On 6/14/06, John Hupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Granted to all: This feedback for the oZone developer may be a bit
> off-topic, unless it reveals any FreeDOS issues. Though I imagine that DOS
> GUI's may be of general interest here.)
>
> Flo,
>
> I looked at oZone 0.6 some. My first questions
Hi Arkady,
Sorry, she downloaded the SR9 beta2 ISO and got MCB Chain corrupt, I
told her to try Odin 0.6, well it solve the problem.
The Kernel should be 2035a-unstable.
Rgds,
Johnson.
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 05:48:54 +0400, you wrote:
Hi,
> Not enough information: which config.sys and autoexec.bat content on
>those disk? After which statement in config.sys you get this message (what
>you see on screen before this message)? Which kernel and FreeCOM version you
>use (do you get
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:31:08 +0200 (MEST), you wrote:
>Hi Johnson, with a forum, you would have to log in
>every time when you want to get the news. I prefer
>receiving the DOS news in my mailbox automatically...
I don't mind, my software manage it well, just BAHCL feel pain.
Also this method wa
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> NNTP is only one protocol to distribute lists. And distribution over
>email has its own advantages (for example, no depends from TCP/IP).
>
>
>
Eh? email use 110/25 pop/smtp and AFIAK those use tcp/udp.
___
Freedos-
dima wrote:
> ...to do anything except pay to ISP or any NNTP provider for NNTP access.
> I have no free NNTP access and not sure if I really need it.
Not really. You can connect to an NNTP server regardless of whether your
ISP offers free access. For example anyone can participate in Microsoft
Hi!
> The threading on NNTP is also much more
> solid (e.g. if someone changed the subject line).
Email threading is not subject line based either - if
you use the proper email software ;-).
> I find it great for low traffic too. You don't have to do anything, just
> click the group and start r
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Gerry Hickman wrote:
> > NNTP is more for higher traffic stuff and for situations
> > where most users only want to read a part of the
> > messages,
>
> I find it great for low traffic too. You don't have to do anything, just
...to do anything except pay to ISP or any NNTP pr
Gerry Hickman wrote:
> easy to skip over. I don't know how, but the NNTP groups have a lot less
> spam than a year ago. I never see all that V_iagra stuff anymore.
Interesting! Before I put the underscore in the line above, sourceforge
refused to post my message!
--
Gerry Hickman (London UK)
Hi,
> Hi Johnson, with a forum, you would have to log in
> every time when you want to get the news.
I agree, also it's less efficient than NNTP and much more difficult to
manage large volume archives. The threading on NNTP is also much more
solid (e.g. if someone changed the subject line).
> NN
Hi Eric,
>>> 5. SYS B: C: /oem:ms (it says "system transferred")
>
> Which it probably did...
Yes, but there's obviously some major problems with this. To be fair,
it's probably unreasonable to expect FreeDOS to be able to install an
MS-DOS 6.22 boot sector from a FAT12 floppy to a FAT16 parti
Hi Johnson, with a forum, you would have to log in
every time when you want to get the news. I prefer
receiving the DOS news in my mailbox automatically...
NNTP is more for higher traffic stuff and for situations
where most users only want to read a part of the
messages, plus, as Jim said, NNTP h
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Johnson Lam wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:41:13 +0100, you wrote:
>> 5. SYS B: C: /oem:ms (it says "system transferred")
Which it probably did...
>> When I reboot with the C drive marked Active I get two dots on a black
>> screen and a flashing cursor, that wasn't expecte
13 matches
Mail list logo
