This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).
If you're supposed to show up, please show up. If you're not supposed
to show up, then show up
On P, 2008-11-09 at 18:34 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
On Sunday 09 November 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 09-11-2008 18:04:05 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
+ # If this is a non-ELF system, chances are good that the .la
files will be needed. + if type -P scanelf /dev/null
I think
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
I heavily object to having any such function introduced or used or
equivalent .la removals conducted without a good rationale and
explanation of why this is the approach taken. I see no such
explanation anywhere, you are just blatantly
Are you considering to replace the mediawiki with a different wiki system such
as moinmoin?
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 7:49:58 am Michael Hammer wrote:
* Gokdeniz Karadag [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 13:06]:
Petteri Räty demis ki::
Michael Hammer wrote:
We should develop some kind of
Hi,
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have been following gentoo-wiki's new procedures and rebuild
process and I think they are on a good track right now.
I am throwing this out there, can we ask Mike Valstar for a dump of
all his stuff, slap it on gentoo hardware under a wiki.gentoo.org
Michael Hammer wrote:
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
...as long as they use a compatible license, is not the case right now
(and never was, IIRC).
That's the way I intended my
On 18:34 Sun 09 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
I've been told that .la files are really only needed on non-ELF
systems and with plugin systems that use dlopen.
And for people who want to build things statically.
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog:
Le 12/11/2008 15:40, Peter Alfredsen a écrit :
But let me point out that in most leaf-packages, removing la files will
cause no pain, but will ensure that they do not have to be rebuilt if
a .la-listed dependency loses its .la file.
Mart, others and myself have already tried removing .la files
On K, 2008-11-12 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
I heavily object to having any such function introduced or used or
equivalent .la removals conducted without a good rationale and
explanation of why this is the approach taken. I
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 18:34 Sun 09 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
I've been told that .la files are really only needed on non-ELF
systems and with plugin systems that use dlopen.
And for people who want to build things statically.
That's true, but we
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le 12/11/2008 15:40, Peter Alfredsen a écrit :
But let me point out that in most leaf-packages, removing la files
will cause no pain, but will ensure that they do not have to be
rebuilt if a .la-listed dependency loses its .la file.
Mart,
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On K, 2008-11-12 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
It's a utility function. I've done all I can to ensure it'll be
used wisely. Whether it is used wisely is between you and ( $ROOT
or $666 ). But let me point out that in most
Michael Hammer wrote:
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What are others feelings on this?
I like the idea!
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a
* Gokdeniz Karadag [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 13:06]:
Petteri Räty demis ki::
Michael Hammer wrote:
We should develop some kind of review process and at least the
possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases
the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a
Petteri Räty demis ki::
Michael Hammer wrote:
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What are others feelings on this?
I like the idea!
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see
Gokdeniz Karadag wrote:
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
. . . no, I'd think not.
It takes time and effort to produce one of our polished, professional
documents. That's duplicating
Josh Saddler wrote:
It takes time and effort to produce one of our polished, professional
documents. That's duplicating the time and effort that it takes to write
a decent wiki article -- pointless duplication.
One of the things I'm hearing from just about every other user and
developer is
Jan Kundrát wrote:
Michael Hammer wrote:
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents,
which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
...as long as they use a compatible license, is not the case right now
(and never was, IIRC).
That's
kashani wrote:
How easy is it to checkout current GDP docs
Append ?passthru=1 to the end of the URL.
and make changes to them?
I take it you want to make a patch. In such case, edit the file and
submit the diff via Bugzilla.
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What are others feelings on this?
I like the idea!
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a
wiki?
We should develop some
On 12.11.2008 11:44, Michael Hammer wrote:
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What are others feelings on this?
I like the idea!
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see
On 13:56 Mon 10 Nov , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 05:30 Sat 01 Nov , Mike Frysinger wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
If anyone has topics they want a
On 23:01 Sat 18 Oct , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
5. Javascript then appends the server results into the Additional
Comments box: a suggested assignee and suggested CC values, with logic
as to why.
6. The wrangler can copy and paste the data into the fields, editing
further as
On 17:24 Wed 12 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
And for people who want to build things statically.
That's true, but we generally don't want to do that, so that's fine.
If needed for a package, we just don't punt la files for it and
On 18:16 Wed 12 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Mart had already proposed a static-lib USE flag. Donnie just
suggested on IRC we turn this use flag into a FEATURES flag.
That's problematic. You can't turn off a FEATURES flag for
25 matches
Mail list logo
