On 7/10/06, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > c is simpler. I like it.
> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to
> ta
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 19:17:09 +0200
Matthias Schwarzott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As the situation now has changed I would like to discuss this one
> more. Since one week we (hd_brummy and me) have changed our Gentoo
> VDR Project
> (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/video/vdr/index.
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
I don't believe retro-actively modifying the 2006.0 profile is a good
idea in general. The profile currently says that for x86, gcc
must be ">=sys-devel/gcc-3.3.4-r1" - if you do
# emerge >=sys-devel/gcc-3.3.4-r1
on a current tree you'll get a much higher version. Still,
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:27:14 -0700
Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 22:10:48 +0200 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote: | > Not true. According to the 2006.0 x86 profile, for
> > exampl
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 23:30:40 +0200
"Molle Bestefich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Fish wrote:
> > The expectation here is that when a new version of gcc is
> > stabilized, that users will upgrade to that in a reasonable amount
> > of time, and use that (by selecting it with gcc-config) for
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > c is simpler. I like it.
> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to
> tag and assigning to that even when a particular maintainer
On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote:
> c is simpler. I like it.
Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to
tag and assigning to that even when a particular maintainer is listed.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
On 09/07/06, Daniel Gryniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 20:46 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote:
> @devs,
>
> If your blog is being aggregated on Planet Gentoo / Universe, it's time to
send
> us a copy of your smiling face. I'm putting out a request for some
> hackergotchis. Real
Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> What do you think of that?
c is simpler. I like it.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> In bug #139412, I ask Paul de Vriese why he thinks python should die
> on --fast-math instead of just filtering it. Here's his answer :
>
> "Denis, quite simple. -ffast-math is broken and short-sighted for a
> global flag.
> Filtering gives the shortsighted message that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Molle Bestefich wrote:
>> > What versioning system do you guys use (CVS?),
>> > and what's the URL for checking out ebuilds?
>>
>> bugs.gentoo.org is where this kind of work is done.
>
> There's already an existing but unmaintained ebuild.
> That's wh
> What versioning system do you guys use (CVS?),
> and what's the URL for checking out ebuilds?
bugs.gentoo.org is where this kind of work is done.
There's already an existing but unmaintained ebuild.
That's what I wanted to check out, so I could modify it and submit a diff -u.
--
gentoo-dev@ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 22:10:48 +0200 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > Not true. According to the 2006.0 x86 profile, for example, you're
> | > required to have ">=sys-devel/gcc-3.3.4-r1". There is no requirement
> | > t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
>> You'd rather fill in a bug report and submit the patch in the bug.
>> Not in this list, definitely.
>
> Oh, ok. Never mind then, I fear I'd be spending way too much time
> fighting with Jakub tryin
Lars Weiler wrote:
app-cdr/dvdrtools: Same reason. No need to use this fork of
cdrtools-1.11...
This is a lot more more than a "add DVD writing support" fork - they
have changed much more than that, and they have an interesting list of
objectives. It's a much saner version of cdrtools.
P
Richard Fish wrote:
The expectation here is that when a new version of gcc is stabilized,
that users will upgrade to that in a reasonable amount of time, and
use that (by selecting it with gcc-config) for compiling all new
updates. FYI, gcc-3.4.4-r1 was stabilized on 2-Dec-2005, and the
current
Dear devs,
In bug #139412, I ask Paul de Vriese why he thinks python should die
on --fast-math instead of just filtering it. Here's his answer :
"Denis, quite simple. -ffast-math is broken and short-sighted for a global flag.
Filtering gives the shortsighted message that it works globally, while
On 7/9/06, Molle Bestefich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to take a stab at maintainership (or at least fixing) an
unmaintained ebuild.
What versioning system do you guys use (CVS?), and what's the URL for
checking out ebuilds?
bugs.gentoo.org is where this kind of work is done.
-Richard
Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
You'd rather fill in a bug report and submit the patch in the bug.
Not in this list, definitely.
Oh, ok. Never mind then, I fear I'd be spending way too much time
fighting with Jakub trying to get the ebuild in the tree. I'll just
drop it.
(Nothing personal, I just d
On 7/9/06, Molle Bestefich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try reading the bug - users are basically being shoved off with an
arrogant silence and a stamp on their forehead saying INVALID.
*Sigh*. You really should post to -user first.
The expectation here is that when a new version of gcc is sta
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Try reading the bug - users are basically being shoved off with an
> arrogant silence and a stamp on their forehead saying INVALID.
>
> Nothing personal against Jakub Moc who probably has a lot to do, but
> the handling of relevant issues raised in the bugzilla is just
> unacce
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 22:10:48 +0200 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Not true. According to the 2006.0 x86 profile, for example, you're
| > required to have ">=sys-devel/gcc-3.3.4-r1". There is no requirement
| > that 3.4 be installed.
|
| Yeah, that's not what I've been talking about at al
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:37:47 +0200 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Molle Bestefich wrote:
> | > I noticed that several users have commented with a relevant
> | > complaint: GCC-4.x is required by the ebuild, but no information is
> | > ever conveyed to the end user
You'd rather fill in a bug report and submit the patch in the bug. Not
in this list, definitely.
On 7/9/06, Molle Bestefich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to take a stab at maintainership (or at least fixing) an
unmaintained ebuild.
What versioning system do you guys use (CVS?), and what's
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:37:47 +0200 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Molle Bestefich wrote:
| > I noticed that several users have commented with a relevant
| > complaint: GCC-4.x is required by the ebuild, but no information is
| > ever conveyed to the end user about this fact. The ebuild doe
Molle Bestefich wrote:
> I noticed that several users have commented with a relevant complaint:
> GCC-4.x is required by the ebuild, but no information is ever conveyed
> to the end user about this fact. The ebuild does not have a
> dependency on GCC-4.x.
No, it's not. gcc-3.4.x *is* required. Th
I'd like to take a stab at maintainership (or at least fixing) an
unmaintained ebuild.
What versioning system do you guys use (CVS?), and what's the URL for
checking out ebuilds?
(I was thinking that I'd conjure up a patch and submit it here so
someone with commit access can put it in.)
--
gento
Molle Bestefich wrote:
The current situation is very annoying for users that update often,
and also makes Portage mostly unusable for automatic server upgrades
After unmerging mono-tools so Portage could finally run a whole
update, it stopped halfway through because of this bug:
http://bugs.gen
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 20:46 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote:
> @devs,
>
> If your blog is being aggregated on Planet Gentoo / Universe, it's time to
> send
> us a copy of your smiling face. I'm putting out a request for some
> hackergotchis. Really, you don't want just a few of us to have all the fun
On Thu, 2006-06-07 at 13:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:29:39 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | On Thursday 06 July 2006 14:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > Sounds rather flaky and unreliable...
> | Sounds rather vague and without arguments
Hi!
As the situation now has changed I would like to discuss this one more.
Since one week we (hd_brummy and me) have changed our Gentoo VDR Project
(http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/video/vdr/index.xml) to an official
subproject of desktop/video.
Now the situation is as follows:
Most pack
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 03:21:49PM +0200, Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:07:45 +0200
> Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > As I have been swamped with emails, private messages and phone calls
> > > from certain people, I will retract my resignation
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 02:32:36PM +0200, "Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >>This is duplicating the superb efforts of the kernel team and of
> > >>linux-info eclass. As such I would like to deprecate $KV in favor
> > >>of using linux-info eclass. I don't see the need for portage
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:13:33AM +, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Portage currently exports $KV as the current kernel version. We detect
> this by attempting to mess around with the things in /usr/src/linux
> (.config, make files, etc...)
>
> This is duplicating the superb effo
060709 Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> On Sunday 09 July 2006 01:10, Duncan wrote:
>> An interesting observation was that of all the FLOSS projects,
>> perhaps only Debian had successfully crossed the line
>> from "medium" to "large".
> but they have maintainers that often does not know what the
35 matches
Mail list logo
