Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Though using todays CVS (head revision for radiusd, checked out about 3
hours) , I still get Unknown type client_balance.
Hmm.. I'll check the code get back to you.
Also it doesn't let me put multiple servers in a server pool, and dies
on runtime with
nikitha wrote:
Thanks for your information.
As we need a fix immediately, can i upgrade to 1.1.5? Does it have fixes
for these kind of issues?
If you need something now, try 1.1.4, or branch_1_1 in CVS.
What is the exact date that you are planning to release 1.1.6?
No idea. Next week
What about 1.1.5? Can i use this version until we get 1.1.6?
Because i already started of porting 1.1.5, so please advise me whether i
can go with 1.1.5 itself. Or should i follow as you mentioned in the below
mail.
Thanks a lot,
-- Nikitha
On 4/7/07, Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What sort of additional information would be useful? If it matters, I was
having the same problem with 1.1.5.
Alan DeKok wrote:
matthew zeier wrote:
Grabbed 2.0.0-pre0 from CVS (the latest, I presume) on a RHEL4 system
with perl 5.8.8.
Running /usr/local/sbin/radiusd -X gives:
radiusd:
matthew zeier wrote:
What sort of additional information would be useful?
doc/bugs
i.e. WHERE the double free is. The message you showed says something
went wrong.. That's nice. Which line of code needs to be changed?
Changing a line at random won't help. Hence the need to know where
nikitha wrote:
What about 1.1.5? Can i use this version until we get 1.1.6?
What part of my message was unclear?
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Alan DeKok wrote:
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Though using todays CVS (head revision for radiusd, checked out about 3
hours) , I still get Unknown type client_balance.
Hmm.. I'll check the code get back to you.
Also it doesn't let me put multiple servers in a server pool,
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
More weirdness
...
Seems to work fine when I define the host using ipaddr, as opposed to a
hostname.
Hmm... I thought I had documented in proxy.conf that hostname
doesn't work yet. Oh well.
...
What would be really cool is if you made a minor change to the
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:43:30PM +0100, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Hi,
Updated The sql querys to honour priority field, and happily it seems
that rlm_sql processes groups in the order they come out of the
database... which is good.
What the packets below are show, is that if the group with the
OK... two new features.
server_pool foo {
# hash the source IP, and pick one of the
# home servers.
type = client-balance
...
}
Nice, but not rocket science. Even nicer is the templates:
#
# Holds default configurations for other sections
# best used when
Alan DeKok wrote:
OK... two new features.
server_pool foo {
# hash the source IP, and pick one of the
# home servers.
type = client-balance
...
}
Nice, but not rocket science. Even nicer is the templates:
#
# Holds default configurations for other
Phil Mayers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:43:30PM +0100, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Hi,
Updated The sql querys to honour priority field, and happily it seems
that rlm_sql processes groups in the order they come out of the
database... which is good.
What the packets below are show,
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Very very cool, have these gone into CVS ? If so i'll recompile now and
have a go :)
Yes, they're in CVS. Also see raddb/templates.conf for some minimal
documentation.
And i'm guessing templates are global too :) ? So they can also be used
in clients and
Alan DeKok wrote:
matthew zeier wrote:
What sort of additional information would be useful?
doc/bugs
i.e. WHERE the double free is. The message you showed says something
went wrong.. That's nice. Which line of code needs to be changed?
How would I know where the double free is?
Alan DeKok wrote:
matthew zeier wrote:
How would I know where the double free is? Just running 'radiusd -X' spit
out
that error just before failing to run.
As I said before: doc/bugs
Doesn't dump core so all I got was:
Starting program: /usr/local/sbin/radiusd
[Thread debugging
matthew zeier wrote:
Doesn't dump core so all I got was:
As you posted before.
Let me clear: I cannot reproduce this problem here. No one else has
seen the same problem.
One inescapable conclusion is that your machine has the information as
to what the problem is.
Another inescapable
So what should i do if i want to test with num_request_per_seconds. Can i do
that ?
On 4/7/07, Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando Prince wrote:
I am using freeradius_1.1.3 i want to test the capacity of it. For that
i m using radclient tool to measure the capacity. I want to test
Fernando Prince wrote:
So what should i do if i want to test with num_request_per_seconds. Can
i do that ?
No.
As always, patches are welcome.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
-
List
Alan DeKok wrote:
Yes, they're in CVS. Also see raddb/templates.conf for some minimal
documentation.
Hmm didn't come through in the install :(
And i'm guessing templates are global too :) ? So they can also be used
in clients and anywhere else you have to repeat something over and over
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Yes, they're in CVS. Also see raddb/templates.conf for some minimal
documentation.
Hmm didn't come through in the install :(
See the distribution directory, not the install directory. I haven't
had a chance to update the Makefiles yet.
Almost anywhere.
Alan DeKok wrote:
matthew zeier wrote:
Doesn't dump core so all I got was:
As you posted before.
Let me clear: I cannot reproduce this problem here. No one else has
seen the same problem.
I find that hard to believe since google found a number of hits
(http://tinyurl.com/2daram
Hmm didn't come through in the install :(
I think the problem is you're still using hostname in home_servers..
Don't. It doesn't work, and it won't work until I find some time to fix it.
Aha, yes it works with ipaddr declaration.
Hmm looks good, failing over as expected, pinging
matthew zeier wrote:
I find that hard to believe since google found a number of hits
(http://tinyurl.com/2daram is a good example)
Which is in 1.1.5. I have already told you multiple times that it's
known, and will be fixed in 1.1.6. Please read my messages.
What *isn't* known is a
23 matches
Mail list logo
