On Feb 6, 2008 9:56 AM, Jesús Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:31:34 +1100
Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
| and it doesn't use any
| hardware acceleration. It will eat your cpu if you need to move a bin
window
| from one page to another. It was
On Feb 5, 2008 3:25 PM, Hans Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
During the last couple of days I had to use the latest Ubuntu release
a lot (7.10 I believe). It had the beautiful graphics from Compiz
Fusion running (transparencies, desktop cube, burn on close).
Now, of course this is in
On Feb 5, 2008 4:35 PM, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 03:51:09PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
(...)
I believe the first part of the work would be to make fvwm support
ARGB visuals. Then, having a proper composite manager module would be
good
On Feb 5, 2008 7:02 PM, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:48:05PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 4:35 PM, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 03:51:09PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
(...)
I believe the first
On 8/27/07, Jonathan Kotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I open a console and don't type anything except CTRL-D into it,
fvwm will crash. If I type something in it first (even backspace,
return, etc.) it will not crash after typing CTRL-D. If I open a new
console after closing the first, it
On 7/12/07, Ryan Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hans Voss said:
You CAN actually use them in shells and all other programs started
from FVWM. (FVWM is the parent and propagates its environment to its
children).
I even use fvwm to set some environment variables for my shells
instead of in
On 6/3/07, Jesús Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am in the process of migrating to an alternate mail accound. And
having some trouble, as usual in these cases.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is having some problems, mainly related to spam (I
know, the name of the account doesn't help either :P
On 5/9/07, Bernard Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED], le 09-05-07, a �crit:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:15:31PM +0200, Bernard Lang wrote:
I used to drag windows by pressing mouse-left on the title-bar,
dragging and releasing in the right place.
Oh that. Yes,
On 4/17/07, Oliver Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:22:12PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:14:02AM +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote:
Hello,
are there simple Beginners-Infos zu start with fvwm(2)?
http://www.zensites.net/fvwm/guide/
What I
On 4/16/07, Oliver Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:22:12PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:14:02AM +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote:
Hello,
are there simple Beginners-Infos zu start with fvwm(2)?
http://www.zensites.net/fvwm/guide/
What I
On 4/5/07, Lucio Chiappetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Parv wrote:
wrote Lucio Chiappetti thusly...
while for moving windows the most frequent way for me is to stick it
to all pages and desks, change page, then eventually unstick it.
Second choice is drag in the
On 4/5/07, Lucio Chiappetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Rainer Koehler wrote:
Actually I find a bit disturbing the feature that an iconized window
belongs to all pages and desktops.
Sure, just _don't_ use the style option StickyIcon ;-)
Thanks to everybody who replied.
On 3/16/07, Arvin Schnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
since I could not find examples about controlling KDM from FVWM I
figured it out myself. You can see my results here:
http://arvin.schnell-web.net/linux/kdm-fvwm.html
Maybe you want to include this in your examples distributed with
FVWM
On 3/13/07, Robert Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:04:01 + seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it work when not using the module? That is, using fvwm's built-in
iconbox style?
I asked to see if it was a fvwm bug or just a module bug. Apparently
On 3/13/07, Dedeco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One can easily install it to $HOME in those rare cases the sysadmin
refuses to install it globally.
Think about QUOTA spaces.
Not the best, IMO.
I personally have fvwm-cvs along with several other apps installed in
my 50M quota at the university.
Please do not repost.. (and sorry for the delay)
On 2/21/07, Robert Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use several Tcl/Tk programs (exmh, plus some homegrown ones) that use
Tcl's 'iconwindow' function to create dynamic window manager icons. I
also use FVWM's IconBox module.
Does it work when
On 3/2/07, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:22:59 +0100
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently I am coding an FvwmOsd (On Screen Display), which I need
This was already done I believe:
http://home.gna.org/felidae/FvwmOsd.html
The link is dead..
On 2/26/07, Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2007-02-21 17:53:27, schrieb Thomas Adam:
On 21/02/07, Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello *,
I have coded some Fvwm-Moduled for Embedded-Systems (used in my Motor-
caravan) and it is the hell to include it always in the
On 2/8/07, Perry Hutchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Linux system in a VM host. When I have the console up and I
need to send the VM host a ctrl-alt-f4 (or similar), my local desktop
intercepts those keys and sends me to the 4th TTY.
Is there a way to have FVWM ignore that and just
On 1/25/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:04:13PM -0500, Emilie Ann Phillips wrote:
Is it possible to have windows default placement to be at the center
of the page,
Sure, with CenterPlacement.
and then cascade rather than from left to right?
I don't
On 10/14/06, stan mcintosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed the RPM, but cannot get FVWM to show as one of the
session choices when logging in. After spending some time searching
list archives and with Dogpile, I am asking if someone here knows of a
tutorial on getting FVWM to show as
On 10/13/06, me again me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at the CursorMove and WarpToWindow commands.
Sorry I wasn't clear. I meant: a way of issuing commands using only
the mouse( no keyboard ), like edgecommand Or mousebutton as modifier
Or
DestroyFunc winmou
AddToFunc winmou
+ M
On 9/4/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian wrote:
I see your point, and I agree that things may not be working
correctly. But what you did is a hack. You just changed the test
program to detect imlib when it is not there.
Even if it works that way, it should be done
On 9/4/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian wrote:
I see your point, and I agree that things may not be working
correctly. But what you did is a hack. You just changed the test
program to detect imlib when
On 9/3/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Of course I haven't tried all different Linux distros. but
for Debian Etch I have to apply the appended patch to make
detecting gdk-imlib11 work. imlib11 (without gdk-)
does not seem to be necessary. Imlib.h doesn't appear
anywhere in
On 9/3/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Renato,
seventh guardian wrote:
On 9/3/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Of course I haven't tried all different Linux distros. but
for Debian Etch I have to apply the appended patch to make
detecting gdk-imlib11 work
On 9/1/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 04:13:56PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/31/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is another broken call to XGetWindowProperty() in ewmh.c,
which seems to have been introduced recently. Attached
On 8/31/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is another broken call to XGetWindowProperty() in ewmh.c,
which seems to have been introduced recently. Attached is the
patch.
I guess it was already corrected? I've tried the patch, but it seemed
that the changes were already there..
with the latest code.
Cheers
Renato
PS: Please reply to the list! Yeah, sometimes it happens to me too :)
Regards
Harri
==
seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/31/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is another broken call
On 8/31/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Renato,
The snapshot of today still uses 0 instead of 0L in the
argument list for XGetWindowProperty. Maybe you have a modified
version, or you are working on a different branch
On 8/23/06, Jacob Bachmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward
On 8/11/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 01:56:48PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
After some messing around with qmake and the generated makefile I
managed to compile the program (having both qt3 and qt4 installed gets
messy..). There's one
On 8/11/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 01:56:48PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
After some messing around with qmake and the generated makefile I
managed to compile the program (having both qt3 and qt4 installed gets
messy..). There's one
On 8/10/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:21:12PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/9/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, Renato,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:40:18AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote
On 8/10/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:21:12PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/9/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, Renato,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:40:18AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote
On 8/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All:
I just installed Fedora Core 5, and am now seeing strange behavior.
When starting the X session with 'startx', things are fine.
When I log in through XDM, I see the following:
[FVWM][Read]: ERROR file
On 8/9/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, FVWM CVS wrote:
* don't add title height and border width to coordinates on pager move
I think that this chagen is correct. I did some tests without it, and is
seems as if high-title windows would slip down the screen without
On 8/9/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, Renato,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:40:18AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Small notice: kate uses qt4, while djview uses qt3!! Serge, what were
you compiling your app against? qt 3 or 4?
Both sample app DjView were
On 8/9/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, Renato,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:40:18AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Small notice: kate uses qt4, while djview uses qt3!! Serge, what were
you compiling
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that the module interface allows keeping track of
changes
to the window flags of a window? Currently FvwmPager allows moving
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that the module interface allows
On 8/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 8/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the effects
of the above VISIBLE changes there could be provided a command that
the modules could use to request an alias. This way the module would
parse the command line alias
On 8/7/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Here some documentation fixes and debug code cleanups in FvwmIconMan.
Please see attached patch's ChangeLog section for more information.
Hello!
Your patch seems ok to me :)
BTW, I've seen some references of manger
On 8/8/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the
effects of the above VISIBLE changes there could
On 8/7/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should the flag tracking icon movement be set by MoveToPage? Currently
it's not, which makes icons jump back to the initial page if do for
example 'Style * IconTitle' if an icon has been moved to another page by
MoveToPage. On a sidenote the same
On 8/8/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:39:42 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/7/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Here some documentation fixes and debug code cleanups in FvwmIconMan.
Please see
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:16:44AM +0400, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov wrote:
Hello,
Here some documentation fixes and debug code cleanups in FvwmIconMan.
Please see attached patch's ChangeLog section for more information.
The patch looks
On 8/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:16:44AM +0400, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov wrote:
Hello,
Here some documentation fixes and debug code cleanups in FvwmIconMan.
Please see attached patch's
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility
On 8/8/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:02:40 +0400 Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:45:49PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Serge --
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:59:10 +0400
Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL
On 8/9/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:02:40 +0400 Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:45:49PM +0100
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that the module interface allows keeping track of changes
to the window flags of a window? Currently FvwmPager allows moving of
FixedPosition mini-windows, but the main window does not move. Just
checking for IS_FIXED in
On 8/4/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I want new MenuStyle which disables ability to tear off menu. Reason:
because I have some dynamic menues like this:
Mouse 3 IST A Menu winmenu +0m +0
DestroyMenu winmenu
AddToMenu winmenu Window menu: Title
+
Hello.
I found this unusual thing in the manual. There is a reference to
ActiveBack/ActiveBackOff all over the place, but aparently the style
doesn't exist any more. It is not documented at all, nor is mentioned
in (both) the ChangeLogs.. Not even in any part of the source code.
Is there a
On 7/25/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this unusual thing in the manual. There is a reference to
ActiveBack/ActiveBackOff all over the place, but aparently the style
doesn't exist any more. It is not documented at all, nor is mentioned
in (both) the ChangeLogs.. Not even
On 7/25/06, FVWM CVS fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/25 09:24:00
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : fvwm.1.in
Log message:
Created a ! flag explanation in Style similar to
On 7/24/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/07/06, Jacob Bachmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/23/06, Jacob Bachmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian wrote:
Ok, what about this:
Some options are now deactivated by prefixing
On 7/24/06, Jake Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FDF == Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FDF Hi!
FDF You asked:
Am I the only FVWM + Eclipse user out here?
FDF No.
FDF I'm using eclipse 3.1.2 with fvwm 2.5.16 and Xorg 7.0.0 on an Athlon
FDF 550 with
On 7/23/06, Jacob Bachmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian wrote:
Ok, what about this:
Some options are now deactivated by prefixing ! to the option. This
will eventually be the default, and the old negative options are
now deprecated.
This is a list of MenuStyle deprecated
On 7/23/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/07/06, Peter Daum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
already for a while now (I think it started shortly after 2.5.15)
the specification of a foreground color for a window (something
like Style * Color red/green or ForeColor red) has been
On 7/22/06, Imbaud Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Denis,
I have been an fvwm user for years, but the lazy kind, I didnt catch
up with technical changes. I began to use kde too, for 2 functions
I cant find with fvwm:
- Multiple X session, and switching betweeen them
You can do this using
On 7/22/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/22/06, Imbaud Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Denis,
I have been an fvwm user for years, but the lazy kind, I didnt catch
up with technical changes. I began to use kde too, for 2 functions
I cant find with fvwm:
- Multiple X
On 7/21/06, FVWM CVS fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm-web
Changes by: scott 06/07/20 22:30:23
Modified files:
documentation/manpages/unstable: FvwmAnimate.php FvwmAuto.php
FvwmBacker.php
Hello all.
After some thought and reasoning, here's a preliminary solution to the
man page entry regarding the style negation method. I followed Thomas'
sugestion and here's what is done for the menu styles. Since I hadn't
done any change to this section yet, I've updated the HilightBackOff
Hi.
Some of the MenuStyle (an maybe Style too) options don't have a
negative form on the man page. But the truth is that some can be
negated.
So in order to unify the whole thing, what should be done to those?
Should we add the negative forms to the man page to the ones missing,
or should we
On 7/21/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 03:56:00PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
Some of the MenuStyle (an maybe Style too) options don't have a
negative form on the man page. But the truth is that some can be
negated.
So in order to unify the whole
On 7/21/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 03:38:40PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hello all.
After some thought and reasoning, here's a preliminary solution to the
man page entry regarding the style negation method. I followed Thomas'
sugestion and here's
On 7/18/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/18/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:47:13PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
I have a question. Is the flag vs. !flag syntax the prefered one? I
On 7/18/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:47:13PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
I have a question. Is the flag vs. !flag syntax the prefered one? I
ask this because even though some styles only have
On 7/18/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/18/06, Yuri Arapov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list!
I started experimenting with FvwmScript and ran into this weird
thing: output of date command called every second in
PeriodicTasks section of the script skips ever second
second
On 7/18/06, Yuri Arapov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list!
I started experimenting with FvwmScript and ran into this weird
thing: output of date command called every second in
PeriodicTasks section of the script skips ever second
second. So I see
Tue Jul 18 19:45:03 MSD 2006
Tue
On 7/18/06, Jake Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several weeks ago I posed a problem with the display performance of Eclipse
when using FVWM 2.5.7. A reasonable poster suggested that I should at least
upgrade to a newer version. I jave just installed v2.5.16 and Eclipse
performance now seems
On 7/17/06, Andrei Popov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dominik and thanks for you response.
You could add some dummy Gnome application to your start function.
I'm sorry, dummy Gnome application doesn't sound too clear to me,
and Google didn't help me either =) Can you perhaps provide an
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:35:15AM +0100, Leon wrote:
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:56:18PM +0100, Leon wrote:
However it seems it does nothing at all. All the icons still have
sticky title. Any ideas?
Hi.
I have a question. Is the flag vs. !flag syntax the prefered one? I
ask this because even though some styles only have the !(stylename)
counterpart, some are still documented as (stylename)Off. So if the
flag negation is prefered to the (stylename) vs. (stylename)Off, or
the other way round,
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:26:32PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:35:15AM +0100, Leon wrote:
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:56
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:47:13PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
I have a question. Is the flag vs. !flag syntax the prefered one? I
ask this because even though some styles only have the !(stylename)
counterpart, some are still
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:02:47PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Yes, but then the 2.5 manual should be updated. I'll start doing
that..
Don't be too hasty. :) Things like:
Style foo !Icon
Won't work.
Yes, I know :) But in any case
On 7/17/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:02:47PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Yes, but then the 2.5 manual should be updated. I'll start doing
that..
Don't be too hasty. :) Things like:
Style foo !Icon
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:36:08PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On the other hand, BackColor and ForeColor apply to both situations.
Don't get too attached to those though -- they're deprecated in favour
of using colorsets. :)
So you can
Hi.
This idea just came into my head: why not #ifdef'ing the deprecated
code and having configure.ac option --disable-backcompat?
Examples:
User A has an old config. So he downloads the new package, compiles it
and installs it just like he allways did.
User B has a new config and wants to
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:56:18PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Lol.. Yes, but how do you specify if its an and or an or?
Just have two separate lines for them?
Style (title=foo, winstate=normal) .
Style (title=fii, winstate=iconic
On 7/16/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:51:55PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 03:55:17AM +0400, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:28:45AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Um, if the manpage
On 7/13/06, Scott Smedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Serge,
In question 7.17 of the FVWM FAQ Autohiding FvwmButtons or other
windows module FvwmAuto launched like this:
+ I Module FvwmAuto FvwmAutohide -menter enter_handler
But from reading manpage source code of this module I figured
On 7/13/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:18:02AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/13/06, Olivier Chapuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian a écrit :
On 7/12/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:24:57PM +0100
On 7/14/06, Scott Smedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn this list is busy!
http://gmane.org/plot-rate.php?group=gmane.comp.window-managers.fvwm.develwidth=1000height=400color=red,orange,%234000title=fvwm-workerssmooth=exp
Not that I'm complaining.
Yes.. Summer hollydays are comming in :) I
On 7/12/06, Dan Espen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi.
I have a question regarding the use of the ChangeLogs.
Obviously, changes to the fvwm core are reported in the root
ChangeLog. But what about changes to modules? I ask this because I've
allways
Hello.
Having looked at FvwmGtk code, I realise there's no need for gnome
support, as no gnome specific functions are used. So, there's no
advantage of calling gnome_init vs gtk_init. And from what I see, the
gnome support has been several times mis-used by precompiled distros
(forcing the
On 7/12/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:24:57PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hello.
Having looked at FvwmGtk code, I realise there's no need for gnome
support, as no gnome specific functions are used. So, there's no
advantage of calling gnome_init vs
On 7/13/06, Olivier Chapuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian a écrit :
On 7/12/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:24:57PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hello.
Having looked at FvwmGtk code, I realise there's no need for gnome
support
On 7/12/06, Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
looking at debian cache, I found a package called fvwm-gnome. After
install, it replace fvwm, but the documentation is the same for both
packages. The package description says:
Unlike fvwm, this has been compiled with GNOME support
On 7/12/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:02:23PM -, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
Which could be the (dis)advantages on using fvwm-gnome instead of
fvwm?
A shed-load of useless libraries you won't ever need.
True, but that's what you get when you use a
On 7/12/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:02:23PM -, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
Which could be the (dis)advantages on using fvwm-gnome instead of
fvwm?
A shed-load of useless libraries you won't ever
attention though.. I should have
By the way, I've long wanted to know the significance of
seventh guardian ... ?
LOL Well, seven is kind of a mystical number, it´s the last day of the
week. I'm kind of the last guardian for something.. I'm yet to
discover what.. Anyway, I created
On 7/11/06, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
With current state of things it's impossible to compile 2.5.17 CVS
branch with --debug-msgs configure option. I investigated created a
patch which fixes this problem.
OOPS that was my fault.. Appiled.
BTW, is it my
Hi.
I have a question regarding the use of the ChangeLogs.
Obviously, changes to the fvwm core are reported in the root
ChangeLog. But what about changes to modules? I ask this because I've
allways logged my changes to the root one, but now think I should have
done it to modues/ChangeLog. On
On 7/9/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 01:00:08AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/9/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, we have been very *very* conservative in the past about
backwards compatibility - and that patch breaks it. It's
On 7/8/06, FVWM CVS fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/08 09:57:42
fvwm/compat
Update of /home/cvs/fvwm/fvwm/compat
In directory util9.math.uh.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv3957/compat
Log Message:
Directory
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
