you can use this in conjunction ox HX extender (www.japheth.de)
http://www.advsys.net/ken/util/kpic.exe
Ken's PICture viewer. Supports: JPG,PNG,GIF,TGA,PCX,BMP. View all files in a
directory or files inside a .ZIP. (no need to extract first!) Example: kpic
/zduke3d_hrp.zip *.png *.jpg. Select a
Robert Riebisch wrote:
>dos386 wrote:
>>> But there is a tool which has the name DISPLAY and
>> There are simply too many DISPLAY's ...
>> I mean the one from 1998 by ???
>> done with DGJPP closed source freeware
>??? = Jih-Shin Ho
This is available from any Simtel mirror /simtelnet/msdos/gr
Just want to add my own thanks for the new kernel.
Marcos
Regular FreeDOS user
Sao Paulo, Brazil
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimite
dos386 wrote:
>> but actually an even easier way is to let the BIOS do the lowlevel stuff.
>> Then your stick looks like a normal int13
>> disk for DOS and it will see all FAT16 and FAT32 partitions.
>
> How ?
It must be supported by your BIOS. My 2003 Compaq Evo N620c does. USB
flash drives are
dos386 wrote:
>> But there is a tool which has the name DISPLAY and
>
> There are simply too many DISPLAY's ... I mean the one from 1998 by ???
> done with DGJPP closed source freeware
??? = Jih-Shin Ho
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
> You can easily register drives AFTER boot, without giving them
> int 13 interfaces, using the well-documented and well-working
> DOS block device interface. Disk editors are not very widespread
> but NTFS4DOS (NTSC is a television thing) and disk caching might
> be a reason why providing int 13
Hi Dos386,
>> Such disks would have to be "installed" into DOS. The BIOS
>> never did handle CD/DVD units directly, thus SHCDX33D always
>> installs its units into DOS. However, the BIOS does handle
>> hard-disks, and DOS "discovers" how many hard-disks the BIOS
>> found during system boot.
Hi!
> > buggy (some PC's)
> Who what where?
RTFB ... mouse cursor invisible on some PC's
> But there is a tool which has the name DISPLAY and
There are simply too many DISPLAY's ... I mean the one from 1998 by ???
done with DGJPP closed source freeware
> Mplayer can also play pure audio files.
>> Such disks would have to be "installed" into DOS ...
>
> OK, so it's trivial to add them into INT $13 and make
> available for WDE disk editor, IDEcheck, NTSC4DOS and
> other "DOS-independent" tools based on INT $13, but DOS
> won't see them for a known design fault of itself ...
> what IMHO cou
> Warcraft II BNE version 2.01A runs in Windows 9x
> and Windows XP. It was designed for 9x
Try HX :-)
> ReactOS is not useful at this point and even if
12 years done, 12 years ahead ;-)
> it were it is not a DOS compatible replacement for Windows.
> There is a lot of DOS based Windows softwar
For the quick answer:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
No, merely using the GCC compiler doesn't make your program a "covered work".
If you are statically linking a library covered by the GPL license, your
program constitutes a "covered work" under the terms of the GPL, unless the
copyr
Hi Florian,
>> USBDOS device scan is part of install but should
>> only be done AFTER install, no USB devices used DURING install
>
> USB support in FreeDOS?
The FreeDOS 1.0 FULL distro defaults to downloading various
proprietary but free USB drivers (which can hang because the
NIC and DHCP a
> Incorrect DOS version
Does FreeDOS have such a message at all ?
BTW, defaulting to "FREECOM.COM" would prevent such (FREQUENT !!!) trouble :-)
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> This is a general question, not(?) completely off topic.
> I have never quite understood the GPL type license
> in the following sense: I write my own c++ software; I compile
> it using an open source deal like djgpp;
> if I then distribute the compiled exe, am I legally obliged to also
> distrib
> is doslnf only for iso?
NO.
> I have unpacked package with tar and wanted to
start configure but names are cuted.
"cuted" -> "truncated" ???
Maybe your TAR doesn't support the NTLFN API. Try 7-ZIP archiver.
But I can't really recommend the DOSLNF thing except badly needed
for some funny reas
Hi
Thanks
> Such disks would have to be "installed" into DOS. The BIOS
> never did handle CD/DVD units directly, thus SHCDX33D always
> installs its units into DOS. However, the BIOS does handle
> hard-disks, and DOS "discovers" how many hard-disks the BIOS
> found during system boot. So, U
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, kurt godel wrote:
> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 03:25:07 -0400
> From: kurt godel
> Reply-To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Freedos-user] The GPL license.
>
> This is a general question, not(?) completely off topic. I have
kurt godel wrote:
> compiled on a GPL system?. If so, is this because the GPL libraries are
> statically linked into the exe?.
Would be true if the libraries are GPL, but they are LGPL (see copying.dj).
> Am I in any case required to include the source code that came with the
> djgpp distro?.
Hi,
is doslnf only for iso?I have unpacked package with tar and wanted to
start configure but names are cuted.
Menuhin
http://www.msaitov.de/pgp.htm
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out th
> USBDOS device scan is part of install but should
> only be done AFTER install, no USB devices used DURING install
USB support in FreeDOS?
LG
Flo
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
---
This is a general question, not(?) completely off topic. I have never quite
understood the GPL type license
in the following sense: I write my own c++ software; I compile it using an
open source deal like djgpp;
if I then distribute the compiled exe, am I legally obliged to also
distribute(i.e. my)
21 matches
Mail list logo
