29.05.2013 03:01, David Carlos Manuelda пишет:
El Martes, 28 de mayo de 2013 14:03:52 Mike Frysinger escribió:
On Tuesday 28 May 2013 13:53:54 Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:43:10 +0200 David Carlos Manuelda wrote:
I posted a bug about that along with a suggestion, despite
On 29/05/2013 02:07, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
Hi!
Cool! I didnt use RB before, but i use gerrit. Do you pan to integrate it to
g.o.g.o? It seems can be done by git commit hooks
What sort of integration did you have in mind?
He is probably thinking about buildtests and automatic commit merges which
are not possible with reviewboard.
Dne 29.5.2013 9:09 Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org napsal(a):
On 29/05/2013 02:07, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
Hi!
Cool! I didnt use RB before, but i use gerrit. Do you pan to
On Wed, 29 May 2013 00:36:58 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
3b) Except... at that point root isn't writable
Let me stop you here. Does it need to be writable at that point?
We're reading the path of the init file to boot from a file, we start
the executable at that path; no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/20/2013 08:29 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
We have `iamlate` for this in app-portage/gentoolkit-dev.
/usr/bin/imlate , nice ;-)
- --
Michael Weber
Gentoo Developer
web: https://xmw.de/
mailto: Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org
-BEGIN PGP
Yep I'm thinking about gerrit like workflow. But seems it doesnt make sense
with RB and CVS.
В письме от 29 мая 2013 10:22:29 пользователь Tomáš Chvátal написал:
He is probably thinking about buildtests and automatic commit merges which
are not possible with reviewboard.
Dne 29.5.2013 9:09
On 29/05/2013 21:18, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
Yep I'm thinking about gerrit like workflow. But seems it doesnt make sense
with RB and CVS.
Yes, Review Board and Gerrit target different things.
On 28/05/2013 01:35, Jonathan Callen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
A quick reminder for anyone using python-r1.eclass or
python-single-r1.eclass:
These eclasses provide a ${PYTHON_REQUIRED_USE} variable that should
be included in REQUIRED_USE under the same USE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2013 04:51 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Would it be possible to add repoman checks for this, and other
common failures like missing PYTHON_USEDEP?
The latter is impossible. Repoman has no way to figure out if
PYTHON_USEDEP is necessary.
On 30/05/2013 01:06, hasufell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2013 04:51 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Would it be possible to add repoman checks for this, and other
common failures like missing PYTHON_USEDEP?
The latter is impossible. Repoman has no way to
I think, it'll be nice to have a way to suggest some packages to user,
when (s)he installs something. For now it is only way to do that by
something like:
pkg_postinst() {
if ! has_version dev-lua/iluajit; then
einfo You'd probably want to install dev-lua/iluajit to;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29/05/13 11:43 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
I think, it'll be nice to have a way to suggest some packages to
user, when (s)he installs something. For now it is only way to do
that by something like:
pkg_postinst() { if ! has_version
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:52:49AM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote
On Wed, 29 May 2013 00:36:58 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
3b) Except... at that point root isn't writable
Let me stop you here. Does it need to be writable at that point?
We're reading the path of the init
On Wed, 29 May 2013 14:15:54 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
In order for a different init system to come up, some file(s)
somewhere *MUST* be different, no ifs/ands/ors/buts.
How true is this in general? It is usually only a change of the init
parameter. As far as I heard there
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:56:00PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
There are a couple of other possible approaches...
1) If the 2 systems can achieve peacefull co-existance (i.e. no
identically-named files with different contents) then simply have 2
boot entries in /etc/lilo.conf (or grub
El mié, 29-05-2013 a las 11:46 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
On 29/05/13 11:43 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
I think, it'll be nice to have a way to suggest some packages to
user, when (s)he installs something. For now it is only way to do
that by something like:
On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:55:23 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
We want to make this easier towards the user, therefore doing heavy
discussion to exhaust all the alternatives and maybe someone's
interested in implementing one of them that appears most feasible.
Since users
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:06:42AM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:55:23 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
We want to make this easier towards the user, therefore doing heavy
discussion to exhaust all the alternatives and maybe someone's
interested in
William Hubbs posted on Wed, 29 May 2013 19:22:32 -0500 as excerpted:
We could probably also turn gcc-config into an eselect module if we want
to use that argument.
IIRC it actually was, at one point. The eselect gcc module even allowed
separate configs for 32-bit and 64-bit on at least
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:56:00PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
In order for a different init system to come up, some file(s)
somewhere *MUST* be different, no ifs/ands/ors/buts.
How true is this in general? It is usually only a change of the init
20 matches
Mail list logo