Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:33:54 -0400 > Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > I've finally gott

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages > to make it possible to use it without having to hack their mistaken > logic around. The

Re: [gentoo-dev] Need design help/input for eclean-kernel

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > So if you have some time, please reply to this thread with > a specific /boot layout that you think needs to be handled, with > as much helpful information as possible -- including possible > distinctive features and

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass: reset XDG env vars

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/577704 --- eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass index c545290..fb0362c 100644 --- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass +++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass @@ -80,7

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote: > It'd be nice if, when replying in a comment, a flag > could be made available to automatically to state that "I've encountered this > issue, too", and once 2, 3, or 4 of those are logged, Bugzilla automatically > changes

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Davide Pesavento wrote: > We could also have separate components for "keywording" vs > "stabilization", which would make the use of STABLEREQ/KEYWORDREQ > keywords obsolete at the same time. The STABLEREQ keyword would still be useful for

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Sunrise was a great way to learn packaging for Gentoo. Reviews were *very* > strict in the past, resulting in better QA standards than the Gentoo main tree > - - and a definite frustration threshold that one had to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this > approach? Why would you want to?

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] distutils-r1.eclass: Strip the trailing slash from D

This just looks nicer in build logs. --- eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass index afd29ed..171762c 100644 --- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass +++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] distutils-r1.eclass: Move creation of .pydistutils.cfg to esetup.py

Also remove .pydistutils.cfg from HOME before returning. This config should only be needed when we are invoking setup.py. The esetup.py wrapper provides a normalized way for doing this; if ebuilds call setup.py without the wrapper, they are now also responsible for setting the build directory if

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] distutils-r1.eclass: Do not modify the HOME variable

This was only necessary when we ran phases in parallel. Also, PMS says this variable should not be modified. --- eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass index 334ce73..c545290 100644 ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: dev-python/buildutils

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Mike Gilbert posted on Wed, 25 May 2016 11:52:46 -0400 as excerpted: > >> # Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> (25 May 2016) >> # Causes build failures in unrelated packages due to invasive # >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/buildutils

# Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> (25 May 2016) # Causes build failures in unrelated packages due to invasive # monkey-patching of easy_install (dev-python/setuptools). # Remove this package in 30 days. # Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/575844 dev-python/buildutils

Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Perhaps it's a good idea to add a section to the devmanual about adding > new keywords to packages. > > Recruits in particular might benefit from some background on what > keywording means and when it should be done,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-writing/variables: better describe ROOT

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Göktürk Yüksek <gokt...@binghamton.edu> wrote: > Mike Gilbert: >> The current description of ROOT makes no sense and just confuses >> people. The new description is paraphrased from PMS. --- >> ebuild-writing/variables/text.xml

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass: Do not apply patches if DISTUTILS_OPTIONAL is used

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Do not apply PATCHES and user patches (either via the EAPI 6 default or > pre-EAPI 5 code) when DISTUTILS_OPTIONAL is being used. In this case, > distutils functions are usually called conditionally, in a subdirectory, >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Add a test case for PMS-compliant usage of the ROOT variable.

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > A recent thread on gentoo-dev proposed a change to the devmanual's > description of the ROOT variable: > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/8901669dd375ca0fdb610efef0ddfe6f > > The proposed change would

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-writing/variables: better describe ROOT

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: >> I agree, repoman should be catching this stuff. >> > > Then Please contribute some test ebuilds for the gen-b0rk repo to test > repoman or any other Q/A apps with. If they fail to detect the test > ebuilds, it will give

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-writing/variables: better describe ROOT

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> Anywhere that you need addpredict() it also seems reasonable. The >>> v4l-dvb-saa716x ebuilds use "${ROO

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-writing/variables: better describe ROOT

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> Anywhere that you need addpredict() it also seems reasonable. The >> v4l-dvb-saa716x ebuilds use "${ROOT}/usr/src/linux/" where EPREFIX would >> not be a good replacement. > > Nah,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-writing/variables: better describe ROOT

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 05/10/2016 02:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> We have maybe 150 ebuilds in the tree using $ROOT in src_

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-writing/variables: better describe ROOT

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > We have maybe 150 ebuilds in the tree using $ROOT in src_* functions. > Some are bugs, but many look OK to me. Do we really want to say "never" > do that? According to PMS, it is only legal in pkg functions. Can you

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-writing/variables: better describe ROOT

The current description of ROOT makes no sense and just confuses people. The new description is paraphrased from PMS. --- ebuild-writing/variables/text.xml | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ebuild-writing/variables/text.xml

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass: Do not modify the HOME variable

This was only necessary when we ran phases in parallel. Also, PMS says this variable should not be modified. --- eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass index 7965e91..497bed5 100644 ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Mike Gilbert wrote: >> "doing your job" > > Remember that everyone is a volunteer. I am referring to arch testing as a job, because it only really works if people treat it that way. If st

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > Having built many stages for an "unstable" arch (mips) has taught me > one thing: it's awful being unstable-only. There's no end to the > compilation failures and other such headaches, none of which have > anything at all

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > The solution is to have people with an actual interest in a specific > architecture determine whether stabilising a package is viable, and > taking sensible action, like dropping stable keywords where applicable. If these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re : Cannot see my eclass modifications

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Farid BENAMROUCHE wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still searching for the reason why I'm not seeing my eclass > modifications... no luck so far. > > What can I do to debug portage's behavior? > > Thank you > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Dropping autotools-utils from xorg-2

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:37:35 -0400 > Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> > On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/7] xorg-2.eclass: drop autotools-utils

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>&

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Dropping autotools-utils from xorg-2

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> The xorg-2 eclass currently uses the deprecated autotools-utils and >> autotools-multil

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/7] xorg-2.eclass: drop autotools-utils

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML... > >> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> @@ -487,10 +497,17 @@ xorg-2_src_configure() { &

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 7/7] x11-libs/xpyb: set XORG_EAUTORECONF instead of AUTOTOOLS_AUTORECONF

Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p66 --- x11-libs/xpyb/xpyb-1.3.1-r2.ebuild | 4 ++-- x11-libs/xpyb/xpyb-1.3.1-r3.ebuild | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/x11-libs/xpyb/xpyb-1.3.1-r2.ebuild b/x11-libs/xpyb/xpyb-1.3.1-r2.ebuild index c563aa3..50243a4 100644 ---

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/7] x11-apps/xauth: drop autotools-utils

Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p66 --- x11-apps/xauth/xauth-1.0.9-r1.ebuild | 7 --- x11-apps/xauth/xauth-1.0.9-r2.ebuild | 7 --- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/x11-apps/xauth/xauth-1.0.9-r1.ebuild b/x11-apps/xauth/xauth-1.0.9-r1.ebuild index

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 6/7] x11-libs/glamor: drop autotools-utils

Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p66 --- x11-libs/glamor/glamor-0.6.0-r1.ebuild | 6 +++--- x11-libs/glamor/glamor-0.6.0.ebuild| 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/x11-libs/glamor/glamor-0.6.0-r1.ebuild b/x11-libs/glamor/glamor-0.6.0-r1.ebuild index

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/7] x11-proto/xcb-proto: drop autotools-utils

Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p3 --- x11-proto/xcb-proto/xcb-proto-1.10.ebuild | 19 +-- x11-proto/xcb-proto/xcb-proto-1.11.ebuild | 19 +-- x11-proto/xcb-proto/xcb-proto-1.8-r3.ebuild | 19 +-- x11-proto/xcb-proto/xcb-proto-1.9-r1.ebuild | 19

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/7] x11-apps/intel-gpu-tools: remove reference to AUTOTOOLS_BUILD_DIR

Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p64 --- x11-apps/intel-gpu-tools/intel-gpu-tools-1.10.ebuild| 16 x11-apps/intel-gpu-tools/intel-gpu-tools-1.11-r1.ebuild | 16 x11-apps/intel-gpu-tools/intel-gpu-tools-1.12.ebuild| 16 3 files changed, 24

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/7] x11-base/xorg-server: remove reference to AUTOTOOLS_BUILD_DIR

Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p64 --- x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.12.4-r5.ebuild | 4 ++-- x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.12.4-r7.ebuild | 4 ++-- x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.15.2-r2.ebuild | 4 ++-- x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.15.2-r4.ebuild | 4 ++--

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Dropping autotools-utils from xorg-2

ot; eclass. If there is a strong feeling that this is too dangerous, I can alter my approach. I have build tested most packages using xorg-2, and only a few had issues. This patchset is also on github: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/1289 Mike Gilbert (7): xorg-2.eclass: drop autotools-utils

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/7] xorg-2.eclass: drop autotools-utils

--- eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 73 +++- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass index 437265a..f6cf1f9 100644 --- a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass @@ -43,12 +43,14 @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> And I don't really see the point in the libressl USE flag in this >> case; I think that was only needed s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 4/16/16 3:27 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >> On 4/16/16 3:05 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:01:02 + (UTC) >>> "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: >> >> Okay for review. Sorry

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: upgrading to Plasma 5

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Michael Palimaka posted on Mon, 04 Apr 2016 05:23:03 +1000 as excerpted: > >> The default in KDE 4 was KDM, with lightdm and sddm also supported. >> >> We included information about migrating away from KDM because it's no >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] CVS headers in ebuilds

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Does anyone still use the CVS $Id$ keywords that are in all ebuilds' > headers, or are they being expanded anywhere? Or is there any other > reason why they should be kept? > > In fact, the council had already voted to drop

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: upgrading to Plasma 5

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Hi, > > KDE team intends to stabilise Plasma 5 shortly, so please review the > accompanying news items. Very exciting, nice work! > If you normally use KDM to launch Plasma, note that it is no longer > supported. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/21] gen_usr_ldscript: migrate away from a sep-/usr by default

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > To make forward progress on bug 417451, introduce a new sep-usr eclass > that will hold all logic related to having a separate /usr. For now, > this is just the gen_usr_ldscript function and a new USE=sep-usr flag.

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 67 is in, please update your metadata.dtd!

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:37:15 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Hello, everyone. >> >> I've finished the GLEP 67 transition last night, and it officially >> applies to all metadata.xml files now. >> > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 67 is in, please update your metadata.dtd!

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: > Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Luis Ressel <ara...@aixah.de> wrote: >>> >>> I might be asking this for a second time, but why does

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI > Author: Mike Frysinger > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2015-10-02 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5 > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: GRUB security update

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Tobias Heinlein <keytoas...@gentoo.org> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 18.12.2015 21:06, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> Hi, please review the news item be

[gentoo-dev] News item: GRUB security update

Hi, please review the news item below. Title: GRUB security update Author: Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2015-12-18 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: >=sys-boot/grub-2 A security flaw in GRUB's username/password authentication

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Why does the official documentation point me at gkeys-gen, which doesn't > work The documentation you linked is a project page for the Gentoo-Keys project. It represents one possible way to accomplish the goal of

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> Since signing is mandatory since the git migration, ahem, this means >> that no one in the last 5 months(!) actually followed the documentation >> (because that does NOT work!). I'm almost impressed, but, wow, this is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Determenistic system group and user id

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: > We trying to use ldap for users @work, many of our workstations running > binary gentoo based distro called Calculate linux. However if we wanna have > wide use of ldap there is a need for determenistic system group gids

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Python ABIFLAGS rebuild needed

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> It is worth noting that GLEP 42 makes no mention of EAPI, and >> current versions of portage do support slots in dependency atoms &

[gentoo-dev] News item: Python ABIFLAGS rebuild needed

Hi, Please review the news item below. I would like to send this out early next week. Title: Python ABIFLAGS rebuild needed Author: Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2015-12-11 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: >=dev-lang/python

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Python ABIFLAGS rebuild needed

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> >>> News-Item-Format: 1.0 >>> Disp

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Python ABIFLAGS rebuild needed

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> News-Item-Format: 1.0 >> Display-If-Installed: >=dev-lang/python-3.3.5-r4:3.3 >> Display-If-Installed: >=dev-lang/pyth

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] python-r1 suite clean up & impl reorder

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > Here's another patchset. Mostly fixups inspired by multilib-build.eclass > changes with a few little additions. > > Changes: > > 1. eclass-set variables are now read-only, Sounds ok, but might break some ebuilds. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-emulation/runc/

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:16:01AM +, Doug Goldstein wrote: >>> commit: 37c1ec7ef31a51206421f03a2df489ec7d7ca244 >>> Author: Doug

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] python-utils-r1.eclass: Change python_export_utf8_locale to deal with LC_ALL=C

Paludis sets LC_ALL=C to ensure a 'sane' build environment. We only want to override LC_CTYPE, so we break LC_ALL into separate LC_* overrides and set LC_ALL to blank. --- eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass | 22 +++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ban package.provided in next EAPI?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > package.provided is listed in PMS as "strongly deprecated" and > "optional" since a long time. Does anybody still need the file as part > of a profile, or could we finally ban it in the next EAPI? > > (This is _not_ about

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sbin directories to PATH for all users

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:10:11 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: >> All, >> >> I would like for us to discuss adding the sbin directories to PATH for >> all users. >> >> The only reason I can think of that we have removed them

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sbin directories to PATH for all users

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:10 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I would like for us to discuss adding the sbin directories to PATH for > all users. I support this idea. The distinction between bin and sbin is stupid.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sbin directories to PATH for all users

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:18:34 -0800 > Daniel Campbell wrote: >> Maybe I'm missing something, but `df` is in /bin. Do you use something >> else to determine free space? > > btrfs fi df In thins case,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xdg.eclass: break dependency loop with glib and utility packages

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Hello all, > > making gnome2.eclass depend on xdg.eclass has the unfortunate > consequence of having xdg utility package in the dependency loop of > glib which uses gnome2.eclass for various features (such as

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ban cmake-utils_use_* in EAPI 6

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:02:15 +0100 > Alexis Ballier wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:53:17 +1100 >> Michael Palimaka wrote: >> >> > What do you think? >> >> >> +1 >> >> even

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 6 portage is out!

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > For developers, is my stable version of repoman smart enough to make > sure I don't break any dependencies in this way? As a developer, please run the latest ~arch version of repoman at the very least.

[gentoo-dev] python.eclass and distutils.eclass deprecation notice

python.eclass and distutils.eclass are now officially deprecated. Please do not add new ebuilds with these eclasses if possible. Note that they have been unofficially deprecated for several months now. They do not support python3.4+, and bugs are not generally being fixed. the python team has

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revise EAPI 6?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Matthias Maier wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 15:52 CST, "Jason A. Donenfeld" >> wrote: > >>> I'd be in favor of full-on LC_ALL=C. > >> ++ > >> I'm surprised that we do

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCHES] python-utils-r1.eclass: Getter cleanup & ABIFLAGS preparation

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > As you probably don't know, Justin lately noticed that we're carrying > some ugly hacks in Python 3.2+ where we diverge from upstream and break > binary compatibility for the sake of 'aesthetics'. While

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] gentoolkit.git repository reorganized

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:06:33 -0700 > Brian Dolbec wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:37:26 -0400 >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> > On 22 Oct 2015 12:54, Paul Varner wrote: >> > > Mike,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] enable USE=xattr by default

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Tsoy wrote: >> >> I was wrong. This patch was not merged upstream. It is still needed and >> included in latest genpatches for 4.2: >> >> $ tar tf

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.5 is in, Python 3.3 deprecation

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:08 AM, <gro...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> >> Python 3.5 has been added to ~arch this morning. Please feel free to >> test and add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT as appropriate. > > And where's python-docs:3

[gentoo-dev] Python 3.5 is in, Python 3.3 deprecation

Hi all, Python 3.5 has been added to ~arch this morning. Please feel free to test and add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT as appropriate. Also, to keep the number of supported implementations manageable, I would like to deprecate Python 3.3. This means that it should not be added to PYTHON_COMPAT in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: moving gcc-5.2 to unstable

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:49:47 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ? >> >> the general list looks pretty good: >>

[gentoo-dev] repoman and useless dependency.badmasked warnings

Hello, I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for sys-apps/systemd. It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the selinux profiles) cannot depend on sys-apps/dbus[systemd], because the systemd use flag is also masked. That's perfectly fine and I suppose it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: OpenRC 0.18 changes to localmount and netmount

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 01/10/15 09:41 AM, William Hubbs wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:13:09AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius >> wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC 0.18 changes -O _netdev

ews-item >> related, I've changed to a new thread. >> >> On 01/10/15 02:17 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: >> > On 1 October 2015 17:49:15 CEST, Mike Gilbert >> > <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, Willi

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Revert "unpack: avoid useless chmods to improve speed"

This reverts commit 0dc7b2a3923508896cf217f325b8339d73353553. The "optimized" chmod is no longer recursive, which causes files to be missed. X-Gentoo-Bug: 561368 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561368 --- bin/phase-helpers.sh | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+),

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] man: repoman commit: Replace reference to "cvs" with "VCS"

--- man/repoman.1 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man/repoman.1 b/man/repoman.1 index abd998b..59d8ca4 100644 --- a/man/repoman.1 +++ b/man/repoman.1 @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ option if you would like to replace existing distfiles digests. Check Manifests for

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] man: Document repoman ci as a synonym for repoman commit

--- man/repoman.1 | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/man/repoman.1 b/man/repoman.1 index 59d8ca4..e2b9c66 100644 --- a/man/repoman.1 +++ b/man/repoman.1 @@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ Check Manifests for missing or incorrect digests .TP .B commit Scan directory tree for QA issues; if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introduce ppc64le architecture into gentoo ! please share your comments

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Leno Hou wrote: > Which version of grub suitable for ppc64le ? Is there any patches to > ppc64le grub ? There appears to be at least partial support on the master branch upstream. Also, take a look at the grub-devel mailing list archives;

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium gtk3 support

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > A user asked for optional gtk3 support in www-client/chromium: > > > However, reading e.g. >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] repoman: ignore unadded files when possible (bug 559636)

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 07:31:27 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> Unadded files that are excluded from the Manifest are safe to ignore. >> >> X-Gentoo-Bug: 559636 >> X-Gentoo-Bug-url:

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is the $Id$ line in our ebuilds still useful?

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Rich Freeman wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: delete it and be done +1 When I asked a few days ago the arugment was made that it will be expanded

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] document openssh-7.0 dsa key change #557388

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: --- .../2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys.en.txt| 26 ++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) create mode 100644 2015/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys.en.txt diff

Re: [gentoo-dev] .gitignore

Author: Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org Date: Wed Aug 12 21:27:59 2015 -0400 Add some additional legacy directories to .gitignore diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 87c1cce..1f8c184 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,2 +1,5 @@ /.ebuild.x -profiles/use.local.desc +/distfiles

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] document openssh-7.0 dsa key change #557388

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: --- .../2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys.en.txt| 26 ++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) create mode 100644 2015/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys.en.txt diff

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH repositories.dtd] Support multiple owner/ elements

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, A quick patch for review. It changes the DTD for repositories.xml to support multiple owner/ tags. We have at least one repository with more than one owner, and I don't really see creating aliases for our users

Re: [gentoo-dev] .gitignore

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10 Aug 2015 08:28, Justin (jlec) wrote: how do we maintain this file? like any other file. git add git commit. I like to propose to add the md5-cache into it. Which other files are of interest? /distfiles/

Re: [gentoo-dev] .gitignore

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10 Aug 2015 08:28, Justin (jlec) wrote: how do we maintain this file? like any other file. git add git commit. I like to propose to add

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: I'm only 90% sure that everything works, but I've spent almost the entire day on it, and there's more to go tomorrow. Thanks a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: Hi! On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: I think X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 also makes the job easier for

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-kernel/dracut looking for more maintainers

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Amadeusz Żołnowski aide...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, I'm resending e-mail from my gentoo.org address, instead of the private one... so just ignore the previuos thread with this subject. I have not much time [0] to maintain Dracut properly. Moreover I don't use

Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: golang-vcs-snapshot.eclass for golang vcs snapshots

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:20 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: This eclass is meant to handle vcs snapshots of golang packages coming from services like github. Let me know what you think. William # The location where the tarball is extracted is defined as # ${S}/src/${EGO_PN}.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/systemd-ui

Resending due to broken Reply-To. # Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org (03 Aug 2015) # Unmaintained upstream. Fails to build. Removal in 30 days. # Bugs: 478174, 546192, 556200. sys-apps/systemd-ui

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/systemd-ui

# Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org (03 Aug 2015) # Unmaintained upstream. Fails to build. Removal in 30 days. # Bugs: 478174, 546192, 556200. sys-apps/systemd-ui

Re: [gentoo-dev] Jvcs-snapshot.eclass: add a way to specify the extraction path

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:44 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:11:20PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:57 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, I'm finding in working on Go ebuilds, that we are propegating

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >