> Has there been any discussion with the Incubator PMC whether this
> contribution needs to come through them? Or does this somehow not
> fit into their purview?
All external codebases brought into the ASF need to come through the
Incubator. Sometimes, as Henri noted, that only requires the IP c
To correct myself, the correct way for the code to come in is via the PMC
and the following form:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/ip-clearance-template.html
Happened to be doing this for the Commons CSV submission. With the case
below
javawebparts.sf.net is my projects' page, nothing to do with this Apache
project... not sure why the code doesn't show up in the CVS stats, but if
you browse the repository you'll see it, and of course there are I think 8
file releases to date, some activity in the forums, mailing list activity,
an
> Yep, that's a decision we all make in contributing to the ASF communities.
> Are you happy to go with the commuhnity view, or want to keep things
> closer to your chest.
I think too that it's maybe a little easier to go with the community view
when its a project you didn't yourself give birth t
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Curt Arnold wrote:
On Aug 9, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I went through the same situation Frank is heading into a few years back. I
had a large lump of code, some good, some crap that I wanted to donate into
various Commons projects. Some was accepted, some
On Aug 9, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I went through the same situation Frank is heading into a few years
back. I had a large lump of code, some good, some crap that I
wanted to donate into various Commons projects. Some was accepted,
some was not. I'm pretty certain that not a
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
+1.
Let's leave Jakarta out of the names. It's assumed. So in the acronym
example from Frank, it would be Apache Jakarta WP4J and not JWP4J.
Makes sense.
Firstly, don't worry about the committership part Frank. I'm certain that
if you had a dec
> +1.
>
> Let's leave Jakarta out of the names. It's assumed. So in the acronym
> example from Frank, it would be Apache Jakarta WP4J and not JWP4J.
Makes sense.
> Firstly, don't worry about the committership part Frank. I'm certain that
> if you had a decently sized lump of code accepted, and wa
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 8/9/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
the best way
On 8/9/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
> > > the best way to handle the name issue.
On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
> > the best way to handle the name issue. didn't seem to be any sort of a
> > consensus. opinions?
>
I
On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
> the best way to handle the name issue. didn't seem to be any sort of a
> consensus. opinions?
An informal thread was here [
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jak
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
point)... It seems like there might be a risk of sub-projects within
sub-projects within sub-projects, which I'm not sure would be the best
organizational stucture... if you had Jakarta Taglibs as a sub-component
of the JWP4J project (assume for the sake of argument that
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
AIUI everything will be flat: collective management and only social
divisions. standard taglibs will become a jakarta sub-project.
+1, I agree.
BTW is there any real reason not to start the promotion process for
standard taglibs ASAP?
None
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 13:14 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> On Mon, August 8, 2005 12:42 pm, robert burrell donkin said:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 01:54 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
> >> Anyway, the Jakarta Taglib Project has voted how it would like to take
> >> part on this new project, and the
On Mon, August 8, 2005 12:42 pm, robert burrell donkin said:
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 01:54 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> What's the status on the new project proposal? Has the discussion moved
>> to another list or has it just staled?
>
> in a holding pattern:
>
> IMO the proposal c
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 01:54 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> What's the status on the new project proposal? Has the discussion moved
> to another list or has it just staled?
in a holding pattern:
IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
the best way to
17 matches
Mail list logo
