Rugxulo has made a single floppy FreeDOS image called BARE_DOS that works
well:
https://sites.google.com/site/rugxulo/
Georg
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's
Hi Jim
As you see, I am a bit delayed with mail.
The site looks very nice and neat now!!!
I was just wandering, whatever happened to those old technotes
(usually text or mail exceprts) that there used to be?
Aitor
2012/2/20 Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org:
I am looking to make a few improvements
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Aitor Santamaría aitor...@gmail.com wrote:
As you see, I am a bit delayed with mail.
No pressure! ;-)
The site looks very nice and neat now!!!
Yes it does. :-)
I was just wandering, whatever happened to those old technotes
(usually text or mail
Hi,
all the talk about the site motivated me to take a quick look.
why does the line
unlike the old ms dos freedos lets you access fat 32 file systems
appear?
fat 32 file systems existed in ms dos about 1997 or so.
I have fat 32 partitions on my ms dos system in fact, and there is no
windows on
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Karen Lewellen
klewel...@shellworld.net wrote:
all the talk about the site motivated me to take a quick look.
why does the line
unlike the old ms dos freedos lets you access fat 32 file systems
appear?
fat 32 file systems existed in ms dos about 1997 or
why does the line
unlike the old ms dos freedos lets you access fat 32 file systems
appear?
fat 32 file systems existed in ms dos about 1997 or so.
I have fat 32 partitions on my ms dos system in fact, and there is no
windows on my computer whatsoever.
While there are likely many things
Yes, Win95 OSR (or whatever) introduced FAT32 later on, but it wasn't
in DOS per se,
This does not accurately describe the technical circumstances.
If we were to discuss LFNs, in that case the MS-Windows-bundled DOS
versions alone did indeed only provide rudimentary help and application
Granted, I am a media professional, so facts especially n the Internet
are important.
the fact is ms dos 7.1 under wind 98 had fat 32, even Dr dos in 99 has it.
if freedos wants to suggest that it is distinctive from older editions of
dos, especially if fat 32 did not exist inf freedos circle
Hi Chris,
Thanks for including the entire passage.
still the point is as you shared yourself, might be understood to mean
older stand
alone ms dos, it might not as well.
be understood..that is.
Why showcase what is subject to misinterpretation when their are aspects,
you bring up another
Chris,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, C. Masloch wrote:
This does not accurately describe the technical circumstances.
If we were to discuss LFNs, in that case the MS-Windows-bundled DOS
versions alone did indeed only provide rudimentary help and application
support, with the important core LFN
Does anyone know of a manufacturer of a SBC PC104 that includes all hardware
including video interface for running FreeDOS? Thanks, Doug, K4CLE
Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless
--
Live Security Virtual
Does freedos have its own long file name utility?
If so, is it close enough to ms dos to be run?
Just curious, the person I know seeking it says they are running freedos,
but they are using the old ms dos 7.1 lfn command.
Made little sense to me, unless there is no specific freedos utility for
still the point is as you shared yourself, might be understood to mean
older stand alone ms dos, it might not as well. be understood..that is.
I agree.
for my part, the edition of ms dos 7 i run was packaged by developers
much like yourselves.
I maybe would personally prefer not to be
Thanks Chris,
I did not see the first message as having gone through. I had forwarded
some of the other messages to my home computer that did not go through
either. Figured I had fat fingered the address on my small keys on my
DROID! Regards
Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless
Hi Karen,
Does freedos have its own long file name utility?
If so, is it close enough to ms dos to be run?
Just curious, the person I know seeking it says they are running freedos,
but they are using the old ms dos 7.1 lfn command.
Made little sense to me, unless there is no specific freedos
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Karen Lewellen
klewel...@shellworld.net wrote:
Does freedos have its own long file name utility?
Yes. It's a loadable driver.
If so, is it close enough to ms dos to be run?
It seems to work here.
Just curious, the person I know seeking it says they are
You are too funny!
consult the rest of the thread.
As for Dr dos, many sites would dispute this, but that is beyond the
scope of this discussion.
Karen
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Ralf A. Quint wrote:
At 04:48 PM 9/17/2012, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Granted, I am a media professional, so facts
Hi Chris,
indeed they are referring to doslfn, but as I am not sure, I have written
to ask just what edition. Also which of freedos.
they sent me the line they are loading...thoughts?
LH DOSLFN /Z:C:\DOS71\CP437UNI.TBL
I feel sure they are not running what is current, and as their complaint
Hi Dennis,
this post made me smile.
how command.com is documented vs how it works indeed.
I am not sure what edition of freedos is being run, have written to ask.
Thanks for your wisdom,
Karen
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, dmccunney wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Karen Lewellen
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Karen Lewellen
klewel...@shellworld.net wrote:
Hi Dennis,
this post made me smile.
how command.com is documented vs how it works indeed.
I am not sure what edition of freedos is being run, have written to ask.
Invite your friend to join us and participate
At 08:45 PM 9/17/2012, Karen Lewellen wrote:
You are too funny!
consult the rest of the thread.
For exactly what?
Ralf
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Karen Lewellen
klewel...@shellworld.net wrote:
Hi Chris,
indeed they are referring to doslfn, but as I am not sure, I have written
to ask just what edition. Also which of freedos.
they sent me the line they are loading...thoughts?
LH DOSLFN
Hi Karen,
I can assure you that none of the computers I have running this
system know the difference as to official or not. They boot as
ms dos, function as ms dos, perhaps a touch better, and remain
solid for me as ms dos.
If you don't have appropriate Windows' license, you are using
23 matches
Mail list logo
