[gentoo-dev] Re: Last Rites: app-portage/udept

2008-12-15 Thread Duncan
Daniel Pielmeier posted 4946fb3f.1090...@googlemail.com, excerpted below, on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:50:07 +0100: > It happens to me sometimes that I forget --oneshot and packages are > added to the world file that are not intended to be there. So this > option gives an overview over packages in wor

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last Rites: app-portage/udept

2008-12-15 Thread Duncan
"Douglas Anderson" posted efeb8d230812151628v149d50c9h7483229511e51...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted below, on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:28:30 +0900: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Daniel Pielmeier > wrote: >>> Duncan schrieb am 16.12.2008 00:47: >>> While I'm at it, is there anything useful to displ

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last Rites: app-portage/udept

2008-12-15 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2008/12/16 Daniel Pielmeier : Hm, looks like I have mixed up something here. The pruneworld option looks for packages that _have reverse dependencies_ and thus are probably unneeded and not the other way round > > Besides that, is there anything similar to dep --pruneworld. > > It happens to me s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last Rites: app-portage/udept

2008-12-15 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Douglas Anderson schrieb am 16.12.2008 01:28: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Daniel Pielmeier > wrote: >>> Duncan schrieb am 16.12.2008 00:47: >>> While I'm at it, is there anything useful to display metadata.xml? In >>> particular, the long descriptions and use flags can be useful. With >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last Rites: app-portage/udept

2008-12-15 Thread Douglas Anderson
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: >> Duncan schrieb am 16.12.2008 00:47: >> While I'm at it, is there anything useful to display metadata.xml? In >> particular, the long descriptions and use flags can be useful. With >> use.desc and especially the local version thereof goi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last Rites: app-portage/udept

2008-12-15 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Duncan schrieb am 16.12.2008 00:47: > Paul Varner posted > 1229371818.21630.7.ca...@txslpc1d36.wkst.vzwnet.com, excerpted below, on > Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:10:17 -0600: > >> # Paul Varner (14 Dec 2008) # Dead upstream, >> masked for removal in ~30 to 60 days. app-portage/udept >> >> Additionally,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last Rites: app-portage/udept

2008-12-15 Thread Duncan
Paul Varner posted 1229371818.21630.7.ca...@txslpc1d36.wkst.vzwnet.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:10:17 -0600: > # Paul Varner (14 Dec 2008) # Dead upstream, > masked for removal in ~30 to 60 days. app-portage/udept > > Additionally, it doesn't play well with EAPI's greater than

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Saving package emerge output (einfo, elog, ewarn, etc.) somewhere official

2008-12-15 Thread Duncan
Joe Peterson posted 4946dd7f.80...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:43:11 -0700: >> I don't think it's our responsibility to put documentation everywhere >> someone might conceivably look for information. > > I agree with this statement, but I wasn't implying we should duplic

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Saving package emerge output (einfo, elog, ewarn, etc.) somewhere official

2008-12-15 Thread Joe Peterson
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 15:35 Mon 01 Dec , Joe Peterson wrote: >> However, what I see as perhaps a missing "piece" is more conceptual: the >> important connection between the valuable info in the emerge logs (and their >> somewhat transient default nature) and what a user looks for when he/

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: app-portage/udept

2008-12-15 Thread Paul Varner
# Paul Varner (14 Dec 2008) # Dead upstream, masked for removal in ~30 to 60 days. app-portage/udept Additionally, it doesn't play well with EAPI's greater than zero. The removal bug is Bug #250839. If upstream comes back alive or someone forks and actively maintains, I will unmask or re-add to