On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009 08:28:12 +0200
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> - Try to avoid subjective statements. Statements like "C++ feels
>> better" don't add anything to the discussion and are objectively
>> wrong for me, so they have no place in a
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I noticed some eclass commits using java-pkg_func-exists() and it's a
> lot more complicated than it needs to me. Perhaps not everybody knows
> that bash generally gives a return status from functions of the last
> command run in that func
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:06:47 +0100
> Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> Considering average post count and Gentoo membership on that list,
>> I'm pretty convinced you're not entitled to decide who is wasting
>> developers' time.
>
> When you've g
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>>> Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
>>> "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first
>>> argument?
>
>> There's a slightly different
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:44:48 +0530
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner
>> wrote:
>> > I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd
>>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 22:26:41 Alec Warner wrote:
>> >> > > Introducing a policy encouraging moving things that definitely
>> >> > > aren't in the least bit likely to be a system dep on a bum
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:41:39 Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200
>> >
>> > Markos Chandras wr
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:55:20 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:53:16 +0100
>>
>> Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> > Because, as you have noticed before, developers get confused which
>> > eapi has which features available. And ea
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with the discussion about EAPI3 we have now 4 (or 7, depending on how you
> count them ;) ) EAPIs available or almost available. This is getting quite
> confusing.
Be more specific, what actual problems have you encountered?
Wha
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but couldn't find how mirrors
>> behave with arrows.
>
> It's supposed to say this:
>
>> In EAPIs supporting arrows, if an arrow is used,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM, AllenJB wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>
>> On 19:06 Wed 11 Mar , Thilo Bangert wrote:
>
> the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be available via
> IRC. it has long been my feeling that Gentoo as a project could realize
> mor
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote:
> On Tue, March 10, 2009 7:07 am, Duncan wrote:
>> Gordon Malm posted
>> 200903091617.48682.gen...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Mar
>> 2009 16:17:48 -0700:
>>
>>> There is an important security aspect to retiring folks - commit
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:20:03 +0100
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>> Package A goes stable, test suite passes. Package B (a dependency of
>> A) goes stable in a newer version, which will cause A to not merge in
>> stable profile. This happ
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht
> wrote:
>> Give a git access to the developpers beside the current CVS ?
>
> or replace cvs with git... oh and you can replace rsync too... because
> git is faster there as well.
People are
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many
> people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in order
> to get some idea what the general developer pool thinks. Everyone is
> only allowed to post a singl
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:33:19 -0800
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> Hey I never said its a perfect solution; but I'm a fan of the 'it
>> covers 80%'. Sometimes you can't have your cake and eat it too;
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:21:25 -0800
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> Somewhat ironically, had everyone been less stubborn last year when
>> discussing this topic we could have embedded the EAPI in line X of the
>> ebuild in
Somewhat ironically, had everyone been less stubborn last year when
discussing this topic we could have embedded the EAPI in line X of the
ebuild in 2008 and be using it now; instead of still discussing it.
I don't expect new novel ideas out of this thread. I expect the
council to defer it again
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:43:09 -0700
> Steve Dibb wrote:
>> Plus, I don't really grasp the whole "we have to source the whole
>> ebuild to know the EAPI version" argument. It's one variable, in one
>> line. Can't a simple parser get that an
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 01:55 Tue 27 Jan , Alec Warner wrote:
>> Getting Index2 live is I think a different operational issue (that
>> changes to the website are very slow) and really has nothing to do
>> with PR aside from them n
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:17 AM, AllenJB wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:30 PM, AllenJB
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The Gentoo PR Project currently appears to be having difficulties with
>>> keep
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> On 21:30 Mon 26 Jan , AllenJB wrote:
>>> The Gentoo PR Project currently appears to be having difficulties with
>>> keeping up, both with the newsletters and announcements, and I believe
>>> this is currently ref
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:30 PM, AllenJB wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Gentoo PR Project currently appears to be having difficulties with
> keeping up, both with the newsletters and announcements, and I believe this
> is currently reflecting badly on the project as a whole. These issues are
> apparentl
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21:04 Sun 25 Jan , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:25:44 -0100
"Jorge Manuel B. S
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Dale wrote:
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> Hi,
>> << SNIP >>
>>
>> Tomas
>> PS: I really hope i didnt miss something important.
>> PPS: I really really hope that this time kmail will sent this as only text
>> mail not html one.
>>
>
> And in the future, hit compose new
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:05 AM, AllenJB wrote:
> Peter Volkov wrote:
>>
>> В Вск, 11/01/2009 в 10:31 +0100, Benedikt Böhm пишет:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote:
- - you forgot the ChangeLog entry
>>>
>>> `cvs log` is the changelog, i don't see w
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Fabio Rossi wrote:
>>
>> I'm proposing to reorganize the files related to Gentoo inside /var/lib.
>> Currently we have this situation (at least on my system):
>>
>> /var/lib/eselect
>> /var/lib/gentoo/enews
>> /var/lib/herdstat/
>> /var/lib/mod
Eudora actually, I use a classy mail client.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> How hard would it be to change permissions on the ,v file for this and
>> just run the use.local.desc updater as a user with different
>> privileges?
&
How hard would it be to change permissions on the ,v file for this and
just run the use.local.desc updater as a user with different
privileges?
-Alec
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Matsuu Takuto (matsuu)
wrote:
> matsuu 09/01/02 16:19:02
>
> Modified: ChangeLog use.local.desc
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Not sure where to report this. net-misc/udhcp got masked recently with
> following notice:
>
> - net-misc/udhcp-0.9.9_pre20041216-r4 (masked by: package.mask)
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
> # Diego Pettenò (23 Dec 2008)
> #
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On P, 2008-12-07 at 12:07 +, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
>> vapier 08/12/07 12:07:53
>>
>> Modified: libIDL-0.8.10.ebuild
>
>
> ChangeLog entires are mandatory without any exceptions for
> stabili
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Wulf C. Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 08. December 2008 17:37:42 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Open and public debate about the right way to do things does take
>> longer, and it's something you certainly participate in quite
>> frequently so I'm surpri
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since not all the buildsystem we support use make for the actual build,
> and they don't necessarily support make-like options (-jX -s and so on),
> it would be nice to be able to express a JOBS variable that
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to implore ALL developers to please ensure that they don't
> commit broken stuff into profiles, esp. corrupt atoms in package.mask.
Imploring is ineffective, humans fail.
>
> This change went into profiles/pack
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Maciej Mrozowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 of December 2008 10:40:19 Alec Warner wrote:
>
>>
>> You asked, so the counter proposal is to *do nothing*.
>>
>> Ideas (even good ones) don't always get impleme
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Maciej Mrozowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 01 of December 2008 22:51:57 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> Experience, manpower, the ability to try out potential enhancements
>> rapidly, a long track record of getting it right and the growing
>> recognition tha
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> - Space savings. Certainly your scheme may be smaller, but the XML
>> tag overhead may eat into the sav
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Diego, What are the concrete benefits of your proposal?
>
> As I said:
>
> - no need to replicate homepag
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Volkov wrote:
>> Seems that we already have everything you dreamed about:
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=1#doc_chap4
>>
>> Take a look at PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM. It even can send
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В Вск, 30/11/2008 в 17:09 +0200, Serkan Kaba пишет:
>> Peter Volkov yazmış:
>> > Also sometimes it's useful to have different HOMEPAGE for different
>> > versions.
>> >
>> > And in general, Diego. What are you trying to impr
On 11/17/08, Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В Вск, 16/11/2008 в 15:33 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
> >
> > > - FEATURES=test failures;
> >
>
> And what we are supposed to do if upstream states that tests are not
> supposed
On 11/19/08, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you *use* or *want* to keep this mode of repoman; please comment on
> the bug[1].
>
> If you do *not* use or do *not* want to keep this mode of repoman, do
> nothing.
>
> This is an informal means to see if a
If you *use* or *want* to keep this mode of repoman; please comment on
the bug[1].
If you do *not* use or do *not* want to keep this mode of repoman, do nothing.
This is an informal means to see if anyone is using repoman full or
repoman lfull; if it turns out not I hope to cut a patch to remove
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Torsten Veller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is time to finish the move of some new dual-lifed perl modules
> from dev-perl to perl-core (plus virtual/). It involves updating of
> 120 packages all over the tree but mostly in dev-perl.
>
> As this takes some time t
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>> Steve Long wrote:
>>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> > Steve Long wrote:
>>> >> > Have a look at, for example, [1], where Mike already gave you an
>>> >> > answer one of the previous times we discussed it.
>>>
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now into it's Nth great year, I bring you the fourth edition of the
> automatic assignment proposal.
>
> Previously:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485 [v1]
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.g
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marius Mauch kirjoitti:
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:59:39 +0200
>> Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Ri
If you don't use NIS or NIS+ you can stop reading now; if you do use
NIS or NIS+...I'm so so sorry.
The basic gist is "this package is old and everyone should move to LDAP."
Consider it masked in two weeks for removal in 30 days unless a
maintainer is found.
-Alec
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
> below, on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:17:14 -0700:
>
>> Consider this your first and last warning from Userrel.
>
>
I don't want to be the guy that kicks people off lists; but I will do
it; so keep the thread on topic[0] and be nice[1]. I know everyone
here is capable of that. Feel free to sling the personal crap
comments somewhere more appropriate (such as a personal diary, blog,
or in verbal complaints to a
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:22:19 -0700
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So where exactly is this "sky is falling" issue you're worried
>> about? Bugs happen.
>
> It means anyone using EAPI 2 now is going to encount
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:25:55 -0500
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 05:30 Wed 01 Oct , Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
>> > vote on, let us
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 03:44:20 -0700
>>
>> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Either we need special cases to declare that it no longer has a
>> > homepage, or we nee
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please consider a new "eapi" profile configuration file that will
> designate the EAPI to which any package atoms within a given layer
> of the profile stack
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Thomas Sachau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alec Warner schrieb:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:23:33 +0200
>>> Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:23:33 +0200
> Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think it's ok. ~arch isn't training ground. It's supposed to
>> work, so asking arch teams to keywords packages that are not suppos
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Gen 2 Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (`date`)
> # Masked for testing.
>>=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver
>
>
> Please people,
>
>
> if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it.If you find
> that you cannot commit an ebui
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 21:39:52 Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> default_src_install() {
>> if [ -f Makefile -o -f GNUmakefile -o -f makefile ]; then
>> if emake DESTDIR="${D} install || einstall ;
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Vaeth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Long wrote:
>
>> Thomas Sachau wrote: [...]
>>
>> > [[ -n ${DOCS} ]] && dodoc ${DOCS}
> [...]
>>
>> It might be wise to use an array for DOCS there
>
> Since I have now seen suggestions for using arrays unnecessarily
> at le
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PR
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23:13 Mon 08 Sep , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:33:50 -0700
>> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 12:46 Sun 07 Sep , Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
>> > > I personally agree with sev
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Santiago M. Mola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Most obvious failure cases these days have build logs and the build
>> logs will specify what the conf
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Vaeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yes. And here another point should be brought up. This proposal should
>> be wider and consider similar changes for the most common used
>> operations on all phases.
>
> And in fact, the most common used operations on all phases
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
>> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler
>>> for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file
>>> name.
>>
>> On
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Thomas Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>Currently we have a lot of:
>>src_configure() {
>>
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Thomas Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>Currently we have a lot of:
>src_configure() {
>econf $(use_enable dvdr) \
>$(use_with ipv6 ssl) \
>--wi
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Robert R. Russell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some of the packages that I use are ~arch keyworded right now and I was
> wanting to ask some questions about when to file stabilization requests and
> about how much information needs to be provided when filling them.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Leverton wrote:
>> 2008/9/5 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler
>>> for ebuild writer if they don't
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27-08-2008 10:28:57 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 06:35:57PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> > For that reason I'd pretty much prefer to keep the CVS Header in place,
>> > unless there is a
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:27:03 +0100
>> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:31:17 +0530
>>> > Arun Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>
>> On 00:26 Mon 11 Aug , Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>>>
>>> My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active
>>> for several months. It is now clear to me that Gentoo i
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
> replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
> channels.
>
> Getting the bot out there
> -
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More than a year ago, I had my first occurrence of a package that
> refused to work when run as root: dev-db/mysql. This lead to the following
> block of code in the src_test block:
>
> if [[ $UID -eq 0 ]]; then
>
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please consider a new PROPERTIES=interactive setting that allows an
>> ebuild to indicate that it uses stdin and stdout for user
>
> I don't think anyone will disagree with this one. The one problem that I see
> is that if t
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello again,
>
> Please consider a new PROPERTIES=interactive setting that allows an
> ebuild to indicate that it uses stdin and stdout for user
> interaction sometime during
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:16:25 -0700
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So assuming the council says we should fix all these issues (and in
>> most cases I would support tha
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:06:11 -0700
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Stephen Bennett
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
>> on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
>> list to see.
>
> I would like to put forward the following suggestion for
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
>> After a category is converted, it will be auto-generated EXCLUSIVELY
>> from metadata.xml.
>
> A minor issue: use.local.desc is not sorted properly anymore.
> It should
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17:26 Mon 21 Jul , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Here's the list of ongoing items from 2 weeks ago:
>> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_bb3a3a0c1b0acb771a263294a67b722e.xml
>>
>> Here's the council summary fro
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using developer
> profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software developers
> and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and not intended f
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Markus Rothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Bridge wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:30:20 +0200
>> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > IMHO it would be better to teach users to explicitly specify
>> > '@system' during updates
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick Börjesson wrote:
>
>> On 2008-07-15 21:40, Tiziano Müller uttered these thoughts:
>>> Marius Mauch wrote:
>>>
>>> > As a result of Cardoes earlier mail we talked a bit about possible
>>> > solutions in #gento-porta
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03:27 Mon 14 Jul , Alec Warner (antarus) wrote:
>> antarus 08/07/14 03:27:17
>>
>> Modified: ChangeLog
>> Added:mako-0.1.10-r1.ebuild
>&
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no
>> compelling examples in
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:11:18 -0700
>> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> GLEP 55:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:11:18 -0700
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> GLEP 55: On hold pending a concrete requirement for it. GLEP 54 may
>> be, but that's unclear until it's been revised.
>
> Which part of t
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01:40 Wed 09 Jul , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> On 05:30 Tue 01 Jul , Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
>> > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:02:37 -0700
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think it's worth losing track of the CVS history just so we
>> can have something in a different place that ultimately is hardly
>> usef
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I a
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
>> categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
>> in. 90% of the time you don't care about the lan
2008/6/22 Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 15:49 +0200, Alin Nstac wrote:
>> Peter Volkov wrote:
>> > В Сбт, 21/06/2008 в 10:56 +0200, Albert Zeyer пишет:
>> >
>> >> Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when
>> >> some of these files is changed
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>
>> Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>>
>>> Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 03:06:17AM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Alex Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/5 Ali Polatel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> I want to nominate:
>>
>> Fernando J. Pereda -- "ferdy"
>> Bo Ørsted Andresen -- "zlin"
>>
>
> Is there a method for objecting to a nomination, kinda like the
> opposite of sec
On 6/1/08, Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:41:28 +0200
> > Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > IMHO the packages should be keyworded if an arch team member or an
> > > user of that arch requests it. Keywording something if
On 01 Jun 2008 05:30:01, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about,
On 5/31/08, Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Volkov wrote:
>
> > В Птн, 30/05/2008 в 20:28 -0700, Brian Harring пишет:
> >
> > > Either way, basically it's coming down to if gentoo wants to follow the
> definition of 'academic' right, or 'pragmatic' right. Exempting ciaran, vote
> se
I'm about to start talking to all the mentors about this years GSOC
event. If you would like to be a mentor[1] please sign up[2] now.
We currently have six mentors who have applied and I have only
confirmed four of them. I expect to take on only (number of mentors)
/ 2 projects, which means only
On 3/16/08, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:51:12 +0100
> Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Not if COPYING file is inside $DOCS and is installed in the loop.
>
>
> Doing something like this would work as well (and go equally unnoticed):
>
> local
On 3/12/08, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:57:29AM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> > So, to sum up, if we can build a better communication way it could be
> > useful for both sides.
I'm going to steal robin's issue summary ;)
>
> - "Most of the Gentoo e
601 - 700 of 1224 matches
Mail list logo
