On Monday 21 June 2010 07:44:50 Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 20 June 2010 20:12, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
We already have 13 packages using this flag, with several more to
come. The current description being used in packages' metadata.xml
sucks - I'll put something
On 21 June 2010 11:43, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
introspection: Add gobject-introspection support, allowing for the
dynamic generation of bindings for various languages
why not naming the useflag gobject-introspection then ?
Mostly because it seems exceedingly verbose to
On Monday 21 June 2010 09:53:02 Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 21 June 2010 11:43, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
introspection: Add gobject-introspection support, allowing for the
dynamic generation of bindings for various languages
why not naming the useflag
On 6/21/10 8:53 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 21 June 2010 11:43, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
introspection: Add gobject-introspection support, allowing for
the dynamic generation of bindings for various languages
why not naming the useflag gobject-introspection then ?
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:13:56 +0530
Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010/6/21 Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org:
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 20:12 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
I'd like to propose a new global USE-flag: introspection.
...
Any objections? I'll wait till Wed (June 23rd)
On Sunday 20 of June 2010 16:42:58 Arun Raghavan wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose a new global USE-flag: introspection.
The purpose of the flag is to enable the building of GIR for the
package using dev-libs/gobject-introspection. gobject-introspection is
going to be quite important in
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. posted on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:04:03 +0200 as excerpted:
On 6/21/10 8:53 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 21 June 2010 11:43, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
introspection: Add gobject-introspection support, allowing for the
dynamic generation of bindings for various
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 09:07 +, Duncan wrote:
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. posted on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:04:03 +0200 as excerpted:
On 6/21/10 8:53 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 21 June 2010 11:43, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
introspection: Add gobject-introspection support, allowing
Am 21.06.2010 09:04, schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.:
I think that introspection is similarly too general.
What about calling the useflag GIR (or gir)? If the user does not
know what it stands for, he will hopefully look up the description to
see what it means. And in contrast to introspection the
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (21 Jun 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# The geda-1.4.3-r1 is the only “split” ebuild for geda;
# most of its dependencies are stable x86 but not all, so
# the split itself is not stable; the latest stable on x86 is
# 1.4.0-r1. The newer versions are no
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 20 of June 2010 16:42:58 Arun Raghavan wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose a new global USE-flag: introspection.
I don't mind adding it as globally recognizable USE flag, I'd mind however
having it enabled
Olivier Crête posted on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:46:58 -0400 as excerpted:
It's not the bindings... It's introspection data that describes the API.
Well, the bindings themselves are dynamic, but this is what enables them,
according to the description. Only explaining all that is a bit long to
On 06/17/2010 11:29 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Petteri,
On 06/17/10 17:45, Petteri Räty wrote:
We communicate in English but that doesn't mean we all the same cultural
background. My native language doesn't do small talk and doesn't have a
word for please. Of course when writing English
On Monday 21 of June 2010 16:22:08 Olivier Crête wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 09:33 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Sunday 20 of June 2010 16:42:58 Arun Raghavan wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose a new global USE-flag: introspection.
The purpose of the flag is to enable the
On 21 June 2010 21:14, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
If that's the case (they are essential for Gnome or whatever to work, just two
files per package, not bringing any additional dependencies nor probability of
causing compilation failures), I find it rather odd to make it
Hello!
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
Thanks for your vote!
Best,
Sebastian
On 06/21/2010 07:33 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello!
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
- Building sites
- Active Council
- More direct democracy
- New conflict resolution team (reforming DevRel)
- Ownership and
Its quite simple. I want to get innovation starting in Gentoo again. I
am tired of seeing pointless arguments and threads that don't actually
make Gentoo any better. Improving QA, improving our documentation,
making it easier for people to recognize how they can contribute, and
improving Gentoo
On 22 June 2010 00:40, Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Its quite simple. I want to get innovation starting in Gentoo again. I
am tired of seeing pointless arguments and threads that don't actually
make Gentoo any better. Improving QA, improving our documentation,
making it easier for
Hi,
On 21 June 2010 22:03, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello!
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
For all your points where you do not have a concrete proposal of how
you intend to tackle the problem, could you please
Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org said:
On 22 June 2010 00:40, Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Its quite simple. I want to get innovation starting in Gentoo again. I
am tired of seeing pointless arguments and threads that don't actually
make Gentoo any better. Improving QA,
On 22 June 2010 00:57, Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
Hope that helps,
Indeed - thanks for the detailed response.
Cheers,
--
Arun Raghavan
http://arunraghavan.net/
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) (arunsr | GNOME)
Hi,
Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org:
Having branches to do development and facilitate access and testing
seems fine, however we should always have the goal of getting these
tested revisions merged back into the main tree. We really don't
want divergent development to be the norm.
Right,
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 17:04:24 +0300, Dror Levin sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll nominate robbat2, darkside and ferringb.
Dror,
Thanks for the vote of confidence. Now, I realize it is past the
deadline for acceptance but I was not intending to accept after I saw
the current batch of people that have
Petteri,
On 06/21/10 20:20, Petteri Räty wrote:
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
- Building sites
- Active Council
- More direct democracy
- New conflict resolution team (reforming DevRel)
- Ownership and territories
-
On Saturday, June 19, 2010 15:56:03 Roy Bamford wrote:
Everything is in place to allow voting in the above election commence
as planned on June 20th at 00:00:00 UTC.
The polls will remain open until July 3rd 23:59:59 UTC.
the motd/whatever of dev.g.o really should contain active elections
2010-06-21 00:27:00 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
On Sunday, June 20, 2010 09:55:39 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-06-19 22:53:37 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
On Thursday, June 10, 2010 16:45:29 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar wrote:
2010-06-10 22:20:44 Nirbheek Chauhan
Arun,
On 06/21/10 21:25, Arun Raghavan wrote:
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
For all your points where you do not have a concrete proposal of how
you intend to tackle the problem, could you please elaborate?
please take your time to
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:36:50PM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Arun,
On 06/21/10 21:25, Arun Raghavan wrote:
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
For all your points where you do not have a concrete proposal of how
you intend
That is a very audacious vision you have. I am curious if you have
any priorities set for the list you provided. At first reading it
appears like you have more work than any one person could complete
(nay, even a skilled council would be hard pressed to finish
everything there.) My intention is
On 06/22/10 03:46, Brian Harring wrote:
Your proposed solutions in your manifesto is to just throw out the
manifest bits that need completion, in the process ignoring the
infrastructural and security reasons for their existance. Same goes
for ignoring the commit hooks chunk for rsync
On 22 June 2010 03:06, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Arun,
On 06/21/10 21:25, Arun Raghavan wrote:
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
For all your points where you do not have a concrete proposal of how
you intend to tackle
On 22 June 2010 03:06, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
(w.r.t. git migration)
I hope to see Robin integrate me with the conversion process.
How have you contributed to the effort thus far?
I would like to re-phrase this question to
how come you are able to help, okay?
That is
33 matches
Mail list logo
