of
one of my favourite Prince Philip quotes... :o)
It's a pleasure to be in a country that isn't ruled by its people. -- Said
to Paraguayan dictator Alfredo Stroessner on a state visit
--
Andreas K. Huettel (dilfridge)
Gentoo Linux developer
kde, sci, arm, tex
ebuilds already in the near
future again).
That is the best way to get policies changed and make your point.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
much childish and
obstructive.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (3 Jun 2011)
# Requires KDE 4.4, which is not in the portage tree anymore.
# Please unmerge before upgrading KDE, and emerge afterwards
# net-wireless/bluedevil for bluetooth support in KDE 4.6.
# Masked for removal in 15 days
net-wireless/kbluetooth
has the same notion of common sense. I hate
fumbling around with cvs, and see it as an absolutely great convenience if the
changelog clearly indicates when exactly an ebuild has been removed...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http
plans here but about the current situation.
And about how to deal with it.
End of message from the department of redundancy department.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
of an ebuild definitely can influence portage behaviour, as can f.ex.
an EAPI bump.
Thoughts?
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
before upgrading crossdev.
Information on how to fix this is available at the following URL:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2011/05/15/
---
Opinions?
Cheers,
Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description
Am Mittwoch 04 Mai 2011, 00:18:08 schrieb Alec Warner:
ask on the gentoo-scm list?
-A
I'd say this is of enough general interest, and the relevant people are for
sure also subscribed here...
-A
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http
?
Cheers,
Andreas
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531
Anyway it would be very nice to get some sort of status update. Apart from one
comment by you, all these bugs have not been touched since september...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
.) But that
is a different discussion.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
we all pretty much agree that getting these warnings is a Good
Thing...
So, +1
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
that is at least bit ok :)
So I would like portage to filter/set environment the way it is always
English.
+1.
jer
+1 too
Is there any good reason for a build to run with a specific locale?
If not, we should really force a standard environment.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
Hk4AnRJtoDovwAfvGO6DdIGjCKEXvc3H
=7Mfc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
that on the packages.g.o site by
default.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
. What's the difference?!
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
basic knowledge of the maths
behind it, but I have no clue of the data structures and software internals.)
I'd say, here the burden of proof is on you.
(i.e. that the signed list of long keyids is as secure as a list of signed keys)
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
/pipermail/release-team/2011-March/004619.html
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
with GnuPG's well-tested and well-thought-out trust relationships.
Back to start, time to re-read the entire thread... :)
Am I missing something?
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
a dev's key
on completion of the recruitment process? Just a first thought...
* The central instance should be able to reliably revoke a key.
Add a revocation list in a portage tree directory? Or is this just shooting
yourself into the foot backwards through the eye?
Cheers, A
--
Andreas K
nobody is certifying something that he/she does not know already by
definition.
Please point out any thinkos... :)
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
no sense...
I guess it's more about starting somewhere and getting required stuff into
place step by step...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
a reason to enforce a dev to have
a dedicated Manifest signing key, and even more I don't see a reason to
add such comments to normal keys.
Well it's probably not necessary. It might simplify identification of the UID
that determines key validity though.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux
this is
a mess.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
... just my 2ct...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
signed using
expired keys.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that does not invalidate the signature (if it was
made before expiration).
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
, you should generate a revocation
certificate (which is also a signature). AFAIK, there is no way to revoke a
revocation.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
we finally made the Big Jump To Git?!
This does not mean that we cannot prepare everything else in the meantime...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
. overlay access is a different matter. But first things first.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
with this
mechanism (I think).
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
The SKS rotation seems to be much better, and kingtaco was looking at
running an additional SKS instance within Gentoo as our offical key
point (also useful for speeding up fetching keys in verification).
Good idea.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri
.
Point taken...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (11 Mar 2011)
# Already in TeXlive since 2008, so the separate packages
# are obsolete. Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-tex/memoir
dev-tex/listings
--
Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
.
New usage described in eclassdoc pretty well.
So any comments? suggestions?
Cheers
Tom
--
Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
On Thursday 10 February 2011 22:57:41 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
[snip]
Repeat after me: Politeness and professional courtesy is an integral part of
our QA team policy.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
-sunbird
app-pda/libopensync-plugin-syncml
app-pda/libopensync-plugin-vformat
app-pda/msynctool
app-pda/multisync-gui
app-pda/osynctool
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description
On Thursday 10 February 2011 17:40:07 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/10/2011 06:30 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Samuli, I'll revert the mask tonight for the moment (removing and then soon
re-adding makes no sense), until I know more. If the project remains as
sluggish as it is now
have had the discussion a few times here already whether
briefness/conciseness or politeness/additional information is more important. I
agree that this may be a cultural thing. But then, normally the consensus is to
rather err on the side of caution...
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
not
nice for the user.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
://psykil.livejournal.com/340806.html), but not every ~arch user
reads the planet, so how about creating news item with detailed
instructions how to ensure smooth glibc-2.13 update or recover a hosed
system?
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http
.
[Sorry, no offense intended. I know we're all understaffed...]
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 18:57:20 Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 08-02-2011 18:46:32 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Other than monitoring bugzilla, how does a Gentoo user even know that they
have a package pending a security update? It seems like glsa's lag
stabilization
.
I think that maybe we could have an even higher priority field called,
for example, Broken Stable that should be *only* used for that cases
and that arch teams should try fix sooner. What do you think?
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de
, leads to
some frustration if the issue could be cleared up in 30s.)
Cheers,
Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
24 hours) but I guess that would intrude too much on this
mailing list. It would certainly help to have some performance
statistics available on a regular basis.
jer
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
?
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-1).
This would at the moment deprecate EAPI=0,1 (and soon also 2).
2) for existing ebuilds...
... it is indeed impractical to force EAPI=0 rewriting. Some of the in-between
steps however should be deprecated. Eg. EAPI=1 and later EAPI=2...
My 2ct...
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
as being the active version.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, sunrise
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
is not equal its SONAME. Does this make sense? And if
yes, what can I do about it?
Thanks a lot in advance for your help...
Cheers, Andreas
[*] http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=user/dilfridge.git;a=blob;f=sci-
libs/clapack/clapack-3.2.1-r4.ebuild;hb=HEAD
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo
Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote:
100 bugs?
150 bugs?
100 is better: that usually equates to a few days of backlog, whereas
150 bugs might very well denote an entire week's work.
Alright, adjusted to 100 bugs for now :)
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri
media-gfx/argyllcms
media-gfx/digikam
media-plugins/kipi-plugins
Done...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
, Andreas
03 Oct 2010; Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org package.mask:
Masked =dev-tex/latex-beamer-3.10 temporarily until overlap with
dev-tex/translator is sorted out
On Sunday 03 October 2010 22:02:17 you wrote:
On Sunday 03 October 2010 10:32:38 Andreas HAttel (dilfridge) wrote
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (02 Oct 2010)
# Masking for removal in 30 days
# Upstream is dead, does not build, would need massive work for current
# gcc. Seems like nobody has missed it for some time. Bug 296651.
sci-chemistry/validation
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux
On Friday 01 October 2010 08:53:11 Thilo Bangert wrote:
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org said:
TexLive 2009 already contains achemso-3.0, and we have a separate
ebuild for 1.0 ...
I am probably missing somthing, but texlive-2009 is not stable yet, is it?
True, and yes, I missed
a copy of latest
Portage (2.1.9 or even 2.2) to use for committing to main tree. Reason
being that if we add more errors to be reported, using the old stable
version will still ignore the error cases, and allow broken ebuilds to
pass through without errors.
Thank you.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
system by deleting the required files from openssl:0.9.8...
I have no clue how this could be improved, though. Any ideas?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, sunrise
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (30 Sep 2010)
# Masking for removal in 30 days
# This package is obsolete, texlive contains a way newer version
dev-tex/algorithms
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
. The natbib ebuild might even become obsolete with texlive-2010
already, have not checked yet. I think most people will be happy with the
texlive version, so we should keep it for simplicity.
Thanks for the tips with the ebuilds; I'll go ahead in the next days.
Best, Andreas
--
Andreas K
TexLive 2009 already contains achemso-3.0, and we have a separate ebuild for
1.0 ...
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (26 Sep 2010)
# Masking for removal in 30 days
# This package is obsolete, texlive contains a way newer version
dev-tex/achemso
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux
-4.10.1-r1.ebuild;hb=HEAD
Please tell me if you have any objections, otherwise I'll go ahead in a few
days.
Best,
Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
See below... I never got a response from t...@g.o - who else could I talk to?
TIA, cheers, Andreas
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: latex packages achemso, revtex
Date: Saturday 18 September 2010, 14:31:11
From: Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org
To: t...@gentoo.org
Hi
,
as well as appear on the GLEP project page.
So, yeah, what do you think? Is it worth it? Can the draft be improved?
I'm specifically interested in the amount of work involved in supporting
something like the thing laid out in the GLEP in our current PMs.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux
://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335750
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332361
--
Dr. Andreas K. Huettel
Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics
University of Regensburg
D-93040 Regensburg
Germany
tel. +49 151 241 67748 (mobile)
e-mail m...@akhuettel.de
e-mail andreas.huet
2.3. Upstream issues
Do not close a bug (as RESOLVED/UPSTREAM) until it is fixed by
upstream.
This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it.
I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, and
that state is documented in the bug.
If we keep
Hi everyone,
could you please help the poor bug wranglers a bit?! The queue has reached 170
unassigned bugs...
Thanks a lot,
dilfridge
--
Dr. Andreas K. Huettel
Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics
University of Regensburg
D-93040 Regensburg
Germany
tel. +49 151 241 67748
).
+1 for OBSOLETE, that would give a clear response to outdated stable requests
etc...
--
Dr. Andreas K. Huettel
Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics
University of Regensburg
D-93040 Regensburg
Germany
tel. +49 151 241 67748 (mobile)
e-mail m...@akhuettel.de
http://www.akhuettel.de
2010 19:15:25 schrieb Jeremy Olexa:
Given that the b-w queue is over 200 bugs and some have not been wrangled
for 3 weeks...
Could everyone spend 5 minutes wrangling 5 bugs? (or more if you are
willing :)
Thanks,
Jeremy
--
Dr. Andreas K. Huettel
Institute for Experimental and Applied
701 - 769 of 769 matches
Mail list logo
