ck Astrego
> To:Christian Horn
> Cc:freeipa-users@redhat.com
> Date: 02/12/2013 01:04 PM
> Subject:Re: [Freeipa-users] Postponing IPA 3 upgrade
> Sent by:freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com
>
RHCE
Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
0064 4 463 6272
From: Rob Crittenden [rcrit...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2013 9:39 a.m.
To: Steven Jones
Cc: Christian Horn; freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Postponing IPA 3 upgrade
S
Christian Horn [ch...@fluxcoil.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2013 8:30 p.m.
To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Postponing IPA 3 upgrade
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:05:40PM +, Steven Jones wrote:
Personally Im very worried, 6.2 to 6.3 went badly and this looks like a
-users-boun...@redhat.com [freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com] on
behalf of rashard.ke...@sita.aero [rashard.ke...@sita.aero]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2013 7:21 a.m.
To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Postponing IPA 3 upgrade
Thanks for all the replies, We are using Red Hat
Horn [ch...@fluxcoil.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2013 8:30 p.m.
To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Postponing IPA 3 upgrade
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:05:40PM +, Steven Jones wrote:
> Personally Im very worried, 6.2 to 6.3 went badly and this looks like a
>
will clone them off before the next patch
cycles.
Is there an official go-live date for IPA3 in RHEL?
Thanks,
Rashard
From: Jorick Astrego
To: Christian Horn
Cc: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Date: 02/12/2013 01:04 PM
Subject:Re: [Freeipa-users] Postponing IPA 3 upgrade
Sent by
On 02/12/2013 08:30 AM, Christian Horn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:05:40PM +, Steven Jones wrote:
Personally Im very worried, 6.2 to 6.3 went badly and this looks like a bigger
upgrade
I might miss something.. but cant one create a "throw away replica"
of the old environment, use tha
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:05:40PM +, Steven Jones wrote:
> Personally Im very worried, 6.2 to 6.3 went badly and this looks like a
> bigger upgrade
I might miss something.. but cant one create a "throw away replica"
of the old environment, use that then separatedly and try out the
upgrade wi
Personally Im very worried, 6.2 to 6.3 went badly and this looks like a bigger
upgrade
:(
regards
Steven Jones
Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE
Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
0064 4 463 6272
From: freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com [freeipa-users-boun..
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:26:06PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Christian Horn wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:25:56PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >>Christian Horn wrote:
> >>>
> >>>If you have the old system only receiving z-stream updates, so i.e.
> >>>6.3.z for a RHEL6.3 then you will
Christian Horn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:25:56PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Christian Horn wrote:
If you have the old system only receiving z-stream updates, so i.e.
6.3.z for a RHEL6.3 then you will stay on ipa2.
I just tested the upgrade of a populated ipa2/rhel6.3 to rhel6.4 .
Wi
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:25:56PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Christian Horn wrote:
> >
> >If you have the old system only receiving z-stream updates, so i.e.
> >6.3.z for a RHEL6.3 then you will stay on ipa2.
> >
> >I just tested the upgrade of a populated ipa2/rhel6.3 to rhel6.4 .
> >Without
Christian Horn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:00:22PM -0500, rashard.ke...@sita.aero wrote:
I was wondering if I need to be concerned about IPA 2 being updated
automatically to IPA 3? We have a working IPA 2 environment in place now
and wanted to know if IPA needed to be added to an exclude l
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:00:22PM -0500, rashard.ke...@sita.aero wrote:
> I was wondering if I need to be concerned about IPA 2 being updated
> automatically to IPA 3? We have a working IPA 2 environment in place now
> and wanted to know if IPA needed to be added to an exclude list. We are
> af
On 02/11/2013 10:00 AM, rashard.ke...@sita.aero wrote:
> I was wondering if I need to be concerned about IPA 2 being updated
> automatically to IPA 3? We have a working IPA 2 environment in place now
> and wanted to know if IPA needed to be added to an exclude list. We are
> afraid of breaking our
15 matches
Mail list logo