Alan,
Thanks for your reply. I see your point. But this does create an issue
when you deprecate a nas when users are connected (which isn't ideal but
does happen) because now the session will never close and radius doesn't
assume that a missing nas also means missing session, nor does it pass
Matthew Schumacher wrote:
When I have a session that didn't get expired in a SQL database, and the
user tries to connect then freeradius correctly checks the nas using the
checkrad script *UNLESS* the nas is no longer defined in the clients.
If the nas is missing, radius doesn't bother to call
Mehdi Ravanbakhsh wrote:
/So i need to change /*Simultaneous Use check strategy and if user with
same Calling Station ID - NAS ip address - NAS port - Called station
ID try to connect i need to accept it .*
Then write that policy in unlang. It's not hard.
*Is there any way to change
Alan,
just to let you know. I figure out where was the problem.
In default file in session I was having set radutmp and
also sql. After I comment radutmp and let just sql it begun
to work:)
Thanks!
Miha
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:27:41 -0400
Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Miha
Miha wrote:
i am turning out you due to issue with simultaneous-Use. I
readed mailing list but did not find any appropriate
answer.
...
my config:
[root@localhost sites-available]# radiusd -X
FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.12, for host
...
Ready to process requests.
The reason to post the
HI Alan,
log with simultaneous-Use := 1:
rad_recv: Accounting-Request packet from host
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 40165, id=56, length=327
Acct-Status-Type = Start
Acct-Session-Id = 21613e25-697e-4d90-a741-586503d4abcb
User-Name = 018108753.enterprise
Freeswitch-Src =
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, opti2k4 dr...@email.t-com.hr wrote:
Hi,
i need little help with this. I have MySQL setup with freeradis, that is
working. Now for Simultaneous-Use checking there are no querys to uncomment
inside sql.conf by default (installed freeradius over apt-get ).
It
Alexander Kosykh wrote:
I'm using Simultaneous-use := 1 and sql for check on my Freeradius
server. When the radius found that customer connected already it reject
customer with Reply-Message := \r\nYou are already logged in - access
denied\r\n\n. Is the way do not reject customer to be able
The question is not how to make captive portal on my NAS, the question is
how do not reject customer, who reached max value of simultaneous-use?
Regards,
Alexander.
2011/12/20 Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
Alexander Kosykh wrote:
I'm using Simultaneous-use := 1 and sql for check on my
Hi,
The question is not how to make captive portal on my NAS, the question is
how do not reject customer, who reached max value of simultaneous-use?
if you dont care about them reaching that value, then why are you checking?
but if you really do want to redirect them to an error
I tried to do this in my config
session {
# radutmp
#
# See Simultaneous Use Checking Queries in sql.conf
sql
if (Post-Auth-Type == reject) {
ok
block_auth_error # my own policy
}
}
but radius answer is reject whatever and pppoe didn't up
2011/12/21 Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Alexander Kosykh avkos...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to do this in my config
session {
# radutmp
#
# See Simultaneous Use Checking Queries in sql.conf
sql
if (Post-Auth-Type == reject) {
ok
block_auth_error # my own policy
}
}
but radius answer is
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Alexander Kosykh avkos...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to do this in my config
but radius answer is reject whatever and pppoe didn't up
You know what, since you say it's pppoe, I can share a
Hi.
I knew how to make all you wrote above. I need to know how to accept
customer, when sim-use rejected him.
Regards,
Alexander.
2011/12/21 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Alexander
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Alexander Kosykh avkos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I knew how to make all you wrote above.
Are you sure?
I need to know how to accept
customer, when sim-use rejected him.
Cause if you do, you wouldn't ask that.
Easiest way: simply remove sql (or radutmp,
How to make checkrad, if disable all in session section? acct-stop
packets is lost sometimes and sql think that customer is online, but he
didn't.
Regards,
Alexander.
2011/12/21 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Alexander Kosykh avkos...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Alexander Kosykh avkos...@gmail.com wrote:
How to make checkrad, if disable all in session section?
checkrad should be disabled (i.e. not called by FR) when you
comment-out radutmp from session section. You should still be able
to run it manually
$ checkrad
Do you have some examples, which work fast to handle 10 AAA/second and
check sim-use without freeradius standart methods?
Regards,
Alexander.
2011/12/21 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net
I belive I responded to a similar question yesterday (search the list
archive). You just have to deal with
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Alexander Kosykh avkos...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have some examples, which work fast to handle 10 AAA/second and check
sim-use without freeradius standart methods?
Did you read what I wrote earlier?
All the concepts are there. Converting it to actual code is
Erik wrote:
wouldn't you at least see checkrad initiate in the freeradius -X debug
if I set the NAS type to cisco? I was just trying to get it to
initiate, not expecting it to work. In the debug, it doesn't even
come up. I've read in prior posts where you said that checkrad should
initiate
det.explo...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'd like to implement this using unlang but not sure where to start. The part
that I am having difficulty is on where to create the procedure and how to
call the procedure. The rest of the things like the DB query I can reuse from
the existing program. I want
Are you looking for additional problems, or are you trying to solve
the original issue?
I'm trying to understand exactly what's happening was wondering why
checkrad wasn't being called. If I get a NAS which does SNMP, for
example, I wanted to know that checkrad would work in a predictable
Erik wrote:
I'm trying to understand exactly what's happening was wondering why
checkrad wasn't being called. If I get a NAS which does SNMP, for
example, I wanted to know that checkrad would work in a predictable
fashion.
It does. It works. See man checkrad.
I'll quote some of your
It does. It works. See man checkrad.
Checkrad is called to double-check duplicate logins.
Thank you, I understand now.
The guy using exec-program-wait for Simultaneous-Use was doing
something different. That was clear from his post.
Not to me - this is a new world for me I'm doing
Subject: Re: Simultaneous-Use For Group Using Unlang
det.explo...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'd like to implement this using unlang but not sure where to start. The part
that I am having difficulty is on where to create the procedure and how to
call the procedure. The rest of the things like the DB query I
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Det Det det.explo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Where do I put this piece of code? Can I do this invocation in the authorize
block? Or is it something I put in the radiusd.conf?
man unlang
Requests are processed through virtual servers (including the default
one),
Erik wrote:
I've been going in circles for days on how to come up with a
workaround to get simultaneous-use checking working on my FreeRadius +
PEAP MSCHAPv2 deployment. I have read through seemingly all of the
posts... I suspect certain areas which might be causing the problem:
1) my NAS
Alan,
thanks for the response...
Because the cheap NAS (a) isn't a Cisco box, and (b) doesn't support
the protocols needed by checkrad.
wouldn't you at least see checkrad initiate in the freeradius -X debug
if I set the NAS type to cisco? I was just trying to get it to
initiate, not
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Erik heideb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read in prior posts where you said that checkrad should
initiate regardless if the radutmp or mysql modules were used.
I really don't recommend using radutmp. And if you use sql, there's no
need to use checkrad. Simultanous
Hi Alan,
Read doc/Simultaneous-Use. It's a how-to, and most questions are
answered there.
Thank you.. I will re-read the Simultaneous-Use Doc again.. I may
have to start from a simple configuration, before trying to integrate
that with e-Directory.
Ugh. Upgrade to 2.1.10.
I'll upgrade
Hi Fajar,
Thanks for replying.. Really appreciate it.
Ask the NAS vendor.
It's CISCO.. I do see one Accounting-Request packet for
Username=Ziggy when I terminate the connection.. But no
Accounting-Request packet for the Start of Username=ziggy logging
in. I do see Access-Request packets for
Ziggy Bopster wrote:
I am want to enable Simultaneous-Use for our users. I have been stuck
for many many days trying to figure this out, any help is greatly
appreciated. This is my first time posting, so sorry if my netiquette
is not correct
Read doc/Simultaneous-Use. It's a how-to, and
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Ziggy Bopster ziggybops...@gmail.com wrote:
IV. Questions:
1) Why is the NAS sending so many randomly generated numeric
UserName in the Accounting-Request?
2) How can I get the NAS to send the correct Username (Ziggy) instead
of the randomly generated numbers
raisedtozero wrote:
Hello
Ive configured my clients files and has the proper NAS type.
Problem is multiple user can login. How do i resolve that?
Read doc/Simultaneous-Use
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Tom Cooper wrote:
hi all,
I have to implement Simultaneous-Use on my freeraduis. Running
freeradius-2.1.9-2 on CentOS 5.4 64 bit. I have followed all the steps
listed here:
its worked after changing the NAS type to other instead of cisco ,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:19 PM, ziko emobux...@yahoo.com wrote:
Go to /etc/raddb/sql/mysql/dialup.conf file and find Simultaneous Use
Checking Queries and there uncomment needed lines. then add
simultaneous-use attribute
Go to /etc/raddb/sql/mysql/dialup.conf file and find Simultaneous Use Checking
Queries and there uncomment needed lines. then add simultaneous-use attribute
to user. It worked for me.
From: Student University studen...@gmail.com
To: FreeRadius users mailing
power159 wrote:
I am trying to load simultaneous-use parameter via exec .
What does that mean?
I have tried
it in any section ( authorize / accounting / post-auth and .. ) at
beginning and end of the section ,
but I dont know why freeradius is not reading it .. its just working
when I am
J Brandon Polley wrote:
I am trying to understand the simultaneous-use doc
I am having trouble with a part that says:
Note that you need to add the Simultaneous-Use parameter to the
check item (first line), not the reply item, using the ':=' operator.
I am not sure where to add the
Hello Fajar,
mysql select * from radgroupreply;
++---+--++---+
| id | GroupName | Attribute ? ? ? ?| op | Value |
++---+--++---+
| ?1 | HZ ? ? ? ?| Simultaneous-Use | := | 1 ? ? |
Yes,
Simulaneous-Use is a check item, not a reply.
2010/2/12 Fojtán Balázs István bal...@fojtan.hu
Hello Fajar,
mysql select * from radgroupreply;
++---+--++---+
| id | GroupName | Attribute ? ? ? ?| op | Value |
Hello,
Yes,
Simulaneous-Use is a check item, not a reply.
Ok, I did this mistake, sorry. Now I've deleted the Simultaneous-Use := 1
record from radgroupreply (now this is empty), and inserted it into the
radgroupcheck.
mysql select * from radgroupcheck;
2010/2/11 Fojtán Balázs István bal...@fojtan.hu:
simul_count_query = SELECT COUNT(*) \
FROM ${acct_table1} \
WHERE username = '%{SQL-User-Name}' \
AND acctstoptime IS NULL
it uses ${acct_table1} (should be radacct by default). Have you
enabled accounting?
mysql select * from radcheck;
Hello Fajar,
thanks for your rapid response!
simul_count_query = SELECT COUNT(*) \
FROM ${acct_table1} \
WHERE username = '%{SQL-User-Name}' \
AND acctstoptime IS NULL
it uses ${acct_table1} (should be radacct by default). Have you
enabled accounting?
Yes, the accounting is working. It is
2010/2/11 Fojtán Balázs István bal...@fojtan.hu:
mysql select * from radgroupreply;
++---+--++---+
| id | GroupName | Attribute | op | Value |
++---+--++---+
| 1 | HZ | Simultaneous-Use | := | 1 |
Yes.
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
2010/2/11 Fojtán Balázs István bal...@fojtan.hu:
mysql select * from radgroupreply;
++---+--++---+
| id | GroupName | Attribute| op | Value |
++---+--++---+
| 1 | HZ|
Josh Willmarth wrote:
Hello,
Quick question: how do I restrict simultaneous use on a user by user
basis in the users file?
You set the attribute Simultaneous-Use on a user by user basis.
bob Simultaneous-Use := 1
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
I have setup a custom module to do auth and acct. In debug mode
everything appears correct, and responses appear correct. When I
don't have radius running in debug mode, responses still appear
correct, but if auth fails due to simultaneous use, radius is logging
'Auth: Login OK'.
Well, in debugging mode, it doesn't log anything to the file, but the
debug output shows it being rejected. When I am not running in debug,
I only get 'Login OK: [zdls02/p2182111] (from client allowed_clients
port 536936642)' logged by the radius server, I am logging my own
simultaneous use
Well, in debugging mode, it doesn't log anything to the file, but the
debug output shows it being rejected. When I am not running in debug,
I only get 'Login OK: [zdls02/p2182111] (from client allowed_clients
port 536936642)' logged by the radius server, I am logging my own
simultaneous use
The authentication portion of the module returns ok, the session
portion returns reject, as it should.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ivan Kalikt...@kalik.net wrote:
Well, in debugging mode, it doesn't log anything to the file, but the
debug output shows it being rejected. When I am not
James Devine wrote:
The authentication portion of the module returns ok, the session
portion returns reject, as it should.
No.
The session portion should return ok, and increment
request-simul_count. See rlm_radutmp for examples.
This is because users may be tracked in multiple places
Ah yes, I was doing that wrong, that seems to work much better now. Thank you.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Alan DeKokal...@deployingradius.com wrote:
James Devine wrote:
The authentication portion of the module returns ok, the session
portion returns reject, as it should.
No.
James Devine wrote:
I have setup a custom module to do auth and acct. In debug mode
everything appears correct, and responses appear correct. When I
don't have radius running in debug mode, responses still appear
correct, but if auth fails due to simultaneous use, radius is logging
'Auth:
I'm back on Simultaneous-Use.
I think the problem comes from NAS because NAS-Port gives 0 value in the
Access-Request. You can see following log
Apr 30 18:17:22.353 GMT: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type [61] 6
Virtual [5]
Apr 30 18:17:22.353 GMT: RADIUS: NAS-Port
Well if you know a way to check if the session is really up or no on
your NAS i might not be hard to write a checkrad script to enable stale
session deletion.
Le 12.02.2009 18:33, ST Wong (ITSC) a écrit :
Hi all,
We enabled Simultaneous-Use checking with checking against accouting
data
I check for a login using radwho and I
see I have a session, I then attempt both a new auth and start
accounting again and still radwho shows only one login.
The fact that you have user listed in radwho doesn't mean that he is
connected to the NAS as well. checkrad script will delete stale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I check for a login using radwho and I
see I have a session, I then attempt both a new auth and start
accounting again and still radwho shows only one login.
The fact that you have user listed in radwho doesn't mean that he is
connected to the NAS as well. checkrad
Are you telling the radius to check for Simultaneous-Use := 1 anywhere?
Even if you have the SQL for simultaneous use uncommented, you still
have to configure Simultaneous-Use := 1 to that specific user or
group, otherwise it will just ignore the SQL...
I also use SQL for my authentication but
It is other both in the localhost client and in the client I created
to test using radiustest.
I have, it shows 5 sessions for this user.
mysql SELECT COUNT(*) FROM radacct WHERE UserName='yellowhousejake'
AND AcctStopTime = 0;
+--+
| COUNT(*) |
+--+
|5 |
+--+
1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is other both in the localhost client and in the client I created
to test using radiustest.
I have, it shows 5 sessions for this user.
mysql SELECT COUNT(*) FROM radacct WHERE UserName='yellowhousejake'
AND AcctStopTime = 0;
+--+
| COUNT(*) |
+--+
|
Marcelus Trojahn wrote:
Are you telling the radius to check for Simultaneous-Use := 1 anywhere?
Even if you have the SQL for simultaneous use uncommented, you still
have to configure Simultaneous-Use := 1 to that specific user or
group, otherwise it will just ignore the SQL...
I also use SQL
Do I need to set Simultaneous-Use := 1 for the groups not allowed SU,
and Simultaneous-Use := 2 for the group allowed SU?
OK. This is how Simultaneous-Use works in freeradius: you put that
attribute when you want to set the limit for a number of simultaneous
connections. The number you enter is
Alexandre J. Correa - Onda Internet wrote:
how i can setup freeradius to disconnect previous session of user that
has Simultaneous-Use = 1 ?!
If your NAS supports it, use radclient to disconnect a user. You
can run radclient as an executable program from within the configuration
files.
Oguzhan Kayhan wrote:
I am trying to run Simultaneous-Use parameter on freeradius 2.0.5 which i
have 2 virtual servers on.
There can be same usernames on both virtual servers, so im not sure about
how it works but i prefer to use sql instead of radutmp file for
simultaneous check.
The
Oguzhan Kayhan wrote:
I am trying to run Simultaneous-Use parameter on freeradius 2.0.5 which
i
have 2 virtual servers on.
There can be same usernames on both virtual servers, so im not sure
about
how it works but i prefer to use sql instead of radutmp file for
simultaneous check.
The
Oguzhan Kayhan wrote:
Different virtual servers using different sql databases, so it wont be a
problem to use same username i think (or am i wrong?)
If you do that, yes, it should work.
In 1.1.7 version to test the sim-use i was using this setting so without
loggin in i was able to test
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Ok, wasn't aware of the functionality. I don't see a radsneeze,
so I'm guessing you pipe them back in via echoing it to radclient?
Yes.
I'd love to help, but I'm a C compiler (I can find includes/functions
and missing libraries) and not a C programmer.
Copy the configs to a test machine. Run radsniff on the production
machine to grab packets. Play them back on the test machine. Run
radiusd -X on the test machine.
Ok, wasn't aware of the functionality. I don't see a radsneeze,
so I'm guessing you pipe them back in via echoing it
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I haven't been given authorization to do a radiusd -X yet,
Copy the configs to a test machine. Run radsniff on the production
machine to grab packets. Play them back on the test machine. Run
radiusd -X on the test machine.
But it seems somehow they
Yes, I receive accounting packets from the NAS normally...
Ivan Kalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Are you getting accounting packets
from the NAS at all?
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 8/4/2008, Eduardo Lima pi¹e:
I removed the Auth-Type Sustem from users, by it stills not working.
Have you made any changes to the accounting {} section?
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 10/4/2008, Eduardo Lima [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
Yes, I receive accounting packets from the NAS normally...
Ivan Kalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Are you getting accounting packets
from the NAS at
It works without the database (accounting) by default. Remove Auth-Type
System from user entry.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 8/4/2008, Eduardo Lima [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
I want to limit one access per user on freeradius 2.0.2 but I don't want to
use a database. Is that possible?
I
I removed the Auth-Type Sustem from users, by it stills not working. Radwho
command doesn't work either...
Ivan Kalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: It works without the database
(accounting) by default. Remove Auth-Type
System from user entry.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 8/4/2008,
Are you getting accounting packets from the NAS at all?
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 8/4/2008, Eduardo Lima [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
I removed the Auth-Type Sustem from users, by it stills not working. Radwho
command doesn't work either...
Ivan Kalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: It
Marcotte, Tyler wrote:
Thank you for the response, even if it was ridden with unnecessary
sarcasm.
shrug After nearly a decade on this list, I've found that the best
way to convince certain people to READ my messages, and to THINK about
the problem they have is to be blunt. Those people
Marcotte, Tyler wrote:
I can understand that nowhere in any documentation does it say that an
Access-Reject is sent back (I just double-checked to verify). However,
what I don't understand is why not?
Because it's an EAP method, *and* it's TLS. Go read the debug output
again: the inner
insightful, even if
it was condescending and rude.
Regards,
-Tyler
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:freeradius-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 3:35 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Simultaneous-Use and PEAP
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 15:11 -0400, Marcotte, Tyler wrote:
Thank you for the response, even if it was ridden with unnecessary
sarcasm.
I wasn't trying to argue, I was trying to understand why an
Access-Reject wasn't sent back. Thank you for explaining that.
While I don't necessarily agree
Hi, You said it's a bug in 1.x. I just tried the latest code in the cvs
repository (2.0 I believe) and I still get the same problem. After the
PEAP failure, it sends an Access-Challenge rather than an Access-Reject.
Am I missing anything else here?
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
-Tyler
Marcotte, Tyler wrote:
Hi, You said it's a bug in 1.x. I just tried the latest code in the cvs
repository (2.0 I believe) and I still get the same problem. After the
PEAP failure, it sends an Access-Challenge rather than an Access-Reject.
That's completely different from what you said
Marcotte, Tyler wrote:
Hi, You said it's a bug in 1.x. I just tried the latest code in the
cvs
repository (2.0 I believe) and I still get the same problem. After
the
PEAP failure, it sends an Access-Challenge rather than an Access-
Reject.
That's completely different from what you
Marcotte, Tyler wrote:
...
PEAP: Got tunneled reply RADIUS code 3
Reply-Message := \r\nYou are already logged in - access
denied\r\n\n
PEAP: Processing from tunneled session code 0x81667248 3
Reply-Message := \r\nYou are already logged in - access
denied\r\n\n
PEAP:
So? Why would you expect it to send an Access-Reject? If you watch
what happens next in the conversation, you should see the side effects
of the Simultaneous-Use.
I'm not surprised at this behavior. It's what is *supposed* to
happen.
Alan DeKok.
I can understand that nowhere in
Marcotte, Tyler wrote:
I've configured Simultaneous-Use on my freeradius server and have it
configured to use PEAP as an authentication method. Users can authenticate
perfectly well, however when the Simultaneous-Use limit is exceeded, it only
half works. The user is not allowed on, the
Marcotte, Tyler wrote:
I've configured Simultaneous-Use on my freeradius server and have it
configured to use PEAP as an authentication method. Users can
authenticate
perfectly well, however when the Simultaneous-Use limit is exceeded,
it
only half works. The user is not allowed on, the PEAP
That is wrong. You need to update the session to which accounting packet
belongs to, not any open session for that user. It's better to
investigate the source of open sessions and resolve it than to fudge
things like that.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP.
Dana 26/9/2007, Michael Ziemann [EMAIL
Michael Ziemann wrote:
Ok, I put the start and stop records back to radacct table. But it's the
same problem... when I delete the entry with the stop time .00.00
00:00:00 the user can login again.
And what do you see when you run the server in debugging mode?
Did you read ALL of
Forget about what I wrote. I was under a (mistaken) impression that you
had some idea what you were doing. BTW, if you read the whole sql.conf
(helps to do that before you start messing with it) you would know what
check and verify query is. If you went back to the default sql.conf,
then you don't
On 8/30/07, Svend Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We run freeradius 1.1.6 against postgresql 8.1.
With the current configuration the user can only login one time
simultaneously. What I want is that a user can login only one time per
NAS, but that the user can login on several NASes at
On 8/30/07, *Svend Eriksen* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We run freeradius 1.1.6 against postgresql 8.1.
With the current configuration the user can only login one time
simultaneously. What I want is that a user can login only one time per
NAS, but
Make multiple sql instances - one for each NAS.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 31/8/2007, Svend Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
On 8/30/07, *Svend Eriksen* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We run freeradius 1.1.6 against postgresql 8.1.
With the
I'm sorry, but I dont understand what you mean. Can you please explain?
reg
Svend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Make multiple sql instances - one for each NAS.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 31/8/2007, Svend Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
On 8/30/07, *Svend Eriksen* [EMAIL
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Rlm_sql
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 31/8/2007, Svend Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
I'm sorry, but I dont understand what you mean. Can you please explain?
reg
Svend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Make multiple sql instances - one for each NAS.
Ivan Kalik
I've got through the same problem, and based in some help I got here
from the list I managed to solve the problem with a simple change to
sql.conf, modifying the simul_count_query.
The original entry:
simul_count_query = SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ${acct_table1} WHERE
UserName='%{SQL-User-Name}' AND
On Monday 25 June 2007 11:42:08 Josh Howlett wrote:
I have a feeling that the answer is blindingly obvious, but I can't
figure it out...
The 'users' file consists of:
DEFAULT Auth-Type = Accept
Simultaneous-Use := 1
Simultaneous-Use is a check item, not a reply item.
On Monday 25 June 2007 11:42:08 Josh Howlett wrote:
I have a feeling that the answer is blindingly obvious, but I can't
figure it out...
The 'users' file consists of:
DEFAULT Auth-Type = Accept
Simultaneous-Use := 1
Because Simultaneous-Use is in the wrong place.
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 07:14:48AM +, PD wrote:
Dear all,
We has the problem regarding the above subject...
mysql select * from radgroupcheck;
++---+--++---+
| id | GroupName | Attribute| op | Value |
On 4/12/2007, Milan Holub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 07:14:48AM +, PD wrote:
Dear all,
We has the problem regarding the above subject...
mysql select * from radgroupcheck;
++---+--++---+
| id | GroupName | Attribute|
On 4/12/2007, Milan Holub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.cut...
== I believe you have a typo in the tables:
radgroupcheck: groupname=POSTPAID
usergroup: groupname=POSPAID
I still have another problem...
many of radacct table records are incompleted.
We know the user already disconnected (even by click
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
