Just to elaborate on Dmitri's comments. In addition to the IPA client
and server packages that are included in the RHEL6.1 beta channel, there
will be a separate RHEL
add-on channel, Enterprise Identity Replication. That add-on channel will
contain ds-replication
and the Windows sync
mvh,
Sigbjorn Lie
's/windows/unix/g'
- Ubuntu - an African word, meaning Slackware is too hard for me
On Fri, April 8, 2011 01:03, Kevin Unthank wrote:
snip
Just to elaborate on Dmitri's comments. In addition to the IPA client
and server packages that are included in the RHEL6.1 beta
Right, forgot to remove autosignature. :)
See my post at the bottom of my last email.
Rgds,
Siggi
On Fri, April 8, 2011 08:38, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
mvh, Sigbjorn Lie
's/windows/unix/g'
- Ubuntu - an African word, meaning Slackware is too hard for me
On Fri, April 8, 2011 01:03,
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote:
Ok, I do like the wider options for channels in Red Hat, but this bring me to
my next question:
Will there be an extra charge for this add on channel, or will this be
included in the base
subscription?
If $answer =
On Fri, April 8, 2011 09:48, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote:
Ok, I do like the wider options for channels in Red Hat, but this bring me
to my next question:
Will there be an extra charge for this add on channel, or will this be
Hello Rob
Thanks for the srpm. Sorry but I just had time now to compile and test it.
While installing and testing ipa-client-install, I found a small installation
dependency problem in the spec.
To install the rpm the package nss-tools should be required. This provides
/usr/bin/certutil which
On 04/08/2011 02:38 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Please disregards Steven Jones' ranting, this was not the kind of feedback I
was looking for.
Ok, I do like the wider options for channels in Red Hat, but this bring me to
my next question:
Will there be an extra charge for this add
Is there any way to capture a description associated with the regex - group
mapping?
I was thinking that after time, it would be important to look back on rules and
know why they were put there.
Particularly in the case of regex, since it may not be completely obvious by
looking back at
On 04/08/2011 11:49 AM, JR Aquino wrote:
Is there any way to capture a description associated with the regex - group
mapping?
I was thinking that after time, it would be important to look back on rules
and know why they were put there.
Particularly in the case of regex, since it may not
On 04/08/2011 06:26 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 04/08/2011 02:38 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Please disregards Steven Jones' ranting, this was not the kind of feedback I
was looking for.
Ok, I do like the wider options for channels in Red Hat, but this bring me to
my next question:
On 04/08/2011 04:51 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
Will ipa-v2 packages be released for Fedora 14 since Fedora 15 final
is not yet available?
The issue with F14 is that it still has an older version of the
Certificate System (Dogtag).
We can't release as there will be collisions but the upstream
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stephen Ingram sbing...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] packages for Fedora 14
To: d...@redhat.com
I installed the rc2 version and used the f14-testing repo to
accommodate. Would this work for v2 or has dogtag
12 matches
Mail list logo
