Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-16 Thread Bill Connelly
On Oct 11, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Mac User #330250 wrote: > > -- Original message -- > Subject: Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not? > Date:Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009N > From:Kris Tilford > To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com > >> According to

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-15 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:35 PM, James Morgan wrote: > Hey, that worked! I can edit my websites having Safari tell websites > it is internet explorer. What a fine trick. Many thanks! This has ALWAYS been available in Safari, it's just that prior to version 3 you had to update a 'secret' pre

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-15 Thread James Morgan
Hey, that worked! I can edit my websites having Safari tell websites it is internet explorer. What a fine trick. Many thanks! === On Oct 13, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Len Gerstel wrote: > > > On Oct 13, 2009, at 9:17 AM, James Morgan wrote: > >> >> Excite upgraded their se

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-13 Thread John Niven
That is a feature in iCab as well (free trial). --- On Tue, 10/13/09, Len Gerstel wrote: > However, a handy feature in Safari (version 4.0.3 in > 10.4.11) is the  > ability to tell web sites it is another browser. I am > 99.99% certain  > that Safari under 10.5 can do the same thing. --~--~

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-13 Thread Len Gerstel
On Oct 13, 2009, at 9:17 AM, James Morgan wrote: > > Excite upgraded their servers and now I can't edit my old websites > there with my G4's running OS 10.4. It looks like I will need to buy > a new G5 with OS 10.5 so I can use internet explorer to edit those > old websites. Do you know i

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-13 Thread James Morgan
Excite upgraded their servers and now I can't edit my old websites there with my G4's running OS 10.4. It looks like I will need to buy a new G5 with OS 10.5 so I can use internet explorer to edit those old websites. Do you know if I can run internet explorer on my mirror door G4'

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-12 Thread Mac User #330250
-- Original message -- Subject: Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not? Date:Montag 12 Oktober 2009N From:Bruce Johnson To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com > On Oct 10, 2009, at 10:04 PM, Richard Gerome wrote: > ... > if your system supports is (and I

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-12 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Oct 10, 2009, at 10:04 PM, Richard Gerome wrote: > > >I don't know what the problem could be, but I have a question > about this??? Why would you upgrade to Leopard if Tiger was running > so great??? I can't find anything that makes Leopard any better then > Tiger??? Spotlight is e

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-11 Thread Dana Collins
On 10/11/09 1:52 AM, Kris Tilford of ktilfo...@cox.net sent > > On Oct 11, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Richard Gerome wrote: > >> I don't know what the problem could be, but I have a question about >> this??? Why would you upgrade to Leopard if Tiger was running so >> great??? I can't find anything t

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-11 Thread dc
On Oct 10, 10:16 pm, DLC wrote: > Do you think that the DVD drive's firmware needs updating? it is a > model SONY CD-RW  CRX315E btw. I'm confused, I thought the CRX series was CD, not DVD; are you trying to load a DVD with a CD-RW? I hope not. I have a couple of Sonnet CPU upgrades and I always

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-11 Thread Mac User #330250
-- Original message -- Subject: Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not? Date:Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009N From:Kris Tilford To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com > According to xBench & GeekBench archives, Leopard's about 20-25% slower than > Tiger for

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-10 Thread Kris Tilford
On Oct 11, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Richard Gerome wrote: > I don't know what the problem could be, but I have a question about > this??? Why would you upgrade to Leopard if Tiger was running so > great??? I can't find anything that makes Leopard any better then > Tiger??? So many Mac users have

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-10 Thread Richard Gerome
I don't know what the problem could be, but I have a question about this??? Why would you upgrade to Leopard if Tiger was running so great??? I can't find anything that makes Leopard any better then Tiger??? So many Mac users have told me to keep my G4 Titanium Powerbook running Tiger, don

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

2009-10-10 Thread Kris Tilford
On Oct 10, 2009, at 9:16 PM, DLC wrote: > Do you think that the DVD drive's firmware needs updating? it is a > model SONY CD-RW CRX315E btw. This is an uncommon combo drive model, I think it's an Apple OEM drive? The last firmware was version NAK7, but I have no idea where to get this firmw