On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:28:52 +0200
Michael Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - An official (by the council accepted) VCS repo (a la git) for the
> document (EAPI draft or even the PMS spec?)
Uh, already exists.
> - An interface (mailing address) where everyone interested can submit
> a patc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 12:46 Sun 07 Sep , Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
>> I personally agree with several others who have replied to this thread.
>> The reduction in lines of code/characters seems to introduce an uglier
>> syntax which is hard
Icedtea has two release tracks. One for the 1.7 OpenJDK code base and
one for the 1.6 code base. They have independent version numbering so
they can have collisions. By moving the slot to the file name we could
have icedtea-1.2:1.6.ebuildN and icedtea-1.2:1.7.ebuildN. This
particular situation
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:14:57 -0400
> Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was personally expecting to see some sort of section called
> > "EAPI-1" that contains something like:
> >
> > "EAPI-1 consists of EAPI-0 with the following features added..
Jim Ramsay yazmış:
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:14:57 -0400
> > Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I was personally expecting to see some sort of section called
> > > "EAPI-1" that contains something like:
> > >
> > > "EAPI-1 consists of EAPI-0 wi
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:14:51 -0400
Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unrelated topic: What packages are actually required to 'make
> pms.pdf' so I can actually read it? I get:
Have a look at the dependencies for app-doc/pms.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:12:30 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Icedtea has two release tracks. One for the 1.7 OpenJDK code base and
> one for the 1.6 code base. They have independent version numbering so
> they can have collisions. By moving the slot to the file name we
> could hav
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Icedtea has two release tracks. One for the 1.7 OpenJDK code base and
> one for the 1.6 code base. They have independent version numbering so
> they can have collisions. By moving the slot to the file name we could
> have icedtea-1.2:1.6.ebuildN and icedtea-1.2:1.7.ebuildN. Th
On 14:56 Fri 12 Sep , Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
> > Icedtea has two release tracks. One for the 1.7 OpenJDK code base and
> > one for the 1.6 code base. They have independent version numbering so
> > they can have collisions. By moving the slot to the file name we could
> > ha
Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti:
On 14:56 Fri 12 Sep , Doug Goldstein wrote:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Icedtea has two release tracks. One for the 1.7 OpenJDK code base and
one for the 1.6 code base. They have independent version numbering so
they can have collisions. By moving the slot to the file nam
On 22:21 Fri 12 Sep , Petteri Räty wrote:
> I do know how to get around it, I did state that in my original email.
> As it happens we are having a discussion on gentoo-java mailing list on
> whether we should use icedtea-..ebuild
> or have different packages for the different slots. One o
Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti:
On 22:21 Fri 12 Sep , Petteri Räty wrote:
I do know how to get around it, I did state that in my original email.
As it happens we are having a discussion on gentoo-java mailing list on
whether we should use icedtea-..ebuild
or have different packages for the d
12 matches
Mail list logo
