On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:59:26 +0200
Mateusz A. Mierzwiński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want to know that Gentoo will be usable for me and my client's
that I provide Gentoo Linux support. I recommending Gentoo whatever I
can, but when I see what happens than I starting to worry.
If you
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:49:25 -0500
Richard Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cringe when I see a stable request for some dialup
networking package - I doubt many devs even own modems these days.
I do own few modems, but alas, no phone line to hook them up to. :)
--
Andrej Ticho Kacian
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:03:39 +0200
Cédric Krier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/09/07 22:48 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:08:29 +0200
Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- app-admin/psmon (mcummings)
- net-im/bitlbee (weeve)
I'll take these two
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:08:29 +0200
Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- app-admin/psmon (mcummings)
- net-im/bitlbee (weeve)
I'll take these two unless someone else wants them more.
Regards,
--
Andrej Ticho Kacian ticho at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:22:56 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
with nice head shots.
Welcome back, Sven. And no, you can't have my brain. I
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:08:48 +0200
Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my pleasure to welcome back Deedra Waters (also known as dmwaters on
IRC).
Deedra is joining us from Pensacola, FL. She is going to work on the
accessibility stuff (she is blind), will be re-joining Developer
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:24:06 -0700
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0 attribute - for
some of the packages that I maintain, I do not want the bugs assigned
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400
Josh Sled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E.g., I don't know what genealogy has to do with theology, but I do see
that both relate to the human condition.
The fact that Adam and Eve will be found at the beginning of every genealogy
graph.
Just kidding, just
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:40:53 +0200
Jan Kundrát [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So just get a beer and be cool, okay? It's friday, after all...
No! No beer until my work shift ends! Then I'll join you.
--
Andrej
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:28:52 +0200
Timothy Redaelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same
things (genloop and qlop)
Perhaps because each has features that the other doesn't (genlop's --date, for
example).
Also, as long as involved people
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:02:28 +0200
Christopher Covington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first condition you list is a sort of nativism that I for one
would expect not to find in a successful copyleft project created on
the Internet. Why should the code Gentoo uses be written by Gentoo
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:24:03 -0400
Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point being made, then, is that for an official package manager to
exist *for Gentoo*, it needs to be under *Gentoo's* control.
Well, the source is open, and there are already enough Gentoo devs working
on it, so
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:55:55 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Ubuntu or Fedora do the job better then Gentoo has failed in its
goal of providing a near-ideal tool...
Semantically speaking, it hasn't failed - there's nothing about providing a
better (or nearer-ideal) tool than
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:46:30 +0100
Raphael Marichez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug.
Non-vulnerable version is in the tree, and I have added myself to metadata.xml
with description Backup
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:47:16 -0500
Larry Lines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So maybe I will stick around and maybe I will find a niche to help out
with that I can feel passionately enough to start a flame war.
Yes please, by all means, do that (the helping out part, not the flame war
part :) ).
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:28:29 -0600
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thing is that kinda stuff just puts ppl off; i've seen you carry on
bugzilla but i always thought fair enough he's stressed and working on
loads a bugs; if you really wanted to say that crap to me, you could have
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:02:50 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How useful is the X use flag in gkrellm? Just thinking if it would be
better to just remove the use flag and always build that code.
There is a possibility for headless servers to run gkrellmd, which runs in
background,
the dubious official status of Gentoo
developership - since when is volunteer work about political (yes,
political) status?
Just. Drop. It.
Regards,
--
Andrej Kacian ticho at gentoo org
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
, because I
have packages to maintain and only limited time, which you're
already cutting into with your nonsensical notions about boundaries.
--
Andrej Kacian ticho at gentoo org
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
different IMHO.
No, in this context it is exactly the same.
--
Andrej Kacian ticho at gentoo org
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
,
--
Andrej Kacian ticho at gentoo org
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:06:17 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my please to introduce to you Daniel drobbins Robbins. Daniel is
going to work with the amd64 arch team but will probably venture to
other areas too. Daniel doesn't have much experience with Gentoo so
let's give him
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:43:10 +0200
Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do YOU think about removing these from tree?
gtk-engines/gtk-engines-0.12.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2*
gtk-engines-begtk/gtk-engines-begtk-1.0.1-r2.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2*
[snip]
As long as we
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:51:51 +
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like I said, tho, I'm happy if the council is. Although I'm starting to
worry at the increasingly poisonous atmosphere, and that devs are leaving.
Flameeyes was on the council, no? It concerns me that this atmosphere is
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:10:16 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind that those who have it already
merged along with their favorite theme can keep them in overlay, so
removing the themes from the tree simply keeps new users from merging
something that's already on its way
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:48:49 -0700
Daniel Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/21/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you insane? What on earth could Jakub possibly contribute? If
you want a rough indication of Jakub's level of ebuild
understanding, take a look at bug 160328.
just because
some people got scary CVS conflict messages. Those happen all the time
in larger repositories.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian ticho at gentoo org
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:50:02 +0100
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Won't waste my time on your trollish rants any more.
Hehe, whenever you write this, there's always several more posts from you down
the same thread. It's kind of amusing.
--
Andrej Ticho Kacian ticho at gentoo dot org
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:17:40 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after all the pains we went through to enforce if you want to stabilize on
$ARCH, talk to the $ARCH team, how is this a good thing ?
I think Mike meant adding ~arch keywords - if you own and use ${ARCH} then
you may
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:04:31 -0500
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
Council-driven projects.
How about unified (and enforced) rules about Manifest PGP
Hi all,
as of today, x11-misc/gtk2mp has been masked, and is pending removal around
February 9th.
It is unmaintained, deprecated, and somewhat broken. Also, better MPD clients
exist as alternative - gmpc, glurp, qmpdclient, pympd, sonata.
Kind regard,
--
Andrej Ticho Kacian ticho at gentoo dot
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:40:55 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Miroslav fordforg Šulc. He is
joining the über cool java people. Expect him to spend endless night
battling with the horrors of bundled jars and sucky build systems.
Welcome aboard,
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:16:25 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upstream for net-misc/cidr has disappeared (their homepage has been dead
for a long long time according to archive.org), and a cursory check on
the Internets doesn't yield a new home. Masked accordingly, pending
this, they need to be spanked - and for that, we
need to know who they are.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:46:25 -0400
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what happens when you let a bunch of hippies build an OS.
No need to involve council - just call Eric Cartman. He'll teach those hippies
all there is about fun.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Ticho Kacian ticho at
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:45:04 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Ryan dirtyepic Hill. He is
joining us to help with the endless x86 testing effort, treecleaners,
and gcc-porting.
Ryan, your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:31:32 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
Which behaviour is this? All the gentoo mailing lists seem fine to me...
The behaviour that _all_ other mailing lists get replies to the list by
default when you hit Reply, just the _one_
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:10:37 +0200
Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody explain how that one list is different from the others? Are
the headers being munged differently for gentoo-core?
This list sets Reply-to to direct replies to the list. gentoo-core
doesn't. People who
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:06:39 +0200
Natanael Copa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of gentoo devs always seems to fight?
Don't get confused by all the flames. It's only 10-20 devs out of ~150 who are
always fighting - and that's usually only on mailinglists, they work together
quite well outside
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:05:16 -0600
Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent, another member of the soon-to-be-famous Gentoo rock band! I
think Joshua Jackson (tsunam) has already volunteered to be the
singer :) What is it, three new musical devs so far in the last 2
weeks?
Ahh, I'm
Dňa Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:07:02 +0100
Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] napísal:
So, make sure you all welcome him onboard, and as he's Czech, I figure
the beer is on him..
Uh-oh, the Czech conspiracy keeps growing!
--
Ticho
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
will die... :)
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
regards,
--
Andrej Kacian
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:42:27 +0200
Robert Cernansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank You for the tip. I looked at mpd also (only on web page). It
have probably good posibility to control it via command line. But what
about xosd support? (Which I mention in my previous post.) I do not
see any
Dňa Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:21:38 +0200
Jan Kundrát [EMAIL PROTECTED] napísal:
I'd like to nominate Andrej Kacian (ticho). He's quite a silent dev
(speaking about -dev and -core flamefests :) ), so chances are that he
won't go bananas. He also wrote nice articles about his hiking
activities so I
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:41:09 -0400
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's actually how I read the first email, was that it's really
the majority of the _minor_ packages that get completely neglected,
and just sits in the tree for months or years marked unstable
because nobody
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:07:45 +0200
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I have been swamped with emails, private messages and phone calls
from certain people, I will retract my resignation for the final time.
I'm fairly new to Gentoo, but I'd like to help.
So, what shall I do ?
You
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:03:32 +0200
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But:
* I'm fairly new here and not familar with the development and
qm process yet, so I need some assistance.
Anything still onclear on my last posting ?
My apologies, Enrico, for snapping out on you.
Kind
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:14:02 -0400
Daniel Ostrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I do ask...Lets all start now getting used to calling the
portage tree something different. I'm all for terms like the tree or
the ebuild tree or the package tree but at this point, given the
prompting subject
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:02:59 -0400
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You want the tree to
be writable, too, so that you can sync from any machine and also because
of distfiles.
Or you can put distfiles dir outside of portage by adjusting the $DISTDIR
variable in make.conf.
--
Andrej
On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:05:42 +0100
Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is my pleasure to inform you that after much discussion I can
announce that Joshua Jackson (tsunam) has come onboard to act as my
co-lead in Userrel[1].
Will that result in dramatic increase of anime smilies
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:21:14 -0400
Curtis Napier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead, I'm now the Web Coordinator. I proposed this new role to
the Infra Leads and met no resistance or objections so I have taken
the initiative and created the role. Also, neysx and I together were
approached and
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:42:50 -0300
Marcelo Góes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/2/06, Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not the case. At least unless the user actively looks at
package.mask. Since Portage doesn't provide the information, this point is
void. And even if - four
Dňa Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:15:37 +0100
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] napísal:
Yeah, and the point is? It happens every day, there are already tons
of third-party overlays used by Gentoo users, but once this thread
about official overlays started, you came here to tell us wow,
this all will cause
Dňa Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:23:14 +
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] napísal:
On 3/24/06, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so we're clear, users would be able to create their own overlays
and publish their ebuilds right ?
Not on overlays.g.o, no.
FWIW, this is already possible
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:49:10 +0100
Jochen Maes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/me gives a hot welcome hump to christel
now yer branded :-)
I don't remember you branding *me* when I was new. :))
Anyway, welcome, Christel!
--
Andrej
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
.
I there are no objections I will remove this package in a week.
Duncan
Hello,
could you please use your @gentoo.org address for such announcements?
Thanks.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 21:35:34 +0100
Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts ? It's doable in some way ?
Whatever way will get chosen, a full copy of every ChangeLog should be made
available somewhere (somewhere other than CVS Attic), for future reference.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 22:55:19 +
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 21:35:34 +0100 Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| That said I can see only two ways to reduce the ChangeLog files (a
| centralized one is obviously not viable)
5) Anyone who really cares
back in my MS-DOS
(gaming) days?
Well, I was going to suggest that, but then I realized that he would have to
be 35+ at this point and to be from Kiev ;).
Yes, and what's worse, I confused the name with Peter Norton - it was Vladimir
Volkov, not Peter. :)
Anyway, welcome, Peter!
--
Andrej Kacian
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:28:03 -0600
Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All-
Please take a moment to welcome our newest developer, pva. Peter is
joining to help out with netmon.
In his own words, I was born in Moscow (it's in Russia). I
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:39:43 -0600
R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc.
Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail
under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of the packages
in this list so
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:12:25 +0100 (CET)
Daniel Ahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14406 ebuilds.
Just FYI, it doesn't display correctly in Opera - I can provide screenshots if
you want.
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 01:51:25 +
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached GLEP is a draft proposal for the emerge --news thing that's
been under discussion. There are still some TODO items. These are calls
for people to weigh in with suggestions. Of course, suggestions on other
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:18:55 +
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Before this, make pre-install and post-install emerge messages more
| usable, instead of having them lost among thousands of gibberish text
| in batch emerges.
Separate issue. That one's the whole elog thing.
Yes,
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:44:17 -0600
Grant Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That seems a bit unfair to me. There's a complete logging facility in
portage CVS for a version that's probably not going to be released, but
I believe that the logging stuff is being back-ported to the current
version
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:58:51 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to solve http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109079. I
asked on #gentoo-dev and ciaramn said that we do not have a policy on
where to make a home directory. So I would now like the input of other
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:33:58 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zphoto: not maintained I'm afraid.
Not maintained and working, or not maintained and FUBARed ?
--
Andrej Ticho Kacian ticho at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, x86
pgpe9YBpjsses.pgp
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:57:44 +0100
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It'd perhaps make sense to extend the DTD for metadata.xml, so that the
maintainer tag has 'type' and 'organisation' attributes. This would
allow tools to tell the difference between an entry for a Gentoo
maintainer,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:32:53 -0500
Grant Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
After quite some time merely being an infra dev, lcars has
finally taken the leap and gained commit access to the tree. He's
going to be officially taking over sendmail and supporting other
packages that
Hi all,
I've been wondering - is there any eclass for fixing gcc warnings in $SUBJ
for C/C++ source files? I know it's upstream's job to fix these, and that they
have no effect on the compilation, but all there needs to be done is
'echo $file', and let's face it - it looks nicer when the code
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 05:39:37 -0700
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
but the effect was that the top ten list was of little practical use at all
[...]
What was useful for me wasn't the topten feature at all, rather it was the
list of packages browsable by herd and architecture. It allowed
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:30:37 +0200
Andrej Kacian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mail-filter/amavis has been package.mask-ed, and will remain so until next
Wednesday, or until someone picks it up.
My first mail never made it to the list, it seems, so again:
mail-filter/amavis is no longer
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:56:20 +0200
Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, ChrisWhite in a protocol IRC bot. Also speaks a few million
languages, including Japanese.
Who's R2D2 then?
--
Andrej Ticho Kacian ticho at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, amd64
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:21:20 +0200
Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not create a voicebot that would sit in the irc channel (the subject
would refer to it), that developers could send a message to, and that
would automatically be forwarded to a team of developers. If the bot
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:54:20 +0200
Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be an easy contact point for users. The other way would certainly
be still allowed, but it might be easier if there was a fixed contact
even if that is actually multiple people.
Just out of curiosity -
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:03:44 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that not a win/win situation? Where exactly is the bureaucracy?
Maybe I used wrong term - I was thinking about time and effort spent on
setting up and maintaining the ircbot. I've been in charge of a large botnet
in the
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:33:01 -0400
Luis F. Araujo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this idea.
I actually proposed a similar idea time ago in #-dev , but
instead of doing it from bugzilla, to do it from the web site, (i like
yours better)
the main idea is to have a list of unmantained packages
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:36:09 +0200
Maurice van der Pot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I definitely would like to see this. Just a few days ago I was
considering adding a comment along the lines of we need a maintainer
for this package, that's why nothing is happening to some bug reports.
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 00:06:41 +0200
Andrej Kacian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:39:41 +0200
Andrej Kacian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As this package doesn't seem to be actively maintained upstream (and people
on amavis-user mailinglist suggest everyone upgrading to amavisd
As this package doesn't seem to be actively maintained upstream (and people
on amavis-user mailinglist suggest everyone upgrading to amavisd-new), has some
open bugs[1][2][3] about it, and noone seems to be maintaining the ebuild
itself, we (net- mail) would like to get rid of it, unless someone
On Sat, 21 May 2005 17:37:53 -0700
Drake Wyrm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always thought that they were to keep 'emerge unmerge' from removing
an empty directory, but I could be wrong...
That, and to keep portage from removing empty directories during the
post-merge clean phase. Were it
Are .keep files necessary in a live filesystem? AFAIK they're only there
to keep portage from removing a directory from emerge-time image. Would it be
possible to just remove them from live filesystem after package files are
merged to / ?
Or do .keep files serve another purpose, not obvious to
83 matches
Mail list logo
