at Jakarta, I'm here, I'm willing and have in fact already begun
the work in essence.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
there have been a number of long running threads
robert burrell donkin wrote:
that's understandable but is likely to cause wrinkles in the approval
process. a subproject needs a name and a charter before it can be
approved. no guarantees could be offered since accepting new committers
is something that sould be delegated to the new community.
complicating things by discussing
external elements prematurely.)
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
that's understandable but is likely to cause wrinkles in the approval
process. a subproject needs a name and a charter before it can
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
...)
--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
robert burrell donkin wrote:
if the new subproject is anything like the commons then each component
will have it's own development rhythm.
I think this is a cogent point... if the idea is that this is like a
Commons project, than I have to ask the question: why not just have a
few new
...)
--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
exciting. Just my
opinion (who else' would it be?!?)
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
On Sat, June 25, 2005 2:22 pm, Stephen Colebourne said:
There doesn't seem to be a thread for this
The current suggestions
On Mon, August 8, 2005 12:42 pm, robert burrell donkin said:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 01:54 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
Hello all,
What's the status on the new project proposal? Has the discussion moved
to another list or has it just staled?
in a holding pattern:
IMO the proposal can be
+1.
Let's leave Jakarta out of the names. It's assumed. So in the acronym
example from Frank, it would be Apache Jakarta WP4J and not JWP4J.
Makes sense.
Firstly, don't worry about the committership part Frank. I'm certain that
if you had a decently sized lump of code accepted, and wanted
Yep, that's a decision we all make in contributing to the ASF communities.
Are you happy to go with the commuhnity view, or want to keep things
closer to your chest.
I think too that it's maybe a little easier to go with the community view
when its a project you didn't yourself give birth to
gave me an idea:
Apache Silk
Silk is what webs are made of.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
If there is a connection to be drawn, I think many probably won't ;-)
Always the risk with names that don't spell out precisely what name.
You can easily be *too* clever, this could be one of those cases.
I'd refrain from voting until a formal thread appears on the
Oh come on Luke, don't you know a good deal when you see one?!? ;) LOL
It's obviously just your friendly neighborhood spambot. Lovely.
Frank
Luke Beard wrote:
WTF ??
-Original Message-
From: Karthik Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 18 March 2006 11:41 PM
To:
thought it should be a bit easier to find, but regardless of that,
if it was a standard all projects (not just commons) followed, would that
suffice?
Frank
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED
15 matches
Mail list logo
