FYI
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13 October 2005 09:26:02 BDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bad link on
In the paragraph entitled Watch where you are sending email.
On the page http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
The following link
On 25/6/03 2:49 Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 06:58 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Someone cares to explain the difference between JEXL and this one?
Jexl is my own concoction to do what the JSTL EL does with extensions,
w/o worry about some
Someone cares to explain the difference between JEXL and this one?
Pier
Jan Luehe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Commons EL team is pleased to announce the first official release of
Commons EL from the Apache Software Foundation.
Commons EL provides an interpreter for the Expression
Vic Cekvenich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI: The rumor is from developers I know of a commercial J2EE
vendor that no one passes all the tests.
But since they pay, that makes you certified.
I worked for Sun Micro for almost two years, in the J2EE team, and unless
something changed in the
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't you think JBoss' huge success has something to do with Sun's
animosity? Every developer I know who has a say on the platform uses
JBoss: better product, better documentation, better support, lower
price.
Don't read me wrong: I'm on the
On 28/5/03 9:08 Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sun should be happy that people create cheap implementations of their
APIs. If their own implementations would be any better, they might also
be making money of them. ;)
Nothing against that, absolutely, but voices are saying that JBoss
Not acked
-- Forwarded Message
From: Erik Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:28:48 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: broken links
There are two sort-of broken links on this page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/library.html
They are the references to The
On 20/3/03 21:03 Magesh Umasankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I get when trying to look up any archived
message thread is $msgHeaders as the meat of it.
What is going on?
We're aware of it... Will be fixed hopefully soon...
Pier
On 18/3/03 11:33 Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 10:02 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 17/3/03 1:24 Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that there's been problem with the Servlet EG this time
around,
but what I'm saying
On 12/3/03 6:53 Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 10:58 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
As it turns out, there is substantial room for innovation and debate in
the implementation of API specs like servlet and JSP (see the history
of
Tomcat
On 16/3/03 20:20 Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir, I _really_ am in troubles when dealing with Servlets. I cannot raise
issues on the tomcat-dev mailing lists, all I can do is discuss them with
Jon and Jason, as they both are on the spec...
You can raise and discuss your
On 16/3/03 23:32 Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I *think* that you should be able to discuss the issues with any
ASF member, if you are representing the ASF on the EG, not just other
EG members. We all are bound by the agreements made by the ASF.
In fact I post my concerns
On 17/3/03 1:24 Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that there's been problem with the Servlet EG this time around,
but what I'm saying is that there are avenues that we _could_ have
used to voice our concerns, but we didn't for some reason. There are a
number of mailing lists and
On 11/3/03 23:40 Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No I'm saying that projects which some committers are bound by Sun's
NDAs and are on the specification commmittees do not
have meritocratic consensus based communities. The committers engaged
in the legal agreement with sun cannot
Paulo Silveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry not giving a link the other time. Here is Apache voting against
JSR 127 long time ago.
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=614
You can see Apache´s comment:
On 2001-05-28 Apache Software Foundation voted No with the following
comment:
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the following committers have passed the PMC nomination vote proposed by
sam ruby:
- Danny Angus
- Peter Carlson
- Morgan Delagrange
- Ceki Gülcü
- Dmitri Plotnikov
- Phillip Rhodes
- James Strachan
-
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I nominate Pier Fumagalli for membership in the Jakarta PMC, for a
period exceeding that of any Italian post-war government.
+1
I thank you and esteem the trust you guys have in me, and I feel honored of
this nomination
On 19/2/03 17:18 Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Dever wrote:
I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to
the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons
HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the time,
including
On 19/2/03 21:31 Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 19/2/03 17:18 Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The goal is to make all active committers PMC members.
I think this is utterly wrong for an umbrella project like Jakarta.
Interesting. 100% of the ASF board
On 19/2/03 23:00 Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess what? No need for that at all! The additional responsibility
being on a PMC entails wasn't additional at all.
Avalon is ONE project... Jakarta, I can't count them with my hands AND feet.
Pier
On 20/2/03 2:34 Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit like
saying the government is responsible for running the country. That doesn't
mean every minister will have expertise in every portfolio
Ministers might not know the details, but know the overall direction and
actions of all the
On 17/2/03 7:25 Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier, Ceki, Jason and Ted are covered by the re-add former PMC
members who want to be PMC members again plan you've hinted at.
I wasn't on the PMC last year, it was two years ago...
Anyhow, I am on the PMC list only because I respond to
On 10/2/03 4:05 Lawrence E. Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should be noted that Apache Software Foundation members
are the legal
*owners* of the software that is available under the Apache
Software License. Indeed, that is one of the key benefits to
becoming an ASF member, as opposed to
On 9/2/03 2:05 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why not: DISPLAY the damn license and require the user to type
I do understand the terms of this licence and click somewhere
( that may also cover the requirements of some of the packages ).
Click-through is something we always
On 5/2/03 16:48 Nathan Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone on this list know who I would need to contact at nagoya.apache.org
in order to change my E-mail address on my Bugzilla account?
My company has changed names and therefore my E-mail address has changed. The
old E-mail
On 5/2/03 2:59 Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The example committer acknowledgement on
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/roles.html indicates that a new committer
should send an email to asf at jaguNET.com. What is the purpose of this,
and assuming there is a purpose, what is the address
On 30/1/03 7:58 Paul Hammant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
different subject/ I am not sure of Steffano's assertion that a Cocoon
block can be GPL from the last of that thread.. If it does an import of
org.apache.anything it is in trouble from my understanding of RMS's
typed GPL wisdoms (pasted
On 30/1/03 13:26 Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 10:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, for instance, I was once interviewed for a contract to hire gig at
Microsoft. (This was circa '97 prior to my involvment in Java). Had I sold
my soul,
Sander Striker wrote:
http://www.apache.org/dev/list-setup.html
Gotcha... Since I was at it I also added Tapestry-DEV, Tapestry-USER,
Avalon-USERS, BSF-DEV and BSF-USERS...
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:08:56PM -0800, Randall J. Parr wrote:
It seems much of the reason people want to have forums is for the search
abilities. There are mail archives available but I must I agree many are
so limited in their search abilities and/or interface that they do not
help
As this is an implementation of a JSR, I believe that the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list should be made aware of those plans...
I forwarded your email there...
Pier
Stefan Hepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose a new Jakarta project, named Pluto, that should
FYI, not acked...
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 19:20:52 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Typo on http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi
First line convienence - convenience. Just thought I'd point it out. I've
been there dozens of
On 21/12/02 2:34 Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Sam, do you or someone have the abillity/will to give me sufficient
rights to install a small cgi script on an apache webserver somewhere
with filesystem access?
Your definition of ACTION is AskSam?
AFAIK, your
On 18/12/02 19:00 Doug Bateman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seeing clarification: Is Sam's post here the official report from
the PMC, or a summary of a PMC report posted elsewhere?
Looking at the news page, I see a summary for status of each
individual project in Jakarta, but no summary of
On 17/12/02 18:03 Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... which follows the SUN and MS bashing thread where this subject was
brushed on.
I'm just forwarding the news, no need to shoot/flame the messenger. Thanks,
--DD
From: xmlhack daily news digest: 17 Dec 2002
Microsoft Office
On 17/12/02 7:14 Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently (slowly) working on this:
http://cocoon.cocoondev.org/mount/trove/ - which should, amongst
others, be dependant on Gump data.
Simple hint... Don't call it Trove...
http://teatrove.sourceforge.net/
It's a pretty-famous
On 19/12/02 13:49 Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trove is also Sourceforge's categorization system. I suspect that is
where the name was taken from. If you'd like to publicize Tea more, why
not put it on the Elsewhere news on the front page? (not being
sarcastic, its an honest
Ok, I got a couple of complaints from freaks whose DNS didn't refresh all
right (not _my_ fault :-)... If someone on your favorite list is complaining
that they can't see Nagoya, or the bug database, tell them to fix their DNS
server (first) and to use the (new) IP address straight:
On 13/12/02 20:00 Jeff Schnitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 06:42:36PM +0200, mohammad nabil wrote:
support Sun, Open Source, and all good manufacturar in our nice world :)
Do you just not grasp that Sun's rigid control of Java is the
antithesis of Open Source, and
On 7/12/02 7:56 Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Current drafts of the 2.0 license include a solution to this
issue, plus a whole bunch of other niceties. Discussions of
the new license are happening on a mailing list dedicated to
that purpose.
Where
A big thank you to Sun Microsystems which is upgrading our bandwidth for
Nagoya from 1.5 Mbps (T1) to something _MUCH_ bigger (as far as I was told,
though)...
We (well, actually Justina and her team) will have to move nagoya off to
another colo somewhere in california next week, so there will be
On 5/12/02 4:04 am, in article 003b01c29c13$6dd962b0$927ba8c0@ROSENGARDEN,
Lawrence E. Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current drafts of the 2.0 license include a solution to this
issue, plus a whole bunch of other niceties. Discussions of
the new license are happening on a mailing list
Wow. Java Server Faces really sucks ass. Much more than I could have ever
imagined. No wonder I didn't bother looking at it before. What a confusing,
over engineered, under thought out way to do things! I'm really surprised that
Sun thinks that anyone is going to use this crap and actually
On 6/12/02 1:00 James Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Question I have for everybody here is does anyone have any interest in
Porting any of the other jakarta projects to C# so that they may be able to
run on Mono/Linux/windows .Net/Micorsoft ?
what this sppose to
Not acked... Please...
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 04:44:41 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Missing pages on xindice site
Hello!
Since two weeks, the following links on your site
produces 404-Errors:
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not acked... Please...
Whopsie... Wrong general! :-)
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 22/11/02 16:41 Laurie Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That looks pretty cool. Is gatewaying mailing lists as easy to do as it
claims?
No, he makes it sound complicate... It's actually easier.
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a feed from gmane ?
Nope.
Does it use the same mail verification program?
Messages are delivered to my Qmail, will through SpamAssassin and McAfee for
viruses, if that's what you're asking.
Do you plan to take the whole feed ( including non
Laurie Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/20/02 9:54 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like a bazillion of other people... Folks, you can't just _forbid_ me to
watch my daily porn just because you want news... Once I'm done with this
deadline, I'll move some stuff over somewhere
On 21/11/02 18:16 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Does it use the same mail verification program?
Messages are delivered to my Qmail, will through SpamAssassin and McAfee
for viruses, if that's what you're asking.
Gmane uses a mail verification mechanism
On 21/11/02 15:58 Laurie Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/02 8:36 AM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only thing I need is bandidth. From the admin point of view, dropping INN
has been the best choice I've made in a _very_ long time. Basically zero
maintenance.
Well
Laurie Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, doesn't seem to be working at all for me :-( Did the server go down?
I took it down yesterday night.
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20/11/02 23:11, Laurie Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn, I was enjoying using that ;-) Is it coming back?
Like a bazillion of other people... Folks, you can't just _forbid_ me to
watch my daily porn just because you want news... Once I'm done with this
deadline, I'll move some stuff over
Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier, this is great! I would be happy to use newsgroup instead of emails
but I have 2 questions:
Shoot...
- how fresh are the messages in the newsgroup? It seems there is a few
hours delay between emails and newsgroup. That makes it difficult to use
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- how fresh are the messages in the newsgroup? It seems there is a few
hours delay between emails and newsgroup. That makes it difficult to use
newsgroup in replacement of emails, don't you think?
Well, to put
Stéphane MOR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 15/11/02 0:50 Stéphane MOR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we could link to the file from the Mailing Lists section
of jakarta-site2.
Any thoughts ?
Yes, start using news.betaversion.org (which will move
On 15/11/02 0:50 Stéphane MOR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we could link to the file from the Mailing Lists section
of jakarta-site2.
Any thoughts ?
Yes, start using news.betaversion.org (which will move to news.apache.org
once I'm over my friggin deadline), which works with mozilla and
Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh? Why not leaving it on Nagoya?
I don't think the nightly build is created on Nagoya, but on Sam's
private machine.
So I'm wondering why the heck I'm running that thing 4 times a day
On 9/11/02 8:51 pm, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2002/11/8 8:53 PM, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, Scarab on nagoya is always very slow, almost to the point of being
unusable.
I just need to make it clear that it isn't Scarab that is slow, it is
nagoya.
=)
I
James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The few but proud members of the Commons Validator team are pleased to
announce the release of Validator 1.0. This represents a first stable
release that should allow develops to start using Validator for their
projects, while we take a moment to reflect
On 30/10/02 7:32 am, Daniel Rall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm actually working on updating nagoya to the latest Eyebrowse code
and schema, which contains some bug fixes and drastically increases
the performance of the ViewLists servlet.
+1 :-) ViewLists
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 30/10/02 22:19, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/10/02 20:51, Daniel Rall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah... Like POI... sniff...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EyeBrowse is a great facility - how do we add other Apache mailing
On 30/10/02 23:07, Daniel Rall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 30/10/02 22:19, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/10/02 20:51, Daniel Rall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah... Like POI... sniff
Either this message goes in the newsgroup or I'm going to kill myself...
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:general-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:general-help;jakarta.apache.org
Given that now I'm replying from a newsgroup, in theory, yes...
Pier
On 31/10/02 3:02 Jeffrey Dever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are safe Pier ... live long and prosper.
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Either this message goes in the newsgroup or I'm going to kill myself
On 26/10/02 15:01, Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, this went out about a week ago, and the guidelines only cover as far as
publishing a proposal on the Jakarta General List. What is the next step?
So far, I haven't seen any real negative responses, and a lot of positive
On 26/10/02 15:20, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I totally disagree with Pier's statement (and you'll find many here will
feel the same as I on this).
The opinion of Tapestry joining is very good.
Realize Apache is more like a confederation than anything. So different
people
On 26/10/02 19:25, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
WHO needs to vote? Jakarta or Incubator?
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/management.html
For Tapestry to become a subproject of Jakarta requires a 3/4 majority
of the PMC. I am very interested in getting
On 25/10/02 7:17, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it true that Marc had asked to move JBoss over and that it was not
accepted?
Question floats around from time to time... It always ends up in someone
being flamed badly and nothing happening...
The wishy-washy relationship started
On 25/10/02 19:14, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is any of this true? Was Jboss rejected from joining Apache?
No, Jboss was not rejected from Jakarta. IIRC, they wanted to join and
jakarta said 'can we digest what we have first?', and jboss said, 'no
thanks', and then switched to
there are files in daemon which appear to be missing license files. this
should be fixed.
If it's stuff I wrote (as most of the daemon AFAICR), well, then stick the
ASL version 1.1 on it and I'm going to be fine... Sorry, my fault, sometimes
I forget the usual copy-and-paste...
Pier
--
Whilst trying to help out to solve the situation of Daedalus being
overloaded (Greg Ames and I were trying to split the load from Daedalus onto
Nagoya), I _seriously_ screwed up Nagoya... I'm sorry...
I started off noticing that Nagoya was collapsing (or better, the network
was collapsing) when
On 22/10/02 23:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of the links off of the Jakarta site to the bug databases are
working.
I tried
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Ant
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
It should
On 19/10/02 19:49, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So could someone clarify that for me... We're here to promote community
software developmentas long as they don't overlap? sorry I totally
misunderstood the apache way. (especially with all the overlapping
projects to the
On 20/10/02 0:40, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2002/10/19 4:22 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to start a new project for a new Servlet Container that is not
Tomcat! :-) Let's see how many fans I'm going to get! :-)
Pier
Yea, let's see if we can
Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're assuming, of course, that you can't have commercial software that
*is* open source :-). Such models do exist -- so I'm assuming you are
primarily talking about closed source commercial software.
This is a very meaningful distinctions. IMO, the
On 9/10/02 3:47, Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even when Quick and Dirty takes longer. I tried to convince my boss that
a certain customization required so many fundamental changes that it would
be quicker and easier to develop/maintain if we did it right. He told me
that he
On 8/10/02 23:59, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Java is not the fastest technology to develop in, however, it produces the
best code for the long term.
PHP is the fastest technology to develop in, however, it produces the
crappiest code for the long term.
The problem is when
I believe they also tried to make a JSR out of it, but got shot down
somewhere in the middle... :-(
Pier
On 9/10/02 13:38, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool! I'm impressed! I'll have to check that out.
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 20:12, Daniel Rall wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver
On 8/10/02 1:30 am, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2002/10/7 5:21 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JSPs are the root of all evil because HTMLers think to have the power (and
obligation, after a while) to blatantly destroy your entire container in
less than 2
On 8/10/02 3:09 am, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does c stand for? Oh wait...explain that to your designers. Also, I
believe you forgot a bunch of other junk that you have to put at the top of
the file or in configuration files to configure what c means anyway.
It is
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So putting out crap code that you have to toggle and mess with over and
over again is where the money is at in web app development. So what is
the solution? There isn't one...web app development is still a big
hairy mess. Choice is good. ;-)
Well
On 7/10/02 22:01, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I think there are places that struts could learn a lot from
turbine... Struts has a bit more design cohesion shall we say? Where
turbine is a bit moreorganic in places.
The nice thing about Turbine is that it does
On 8/10/02 1:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And to resurface the old issue, this is so much worse than
#if (..)
#end
in Velocity...?
I believe that Andy doesn't quite know what templates are ! :-) Dude,
we're not talking about the beauty of XML around here, but stuff
On 8/10/02 1:12, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the Velocity is much easier to teach to a web designer (non-programmer)
than the JSP.
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd.html
More than easier to teach, is that it _forbids_ them to do what they're not
supposed to do...
On 5/10/02 6:22, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate the willingness of Pier (and others) to work there. All I
can say is that *not* moving to the Bay Area was a condition of me
accepting my job at Sun ... :-)
Aw, Craig, ye olde man... It's just the sunshine, the
On 4/10/02 14:49, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be more interested to hear statistics on how many people are
California-based versus non-California based. (It would help me with my
research into Apache cultures and cliches ;-) for a paper I'm writing )
More than being in CA,
On 3/10/02 15:35, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2/are we
a) young
b) 20-30
c) 30-40
d) 40-50
d) old
My mother would _kill_ your for saying that over-50 is old
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Dever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
A new mailing list on Jakarta was created today for the Commons
HttpClient project. You can subscribe to this list by sending email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This list is ment for *all* development traffic related to HttpClient,
The reconfiguration of the mailing list is now done... It should be all
archived now, with digests and stuff...
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 29/9/02 10:49 am, Mr Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
SMTP Protocol Returned a Permanent Error 553 Spam or
junk mail threshold exceeded. See
http://www.flame.org/qmail/spamjunk.html (#5.7.1)
-
Searching their database results in a
On 26/9/02 3:04, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am in the process of tidying up the issue tracking systems used by the
turbine projects. The biggest change is that we are predominantly going to
use an instance of the turbine based Scarab issue tracking system (from
tigris.org)
Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 26/9/02 3:04, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This instance was set up
as it apparently proved difficult to gain the necessary access to maintain
the Scarab instance at issues.apache.org/scarab.
We
On 26/9/02 19:43, John McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made a request for access to nagoya so that I could take over
maintenance of the scarab installation there. I never heard back from
you; I would/should have followed up, but Jason made the offer of the
werken.com box so I took him up
IIRC /opt/mysql/bin/mysqlclient
Pier
On 27/9/02 2:47 am, John McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you. Now is there a mysql client on this box?
john mcnally
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 17:31, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 26/9/02 22:54, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emacs? I
: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Sep 23, 2002 11:22:07 AM America/Halifax
To: Steve Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Jakarta projects on OSDir.com
Write to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Steve Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
**Hi
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] we should be getting some more powerful mail list servers, just in case.
Not needed. Trust me.
Pier (the mail master)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/love.html
With a file name like this, I miss a pink hearts background.
Does anyone have one of those to contribute?
Nope, but if it helps making him look better, I have a pic of Jon wearing a
pink ballerina dress...
Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And even better is there is a revenge:
- Lots of pictures!
Being Jon one of my closest friends since _a_lot_, he has _a_lot_ of
compromising material on me... And not only pictures (aaarrrggghhh)
Pier (ducks for cover)
--
[Perl] combines all the
Not acked...
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: Gregory Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:36:45 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AESGI Support
Please add the following to your list:
Applied Engineering Software Group - http://www.aesgi.com
Green Bay,
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
