9, 2016 07:56 PM
To: "郑磊"; "freeipa-devel";
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-devel] [help]
Comments inline
On 19.10.2016 10:30, 郑磊 wrote:
-
Basti";
*Date: * Wed, Oct 19, 2016 04:03 PM
*To: * "郑磊";
"freeipa-devel";
*Subject: * Re: [Freeipa-devel] [help]
On 19.10.2016 03:35, 郑磊 wrote:
Hello,
In the process of using freeipa, we found a lot of content without
Chinese translation. In order to we can better use the
M
To: "郑磊"; "freeipa-devel";
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-devel] [help]
On 19.10.2016 03:35, 郑磊 wrote:
Hello,
In the process of using freeipa, we found a lot of content without
Chinese translation. In order to we can better u
郑磊
>> Phone：18684703229
>> Email：zheng...@kylinos.cn
>> Company：天津麒麟信息技术有限公司
>> Address：湖南长沙市开福区三一大道工美大厦十四楼
>> -- Original --
>> *From: * "Martin Basti";
>> *Date: * Tue, Oct 18, 2016 06:50 PM
>> *To: * &quo
rtin Basti";
*Date: * Tue, Oct 18, 2016 06:50 PM
*To: * "郑磊";
"freeipa-devel";
*Subject: * Re: [Freeipa-devel] [help]
On 18.10.2016 03:28, 郑磊 wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm using freeipa, and having a test and research with the
function of freeipa. At the same time, I
uot;;
Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2016 06:50 PM
To: "郑磊"; "freeipa-devel";
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-devel] [help]
On 18.10.2016 03:28, 郑磊 wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm using freeipa, and having a test and research with the
On 18.10.2016 03:28, 郑磊 wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm using freeipa, and having a test and research with the
function of freeipa. At the same time, I have carried on the Chinese
translation to the web interface, also added own log module in web
interface, referring to the following screensh
Hello everyone,
I'm using freeipa, and having a test and research with the function of
freeipa. At the same time, I have carried on the Chinese translation to the
web interface, also added own log module in web interface, referring to the
following screenshots. However, for these changes
On 14.10.2014 20:33, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 10:38 +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 14.10.2014 v 10:23 Petr Viktorin napsal(a):
On 10/14/2014 08:51 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 14.10.2014 v 08:37 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 10/13/2014 07:23 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
O
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 10:38 +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Dne 14.10.2014 v 10:23 Petr Viktorin napsal(a):
> > On 10/14/2014 08:51 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> >> Dne 14.10.2014 v 08:37 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
> >>> On 10/13/2014 07:23 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 12:39 +02
Dne 14.10.2014 v 10:23 Petr Viktorin napsal(a):
On 10/14/2014 08:51 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 14.10.2014 v 08:37 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 10/13/2014 07:23 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 12:39 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
Also, few comments to your current patch set (tho
On 10/14/2014 08:51 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 14.10.2014 v 08:37 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 10/13/2014 07:23 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 12:39 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
Also, few comments to your current patch set (though the patches
themselves
will probably not land
Dne 14.10.2014 v 08:37 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 10/13/2014 07:23 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 12:39 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
Also, few comments to your current patch set (though the patches themselves
will probably not land in 4.1):
Patch 0001:
- while it may work (a
On 10/13/2014 07:23 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 12:39 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 10/10/2014 05:43 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>> As a result of this ongoing conversation, I have opened two 389 bugs:
>>>
>>> 1. Post Read - https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47924
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 12:39 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 05:43 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > As a result of this ongoing conversation, I have opened two 389 bugs:
> >
> > 1. Post Read - https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47924
> > 2. UUID ACIs - https://fedorahosted.org/389/tick
On 10/10/2014 05:43 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> As a result of this ongoing conversation, I have opened two 389 bugs:
>
> 1. Post Read - https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47924
> 2. UUID ACIs - https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47925
>
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 17:46 -0400, Nathaniel McCall
aci: (targetfilter = "(objectClass=ipaToken)")(targetattrs =
"objectclass || d
escription || managedBy || ipatokenUniqueID ||
ipatokenDisabled || ipatokenNo
tBefore || ipatokenNotAfter || ipatokenVendor ||
ipatokenModel || ipatokenSer
i
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:38:46 +0200
Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
> > https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47924
> >
> >> is it possible to reproduce without IPA ?
> > Perhaps. You'd need the OTP schema and ACIs from FreeIPA, unless
> > you can find another way to reproduce it.
> well, did think abou
As a result of this ongoing conversation, I have opened two 389 bugs:
1. Post Read - https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47924
2. UUID ACIs - https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47925
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 17:46 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> The background of this email is this bug:
> https:
On 10/10/2014 05:30 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/10/2014 05:16 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/10/2014 04:38 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/10/2014 03:58 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 10:51 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 22:22 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 17:38 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47924
> >
> >> is it possible to reproduce without IPA ?
> > Perhaps. You'd need the OTP schema and ACIs from FreeIPA, unless you can
> > find another way to reproduce it.
> well, did think about it
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47924
is it possible to reproduce without IPA ?
Perhaps. You'd need the OTP schema and ACIs from FreeIPA, unless you can
find another way to reproduce it.
well, did think about it again, we probaly also would need all the
plugins, so could be difficult
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 17:30 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2014 05:16 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
>
> > On 10/10/2014 04:38 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 10/10/2014 03:58 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 10/09/2014 10:51 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > >
On 10/10/2014 05:16 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/10/2014 04:38 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/10/2014 03:58 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 10:51 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 22:22 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:40 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wr
On 10/10/2014 04:38 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/10/2014 03:58 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 10:51 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 22:22 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:40 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:32 +0200, thierr
On 10/10/2014 03:58 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 10:51 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 22:22 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:40 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:32 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:27 PM, Nathani
On 10/09/2014 10:51 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 22:22 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:40 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:32 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:27 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:11
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 22:22 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 06:40 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:32 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> > > On 10/09/2014 06:27 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:11 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> > >
On 10/09/2014 06:40 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:32 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:27 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:11 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/08/2014 11:46 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The background of this email
On 10/09/2014 06:53 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:38 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:32 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:27 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:11 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/08/2014 11:46 PM, Nathani
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:38 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 06:32 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
> > On 10/09/2014 06:27 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:11 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> >>> On 10/08/2014 11:46 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >>>
> The back
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:32 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 06:27 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:11 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> >> On 10/08/2014 11:46 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >>
> >>> The background of this email is this bug:
> >>> https://fedorah
On 10/09/2014 06:32 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 06:27 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:11 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/08/2014 11:46 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The background of this email is this bug:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4456
A
On 10/09/2014 06:27 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:11 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/08/2014 11:46 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The background of this email is this bug:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4456
Attached are two patches which solve this issue f
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 14:11 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 10/08/2014 11:46 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>
> > The background of this email is this bug:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4456
> >
> > Attached are two patches which solve this issue for admin users (not
> > very helpf
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:01 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 05:51 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 16:33 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> >> On 10/09/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:06:06 +0200
> >>> Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> >>>
> >
On 10/09/2014 05:51 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 16:33 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:06:06 +0200
Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 03:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:46:01 -0400
Natha
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 16:33 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:06:06 +0200
> > Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/09/2014 03:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:46:01 -0400
> >>> Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >>>
On 10/09/2014 04:47 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:33:20 +0200
Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:06:06 +0200
Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 03:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:46:01 -0400
Nathaniel M
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:33:20 +0200
Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
> On 10/09/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:06:06 +0200
> > Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/09/2014 03:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:46:01 -0400
> >>> Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On 10/09/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:06:06 +0200
Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/09/2014 03:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:46:01 -0400
Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The background of this email is this bug:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4456
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:06:06 +0200
Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
> On 10/09/2014 03:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:46:01 -0400
> > Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >
> >> The background of this email is this bug:
> >> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4456
> >>
> >> Attached ar
On 10/09/2014 03:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:46:01 -0400
Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The background of this email is this bug:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4456
Attached are two patches which solve this issue for admin users (not
very helpful, I know). They depen
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:46:01 -0400
Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> The background of this email is this bug:
> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4456
>
> Attached are two patches which solve this issue for admin users (not
> very helpful, I know). They depend on this fix in 389:
> https://fedo
On 10/08/2014 11:46 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The background of this email is this bug:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4456
Attached are two patches which solve this issue for admin users (not
very helpful, I know). They depend on this fix in 389:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket
The background of this email is this bug:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4456
Attached are two patches which solve this issue for admin users (not
very helpful, I know). They depend on this fix in 389:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47920
There are two outstanding issues:
1. 389 do
Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/11/2011 10:12 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2011 07:25 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2011 03:05 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 02/10/2011 05:12 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
But what other roles do we need? The mind boggles and ra
On 02/11/2011 10:12 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 02/10/2011 07:25 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
>>> Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2011 03:05 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 05:12 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> But what other roles do we need? The mind boggles and r
Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2011 07:25 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2011 03:05 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 02/10/2011 05:12 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
But what other roles do we need? The mind boggles and rather than
dictating what the initial ones will be I'm looking for
On 02/10/2011 07:25 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 02/10/2011 03:05 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2011 05:12 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
But what other roles do we need? The mind boggles and rather than
dictating what the initial ones will be I'm looking for some
Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2011 03:05 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 02/10/2011 05:12 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
But what other roles do we need? The mind boggles and rather than
dictating what the initial ones will be I'm looking for some
guidance/suggestions.
thanks
rob
I'm actually wondering i
On 02/10/2011 03:05 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 05:12 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> But what other roles do we need? The mind boggles and rather than
>> dictating what the initial ones will be I'm looking for some
>> guidance/suggestions.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> rob
>
> I'm actually wondering
On 02/10/2011 05:12 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
But what other roles do we need? The mind boggles and rather than
dictating what the initial ones will be I'm looking for some
guidance/suggestions.
thanks
rob
I'm actually wondering if we need to define many default roles in the
upstream project
On 02/10/2011 01:11 PM, Jan Zeleny wrote:
> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> One of the features of IPAv2 is it is much easier to delegate
>> permissions to perform tasks (add, delete, modify, etc).
>>
>> This delegation is broken out into three pieces:
>>
>> * permissions
>> * privileges
>> * roles
On 02/10/2011 01:11 PM, Jan Zeleny wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
One of the features of IPAv2 is it is much easier to delegate
permissions to perform tasks (add, delete, modify, etc).
This delegation is broken out into three pieces:
* permissions
* privileges
* roles
A permission is
Rob Crittenden wrote:
> One of the features of IPAv2 is it is much easier to delegate
> permissions to perform tasks (add, delete, modify, etc).
>
> This delegation is broken out into three pieces:
>
> * permissions
> * privileges
> * roles
>
> A permission is a very low-level object that
On 02/10/2011 09:42 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
One of the features of IPAv2 is it is much easier to delegate
permissions to perform tasks (add, delete, modify, etc).
This delegation is broken out into three pieces:
* permissions
* privileges
* roles
A permission is a very low-level object that
One of the features of IPAv2 is it is much easier to delegate
permissions to perform tasks (add, delete, modify, etc).
This delegation is broken out into three pieces:
* permissions
* privileges
* roles
A permission is a very low-level object that says who can do what to
whom. These permis
58 matches
Mail list logo
