Re: [Freedos-user] FDAPM

2011-10-08 Thread Ulrich Hansen
Am 08.10.11 06:59, schrieb Marcos Favero Florence de Barros: > FDAPM is *very* effective, but softwares must be FDAPM-aware. > > DosZip is FDAPM-aware and will typically use only 2% of CPU time, > provided it is configured for that. Go to the Setup, System Options > menu and chech the "Use DOS Idl

Re: [Freedos-user] Announce: vmsmount, a driver for mounting VMware's shared folders in DOS

2011-10-08 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 8-10-2011 3:17, Michael B. Brutman schreef: > I noticed that it doesn't support older versions of DOS - I presume that > is just a matter of some of the data structures being different, and > that it would be possible? Also, your code assumes a Pentium (which > makes sense for something runnin

Re: [Freedos-user] Announce: vmsmount, a driver for mounting VMware's shared folders in DOS

2011-10-08 Thread Bret Johnson
> I'm still not sure how to get base directory names of drives and > shares under standard COMMAND.COM. Perhaps time for 4DOS after all :) While I was writing USBDRIVE, I found the only reliable way to detect which drive letters were really used and find any information about directories and suc

Re: [Freedos-user] FDAPM

2011-10-08 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Ulrich Hansen wrote: > > It would be really good if a helpful FreeDOS developer could add FDAPM > awareness to more important programs in FreeDOS. I assume the shell would benefit from this the most, if not already. Other stuff? Dunno, probably less benefit as

Re: [Freedos-user] FDAPM

2011-10-08 Thread Ulrich Hansen
Am 08.10.11 19:54, schrieb Rugxulo: >> It would be really good if a helpful FreeDOS developer could add FDAPM >> awareness to more important programs in FreeDOS. > I assume the shell would benefit from this the most, if not already. The shell has no problem. CPU usage is normal (4%) if FDAPM is r

Re: [Freedos-user] FDAPM

2011-10-08 Thread Jack
I run a 15-year-old Windows/NT V4.0, "backed up" (and restored occasionally!) by a 17-year-old V6.22 MS-DOS. My system is a "flat" desktop (not a "tower") with its power-supply fan and a 13-CFM extra fan, thanks to my old 85-watt AMD 2100 CPU. TOO MUCH, so now I have a 45 watt AMD 3000+, which

[Freedos-user] FDAPM

2011-10-08 Thread Marcos Favero Florence de Barros
Hi Jack, > Absolutely NO "self respecting" computer, or computer program, should > at-all REQUIRE using "FDAPM" or any equivalents! What has happened > to Industrial RESPONSIBILITY, i.e. making systems that RUN, WITHOUT > requiring such "Band Aid" power software??!! Agreed -- they should indeed