Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeCOM feature list outdated / wrong?

2006-05-27 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Eric and the rest, Simply four coments about this (Eric, sorry to reply in public here). (1) For the KEYB roadmap: there's just one important feature that I want for the final FD-KEYB 2.0, and it is the sound alert (beep) for these three cases: - COMBI where the combination is not possible

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeCOM feature list outdated / wrong?

2006-05-31 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Eduardo, Many thanks!! Great news both, as usual. :-)) Thanks, Aitor 2006/5/31, Eduardo Casino [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aitor Santamaría [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know the current status of NLSFUNC, but I think it is now using the same interface as MODE, which is good: for the final

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-cvs] freecom/suppl suppl.tgz,1.4,1.5

2006-06-13 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Blair, You removed files or changed lines within files? In the first case perhaps it'd be good to keep the full suppl somewhere just in case and keep it updated too (I don't know what you removed really). Aitor 2006/6/11, Blair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Update of

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-cvs] freecom/cmd dir.c,1.27,1.28

2006-06-13 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, I did like the LFN features listing in dir (even if MS-DOS 7.X COMMAND does not have it, was it removed by the change above? Wouldn't it be possible to make it a conditional compile? Aitor 2006/6/11, Blair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Update of /cvsroot/freedos/freecom/cmd In directory

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-cvs] freecom/cmd echo.c,1.5,1.6

2006-06-13 Thread Aitor Santamaría
A slight commenr, weren't you changing C++-style comments wich C-style comments? Sorry for being too concerned for such regardless comments! :-) Aitor 2006/6/11, Blair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Update of /cvsroot/freedos/freecom/cmd In directory

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-cvs] freecom/include command.h, 1.14, 1.15

2006-06-22 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Blair, I am very happy to see your code moving towards LFN support, many thanks! There's something I've always been concerned about, which is how is the stuff supported in MS-DOS 7.x+? Forgive me for my ignorance, but In particular, who parses command line? who turns a zero-terminated

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-cvs] freecom/include command.h, 1.14, 1.15

2006-06-23 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Replying to both: I also thought that, until I realised that this really works in UNIX as much as one would expect: # grep two words filename.txt If I remember correctly, the are parsed by the shell, so how does the previous work? Aitor 2006/6/23, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi!

Re: [Freedos-devel] Contributions towards FreeDOS 1.0

2006-07-08 Thread Aitor Santamaría
My two cents on this: (1) KEYB and DISPLAY also admit translations, but hardcoded ones (that is, you need to recompile). I'll announce here the soonest the English catalogs, and the makefiles you'll need to compile it yourself. Also I will announce the new KEYB versions: dutch, spanish and

Re: [Freedos-devel] Things about the upcoming distro

2006-07-08 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Blair, 2006/7/5, Blair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just to let you know, due to lack of bugfixes in the graphical installer, it cannot be included with 1.0, otherwise people would blame us for releasing buggy software. The text installer works pretty much everywhere and is much more

Re: [Freedos-devel] Things about the upcoming distro

2006-07-08 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, Yes, a pitty indeed that the DOS port of FreePascal was abandoned quite a while ago (I imagine it was hard to keep up with multithreading and such ;) I've always wanted to have a look at the DEFRAG gadgets, I've always liked DFLAT too. Aitor 2006/7/6, Imre Leber [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The

Re: [Freedos-devel] New Release: EMM386 2.10, HIMEM 3.13

2006-07-09 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Michael, Thanks for the update! I am unable to get the file via FTP (unable to connect), could you please give alternative ways, or upload it to ibiblio? Thanks! Aitor 2006/7/9, Michael Devore [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386/ are the files

Re: [Freedos-devel] New Release: EMM386 2.10, HIMEM 3.13

2006-07-09 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Ok, IE does not work for me (Windows cannot acceed this folder), neither filezilla. Perhaps Jim can upload the files to ibiblio? (or alternatively can someone else send those (source+binary) to me? Thanks!) Aitor 2006/7/9, Michael Devore [EMAIL PROTECTED]: At 01:16 PM 7/9/2006 +0200, Aitor

[Freedos-devel] Testings on the FreeDOS 1.0 second version available

2006-07-30 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, I just want to share my experiences on the installing of the latest CD-ROM (full, with sources) available. In general, my opinion is good!! There's a lot of good stuff that is being downloaded for a robust DOS system. There are a couple of faults that I have found, I think that some could

[Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: DISPLAY 0.13

2006-07-30 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi all, Uploaded to ibiblio there is the new FD-DISPLAY 0.13, http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/display/ SOURCE: DISP013S.ZIP BINARY: DISP013X.ZIP which has the following new features: (1) Heavy source re-structure. Separation of hardware-specific routines from

Re: [Freedos-devel] Testings on the FreeDOS 1.0 second version available

2006-07-31 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Eric, 2006/7/31, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Aitor, (3) Once I create the partition with FDISK under WMWARE, I get the usual message: Partition signature != 55AA and PC locks. I have to FORMAT and SYS manually to avoid this. It took a while to find that string, but basically it

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: DISPLAY 0.13

2006-07-31 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Thanks for the feedback, John, I'll see into this the soonest. Aitor 2006/7/31, John Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : (5) EGA/VGA specific: support for DR-FONTS : (thanks to John Elliott, who submitted the changes) This is broken :-( - You've missed a line in the bit that skips over fonts of

Re: [Freedos-devel] freedos 1 preview 3 august experiments

2006-08-06 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Eric, 2006/8/7, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I cleaned up and improved the config / autoexec of the 1.0 preview fdbasecd of 3 august, both the ones of the virtual (for me: real, because isolinux 3.11 does NOT boot with my older BIOS, while older iso- linux had no problems) boot

[Freedos-devel] DISPLAY 0.13b (small patch) ready

2006-08-10 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi all, I thereby announce DISPLAY 0.13b, a small patch over DISPLAY 0.13. Changes: - The DR-FONT bug notified by John Elliot - There was a bug with the CGA specific code - The double-SELECT bug found by John Elliot is fixed too (it was a variable announcing to hold words were they were bytes,

[Freedos-devel] Some files translated to Spanish

2006-08-13 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi all, I have translated some files to Spanish, and have submitted them to Blair for FreeDOS 1.0. Anyway I let you know developers of the utilities in case you want to have them. Some of them are just for the install batch, and others were already translated (e.g. FreeCOM, XCOPY, TREE, DISPLAY,

[Freedos-devel] Translation status for FreeDOS components

2006-08-19 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi all, I have slightly modified the Translation status page as follows: http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Translations Now you have for each tool wether it is translatable, and the different translation status (latest version translated) for each language. May I ask: DEVELOPERS: Please have a look at

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Michael, Thanks for that good piece of work. Besides these late fixings, you did quite a lot of quite great follow-up to Tom's EMM386 (port to NASM / new UPX are my two favourite). All the best for whatever else you will be doing, in the times of WinXP+ I am afraid that technical thourough

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2006/8/20, tom ehlert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Aitor, Thanks for that good piece of work. yes, indeed. Besides these late fixings, you did quite a lot of quite great follow-up to Tom's EMM386 (port to NASM / new UPX are my two favourite). my favorite is VDS and VCPI; port to

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Sorry, again my problems to acceed Michael's FTP (I wonder why, I've been using FileZilla, any user/pwwd so that I can try?). Could someone send it in private to this mail? Aitor 2006/8/20, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! 20-Авг-2006 20:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hopefully last testing distribution

2006-08-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Eric, 2006/8/21, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - DISPLAY somehow manages to resist LOADHIGH, Aitor! Maybe it just tries to be too clever... Not at all. I remind you (discussed long ago) that it happens because of UPX. The creation of DISPLAY is: NASM = COM2EXE = UPX I must use UPX,

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hopefully last testing distribution

2006-08-21 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2006/8/21, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! 21--2006 02:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: - DISPLAY somehow manages to resist LOADHIGH, Aitor! Maybe it just tries to be too clever... AS Not at all. I remind you (discussed

Re: [Freedos-devel] display exe versus upx versus loading high

2006-08-21 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2006/8/21, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: AS actually supposed I was relying on caller's stack (I am not doing many AS weird things, not using C or the like, that can abuse the stack more AS than I do in assembler. There is no such thing as caller stack when we discuss

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hopefully last testing distribution

2006-08-21 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2006/8/21, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! 21--2006 17:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: AFAIR, device driver not need to expand memory block - it already own all free memory... As for .EXE, then its header already says

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-user] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-21 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2006/8/21, tom ehlert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: it should be possibble to avoid this by NOT doing anything special on keyboard interrupt, but by doing the same stuff MKEYB does to get keyboard scancodes: intercept interrupt 15, ah=04f, al=scancode ... pushf

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-user] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-21 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2006/8/21, tom ehlert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Aitor, For the rare cases in which this should not happen, KEYB xx /9 does install such handler for int15h (as the rest of KEYB is also based in the same principle). a) KEYB isn't always installed Ok, let me rephrase: if you are in

Re: [Freedos-devel] announce: freedos mem 1.10

2006-08-24 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Eric, 2006/8/25, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I uploaded a new MEM 1.10 to SourceForge, based on 1.9a3: http://freedos.sourceforge.net/mem/mem110.zip (Dutch, Spanish and Italian translation not updated yet) Could you please just update here, so that I (we) know that there's

Re: [Freedos-devel] announce: freedos mem 1.10

2006-08-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría
I meant HERE: http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Translations 2006/8/25, Aitor Santamaría [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Eric, 2006/8/25, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I uploaded a new MEM 1.10 to SourceForge, based on 1.9a3: http://freedos.sourceforge.net/mem/mem110.zip (Dutch, Spanish

Re: [Freedos-devel] freedos package spec problem: sources, binary, docs

2006-08-27 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Two small notes: (1) The HELP file (for FASTHELP) is probably NOT required in the source package either (2) There are docs that are very specific to sources (e.g. how to build and such), that I myself usually don't pack under DOC, but under SRC\DOC, so that they are only installed with sources (I

Re: [Freedos-devel] freedos package spec problem: sources, binary, docs

2006-08-27 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2006/8/28, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: To bring this in context of our installer: The sources included CDROM could just contain ONE set of FULL packages and selectively skip files in source/ directories at the moment when the packages are unzipped. That would also allow full 8 char file

Re: [Freedos-devel] freedos package spec problem: sources, binary, docs

2006-08-27 Thread Aitor Santamaría
versions. Aitor 2006/8/28, Aitor Santamaría [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Two small notes: (1) The HELP file (for FASTHELP) is probably NOT required in the source package either (2) There are docs that are very specific to sources (e.g. how to build and such), that I myself usually don't pack under DOC

[Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD-KEYB 2.0 final ready!

2006-08-29 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi all, I'd like to announce the final version of FD-KEYB 2.0, thereby ending TAURUS project started long ago. Changes: - ADD: Beep support: after a wrong COMBI, or secondary buffer full - ADD: Commands 162 (beep) and 164 (toggle beep on/off) - BUG: Secondary buffer was habing problems with

Re: [Freedos-devel] Surprise!

2006-09-03 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Jim, looks good! Just one thing on the left column: isn't report bugs more of users than developers? Aitor 2006/9/3, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: FYI: I have updated the FreeDOS web site with the 1.0 announcement. A few pages have changed: - the front page has been rearranged, and should

Re: [Freedos-devel] Surprise!

2006-09-03 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Please, be CAREFUL about this. If you changed something critical, it may be a nightmare later when users complain. I don't think that marking as FreeDOS 1.0 a newly upgraded (untested) CD is the best way to proceed, but now that you have done it, then the only thing to do is: collect bugfixes and

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 in the news

2006-09-04 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Well, the first feature of FreeDOS mentioned in Slashdot is LFN support... I hope it is not bringing much headaches ;-) Aitor 2006/9/5, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just in case anyone is interested in the press coverage this is getting: Heise Online was the first to post an article about us:

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS

2006-09-05 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi Imre, I am certainly glad and happy that FreeDOS 1.0 is out. My apologies for those (including you) that believe the contrary. But I am certainly aware that (and I agree with you) that we have and image problem, and that most people just trashes away a project at the first critical problem

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS

2006-09-05 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Easy: just for going to the extreme, write a DOS API extension function that checks the drive passed as argument in BX. ;-) Anyway, I am of Eric's opinion: you cannot write a complete, good CHKDSK code in that few lines. Aitor 2006/9/5, Imre Leber [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well i am still kind of

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-user] Announcing FreeDOS on some newsgroups

2006-09-09 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Incidentaly, when reading this message on the google mail web tools, I could find these two FreeDOS 1.0 related news on the related links, on the left: http://www.techworld.com/networking/news/index.cfm?newsID=6783pagtype=samechan

[Freedos-devel] Kernel binary clarification

2006-09-10 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello there, I am trying to download the kernel binary, and I find the ibiblio stuff a bit confusing, even if I read the list regularly (so figure out for those that don't :)). Here we go: I click to http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/ and the first thing I see is

[Freedos-devel] Small issue on FD-MODE (or DISPLAY)

2006-09-10 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Suppose you didn't prepare the codepage (where KEYB *knows* about the codepage). You issue: A:\MODE CON CP SEL=850 MODE select codepage 850 failed MODE: specified codepage was not found in file Select has nothing to do with files, so this is confusing. The errorcode returned by DISPLAY in this

Re: [Freedos-devel] Kernel binary clarification

2006-09-11 Thread Aitor Santamaría
2006/9/11, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: also try to test DISPLAY and KEYB there, if anyone wants to run a small XT test, please let me know NOW and point to me to the software Just run all programs on the 1.0 distro and see if they either work or safely refuse to work :-). There are three

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiler group?

2006-09-14 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2006/9/14, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! 14-Сен-2006 05:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: BC I think what we REALLY need is a free PASCAL compiler that can BC generate 16-bit code. I think, Modula (which is superset

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiler group?

2006-09-16 Thread Aitor Santamaría
No, this is not that easy. Just mind that in TP and FP a pointer is 4 bytes long. But in TP it is SEG:OFS, and in FP it is a 32-bit offset. That is a big difference Aitor 2006/9/16, Daniel Franzini [EMAIL PROTECTED]: well...i'm not exactly an expert in the subject but i've noticed that

Re: [Freedos-devel] Disabling Ctrl-Break?

2006-09-19 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, you can do this with KEY without recompiling (the KEYB.EXE file), you have just to modify a little bit the layout file you are using. Aitor 2006/9/18, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! 18-Сен-2006 04:47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marton) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:

Re: [Freedos-devel] INT 21h, AX=43FFh

2006-09-19 Thread Aitor Santamaría
What would 7.20 be? Win98SE? 2006/9/19, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! 18-Сен-2006 17:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to FreeDOS Devel Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: BC I see that the RBIL says that MS-DOS 7.20 supports this interrupt. I BC am all for FreeDOS

Re: [Freedos-devel] 8086/XT compatibility issues for FreeDOS 1.0

2006-10-14 Thread Aitor Santamaría
What about the rest? Do we assume they work? Unfortunately my XT stopped working, so I couldn't test. I compiled KEYB with 8088 specific instructions, and it installs own handlers so that it works in XT, so I'm curious if it does work well. For a PC/XT you'll probably have a CGA, for which DISPLAY

Re: [Freedos-devel] 8086/XT compatibility issues for FreeDOS 1.0

2006-10-14 Thread Aitor Santamaría
2006/10/14, Joris van Rantwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aitor Santamaría wrote: What about the rest? Do we assume they work? By popular (ahem) request, a list of things that work correctly on my XT. This list is not exhaustive. My testing was not thorough; I only tested very basic functionality

Re: [Freedos-devel] 8086/XT compatibility issues for FreeDOS 1.0

2006-10-15 Thread Aitor Santamaría
be there (850 is the western european typical codepage, 858 is the same but with the Euro sign). Aitor 2006/10/15, Joris van Rantwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aitor Santamaría wrote: As for DISPLAY, I really never tested under CGA cards, it should be something like: DISPLAY CON=(CGA,,1) MODE

Re: [Freedos-devel] 8086/XT compatibility issues for FreeDOS 1.0

2006-10-16 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Wow, many thanks for the analysis, I'm impressed! I'll try to build a patching DISPLAY asap. Aitor 2006/10/16, Joris van Rantwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Aitor, Aitor Santamaría wrote: Perhaps you could try 850 or 858, at least one of them should be there (850 is the western european

Re: [Freedos-devel] free paint and file manager dos navigator for the distro

2006-11-02 Thread Aitor Santamaría
2006/11/1, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Questions are: - what is the roadmap for FreeDOS 1.1 release? Call on me... wanted to consolidate some documents here and there. On the way ;-) Aitor - Using Tomcat but need to do

Re: [Freedos-devel] Update proposal

2006-11-02 Thread Aitor Santamaría
May I suggest two decimal cyphers? (1.01, 1.02, 1.03... 1.99) 9 small updates to FreeDOS 1.0 may not make FreeDOS 2.0. Aitor 2006/10/29, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: E! I'd rather not go back to beta9 SP2 etc naming scheme. The next FreeDOS should _not_ be a FreeDOS 1.0 SP1. The next

Re: [Freedos-devel] Come visit EDR-DOS sites!

2007-03-29 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Jim suggested classic, another word (perhaps more precise) that comes to my mind is legacy, but I'm not saying I like it better, I just post the idea. Aitor 2007/3/29, Alain M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I agree that old is ugly. I use FreeDOS for new and big programs, with databases of a few Giga

Re: [Freedos-devel] Come visit EDR-DOS sites!

2007-03-31 Thread Aitor Santamaría
I don't agree that there should be a single compiler, but if there's to be one, then we must have a 16-bit compiler, that leaves DJGPP out (so that's a good reason not to choose just one). AItor 2007/3/31, Florian Xaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]: PS: And... one thing, which could also be posted at

Re: [Freedos-devel] Come visit EDR-DOS sites!

2007-04-01 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Just a side note, it is not even possible, as there are some programs which are compiled with non-free compilers. Just two examples come to my mind (EMM386 with MASM, keyb with TP for the non-resident part). Aitor 2007/4/1, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It's an interesting idea, but I consider it

Re: [Freedos-devel] ideas about FreeDOS resident calculator

2007-04-11 Thread Aitor Santamaría
I support this idea too, and for the operators, let me suggest using C-style ones, given the big amount of C-compatible languages, not only C/C++ but also Java, ecma-script and derivatives, etc. I am not saying to support them all: - there's no sense for =, +=, -=, etc, unless you implement some

Re: [Freedos-devel] Basic question on OW

2007-05-02 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Robert, 2007/5/2, Robert Riebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aitor Santamaría wrote: Being used to BC, I'm experimenting with OpenWatcom, and before What OW version? What memory model? Watcom 1.6, model Large. Apparently, OW doesn't seem to like when I do use it's own MK_FP (which

Re: [Freedos-devel] Basic question on OW

2007-05-02 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Self-correction: 2007/5/2, Aitor Santamaría [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have redefined MK_FP as (void *)((unsigned long)((unsigned short)(seg)*0x100)+((unsigned short)ofs)) I have redefined it as the more logical: (void *)(((unsigned long)(seg)16)|((unsigned short)ofs)) which gives the shift amount

Re: [Freedos-devel] Basic question on OW

2007-05-02 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, The code you wrote does, but this does not: #include i86.h char far *myvar = MK_FP(0x40, 0x55); void main() { } Aitor 2007/5/2, Robert Riebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aitor Santamaría wrote: Watcom 1.6, model Large. OK Maybe you can use this. *** #include i86.h void main

Re: [Freedos-devel] Basic question on OW

2007-05-02 Thread Aitor Santamaría
(1) That it is NOT what I want (2) That I want to define a variable widely used accross sources. 2007/5/2, Robert Riebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aitor Santamaría wrote: The code you wrote does, but this does not: I already knew. ;-) What's wrong with the following (except more typing

Re: [Freedos-devel] DOSLFN needs a new maintainer

2007-05-04 Thread Aitor Santamaría
ANd what's more, even SHSUCDX are requiring a new maintainer... Oh well... I hope we keep the latest versions of both at ibiblio just in case... they are quite useful pieces of software. Aitor 2007/5/4, Robert Riebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! Maybe you missed it all: Jason Hood is looking for

Re: [Freedos-devel] LFNs and DOS

2007-05-09 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, Oops, I understood Jose's message the other way round. So it actually seems that FreeDOS kernel is doing WELL... Apologies, I was afraid there would be problems about this. Aitor 2007/5/9, Jose Antonio Senna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Maybe FreeDOS does not use LFNs, but it detects and erases

Re: [Freedos-devel] Subversion instead of CVS?

2007-05-15 Thread Aitor Santamaría
I'm just curious, as I have never used much of cvs and none of SVN (just MS Sourcesafe, pvcs and other commercial solutions), what would be the main advantages of SVN to CVS? (in other words, why would you care to make such a big effort? probably there are many good reasons, then). Aitor

Re: [Freedos-devel] LPTtest v1.3

2007-07-16 Thread Aitor Santamaría
I haven't followed the conversation thoroughly, but seems to me that you mean NASM? Aitor 2007/7/15, Ladislav Lacina [EMAIL PROTECTED]: OK, do it yourself, it is open source :-) The main version is now Eric's MASM version. I'll not work on TASM version more. Anyway, next two weeks I'll not

Re: [Freedos-devel] lfn in freecom?

2007-09-30 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Eric, 2007/9/17, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Imre, Does anybody know what the status is of long file name support in freecom. There is absolutely a compile time option you can use, but does it work (well)? FreeCOM 0.84 arguably has far too many changes with far too little

Re: [Freedos-devel] lfn in freecom?

2007-10-01 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Ok, thanks, that's good news. I'm used to such feature in UNIX, and mistrusted it would ever be possible in DOS. Aitor 2007/10/1, Tom Ehlert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Second is the ability of the internal commands to handle the properly. Like: copy my file.txt a: Do you mean that both have

Re: [Freedos-devel] Removing old distributions from ibiblio

2007-10-02 Thread Aitor Santamaría
I've lost the hint of floppy distributions, but I think there should be at least one. (Just in case) Aitor 2007/10/2, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I keep getting the occasional user who has downloaded a really old version of the FreeDOS distribution (usually Beta5) and even though they ftp'd

Re: [Freedos-devel] Codepages and printers

2007-10-08 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Henrique, 2007/10/8, Henrique Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Bruce, today, on FreeDOS, we rely on codepages already encoded into printer's firmware. The equivalent to the BIOS codepages for DISPLAY (the 437 in DISPLAY CON=(EGA,437,1) For instance, if I happen to be russian and type a

Re: [Freedos-devel] Codepages and printers

2007-10-09 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2007/10/9, lyricalnanoha [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Aitor Santamaría wrote: Unfortunately, all the codepages (CPI/CPX files) that you have created have an indicator inside them that they are for DISPLAY only (and not for PRINTER). And that is because the way in which you

[Freedos-devel] (OT) To Jeremy

2007-11-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Jeremy, The email address I have from you seems full or inoperative, are you around? Please write to me in private when you can. Aitor - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R)

Re: [Freedos-devel] simple freedos 1.1 installer please / 1.0 overview

2007-12-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2007/12/25, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Oleg, IMHO i18n should be done by _POST_install_ scripts. On one hand, that would make the installer much easier. On the other hand, it is nice that the installer can do the keyboard and font config for you... I am of this opinion too,

[Freedos-devel] Help: TLINK commandline getting too long

2007-12-30 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, I'm trying to link a project with TLINK, where the commandline is getting too long (because of a large number of LIBs and OBJs that I have to link), and the @FILE.TXT trick of TLIB does not seem to work, or maybe I'm doing it wrong? Does anyone know of a way to outcome this problem?

Re: [Freedos-devel] Help: TLINK commandline getting too long

2007-12-31 Thread Aitor Santamaría
The problem is with TLINK, not TLIB. Both TMAKE and FREECOM complain that after unrolling the variables, the commandline is too long and the command cannot be executed. Thus my question if there's something to do similar to the Watcom linker or to TLIB to use an external file. Aitor

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS directory standard (1.1?)

2008-01-05 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Arkady, Even if I like as you the idea of the short names, there is a good practical reason why it'd be difficult to change: the tones of packages already using HELP and SOURCE. Althgouth perhaps it'd be good to short INC for INCLUDE? Just thinking... Aitor 2008/1/5, Arkady V.Belousov

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS directory standard (1.1?)

2008-01-07 Thread Aitor Santamaría
2008/1/5, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! LIB for libraries. We never really defined a lib before because FreeDOS doesn't support the shared-library model... I would put those in BIN if dynamic and in SOURCE if used to compile I disagree. I agree with Jim, nowadays, BIN is usually

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS directory standard (1.1?)

2008-01-07 Thread Aitor Santamaría
But at least it helps if I know that ANY lib would be in certain path, and I can adjust all my makefiles to it. It is even worse if I have to be manually tunning makefiles everytime I download new version for libraries. A third option would be: ok, make both LIB and their H files under SOURCE,

Re: [Freedos-devel] Help: TLINK commandline getting too long

2008-01-11 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Arkady, Thanks for the help. I circumvented the problem. Just to make myself clear about it. 2008/1/2, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! 31-Дек-2007 20:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: AS Both TMAKE and FREECOM complain that

[Freedos-devel] Curious MS-COPY behaviour

2008-01-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, I have come across: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/69581 how could one interpretate that +,, ? Would our COPY have the same effect? Just curious, Aitor - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS directory structure (technotes)

2008-01-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Thanks Jim! In case the link disappears for growing older, I'd suggest an entry under the developer section on the sidebar Aitor 2008/1/20, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oops, it would have been better to link to them from the front page. I've done that now. :-) On 1/19/08, Geraldo Netto

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS bugzilla

2008-01-27 Thread Aitor Santamaría
If there was an option to dump current bugzilla info to a file or something like that, before losing it completely, I'd do it that too (in case you guys are thinking of taking bugzilla down some time). Aitor 2008/1/25, Tom Ehlert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just wanted to do quick survey to see who

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS bugzilla

2008-01-29 Thread Aitor Santamaría
2008/1/30, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Since Eric and tassilo have identified the free web hosting for FreeDOS bugzilla, and since Eric has volunteered to install the new FreeDOS bugzilla, migrate the existing data, and do any ongoing maintenance - so I think we have a winner! :-) Erm, Eric,

Re: [Freedos-devel] about Directory Structure

2008-03-30 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2008/3/21, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2. Windows drivers can't work under FreeDOS at all just because absolutely different environment and interfaces. I should say more: Windows NT (2000, XP, Vista) drivers can't work under Win9x and Win9x .386 drivers can't work under

Re: [Freedos-devel] about Directory Structure

2008-04-14 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2008/4/1, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! 31-Мар-2008 03:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: 2. Windows drivers can't work under FreeDOS at all just because absolutely different environment and interfaces. I should say

Re: [Freedos-devel] lbacache stack space too small

2008-05-03 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2008/4/6, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Kevin, (sorry everybody for the long mail :-p Otoh, Kevin keeps CCing the mailing list - and Alain thinks always CCing the list is a good way to let people know that DOS is alive. oh well... ;-)) Yes please! And would prefer that by default

Re: [Freedos-devel] Willing to help

2008-06-18 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2008/5/15, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2. The Freemacs editor needs updating. Interesting :-). Aitor also plans to update our EDIT, but I have not heard about his project recently... I'm just packing. Most probably the 1st week of July can be settled as deadline. Aitor

Re: [Freedos-devel] [Freedos-user] Freedos 1.1 status

2008-09-02 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2008/8/29, Travis Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Speaking of freedos 1.1. I know freedos isn't intended to be dos *exactly* but it is intended to be a free dos replacement. This is fine for those using emulators under other operating systems, and those who can see their screens. However,

[Freedos-devel] OT: mount a local directory onto VMWare

2008-09-03 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello: I seem to remember that there was an easy way to mount a local win directory inside VMWare (as an extra driver or whatever), but I can't find the reference, could someone give me a clue? I am not interested in something elaborate such as using the network bridge. Something as simple as to

Re: [Freedos-devel] OT: mount a local directory onto VMWare

2008-09-03 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Thanks to both, I knew the DOSEMU stuff, and was new to VirtualBox!! Incidentally, some minutes later I've found it, it is called DiskMount: http://www.vmware.com/download/eula/diskmount_ws_v55.html and it is a pure commandline tool that works acceptably ok. It does just that: mounts the disk

Re: [Freedos-devel] OT: mount a local directory onto VMWare

2008-09-03 Thread Aitor Santamaría
, Alain M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Interesting... can you use it to mount directories or only disks and/or partitions? It makes a big difference because a disk cannot be accessed by two OSes... Alain Aitor Santamaría escreveu: Thanks to both, I knew the DOSEMU stuff, and was new to VirtualBox

[Freedos-devel] Virtualization made in Sun Microsystems

2008-09-05 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, Maybe you know it already, but it seems that Sun have launched their own virtualisation software: http://www.sun.com/software/products/virtualbox/get.jsp It was completely new to me, but I was wondering if someone has tried FreeDOS there already. Cheers! Aitor

[Freedos-devel] NEW: DFlat+ User Interface development kit

2008-09-06 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello: I announce my new project, FreeDOS DFlat +, as a set of libraries for easily designing text-mode user interfaces based on windowing and messaging, which has been excerpted out of FreeDOS EDIT 0.7d, in order to be used by other developers to create their text-mode user interface with

[Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FreeDOS EDIT 0.9a (FD-Dflat+ based)

2008-09-06 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi all, I hereby announce FreeDOS EDIT 0.9a (the sucessor of EDIT 0.7d). The big change about the 0.9 series is that it is now based on FreeDOS DFlat+, which is a user interface development toolkit, that has actually been excerpted (and continued) from EDIT. Thus, if you ever happen to see

Re: [Freedos-devel] compiling dflat+

2008-09-06 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Michael, The HW.MAK as it is (Makefile for Hello World), is ready to compile for BorlandC. If you plan to develop for OpenWatcom C/C++ you'll need to edit the makefile yourself and comment some lines in/out. wcc is the compiler executable for open watcom. In many cases (as now) you need to tune

Re: [Freedos-devel] compiling dflat+

2008-09-06 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2008/9/6 Michael Reichenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Also note that Borland's make and Watcom's wmake work a bit differently, so maybe the changes are more than expected. Shall this implicate you didn't test it with watcom? (Sorry if my understanding of English is weak.) No, that I didn't

Re: [Freedos-devel] compiling dflat+

2008-09-06 Thread Aitor Santamaría
:\watcom\lib286 libpath c:\watcom\lib286\dos library dflatplo.lib library dtool2lo.lib === And it works for me. Aitor 2008/9/6 Michael Reichenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aitor Santamaría schrieb: No, that I didn't bother to adjust the final makefile to OW. And did you test to build the example

Re: [Freedos-devel] compiling dflat+

2008-09-06 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello all, I am bringing the conversation to private, as it seems mostly a OWC configuration problem. If anyone is interested in following, let us know. Aitor 2008/9/6 Michael Reichenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Michael Reichenbach schrieb: Aitor Santamaría schrieb: No, that I didn't bother

Re: [Freedos-devel] compiling dflat+

2008-09-06 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2008/9/7 Michael Reichenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aitor Santamaría schrieb: Martin, Of course I tried under Open Watcom. Try these lines: wcc -ml -i=c:\\WATCOM\h -i=c:\freedos\source\INC hworld.c wlink @owlink.wcl where owlink.wcl is: === system dos option map option

Re: [Freedos-devel] Gmake (was: compiling dflat+)

2008-09-08 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Well, I have my doubts, WMAKE is also opensource (as much as OpenWatcom), when compiling with OWC I just prefer the all-in-one approach. I do not know much about GMAKE, but the ones I've seen look like a bit overly complex to me? Aitor 2008/9/8 Alain M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: All this discussion

  1   2   3   4   >