Hi all,
We're trying to implement our puppet infrastructure, and have discovered
something strange about TCP connections between jails on the same host. As our
jails haven't generally been doing a lot of connections between each other,
this issue hasn't popped up before.
We have two 100%
Hi all,
We're trying to implement our puppet infrastructure, and have discovered
something strange about TCP connections between jails on the same host. As our
jails haven't generally been doing a lot of connections between each other,
this issue hasn't popped up before.
We have two 100%
On 27. feb. 2010, at 20.38, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 08:21:05PM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:15:52 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
WJW 81492/2613/84105 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
WJW
On 27. feb. 2010, at 22.38, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:32:39 +0100 Eirik Øverby ltn...@anduin.net wrote
about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
E I've had a discussion with some folks on this for a while. I can easily
E reproduce this situation by mounting a FreeBSD ZFS
Hi,
whenever I try to use openct/opensc to use my gemplus USB smartcard
readers, I get the following in dmesg:
ugenioctl: USB_SET_SHORT_XFER, no pipe
The readers work fine on MacOS X and (reportedly) Linux, and the
driver included in openct should support it. I can't find any PC/SC
On Mar 3, 2009, at 19:23, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Max Laier m...@love2party.net wrote:
[snip]
Make sure that you are configuring the same aliases with the same
netmasks on
all members of the carp group - preferably before bringing the
interface up
for the first
Hi,
whenever I configure an extra IP on one of my CARP interfaces, traffic
on that particular subnet slows to a crawl (the primary IP of the
interface is the gateway IP), and I get lots of
carp4: incorrect hash
in dmesg.
I see this issue referenced also in
On Mar 3, 2009, at 19:23, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Max Laier m...@love2party.net wrote:
[snip]
Make sure that you are configuring the same aliases with the same
netmasks on
all members of the carp group - preferably before bringing the
interface up
for the first
On Apr 11, 2008, at 23:07, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:57:53PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Does anyone have experience with running Sun's Opteron-based
workstation, Ultra 20, 25, 40? Both with FreeBSD and other systems
(Linux)? Are they stable, all the drivers are present,
On Mar 23, 2008, at 08:28, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Freddie Cash wrote:
All that's really needed is a more formalised process for handling
upgrading config files, with as much as possible managed via the
ports
framework itself. Something that dictates the name of the config
file, and that
On Feb 23, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Guido Falsi wrote:
Eirik Øverby wrote:
I read somewhere else about NFS issues on 7-RC* where snapshots
have been used. In particular - and this is something I'm seeing
too - changing the exports file or reloading mountd gives the
following in messages log
On Feb 13, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Eirik Øverby wrote:
Yes, I am absolutely sure of this.
I considered using the snapshot tool, however I need to reduce
dependencies to an absolute minimum (as one target environment is
very strict on allowing additional
On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Eirik Øverby wrote:
I am at a total loss here. Is it re-using the first snapshot I ever
made of this filesystem, even though I've removed it? Didn't I
understand how to create/remove snapshots? Is this a bug?
Sure
Hi all,
I've been making a wrapper script for the backup tool 'duplicity',
allowing me to create config files for each resource, wherein I define
whether a snapshot should be made prior to backing up the resource or
not.
Now I find that my snapshots never change
The script creates
Hi,
I've created some jails on FreeBSD 7-RC* now, and I realized there
must be some kind of problem when I tried to install and run diablo-
jdk 1.5 from the freebsdfoundation packages. It complains about
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libz.so.3: unsupported
file layout
On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:01:40AM -0500, Robin Blanchard wrote:
I just inherited a remote 4.8 box...Having not used RELENG_4 in eons,
just wanted to check if it's safe to live upgrade (make
installworld/kernel ; mergemaster) directly to 4.11
Hi,
not sure if this is a problem, but:
# sysctl -a | grep witness
debug.witness.child_cnt: 161
debug.witness.child_free_cnt: 3935
debug.witness.sleep_cnt: 235
debug.witness.spin_cnt: 0
debug.witness.free_cnt: 789
debug.witness.skipspin: 1
debug.witness.trace: 1
debug.witness.kdb: 1
So I need to reboot. Brilliant :) And I thought I was being clever...
Using WITNESS to try and help figuring out why bge is crapping out on
me all the time, but with WITNESS it's been stable, but oh-so-slow :P
/Eirik
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:10 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Eirik Øverby wrote
On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Chris H. wrote:
Quoting pluknet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 29/01/2008, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:41:56PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
In case you're wondering, objformat /is/ required - at leas
Hi,
Like on 6.x, I'm seeing frequent kernel panics when using my bge NICs.
If I plug the cable into the fxp NIC all is fine. Dual opteron, Tyan
K8S Pro (2882) board. I cannot see any pattern as to what is causing
the panics, however I have obtained kernel dumps on a freshly built
kernel
On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:32 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
I would advise contacting them. There support was helpful when I
last contacted
them and for the card that was involved the did release the code for
the driver
when enabled us to fix the issues.
Actually, the new(?) hptrr driver seems
Hi all,
did anyone try the Highpoint RocetRaid drivers (hptmv6.ko) on 7-RC1 or
later? I'm considering upgrading one of my servers here, but I need to
know if my RAID-controller will work after reinstall..
A shame HPT doesn't release the driver to the community...
Thanks,
/Eirik
On Jan 23, 2008, at 7:32 AM, Scott Long wrote:
Eirik Øverby wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:16:16AM +0100, Eirik verby wrote:
Hi list,
by disabling the isp driver (set hint.isp.o.disabled=1), the
system comes up. This of course denies
Hi list,
by disabling the isp driver (set hint.isp.o.disabled=1), the system
comes up. This of course denies us access to the external disk array
hosted by the internal QLogic controller, but pinpoints the problem.
We tried setting hint.isp.0.prefer_iomap=1, which made no difference
On Jan 22, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:16:16AM +0100, Eirik verby wrote:
Hi list,
by disabling the isp driver (set hint.isp.o.disabled=1), the system
comes up. This of course denies us access to the external disk array
hosted by the internal QLogic
Will apply the patch and reboot in an hour or two.
The isp interface is only used for an external array, so we disable it
and boot from internal drives on esp.
Thanks!
/Eirik
On Jan 23, 2008, at 7:32 AM, Scott Long wrote:
Eirik Øverby wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote
Hi all,
running 6.1-RELEASE on several HP DL385 servers (identically
configured), one of them has recently spat the following out in the /
var/log/messages file:
..
Mar 10 03:51:24 apphost02 ntpd[445]: kernel time sync enabled 2001
Mar 10 05:02:01 apphost02 kernel: NMI ISA 30, EISA
On 27. mar. 2007, at 15.33, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 15:00 +0200, Eirik Øverby wrote:
Hi all,
running 6.1-RELEASE on several HP DL385 servers (identically
configured), one of them has recently spat the following out in the /
var/log/messages file:
..
Mar 10 03:51
On Mar 9, 2007, at 03:41, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:44:03AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual
P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID
controller.
It has been working OK
On Mar 9, 2007, at 03:41, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:44:03AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual
P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID
controller.
It has been working OK (although
Hi all,
I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual
P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID
controller.
It has been working OK (although I suspect the asr driven, being
giant-locked, is very inefficient) for a little while, but as I was
Hi,
ever since 6.1-RELEASE (possibly earlier, not sure) I've been seeing
frequent panics on a previously stable (6.0-STABLE) dual opteron
server. When I say previously stable I mean weeks and months of
uptime, and no known non-intended reboots.
Now I'm seeing panics on a semi-regular
Hi all,
I'm pretty aggravated right now. At exactly the wrong moment my
spinal reflexes kicked in and I logged out from my serial console
session on an important server. BANG! Kernel panic. This has been
reported numerous times before, so I won't bother giving you the
specifics right now
On Dec 6, 2005, at 03:20 , Joshua Coombs wrote:
#optionsZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable? The idea of
avoiding memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my
386, on which any little boost is significant. : )
Hoi,
let me know
failing. Latest at the 2nd
or 3rd transaction Java coredumps. :(
And as current load testing is done without Apache in between, this
is moot..
/Eirik
Mike
Eirik Øverby wrote:
Update: The diff below was made after making sure both systems
are running the exact same kernel. Behavior
On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:15 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:00PM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings are equal.
However, a diff of
On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:44 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
EØ Yea yea ;) Working on it..
EØ Is there a way to force ACPI-safe on the slower system?
# sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=one of the values from
kern.timecounter.choice
kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(-100) ACPI-fast(1000) i8254(0) dummy
On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:37 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:25:07AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:15 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005
On Nov 28, 2005, at 14:45 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
On 11/26/05, Eirik Øverby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EØ [Cross-posting after lack of response on -stable]
The first step would be do some performance debugging.
Yep.
- What do top/vmstat/systat say about what the OS and
apps are doing
On Nov 28, 2005, at 15:54 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
EØ *loads* more context switches than on the BETA-3 system.
EØ I have not yet tried this during load
- Which scheduler have you configured (BSD or ULE)?
Running GENERIC/SMP kernels, with BSD scheduler.
Speaking of which; is there a way to
Follow-up:
I've now ran vmstat during load, which confirms the findings of
vmstat during idle time.
Slow system - one sample before and after load start included:
procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
r b w avmfre flt re pi po fr sr da0 pa0
Hi,
I think I have found the culprit. There must be some sort of
difference between the machines after all (BIOS revision?), because
while on one machine the interrupt rate for the bge card stays very
low (2 to be exact) during maximum load, the other machine goes
beyond 1000 and keeps
Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings are equal.
However, a diff of the dmesgs show (apart from MAC address differences):
30c30
Timecounter ACPI-safe frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
---
Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
What on earth is that all about? The slow
Update: The diff below was made after making sure both systems are
running the exact same kernel. Behavior is the same. Building new
kernels (6-STABLE) now to get out of the BETA stage.
/Eirik
On Nov 28, 2005, at 22:53 , Eirik Øverby wrote:
Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings
Hi all,
are there any obvious changes between 6.0-BETA3 and 6.0-RELEASE / 6.0-
STABLE that I should be aware of, that could cause a quite noticeable
decline in performance (and a change in performance patterns) for
java/tomcat?
On a BETA-3 system I'm seeing, with the particular
On Nov 19, 2005, at 19:43 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
AFAICT cross-compiling amd64 on a i386 machine isn't supported
yet. I ran into a similar problem when I upgraded an i386
machine to amd64. I thought I could just set CPUTYPE=athlon-64
and buildworld would do the right thing. Apparently not.
On Nov 20, 2005, at 09:50 , Eirik Øverby wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 19:43 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
AFAICT cross-compiling amd64 on a i386 machine isn't supported
yet. I ran into a similar problem when I upgraded an i386
machine to amd64. I thought I could just set CPUTYPE=athlon-64
Hi all!
I've spent about a week trying to accomplish a rather simple task: To
build kernel and world once for each architecture we have, and
distribute this precompiled src and obj tree via NFS to all the
systems that need updating. I have combined this with a locally
maintained CVS
On Nov 19, 2005, at 13:28 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
Starting out trying to upgrade the amd64 hosts, I export the
two obj directories via NFS, and mount them as /usr/obj on the
amd64 hosts that need upgrading.
I done upgrades the other way, by having the build machine
mount the clients to-be-root
Hi, every once in a while (about once a week lately), one of my
servers has been known to stop responding. Upon connecting the serial
console, I find myself at a debugger prompt. This is the output I've
gotten this time.
I do think I have a debug kernel on that machine, what can I do to
On Aug 31, 2005, at 8:28 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Hi, every once in a while (about once a week lately), one of my
servers has been known to stop responding. Upon connecting the serial
console, I find myself at a debugger prompt.
On Jul 28, 2005, at 8:58 AM, Roger Grosswiler wrote:
Hi,
I have apache2 running, with ssl. now, if i call my domain in a
browser
not using https, i cannot connect.
Try adding port 80 to your Listen statement(s) in httpd.conf. Also
make sure you have virtual hosts that capture requests
On Jul 28, 2005, at 10:01 AM, Roger Grosswiler wrote:
Try adding port 80 to your Listen statement(s) in httpd.conf. Also
make
sure you have virtual hosts that capture requests on port 80.
/Eirik
i did a file called virtual.conf in /usr/local/etc/apache2/Include
with
this content:
On Jul 21, 2005, at 7:00 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:58:54AM +0200, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Hi,
I reported this before, but I am very surprised that it is still the
case:
(This is from the last time it happened; this time the box rebooted
and cleared the serial console
On Jul 21, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Eirik Øverby wrote:
The above panic will show up occasionally when logging out from a
serial console (i.e. ctrl-D, logout, exit, whatever). This is
EXTREMELY BAD, as it will crash an otherwise perfectly healthy
box
On Jul 21, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Eirik Øverby wrote:
I've only seen the issue when logging out of a serial console
session, and had previously hypothesized that it had to do with
the simultaneous timing of a console message from syslog
On Jul 20, 2005, at 2:22 AM, J. Nyhuis wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to have RT running in a jailed environment. The
challenge, it seems, will be to get sendmail running in the same
jailed environment as RT and the other components.
For those not so familiar with the
On Jul 18, 2005, at 8:17 PM, Jean Milanez Melo wrote:
Hello gentlemen,
In the last saturday a new port has been added under sysutils/
category, ports/sysutils/tinybsd. TinyBSD is a tool which was meant
to allow an easy way to build embedded systems based on FreeBSD. It
is based on
On Apr 10, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
warning: This report might be somewhat vague. For quite a while
now I`ve been plagued with the problem that logging out from a
serial console causes the box to panic. For a while I`ve been
Hi,
I reported this before, but I am very surprised that it is still the
case:
(This is from the last time it happened; this time the box rebooted
and cleared the serial console before I had time to cut/paste it.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 00
fault
On Jul 15, 2005, at 5:10 PM, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Am Freitag, 15. Juli 2005 16:58 CEST schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
And, for the stupid question of the day ... how long before 5.x
is no
longer supported? I'm just about to deploy a new server, and was
*going* to go with 5.x, but would I be
On Jul 6, 2005, at 6:29 PM, Blaz Zupan wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
That should be OK as long as you're not cross-compiling for different
architectures.
No, we only have i386 boxes.
Hi,
thanks for doing this work. I was working on preparing a similiar set
of
On 29. jun. 2005, at 20.58, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:28:09PM +0200, Eirik Øverby wrote:
On 28. jun. 2005, at 16.58, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:37:29AM +0200, Eirik Øverby wrote:
Hi,
I have, since upgrading to 5.x
On 30. jun. 2005, at 22.56, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:53:56PM +0200, Eirik Øverby wrote:
On 29. jun. 2005, at 20.58, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:28:09PM +0200, Eirik Øverby wrote:
On 28. jun. 2005, at 16.58, Brian
On 28. jun. 2005, at 16.58, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:37:29AM +0200, Eirik Øverby wrote:
Hi,
I have, since upgrading to 5.x and updating my management tools, seen
a number of problems relating to stopping jails.
I'm maintaining several hosts with a number
Hi,
I have, since upgrading to 5.x and updating my management tools, seen
a number of problems relating to stopping jails.
I'm maintaining several hosts with a number of full-featured jails
(i.e. full virtual FreeBSD installations in each jail), and in
general this works fine. However,
Hi all,
I recently re-enabled SMP on one of my 5.4 servers (dual intel p3),
and after a relatively short while (couple of days) it starts acting
up. Today it was frozen and had jumped into kernel debugger on serial
console. Problem is that my serial console was controlled by a
terminal
On 20. jun. 2005, at 10.38, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Eirik Øverby wrote:
Hmm. Looks like a bug in dummynet. ipfw should not be directly
re- injecting UDP traffic back into the input path from an
outbound path, or it risks re-entering, generating lock order
problems
On 20. jun. 2005, at 17.18, Marc Olzheim wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Eirik verby wrote:
I know enough not to call this a confirmation, but disabling
dummynet did indeed allow me to finish the backup. I never made it
past 15GBs before, now the full 19GB tar.gz file is
Hi,
when doing large file transfers (backing up jails using tar+gzip to a
neighboring server), NFS has a tendency to lock up on me. This
usually happens after quite a while - like a few hours or so. Also,
before the hang, performance is generally bad.
KDB trace:
db trace
Tracing pid 56
On 19. jun. 2005, at 20.06, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Eirik verby wrote:
when doing large file transfers (backing up jails using tar+gzip
to a neighboring server), NFS has a tendency to lock up on me.
This usually happens after quite a while - like a few hours or so.
Hi folks,
I have sinned, I have forgotten to configure a dump device. I do have
a debug kernel compiled though (I think), so maybe someone can help
me figure out what's happening here. Nothing in particular going on,
server has been up for a few weeks. Dual opteron machine, running
On 07-05-05 03:19, George Hartzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eirik Øverby writes:
Hi,
I just started playing with mounting ports into jails using unionfs
(mount_unionfs -b /usr/ports_jail /usr/local/jails/jail-0/usr/ports), and
many things seem to work fine.
However, when trying to install
On 06-05-05 08:18, Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eirik Øverby writes:
[...]
What can I expect to see when trying nullfs and/or unionfs today? Has
anything changed? Do I have even a remote chance of making it work - and if
it doesn't work, what are my chances of anyone having time
On 05-05-05 16:59, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Eirik [ISO-8859-1] Øverby wrote:
The solution, or at least parts of it, would be to have certain parts of
the jail filesystems mounted in via nullfs (acceptable solution) or
unionfs (ideal solution). However,
On 06-05-05 09:25, Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting approach. Is this with 4.x or 5.x? How do you union-mount /etc
(mount command/fstab entry)?
been doing it since 4.x (i think x 9)
Any idea how unionfs will behave if stacked (more mounts on top of each
other)? I was
On 06-05-05 13:14, Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06-05-05 09:25, Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting approach. Is this with 4.x or 5.x? How do you union-mount /etc
(mount command/fstab entry)?
been doing it since 4.x (i think x 9)
Any idea how unionfs
Hi,
I just started playing with mounting ports into jails using unionfs
(mount_unionfs -b /usr/ports_jail /usr/local/jails/jail-0/usr/ports), and
many things seem to work fine.
However, when trying to install either of mysql41-server or mysql41-client,
I see the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I'm struggling with some hosting environments where I am managing a large
number of jails (100) spread over about a dozen servers. I am starting to
see disk space as a real problem, especially given that each physical box
needs to be autonomous - i.e. I can't rely on any external storage,
Hi!
I've been using gmirror for a while to safeguard my system disks. I have
taken the slice-based mirror approach, where I use, say, ad0s1 and ad2s1 as
providers.
On one of my servers, this seems to be impossible. I create the mirror using
ad2s1 first (to keep my system running while I do some
On 03-05-05 20:34, George Hartzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eirik Øverby writes:
Hi!
I've been using gmirror for a while to safeguard my system disks. I have
taken the slice-based mirror approach, where I use, say, ad0s1 and ad2s1 as
providers.
On one of my servers, this seems
Hi!
Daring as I am, here's another attempt at having someone look into the
asr driver and why it doesn't work on amd64.
I have such a Zero-Channel RAID card laying around collecting dust,
whereas it was planned installed in a server here long time ago.
I know Scott Long looked into it long ago,
Hi,
to the best of my ability I have been investigating the 'real'
requirements of a raid-3 array, and cannot see that the following text
from graid3(8) cannot possibly be correct - and if it is, then the
implementation must be wrong or incomplete (emphasis added):
label Create a RAID3
On 24. Nov 2004, at 18:11, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 10:54:07AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
+ to the best of my ability I have been investigating the 'real'
+ requirements of a raid-3 array, and cannot see that the following
text
+ from graid3(8) cannot possibly be
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 10:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kowalik wrote:
Hello,
Recently I took some time to upgrade my home 4.9 system to
5.3-RELEASE (fortunately, taking full system dump before, so I can
easily get back). In fact just after upgrading I ran into the weird
issue during installation
PS: I've posted a similiar mail to @current, but not a dupe ;)
Hi!
For some time I've been wanting to use NO_YP_LIBC with buildworld for
my jails, to enable NIS on the host system but keep the jails
functioning.
I noticed back in August that a patch was submitted to make this work
on
On 25. Sep 2004, at 22:29, Doug White wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Eirik Øverby wrote:
On 23. Sep 2004, at 04:15, Doug White wrote:
Is something sharing an interrupt with that device?
PCI bus errors are generally Bad News .. either some device or the
mobo is inroducing errors.
Well
87 matches
Mail list logo
