> 9 -> 10 > -> 11)? Boiling water on the HDs? :-) Stepwise. Huge jumps have too many

Re: Ancient FreeBSD update path

.3 upgrade with freebsd-update and pkg. Networking wasn't avalable when the system was running 10.3 kernel with 9.3 userland so I did that part of the update on the console. That system started life as a FreeBSD 5.x system and got left to rot at that version for a long time because it

Ancient FreeBSD update path

Hello guys. I have a couple of ancient FreeBSD install that I have to bring into this century (read either 10.4 or 11.1) :-) I'm talking about a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 and a couple of FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p53. What upgrade strategy would you suggest? Direct jump into the future (8 -> 11)? Pr

Re: Mirror the freebsd-update server?

Have a look at pkgbase, Im not sure of the current status, but its worth being aware, and it works quite well with my setup. Caution will be needed though as its new. On 13 September 2017 at 01:03, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > Am 13.09.2017 um 00:09 schrieb Jason Tubnor : > > > > I found this use

Re: Mirror the freebsd-update server?

> Am 13.09.2017 um 00:09 schrieb Jason Tubnor : > > I found this useful. I made some adjustments for what I needed but those > updates are sweet now :-) > https://wiki.freebsd.org/VladimirKrstulja/Guides/FreeBSDUpdateReverseProxy >

Re: Mirror the freebsd-update server?

On 13 September 2017 at 07:52, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > is it possible or even allowed to just mirror one of the > freebsd-update servers locally? > [...] > > > Take a look at https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/hubs/index.html. > > This doc disc

Re: Mirror the freebsd-update server?

Hi! > > is it possible or even allowed to just mirror one of the freebsd-update > > servers locally? [...] > Take a look at https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/hubs/index.html. > This doc discusses setting up a mirror (found via quick Google > search). That's a

Re: Mirror the freebsd-update server?

it doesn’t talk about freebsd-update - which is quite a different beast than FTP/WWW mirrors? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Mirror the freebsd-update server?

> On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:03 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote: > > Hi, > > is it possible or even allowed to just mirror one of the freebsd-update > servers locally? > > I don't want to build the patches myself (I have no custom kernels, but best > I can do is

Mirror the freebsd-update server?

Hi, is it possible or even allowed to just mirror one of the freebsd-update servers locally? I don't want to build the patches myself (I have no custom kernels, but best I can do is not completely f' it up - so why bother?). I have between 100 und 200 servers that need update

FreeBSD-update incorrectly reporting that it is approaching End of Life

FreeBSD-update has outdated release lifetime data, and is emitting a false warning that the End-of-Life date for FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p8 is approaching. | WARNING: FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p8 is approaching its End-of-Life date. | It is strongly recommended that you upgrade to a newer | release

freebsd-update: 11.0 approaching EOL?

Hi, I just got the following message after running freebsd-update: ... WARNING: FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p8 is approaching its End-of-Life date. It is strongly recommended that you upgrade to a newer release within the next 2 months. I guess this should be fixed. -- Before enlightenment - chop

Re: freebsd-update

On Dec 8, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > Basic symptom: > ># /usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch >Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. >Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-STABLE from update.FreeBSD.org... > failed. >No mirrors remainin

Re: freebsd-update

the problems were o op error trying to binary on stable not release o freebsf-update fetch should not be dns case sensitive no matter what o the libipx.so.4/5 lack of update in 10-release.p13 i am sure there are other problems including yours. it's getting sloppy. randy ___

freebsd-update

Basic symptom: # /usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-STABLE from update.FreeBSD.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. Trace: # sh -x /usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

_config with > the default version in /usr/src/crypto/openssh. > I used to explicitly disable v1 compatibility. The machine that's a target of the "freebsd-update" attention has no sources, so I copied sshd_config from it to /tmp on my laptop (which does): g1-252(11.0

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

ab on the inactive slice to reflect > > > reality for when it's the boot slice, then (while the file systemms > > > from the other slice are still mounted -- e.g., on /S2) run > > > "freebsd-update -b /S2 fetch install", then reboot from the > > >

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

the file systemms > > from the other slice are still mounted -- e.g., on /S2) run > > "freebsd-update -b /S2 fetch install", then reboot from the > > newly-updated slice. > > > > In the past, that's Just Worked. > > Your usage probably worked

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

/usr file systems from the "active" slice to the > "inactive" slice, adjust /etc/fstab on the inactive slice to reflect > reality for when it's the boot slice, then (while the file systemms > from the other slice are still mounted -- e.g., on /S2) run > "freeb

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:35:01PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:26 PM, David Wolfskill > wrote: > > > This weekend, though, I was planning to update my other systems tfrom > > stable/10 to stable/11, so I figured I'd try freebsd-update

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:26 PM, David Wolfskill wrote: > This weekend, though, I was planning to update my other systems tfrom > stable/10 to stable/11, so I figured I'd try freebsd-update on this > machine first. > Wait, you used freebsd-update on a machine running stable?

sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

less turbulent -- usually! -- now than it was a decade ago). However, I have one machine that is pretty much dedicated to one specific function, and for it, I thought I'd try freebsd-update. And over the last year or so, it's worked pretty well: I have the machine set up (as is usually my app

RE: working now: freebsd-update to FreeBSD 11.0-RC3 then kernel compile fails In function `iflib_legacy_setup'

Attempted to isolate the problem, compiled a GENERIC kernel with nothing added, with no problem. Then with only pf added and then with pf and altq added and still no compile problem. Did not reboot the machine any more between these trials so I think the update process was good, do not know what

freebsd-update to FreeBSD 11.0-RC3 then kernel compile fails In function `iflib_legacy_setup'

Used freebsd-update from 11.0-RC1 to 11.0-RC3 and kernel compile failed: linking kernel.full iflib.o: In function `iflib_legacy_setup': /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/hyster3/../../../net/iflib.c:4457: undefined reference to `taskqgroup_attach' kernel config was GENERIC with added:

Re: FreeBSD 10.1 can't upgrade to FreeBSD 11-RC1 via freebsd-update

> Am 20.08.2016 um 22:34 schrieb Doug Hardie : > > >> On 20 August 2016, at 11:50, Rainer Duffner wrote: >> >> FreeBSD 10.3 works. >> >> FreeBSD 10.1 complains about a failed integrity check etc (which the EN was >> supposed to fix, I assume) >

FreeBSD 10.1 can't upgrade to FreeBSD 11-RC1 via freebsd-update

FreeBSD 10.3 works. FreeBSD 10.1 complains about a failed integrity check etc (which the EN was supposed to fix, I assume) I did run freebsd-update to update to the latest patch-level and freebsd-version said, I was on p37. ___ freebsd-stable

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

On 08/07/16 06:55, Doug Hardie wrote: > Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might be > corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? I have tried all the > beta's and none of them will do the upgrade even with the EN applied. > Bug 211398 has the details.

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

> The patch (correctly applied by hand) worked fine. The update completed and > the server is running 11.0-BETA4. I have sources on both boxen. When time comes, I will add a patch. Is it the same way to get a patch like " patch < something"? You saved me from installing from the start, which I

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

> On 7 August 2016, at 23:05, Zoran Kolic wrote: > >> The patch (correctly applied by hand) worked fine. The update completed and >> the server is running 11.0-BETA4. > > I have sources on both boxen. When time comes, I will add a patch. > Is it the same way to get a patch like " patch < some

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

> On 7 August 2016, at 21:27, Zoran Kolic wrote: > >> However, that patch works and I am now able to upgrade to 11.0-BETA4. > > Would you continue informing us with the end result of your procedure. > Personally, I will go the same way on my home nodes. I'm sure latter > RCs would be more frien

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

> However, that patch works and I am now able to upgrade to 11.0-BETA4. Would you continue informing us with the end result of your procedure. Personally, I will go the same way on my home nodes. I'm sure latter RCs would be more friendly regarding this upgrade. Since I have desktop and laptop, I'

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

ot on that hardware. >>> However, 11.0 does boot. I can't afford the downtime to completely >>> rebuild them. >> >> Uh, that sounds complicated. > > Maybe it's worth the hassle to set up > a freebsd-update server which provides > a 11.0 Ker

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

completely > > rebuild them. > > Uh, that sounds complicated. Maybe it's worth the hassle to set up a freebsd-update server which provides a 11.0 Kernel with a 10.x userland as 10.x-RELEASE? It's a hack, but only needed for the upgrade… Regards, Florian

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

> On 6 August 2016, at 23:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > >> Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might >> be corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? > > Does > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211354

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

Hi! > Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might > be corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? Does https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211354 help ? > I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need to be > upgraded. I can't

freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might be corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? I have tried all the beta's and none of them will do the upgrade even with the EN applied. Bug 211398 has the details. I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need

freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might be corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? I have tried all the beta's and none of them will do the upgrade even with the EN applied. Bug 211398 has the details. I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need

Re: Re: Re: freebsd-update borked?

On 08/05/2016 07:00 AM, freebsd-stable-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: Well the: [root@cheetah ~]# mv /var/db/freebsd-update /var/db/freebsd-update.9.2 [root@cheetah ~]# mkdir /var/db/freebsd-update Would have done the same thing... DNS should be fine... appears to be: [michelle@cheetah /usr

Re: freebsd-update borked?

Yass Amed wrote: On 08/04/2016 07:00 AM, freebsd-stable-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: Message: 1 Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:51:13 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan To: St?phane Dupille via freebsd-stable Subject: freebsd-update borked? Message-ID:<57a212f1.6060...@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text

Re: freebsd-update borked?

On 08/04/2016 07:00 AM, freebsd-stable-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: Message: 1 Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:51:13 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan To: St?phane Dupille via freebsd-stable Subject: freebsd-update borked? Message-ID:<57a212f1.6060...@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US

freebsd-update borked?

As per the subject... [root@cheetah ~]# freebsd-update -r 9.3-RELEASE upgrade Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching metadata signature for 9.2-RELEASE from update.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. Applying metadata

freebsd-update 10.0 -> 10.3 segmentation fault

I wanted to updating an old 10.0-R-? system to 10.3 and tried to see if I could go from 10.0 to 10.3 using freebsd-update. I got segfaults during the freebsd-update install portion and the base binaries got trashed. Is going up multiple minor versions unsupported with freebsd-update or something

  1   2   3   4   5   >