Update of bug #17264 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = In Progress
___
Follow-up Comment #5:
Since MAX_VET_LEVELS is hardcoded at 10 what is the point of
doing this calculation
On 8 Dec, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Matthias Pfafferodt wrote:
@Dave
0: data/default/techs.ruleset: ruleset datafile appears
incompatible:
0: datafile options: +Freeciv-2.3-ruleset
0: supported options: +1.9
You have old ruleset data somethere in the path. Freeciv 2.3.0 has updated
all
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #17267 (project freeciv):
My apologies, you are indeed correct. I must have still had an old version.
I rebuilt 2.2.4 and saw the same as you see for 2.2.3.
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of bug #17267 (project freeciv):
Release: = 2.3.0
___
Follow-up Comment #3:
But there are still the errors for 2.3.0 ...
Update of bug #17267 (project freeciv):
Release: 2.3.0 = 2.2.99
Planned Release: 2.3.0,2.3.1 = 2.3.0,2.4.0
Summary: civmanual does not give error messages = asserts
in civmanual (module nation)
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #15805 (project freeciv):
unable to load save games in xaw client.
I did test it - I can start a new game but after I did load a savegame I
could not connect to it. Only after I did use a username which was defined in
the game it did work. For the example game (file
On 8 December 2010 23:39, David Lowe no-reply.invalid-addr...@gna.org wrote:
0: data/default/techs.ruleset: ruleset datafile appears incompatible:
0: datafile options: +Freeciv-2.3-ruleset
0: supported options: +1.9
This error message says that ruleset file is freeciv-2.3 compatible
and
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?17281
Summary: Segmentation fault in get_total_defense_power
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: doctorjlowe
Submitted on: Thu 09 Dec 2010 01:59:59 PM GMT
Category: None
Severity: 3 -
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?17282
Summary: Metaserver says players are playing when they are
not
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Thu Dec 9 14:01:44 2010
Category: general
Severity: 3 -
Update of bug #17281 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Confirmed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
I can confirm it; it seems to be that defender is NULL in a combat
#0 0x004d0a08 in
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Daniel Markstedt wrote:
Congrats on this. The Web Store seems to be a quite high-profile
endeavor on behalf of Google, so it will probably give you some good
exposure.
BTW, do you have plans to make this more than 'just' a simple link to
the website? What kind of additional
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?17284
Summary: Memory leak in process_attacker_want with
experimental ruleset
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Thu 09 Dec 2010 06:54:08 PM UTC
Category: ai
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?17285
Summary: flag ignore when paradrop
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Thu 09 Dec 2010 08:22:14 PM UTC
Category: general
Severity: 2 - Minor
13 matches
Mail list logo
