Hi all,
I would like to propose a new Jakarta project, named Pluto, that should
provide the reference implementation of the JSR 168 Portlet Specification.
Please see http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?PlutoProposal for
more details (I've also attached the proposal below).
Regards,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to nominate Glen Stampoultzis
On 16 Jan 2003, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also want ask you to also nominate Robert Burrel Donkin.
+1 to both.
It is my intent to declare this vote closed immediately
I would like to state my support and desire to be involved in the
project. I do kinda think a project proposal might be premature since
the specification isn't public yet.
-Andy
Stefan Hepper wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose a new Jakarta project, named Pluto, that should
provide the
Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to nominate Glen Stampoultzis
On 16 Jan 2003, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also want ask you to also nominate Robert Burrel Donkin.
+1 to both.
+1
Conor
--
To unsubscribe,
Hi,
I would like to propose a new Jakarta project, named Charon, that should
provide a demo implementation of the WSRP Specification
(http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsrp/).
Please see http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?CharonProposal for
more details (I've also attached the
Stefan Hepper wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose a new Jakarta project, named Pluto, that should
provide the reference implementation of the JSR 168 Portlet Specification.
Please see http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?PlutoProposal for
more details (I've also attached the proposal
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I would like to state my support and desire to be involved in the
project. I do kinda think a project proposal might be premature since
the specification isn't public yet.
I was trying not to post the obvious, but yes: this seems largely
premature. No code, a
Note the mail was cc'd to both.
Conor MacNeill wrote:
Stefan Hepper wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose a new Jakarta project, named Pluto, that should
provide the reference implementation of the JSR 168 Portlet
Specification.
Please see
What is it with IBM people suddenly wanting to start projects based around
JSR's? Looks suspicious to me.
-jon
--
StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco
http://studioz.tv/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Steven Noels wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
project. I do kinda think a project proposal might be premature since
the specification isn't public yet.
I was trying not to post the obvious, but yes: this seems largely
premature. No code, a restricted community, too
Henri Yandell wrote:
Is this not-invented-here-ism or maintaining scope?
From my part: scope fairness.
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at
At 13:38 21/01/03, Stefan Hepper wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose a new Jakarta project, named Pluto, that should
provide the reference implementation of the JSR 168 Portlet Specification.
Please see http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?PlutoProposal for
more details (I've also
Steven Noels wrote:
I was trying not to post the obvious, but yes: this seems largely
premature.
Deja vu.
Check back next week for the inevitable complaint that Pluto is too mature.
No code, a restricted community, too much committers coming from one
company, I've seen better proposals
I've been away from the Jetspeed list, but I believe that they are intending
to fully support JSR168.
http://jakarta.apache.org/jetspeed/
--
Paul Balogh
Co-Owner / Lead Developer
The Netrix Group
www.netrixgroup.com
We live for this stuff...
Andrew C. Oliver said:
I would like to state my
As this is an implementation of a JSR, I believe that the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list should be made aware of those plans...
I forwarded your email there...
Pier
Stefan Hepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose a new Jakarta project, named Pluto, that should
Sam Ruby wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
I was trying not to post the obvious, but yes: this seems largely
premature.
Deja vu.
What else could one expect ;-)
Check back next week for the inevitable complaint that Pluto is too mature.
No code, a restricted community, too much committers
Greetings,
I was wondering if there was a JDO implementation in the planning stages.
I know, you are probably going to answer, Go look at OJB. However, to face reality,
OJB was started and an OMG data mapping implementation. It is far too big to be warped
into a world class JDO
Hi Robert,
Greetings,
I was wondering if there was a JDO implementation in the
planning stages.
OJB provides a plugin to the JDO reference implementation. By using this
plugin you can write JDO compliant applications running against the OJB O/R
mapping.
See here for a sample
Interesting your replies. I actually looked at OJB in consideration of a
book I am working on in which I use JDO. What I donate want to have to do is
allot of complex configuration and initialization to get it to work.
Although I am interested in writing JDO code, at this moment I'm a pure
user.
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
What is it with IBM people suddenly wanting to start projects based around
JSR's? Looks suspicious to me.
IBM has proposed ASF projects in the past. IBM has both lead and
participated in JSRs. In fact, JSR 110 is both lead by IBM and has an
open source reference
Hi,
here some answers to questions asked in this thread:
- Apache was one of the first memebers in the JSR 168 Expert Group and
IBM asked Apache explicitly for their support before submitting this
JSR. Currently the Apache resprentative in the Expert Group is David
Sean Taylor from the
At 17:41 21/01/03, you wrote:
One more question: why not doing this as a subproject of JetSpeed ?
It is an existing jakarta project, the scope matches - why
creating a separate jakarta community instead of joining the
existing one ?
I assume that it would be a tool which could be used by the
Hi again Robert,
Robert Simmons wrote:
Interesting your replies. I actually looked at OJB in consideration of a
book I am working on in which I use JDO. What I donate want to have to do is
allot of complex configuration and initialization to get it to work.
Although I am interested in writing
The criteria you used for nominating people seems a bit weird to me.
Release managers I understand somewhat, but contributers to the
newsletter? That's like saying those that baked cookies for the last
board meeting should be nominated.
Weird. Arbitrary. Rewards self-promotion, not
Charles Burdick wrote:
The criteria you used for nominating people seems a bit weird to me.
Release managers I understand somewhat, but contributers to the
newsletter? That's like saying those that baked cookies for the last
board meeting should be nominated.
I have a lot more respect for the
Alex McLintock wrote:
At 17:41 21/01/03, you wrote:
One more question: why not doing this as a subproject of JetSpeed ?
It is an existing jakarta project, the scope matches - why
creating a separate jakarta community instead of joining the
existing one ?
I assume that it would be a tool
Alex McLintock wrote:
At 17:41 21/01/03, you wrote:
One more question: why not doing this as a subproject of JetSpeed ?
It is an existing jakarta project, the scope matches - why
creating a separate jakarta community instead of joining the
existing one ?
I assume that it would be a tool
Sam Ruby wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
I was trying not to post the obvious, but yes: this seems largely
premature.
Deja vu.
Check back next week for the inevitable complaint that Pluto is too mature.
No code, a restricted community, too much committers coming from one
company, I've
Stefan Hepper wrote:
Hi,
here some answers to questions asked in this thread:
- Apache was one of the first memebers in the JSR 168 Expert Group and
IBM asked Apache explicitly for their support before submitting this
JSR. Currently the Apache resprentative in the Expert Group is David
Sean
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote:
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:31:32 -0800
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Jakarta proposal: Pluto
Alex McLintock wrote:
At 17:41 21/01/03, you
Sam Ruby wrote:
Charles Burdick wrote:
The criteria you used for nominating people seems a bit weird to me.
Release managers I understand somewhat, but contributers to the
newsletter? That's like saying those that baked cookies for the last
board meeting should be nominated.
IMHO, this
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
snip/
Totally! Anyone doing portal work will probably understand the need for
this.
-Andy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 2003/1/21 8:10 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
What is it with IBM people suddenly wanting to start projects based around
JSR's? Looks suspicious to me.
IBM has proposed ASF projects in the past. IBM has both lead and
participated in JSRs. In fact, JSR
From: Henri Yandell bayard at generationjava.com
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Steven Noels wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
project. I do kinda think a project proposal might be premature since
the specification isn't public yet.
I was trying not to post the obvious, but yes: this seems
Eduardo Andrés Alfonso Sierra wrote:
Hi again,
I wrote this message a few days ago...
Hi
I'm an undergraduate student of Computer Science and I'm interested in
how a
group of developers that are geographically separated works. You are
exactly that kind of group. I wanna know what
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Luta, Raphael (VUN) wrote:
From: Henri Yandell bayard at generationjava.com
Is this different from Tomcat and/or JSTL? If so, how?
I'm clueless on portlets, but from my 'vague consumer' view, I thought
the JSR was standardising a lot of what Jetspeed does.
A
I realy think JetSpeed could use competition, to make it better.
.V
Alex McLintock wrote:
At 13:38 21/01/03, Stefan Hepper wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose a new Jakarta project, named Pluto, that should
provide the reference implementation of the JSR 168 Portlet
Specification.
Please
Steven Noels wrote:
I was trying not to post the obvious, but yes: this seems largely
premature. No code, a restricted community, too much committers coming
from one company, I've seen better proposals being fought over lately.
Also, possible future integration 'ideas' with some related
Hi,
here some more answers to questions that arouse:
- Pluto is only the reference implementation for the Portlet API defined
in the JSR 168
This is comparable with the tomcat being the servlet container and
implementing the servlet API.
Pluto itself is only a infrastructure component. All
39 matches
Mail list logo
