Hi,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
>
>> We use an online tool to edit the software list via a web browser, and
>> several "admin" folks have the ability to update the software list in
>> this way. You can also contact Pat, Aitor, Eric, Rugxulo, Mateusz, or
>> Jeremy.
>
> Mir
Hi again,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
>> UPX is convenient to have around indeed, if space limited. The
>> bugreports showed that the extra FDISK utility included in FreeDOS
>> doesn't like UPX due to a file checksum (integrity test) being done
>> before running.
>
> XFDISK?
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> On 7/16/11, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
>>
>> Anyone got experience with the watcom port of FreeCOM yet? Or too
>> experimental / work-in-progress?
>
> Bart said it works pretty well, but it's only in SVN (and I don't have
> a client installed on
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Op 29-7-2011 19:02, Rugxulo schreef:
>
> I can't even recall what WDE was for anymore.
"disk editor", basically for viewing raw disks and/or editing or
saving bits to wherever. Not useful except for hardcore nerds.
http://www.ibiblio.or
Op 29-7-2011 19:02, Rugxulo schreef:
>> - KERNELS< 2040
>> - WDE< 0.30
>> - UPX
>
> UPX is too useful, IMHO, though I know some shun it (which seems
> weird). And I don't think WDE is included in there (yet). At least a
> quick search couldn't find it in "BASE" or "UTIL".
I can't even recall wha
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
>> BTW, what's the goal of EDLIN ??? Never used it ...
>
> It is there for nostalgic reasons and aims to be the DOS
> text editor which is translated into most languages ;-)
Presumably it's for limited automated scripting (e.g. "edlin <
cha
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:03 AM, dos386 wrote:
>
>> In short, I don't think EXE2BIN belongs in "BASE" for FreeDOS.
>
> So do I.
>
>> I don't know of anybody using it
>
> I don't use it and have no clue for what it is supposed to be useful.
In old days, "MASM, LINK, EXE2BIN" was the norm. The
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> BTW, what's the goal of EDLIN ??? Never used it ...
>
> It is there for nostalgic reasons and aims to be the DOS
> text editor which is translated into most languages ;-)
>
> But actually even the author of MS EDLIN barely used it,
> so we can be
Hi!
> BTW, what's the goal of EDLIN ??? Never used it ...
It is there for nostalgic reasons and aims to be the DOS
text editor which is translated into most languages ;-)
But actually even the author of MS EDLIN barely used it,
so we can be happy to also have our EDIT text editor.
> But please
BTW, what's the goal of EDLIN ??? Never used it ...
But please keep DEBUG, I'm using it (but not as ASS'embler, maybe add
FASM also ?)
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online. C
> Who gives a shit? It's included in MS-DOS 6.22, it'll be included in
> FreeDOS. It's not hurting you is it? You don't suffer from erectile
> disfunction because you
?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erectile_dysfunction <- because you can't
wr
11 matches
Mail list logo
