Hi Brady,
Thank you very much for the detailed.description of the code. This was very
helpful. It appears that there is no difference between 2400b and my modem
except for the pulse shaping filters.
I think the performance should also.be very similar. Unfortunately I no longer
have the time to
agreed.
the only way these DMR/ C4FM mod schemes fit into a channel is because
they are aggressively filtered...
On 7/07/2016 10:55 AM, David Rowe wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> Pls check that gut feeling abt pulse shaping very carefully - many ideal
> demods use "integrate and dump" filters - and IIRC
Hi Jeroen,
Pls check that gut feeling abt pulse shaping very carefully - many ideal
demods use "integrate and dump" filters - and IIRC Brady obtained some
surprisingly good Eb/No versus BER results for the 2400B modem.
Indeed, the pulse shaping filters used on DMR/C4FM and friends seem to
be
Hi Adrian,
On 07/06/2016 09:20 PM, Adrian Musceac wrote:
> I have read your blog posts about the 2400B modem, but I would really
> like to understand more, like what kind of filters do you use for
> pulse shaping and how do they affect performance/bandwidth, how do you
> track the carrier
Hi David,
I wish I was able to generate BER plots similar to those in your images.
Unfortunately, while Gnuradio has powerful real time plotting blocks, I haven't
figured out how to use them yet.
For this reason, I have to use two flowgraphs, one for the analog radio and one
for the USRP, get
Nice work Adrian. A good way to present this work is plots of BER
against Eb/No for the various modulation schemes you are experimenting
with. See my blog posts on FSK etc for examples.
It's useful to include the theoretical curves as comparisons to your
real world implementations, these are
Hi Brady, David,
Thank you very much for sharing the GRC flowgraphs. This will help me
a lot setting up a similar test. Regarding the performance, I was just
surprised to see such a big difference between a modem which runs
through analog FM and your new modem. I would have expected something
in
Hey Adrian,
The gnuradio-companion pipelines I used for the test are attached. These
grc pipelines are only meant to get 16-bit 48k samples in and out of the
HackRF and rtlsdr for testing. The meat of the FSK is done with the C fsk
modem, used in freedv_rx, freedv_tx, fsk_mod, and fsk_demod. We
Hi Adrian,
I think Brady's going to get back you with his GR code. Not sure if the
FSK modem is still outboard of GR, or if he has a GR module for it.
Note we are not running our modems through the analog FM
modulator/demodulator, as that's how you throw perfectly good dB away.
I'm looking
Did I hear that right? Works with non linear amplifiers, competitive with
SSB, replaces all your multi carrier modems?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 11:51 David Rowe wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Getting the modem right can be really critical. It's good that we are
> discovering this and
Hi David,
You are right, it was measurement error. With the help of Brady's GRC
flowgraphs, I was able to set up a more reliable test.
The chain was: gnuradio DBPSK modem on laptop -> Yaesu FT60 set on narrow
deviation -> USRP B200 -> Gqrx
The USRP has fine adjustable gain, between 0 and 70 dB.
Also, for comparison purposes, here is my 2000 bit/s modem running
through a Yaesu FT60 handheld radio:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsmGYWxjfjU
The filter in Gqrx is adjusted for wide deviation (5 kHz) but the
signal is only really about 3 kHz wide.
Please note how the signal is 15-16 dB
I think in the case of coherent vs non-coherent for 4FSK, the plot of
EbN0(dB) vs BER for ideal coherent and non-coherent says it all. If we find
that we really need that extra dB, It'd be easier to switch to non-coherent
8FSK than write and test coherent 4FSK (and at 8FSK, coherent and
Hi David,
Is it possible to get our hands on the Gnuradio code? I've been trying
to optimize modems running at 1200 bits/second and the best I could do
was 100% copy at 8 dB above analog FM for DBPSK and 12 dB above for
GMSK. Your modem seems to be 16-20 dB better than that! If I could see
the
Ha, I wish it was through a radio!
I'm trying to think what I have laying around here that might make a good
transmitter for it.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:02 AM, glen english wrote:
> ah. good stuff. nice progress.
>
>
> On 16/03/2016 7:50 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> Just using
ah. good stuff. nice progress.
On 16/03/2016 7:50 PM, Steve wrote:
Just using the script:
freedv_tx 2400A ve9qrp_10s.raw modem.raw
Which produces a RAW audio file sampled at 48 kHz and
Cool. Perhaps something to put my HackRF to use for, a local FreeDV
beacon. OH6ESQ expressed some interest in FreeDV, perhaps he'll be able
to pick it up from across the Baltic sea
/Tomas, SA2TMS
On 2016-03-16 00:28, David Rowe wrote:
> Hello Lists,
>
> We've just tested the new FreeDV 2400A
Hi Steve
Nice
is that through a PA- if so, linear or linear in say 3dB
compression?
On 16/03/2016 7:42 PM, Steve wrote:
Thought I'd upload a spectrum snapshot. You can't
really see the carriers until you drop the
Thought I'd upload a spectrum snapshot. You can't really see the carriers
until you drop the number of samples to about 256, but this shows how wide
it is.
I noticed that the freedv_tx was outputting +/- 1.0 signals and a couple of
clips going on. Maybe need to knock it down to +/- .5 like the
Hello Lists,
We've just tested the new FreeDV 2400A mode designed for VHF and above.
Here's the scoop:
http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?p=5119
Thanks,
David
--
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data
20 matches
Mail list logo