On 05/28/2015 05:53 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 05:35 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 17:18 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 201
On 05/28/2015 05:35 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 17:18 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 17:18 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> >> On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Si
On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 2
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:59 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> >> On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 28.5.2015 10:49, M
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:40 +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 28/05/15 16:29, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:23 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
> >> Hi Simo,
> >>
> >> On 05/28/2015 03:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
> On 05/28/2015
On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
> On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>> On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 10:46 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> > On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > >> On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > >>> On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, P
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >> On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote
On 28/05/15 16:29, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:23 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Simo,
On 05/28/2015 03:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:23 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
> Hi Simo,
>
> On 05/28/2015 03:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
> >> On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 28.5.2015 10
Hi Simo,
On 05/28/2015 03:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>> On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek w
On 28.5.2015 15:26, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
>> On 26.5.2015
On 05/28/2015 03:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 08:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>
> On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >> On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >> On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> >>> Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
> On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On 05
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>> Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
>> On 05/26/2015 02:1
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>> Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
>>> On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>
On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
>> On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it came to my mind that domain level for topol
Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should actually be
number 2, not 1.
We already used nu
On 05/27/2015 01:04 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2015 04:32 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
If you really want to avoid unforeseen issues rather go and get rid of
"major.minor" logic we have in the topology plugin right now :-)
Ludwig, I thought we agre
On 05/26/2015 04:32 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
> If you really want to avoid unforeseen issues rather go and get rid of
> "major.minor" logic we have in the topology plugin right now :-)
Ludwig, I thought we agreed to avoid using major.minor format in the
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
>> On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should actually be
>>> number 2, not 1.
>>>
>>> We already used number 1 for incompatible
On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should actually be
number 2, not 1.
We already used number 1 for incompatible changes in DNS tree and I believe
that it is not a good idea to
On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should actually be
number 2, not 1.
We already used number 1 for incompatible changes in DNS tree and I believe
that it is not a good idea to have two places which say 'version 1' but and
Hello,
it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should actually be
number 2, not 1.
We already used number 1 for incompatible changes in DNS tree and I believe
that it is not a good idea to have two places which say 'version 1' but and
actually mean two different things. (DNS tree
28 matches
Mail list logo